On Qua, 2013-04-24 at 21:56 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Hi, > > > Just a quick note, that from my list, theses package still aren't > rebuilt for F-19 on the free section. > > 16340 lxdream lxdream-0_9_1-7_fc19 > > 16324 k9copy k9copy-2_3_8-3_fc19 ffmpeg/API https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2743 have a patch to switch to ffmpeg-compat > > 16300 audacity-freeworld audacity-freeworld-2_0_1-2_fc19 > > > audacity would need an update for fedora counterpart also. > > > Nicolas (kwizart) > -- Sérgio M. B.

Hi, Just a quick note, that from my list, theses package still aren't rebuilt for F-19 on the free section. > 16340 lxdream lxdream-0_9_1-7_fc19 > 16324 k9copy k9copy-2_3_8-3_fc19 ffmpeg/API > 16300 audacity-freeworld audacity-freeworld-2_0_1-2_fc19 audacity would need an update for fedora counterpart also.

Hi, On 04/27/2013 04:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > ... > sidplay-2.0.9-13.fc17.x86_64 > While working on sidplay, I found out there is a new upstream for it called sidplayfp, which fixes the issues making sidplay nonfree. So I've packaged libsidplayfp and sidplay for Fedora. Also the sid plugin for audacious has been changed to build with libsidplayfp and this has now landed in Fedora-updates for F-19+, so the following packages can now be retired from rpmfusion: sidplay sidplay-libs audacious-plugins-nonfree I'll go and create dead.package files for them in their F-19+ branches. What is the proper procedure for blocking these from inclusion in rpmfusion F-19+ repos ?

Hi, On 04/29/2013 03:36 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2013/4/29 Hans de Goede <j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com <mailto:j.w.r.degoede@gmail.com>> > > Hi, > > > On 04/27/2013 04:07 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > ... > sidplay-2.0.9-13.fc17.x86_64 > > > While working on sidplay, I found out there is a new upstream for it called sidplayfp, > which fixes the issues making sidplay nonfree. So I've packaged libsidplayfp and > sidplay for Fedora. Also the sid plugin for audacious has been changed to build with > libsidplayfp and this has now landed in Fedora-updates for F-19+, so the following > packages can now be retired from rpmfusion: > > sidplay > sidplay-libs > audacious-plugins-nonfree > > I'll go and create dead.package files for them in their F-19+ branches. What is > the proper procedure for blocking these from inclusion in rpmfusion F-19+ repos ? > > > I will manually remove them from the repository. > taking care of that before the next push. > > BTW, what about an audacity update (in both fedora and RPM Fusion ?) > It looks unmaintained. I've pinged the Fedora maintainer and he admits he was away for a while, but he is back now. I've offered him help on getting the Fedora packages upgraded to 2.0.3, once that is done I'll also take care of the rpmfusion packages.

Hi, I've pinged the Fedora maintainer and he admits he was away for a while, but he is back now. I've offered him help on getting the Fedora packages upgraded to 2.0.3, once that is done I'll also take care of the rpmfusion packages.

lightspark-0.7.1-2.fc19.x86_64 lightspark-mozilla-plugin-0.7.1-2.fc19.x86_64

Hi, On 04/24/2013 09:56 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Hi, > > Just a quick note, that from my list, theses package still aren't rebuilt for F-19 on the free section. > > 16340 lxdream lxdream-0_9_1-7_fc19 > > 16324 k9copy k9copy-2_3_8-3_fc19 ffmpeg/API > > 16300 audacity-freeworld audacity-freeworld-2_0_1-2_fc19 > > audacity would need an update for fedora counterpart also. So audacity is taken care of (barring builds which need a new portaudio to trickle down into the buildroots from Fedora first). k9copy has also been taken care of, courtesy of Sérgio. That leaves lxdream, as a first step I've taken a look to see if there is a new version from upstream, and the latest upstream release is from Jun 29 2009. Combine that with a %description of: " ... it is still in heavy development (and many features are buggy or unimplemented), it is already capable of running many demos and some games." And I suggest that we just dead.package it. mixxx seems to be missing from the list of not build packages from the free section. Let me know if you need a hand in fixing it. Also I wonder if someone has a complete up2date *summary* of any FTBFS / broken deps issues in non-free (excluding dead.package packages please).

On Ter, 2013-05-07 at 23:31 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sáb, 2013-05-04 at 22:04 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On 04/24/2013 09:56 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Just a quick note, that from my list, theses package still aren't rebuilt for F-19 on the free section. >>> > 16340 lxdream lxdream-0_9_1-7_fc19 >>> > 16324 k9copy k9copy-2_3_8-3_fc19 ffmpeg/API >>> > 16300 audacity-freeworld audacity-freeworld-2_0_1-2_fc19 >>> >>> audacity would need an update for fedora counterpart also. >> >> So audacity is taken care of (barring builds which need a >> new portaudio to trickle down into the buildroots from Fedora first). >> >> k9copy has also been taken care of, courtesy of Sérgio. >> >> That leaves lxdream, as a first step I've taken a look to see >> if there is a new version from upstream, and the latest upstream >> release is from Jun 29 2009. Combine that with a %description of: >> >> " ... it is still in heavy development (and many features are >> buggy or unimplemented), it is already capable of running many >> demos and some games." >> >> And I suggest that we just dead.package it. >> >> mixxx seems to be missing from the list of not build >> packages from the free section. Let me know if you need a hand in >> fixing it. >> >> Also I wonder if someone has a complete up2date *summary* of any >> FTBFS / broken deps issues in non-free (excluding dead.package >> packages please). > > Hi, we have two kind of lists 1 - FTBFS and 2 - broken deps > for broken deps > I use on my vm with F19.x86_64 > > repoquery --disablerepo=fedora,updates,updates-testing -a > --pkgnarrow=available --envr | perl -pe 's/^\d+://' | grep -vP "kmod| > nvidia|VirtualBox|ufoai|i686|ndiswrapper" > list2.txt > > and > > yum install `cat list2.txt` --skip-broken > > Can't install: > bino-1.4.1-2.fc19.x86_64 > dvbcut-0.6.1-8.svn179.fc19.x86_64 > freecad-0.13-2.fc19.x86_64 > freecad-doc-0.13-2.fc19.noarch > > lightspark-0.7.1-2.fc19.x86_64 > lightspark-mozilla-plugin-0.7.1-2.fc19.x86_64 > mlt-ruby-0.8.8-3.fc19.x86_64 > rpmfusion-nonfree-package-config-smart-16-3.x86_64 > > xmms2-nonfree-0.8-4.fc19.x86_64 > xmms2-sid-0.8-4.fc19.x86_64 > z-push-zarafa-2.0.7-2.fc19.noarch > > > resuming some fails: > lightspark > fails due a cannot find LLVMLinker , > is not just add BuildRequires: llvm-devel ? > > xmms2-nonfree-0.8-4.fc19.x86_64 > xmms2-sid-0.8-4.fc19.x86_64 > seems needs a rebuild for new libsid > > freecad-0.13-2.fc19.x86_64 > Requires: python-collada > No package python-collada available > > > > For FTBFS : > repoquery --disablerepo=fedora,updates,updates-testing -a --envr | perl > -pe 's/^\d+://' | grep -v fc19 > > Mosaic-2.7-0.3.b5.fc11.x86_64 > ProjectX-0.91.0-3.noarch > audacity-freeworld-2.0.0-1.fc18.x86_64 > (...) > lxdream-0.9.1-6.fc18.x86_64 > mixxx-1.10.0-1.fc18.x86_64 > (...) > rpmfusion-nonfree-package-config-smart-16-3.x86_64 > (...) > ufoai-2.4-1.fc18.x86_64 > ufoai-common-2.4-1.fc18.x86_64 > ufoai-data-2.4-1.noarch > ufoai-data-server-2.4-1.noarch > ufoai-doc-2.4-1.fc18.x86_64 > ufoai-server-2.4-1.fc18.x86_64 > ufoai-tools-2.4-1.fc18.x86_64 > ufoai-uforadiant-2.4-1.fc18.x86_64 > wormsofprey-data-20051221-4.fc17.noarch raine-0.50.11-4.fc10 was out of this list because as removed from repos 6 days ago, by Nicolas (kwizart) but raine is alive with new home http://rainemu.swishparty.co.uk/ I'm trying rebuild it for 0.60.1 but I hadn't much time ...

On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com&gt; wrote: > freecad-0.13-2.fc19.x86_64 > Requires: python-collada > No package python-collada available > Looks like python-collada somehow fell in the hole during the F19 branching process. I'm building a package now. Bodhi update submitted...

resuming some fails: lightspark fails due a cannot find LLVMLinker , is not just add BuildRequires: llvm-devel ?