https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2126 Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com --- Comment #1 from Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com&gt; 2012-05-14 18:21:11 CEST --- It can go into Fedora? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2126 Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |hobbes1069(a)gmail.com Blocks|2 |3 AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |hobbes1069(a)gmail.com |mfusion.org | --- Comment #3 from Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-05-26 19:41:35 CEST --- Spec looks good. One minor nit-pick. Why is autoreconf being run in %prep? I don't think it's a problem but it does make it take quite a bit longer when you run rpmbuild -bp... just to get a look at the "clean" source. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2126 --- Comment #5 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-05-26 21:33:40 CEST --- Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/libva-vdpau-driver.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/libva-vdpau-driver-0.7.3-4.fc17.sr... Description: HW video decode support for VDPAU platforms Updated changelog: - Introduce --with gen4asm Good catch I've added the missing doc files as this was probably some empty files in earlier version. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2126 Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|3 |4 --- Comment #7 from Richard <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-06-06 02:47:04 CEST --- +: OK -: must be fixed =: should be fixed (at your discretion) ?: Question or clairification needed N: not applicable MUST: [+] rpmlint output: none [+] follows package naming guidelines [N] spec file base name matches package name: Package name intentionally different from package name. [+] package meets the packaging guidelines [+] package uses a Fedora approved license: GPLv2+ [+] license field matches the actual license. [+] license file is included in %doc: COPYING [+] spec file is in American English [+] spec file is legible [+] sources match upstream: md5 sum matches (51ad60baf76e324708e28271d5fd6e97) [+] package builds on at least one primary arch: Tested x86_64 [N] appropriate use of ExcludeArch [+] all build requirements in BuildRequires [N] spec file handles locales properly [N] ldconfig in %post and %postun [+] no bundled copies of system libraries [+] no relocatable packages [+] package owns all directories that it creates [+] no files listed twice in %files [+] proper permissions on files [+] consistent use of macros [+] code or permissible content [N] large documentation in -doc [+] no runtime dependencies in %doc [N] header files in -devel [N] static libraries in -static [N] .so in -devel [N] -devel requires main package [+] package contains no libtool archives [+] package contains a desktop file, uses desktop-file-install/validate [+] package does not own files/dirs owned by other packages [+] all filenames in UTF-8 SHOULD: [+] query upstream for license text [N] description and summary contains available translations [+] package builds in mock [+] package builds on all supported arches: Tested x86_64 [N] package functions as described: Not tested [+] sane scriptlets [N] subpackages require the main package [N] placement of pkgconfig files [+] file dependencies versus package dependencies [N] package contains man pages for binaries/scripts *** APPROVED *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2126 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|33 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.