10:01 p.m.
Would Google Earth be acceptable as a rpmfusion package?
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
10:52 p.m.
2009/4/22 Orion Poplawski <orion(a)cora.nwra.com>:
Would Google Earth be acceptable as a rpmfusion package?
Probably not as it need to be at least redistributable.
You can still ask google for an eventual agreement for rpmfusion to
redistribute googleearth,
I haven't the GoogleEarth license in mind.
Last time I've checked, Ville Skytta did some experiments, maybe they
still remain on his personal repository.
Once that said, having a "nosource" rpm package redistributed by
rpmfusion would be awesome.
As the same with the flash-plugin, we could eventually redistribute
such nosource rpm within the SRPM rpmfusion_nonfre repository. I
don't know if this could be handled properly from the builder side.
Nicolas (kwizart)
7:25 a.m.
On 04/22/2009 12:52 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2009/4/22 Orion Poplawski<orion(a)cora.nwra.com>:
> Would Google Earth be acceptable as a rpmfusion package?
Probably not as it need to be at least redistributable.
You can still ask google for an eventual agreement for rpmfusion to
redistribute googleearth,
Ack,
If there is someone who is willing to do the work on this wrt packaging
I know someone at google (who has nothing todo with googleearth) and I
can ask him to put me into contact with someone who can make a decision
about giving us redistribution permission.
I must say it would be cool to have googleearth packaged up, last time I
checked it needed some fixing to work on Fedora (some selinux context stuff),
and it would be nice to offer a good out of the box experience.
Regards,
Hans
11:52 a.m.
On Wednesday, 22 April 2009 at 09:25, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 04/22/2009 12:52 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>2009/4/22 Orion Poplawski<orion(a)cora.nwra.com>:
>>Would Google Earth be acceptable as a rpmfusion package?
>Probably not as it need to be at least redistributable.
>You can still ask google for an eventual agreement for rpmfusion to
>redistribute googleearth,
Ack,
If there is someone who is willing to do the work on this wrt packaging
I know someone at google (who has nothing todo with googleearth) and I
can ask him to put me into contact with someone who can make a decision
about giving us redistribution permission.
I must say it would be cool to have googleearth packaged up, last time I
checked it needed some fixing to work on Fedora (some selinux context
stuff),
and it would be nice to offer a good out of the box experience.
If someone wants it, here's a specfile I use personally:
http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/nosrc/
The issue of bundled libs needs ironing out, though (nothing in Fedora
provides libssl.so.0.9.8).
Regards,
R.
--
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
-- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"
4:08 a.m.
What's wrong with google's own repository?
http://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/yum.html
-Chris
6:44 a.m.
2009/4/25 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik(a)greysector.net>:
On Wednesday, 22 April 2009 at 09:25, Hans de Goede wrote:
> On 04/22/2009 12:52 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> >2009/4/22 Orion Poplawski<orion(a)cora.nwra.com>:
> >>Would Google Earth be acceptable as a rpmfusion package?
> >Probably not as it need to be at least redistributable.
> >You can still ask google for an eventual agreement for rpmfusion to
> >redistribute googleearth,
>
> Ack,
>
> If there is someone who is willing to do the work on this wrt packaging
> I know someone at google (who has nothing todo with googleearth) and I
> can ask him to put me into contact with someone who can make a decision
> about giving us redistribution permission.
>
> I must say it would be cool to have googleearth packaged up, last time I
> checked it needed some fixing to work on Fedora (some selinux context
> stuff),
> and it would be nice to offer a good out of the box experience.
If someone wants it, here's a specfile I use personally:
http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/nosrc/
This seems still ge4. have you tried with
ge5 ?
libssl.so.0.9.8{g,k} is present in F-10 F-11, but it shouldn't matter
as the real SONAME for this library is libssl.so.7.
Nicolas (kwizart)
2:48 a.m.
On 4/21/09 6:01 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Would Google Earth be acceptable as a rpmfusion package?
Among
other sections, this section of licensing is a bit tricky:
"1. USE OF SOFTWARE; RESTRICTIONS
Use of Software. For an individual end user, the Software is made available
to and may be used by you only for your personal, non-commercial use
according to these Terms of Service and the Software documentation"
(from http://earth.google.com/intl/en/download-earth.html)
Stewart
5686
days inactive
5694
days old
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
7 comments
7 participants
participants (7)
-
Chris Petersen -
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski -
Hans de Goede -
Nicolas Chauvet -
Orion Poplawski -
Richard Körber -
Stewart Adam