So how are we going to handle the new no frozen rawhide ?

I see 2 options: [...] 2) Do early branching, just like Fedora does. We could make it a bit easier on ourselves by immediately putting the new F-## repo next to the already released repo's instead of putting it under development like Fedora does.

On 17.02.2010 09:36, Hans de Goede wrote: > > So how are we going to handle the new no frozen rawhide ? That's a very interesting question -- especially as our development branch still builds against rawhide which sine a few hours is heading towards F-14. IOW: something should happen soon... > I see 2 options: > [...] > 2) Do early branching, just like Fedora does. We could make it >     a bit easier on ourselves by immediately putting the new >     F-## repo next to the already released repo's instead of >     putting it under development like Fedora does. Just my 2 cent: In an ideal world we IMHO wouldn't do anything different from Fedora to avoid any confusion -- even if it's feels like we are doing something that looks better or easier...

On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 05:18 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > > Just my 2 cent: In an ideal world we IMHO wouldn't do anything different > > from Fedora to avoid any confusion -- even if it's feels like we are > > doing something that looks better or easier... > > Just out of my personal curiosity. What is the current situation. > plan? Fedora is next to nothing on desktop computers, without > rpmfusion. Yeah, I am wondering what's going on here too. The mock files I have from RPM Fusion generate packages with a .fc13 extension but are building against the Fedora Rawhide repo, which is *not* Fedora 13. I don't know if the actual Fusion packages are built against F14 but labelled F13, but if they are that's a very big problem and we really shouldn't do it. Anything built against Fedora's Rawhide repo is for Fedora 14 and should be labelled .fc14, not .fc13.

Adam Williamson wrote on 26.04.2010 21:06: > [...] I > don't know if the actual Fusion packages are built against F14 but > labelled F13, but if they are that's a very big problem and we really > shouldn't do it. Anything built against Fedora's Rawhide repo is for > Fedora 14 and should be labelled .fc14, not .fc13. There iirc was a small window when rawhide branched when F13 builds where done using rawhide. Xavier changed it back then and I did a lot of other adjustments in the past weeks, so everything should be sane now (and mostly was duing all that time; yes, that's the long story short, but there is nothing to worry about afaics). The only remaining thing that need fixing is a rebuild for those packages that were build against rawhide and contain "fc14" in their name. (libmms, gnome-mplayer, gecko-mediaplayer). That's on my todo list. BTW, in you blog post you wrote """ There’s a secondary problem with F13, which is that as far as RPM Fusion is concerned, F13 doesn’t seem to exist. """ That's incorrect. Everything is on the servers, but the 13 repo is not under development/13 -- instead there is an empty one in the final place and everything is in the updates and updates-testing repos for now, as that's easier to handle with our push scripts.