2012/7/3 Ismael Olea <ismael(a)olea.org&gt;: The Kevin point is to goes the freetype-freeworld way without minding the specific case of such core component as openssl and others. None has promoted to replace the fedora package. My point is that even sometime it turn out that the freetype-freeword package got broken for some reason. (I guess one of the reason is that others components using freetype are using rpath which fedora policy forbids but does not hunt). So the result is a sometime broken rendering. I can leave without freetype-freeworld, but not with a non-working openssl/gnutls/others. There is no decision to be made before having a package actually tested. So that's mean a review to be made with package built outside of the infra and provided in some other place, so that RPM Fusion developers can actually make any decision based on one solution or another that can be considered as fully working. Nicolas (kwizart)