December 2008 - rpmfusion-developers

Some new documentation pages on the Wiki

by Stewart Adam

Hi, First of all, sorry for all the Wiki spam - I know a few of you subscribe to all changes so as I was messing around with the page layouts, I probably filled up your inbox with a bunch of messages. I've added some new places on the Wiki where we can publish documentation about packages as well as some user guides: * http://rpmfusion.org/Package * http://rpmfusion.org/Howto The Package/PackageName pages are for individual packages, where as the Howto/Howtoname pages are for grouped items (for example, "DVD playback" where we could recommend installing gstreamer-plugins-ugly, totem-xine and xine-lib-extras-nonfree) or for more complex tasks such as choosing the right nVidia driver series for your card. To add your own package page, follow these steps: 1. Browse to http://rpmfusion.org/Package/YourPackageName and fill in information about the package. I haven't come up with a template yet, but I think a good place to start is "== What is PackageName? ==" along with sections for installing, configuring (if applicable), and troubleshooting/FAQ. 2. At the very end of your page, add this so that it gets added to the Package category: ---- CategoryPackage 3. The last step is to add your package to the list at http://rpmfusion.org/Package: * [[Package/YourPackageName|YourPackageName]] Adding a howto is roughly the process, but instead browse to http://rpmfusion.org/Howto/AShortName and use "CategoryHowto" at the end of your page instead of "CategoryPackage". You'll also need to add the howto to the list at http://rpmfusion.org/Howto: * [[Howto/ShortName|A Long(er) Name]] There's definitely room for improvement, but let me know what you think! Stewart

15 years, 11 months

3
5
0 / 0

RFC: staging repo

by Thorsten Leemhuis

Hi all! I suppose a lot of people won't like the following idea (some people will say that it's totally crazy and will hurt Fedora/RPM Fusion), but I'll put it up for comments nevertheless: Should we open a "staging" repo in addition to the free and nonfree repos which would hold unreviewed packages that could be improved in the staging area in a wiki-like style and then easily transferred to the proper repos? Background: there are way to many 3rd party repos out there that hold a lot of useful Fedora packages -- see http://rpmfusion.org/FedoraThirdPartyRepos for examples. It seems it's to complicated, time consuming or simply not worth the trouble for the package maintainers to bring those packages trough the review to get them into Fedora's or RPM Fusion's proper repos. I for example had asked Gérard Milmeister (gemi) if he wanted to submit PovRay to RPM Fusion nonfree (he has it in this gemi repo), as I seldomly (maybe once a year for about 10 or 30 minutes) need it for benchmarking systems. He answered > I would have rather have someone already involved with rpmfusion take > over the package. My repository IS in fact meant for other people to > use the packages as a basis for inclusion in "offical" Fedora > repositories. [...] I suppose other add-on repo maintainers have similar or other good reasons to avoid the time consuming review process. Which is understandable, but far from ideal for Fedora/RPM Fusion. Hence the above idea; the maintainers of external repos thus would use our cvs, build and download infra (makes it things easier for them) and others maintainers could help to improve the packages in a wiki-like way (which results in better packages that likely are easy to review later). Yes, I'm well aware that this has a big downside over time: Why review packages for the proper repo all all when there is a staging repo? I have no good answer to that besides making it a bit harder then usually to find and use the staging repo. But I thing it's worth the risk trying, as that way we get a lot of packages under our hood and from there into the proper RPM Fusion and Fedora repos, resulting in a better user experience and thus happier users. Comments? Cu knurd

15 years, 11 months

7
16
0 / 0

[Bug 29] New: Review request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=29 Summary: Review request: freesci - A portable interpreter for SCI games Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: cheekyboinc(a)foresightlinux.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/freesci.spec SRPM: http://cheekyboinc.spielen-unter-linux.de/freesci-0.6.4-1.fc9.src.rpm Description: FreeSCI is a portable interpreter for SCI (Sierra Creative Interpreter) games, such as the Space Quest series (starting with SQ3) or Leisure Suit Larry (2 and sequels). Not in Fedora: "Is there any free data for it? If the answer is no, it cannot be included." -> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448808 - This is my first rpmfusion package - I made fbpanel (Fedora 8/9), XQF (in review) and various Foresight Linux packages -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 11 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 9] Review request: kdeaddons-emulation - Emulation plugins for KDE

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9 Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 | Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #3 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com> 2008-12-15 13:57:18 --- Closing as WONTFIX. If the original packager wants to restart the review process then he can reopen this bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 9] Review request: kdeaddons-emulation - Emulation plugins for KDE

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9 Bug 9 depends on bug 8, which changed state. Bug 8 Summary: Review request: emuexec - Emulation simplifier http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8 What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 8] Review request: emuexec - Emulation simplifier

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8 Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 | Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |WONTFIX --- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane <musuruan(a)gmail.com> 2008-12-15 13:57:15 --- Closing as WONTFIX. If the original packager wants to restart the review process then he can reopen this bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: autopano-sift-C-2.5.0

by Andrea Musuruane

2008/12/15 Bruno Postle <bruno(a)postle.net>: > On Mon 15-Dec-2008 at 11:50 +0100, Andrea Musuruane wrote: >> >> I've noticed that version 2.5.0 of autopano-sift-C has been >> released last July. Can you update it in RPM Fusion? > > Yes, I even have a .spec for it. I just haven't caught up with the > rpmfusion systems yet. I have a backlog, there is a similar package called > panomatic which needs some work. If you need help please ask here on the RPM Fusion developers discussion list or join the IRC channel #rpmfusion on freenode. Thanks. Regards, Andrea.

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

autopano-sift-C-2.5.0

by Andrea Musuruane

Hi Bruno, I've noticed that version 2.5.0 of autopano-sift-C has been released last July. Can you update it in RPM Fusion? Thanks. Regards, Andrea.

15 years, 11 months

2
1
0 / 0

libdvdcss,again

by Peter Lemenkov

Hello All! > Request: libdvdcss > Why not in RPM Fusion: The short story is: *It was agreed* on not to ship it due to > various reasons around the fact that libdvdcss is a bit more complicated (or > dangerous) than all the other software RPM Fusion offeres have. The question is, who agreed not to ship libdvdcss (completely legal in wast majority of countries) and when? -- With best regards!

15 years, 11 months

9
23
0 / 0

RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2008-12-15

by rpmfusion-pkgs-report＠rpmfusion.org

============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: 1 NEW pgplot-5.2.2-29.fc10.1 : Graphic library for making simple scientific graphs ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/9: 1 pgplot-5.2.2-27.fc9 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 7 livna-config-display-0.0.22-2.fc11 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.15-1.fc11.5 nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.09-1.fc11.6 pgplot-5.2.2-29.fc11 slmodem-kmod-2.9.11-26.fc11.11 ufoai-2.2.1-3.fc11 wl-kmod-5.10.27.6-5.fc11.6 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/10: pgplot-5.2.2-29.fc10.1 ---------------------- * Sat Dec 06 2008 Sergio Pascual <sergio.pasra(a)gmail.com> 5.2.2-29.1 - Rebump to allow rebuild * Sat Dec 06 2008 Sergio Pascual <sergio.pasra(a)gmail.com> 5.2.2-29 - Fixing bz #228. Multilib conflict produced by pgplot-routines.pdf * Tue Nov 18 2008 Sergio Pascual <sergio.pasra(a)gmail.com> 5.2.2-28 - Fixing bz #168. There was a typo in patch0 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/9: pgplot-5.2.2-27.fc9 ------------------- * Sat Dec 06 2008 Sergio Pascual <sergio.pasra(a)gmail.com> 5.2.2-27 - Fixing bz #228. Multilib conflict produced by pgplot-routines.pdf ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: livna-config-display-0.0.22-2.fc11 ---------------------------------- * Thu Dec 11 2008 Stewart Adam <s.adam at diffingo.com> - 0.0.22-2 - Rebuild for python 2.6 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.15-1.fc11.5 ------------------------------------ * Sun Dec 14 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora [AT] leemhuis [DOT] info> - 173.14.15-1.5 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; nvidia-96xx-kmod-96.43.09-1.fc11.6 ---------------------------------- * Sun Dec 14 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora [AT] leemhuis [DOT] info> - 96.43.09-1.6 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; pgplot-5.2.2-29.fc11 -------------------- * Sat Dec 06 2008 Sergio Pascual <sergio.pasra(a)gmail.com> 5.2.2-29 - Fixing bz #228. Multilib conflict produced by pgplot-routines.pdf slmodem-kmod-2.9.11-26.fc11.11 ------------------------------ * Sun Dec 14 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora [AT] leemhuis [DOT] info> - 2.9.11-26.11 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel; ufoai-2.2.1-3.fc11 ------------------ * Thu Dec 11 2008 Karel Volny <kvolny(a)redhat.com> 2.2.1-3 - Fixed unowned directories (bug #225) wl-kmod-5.10.27.6-5.fc11.6 -------------------------- * Sun Dec 14 2008 Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora [AT] leemhuis [DOT] info> - 5.10.27.6-5.6 - rebuild for latest Fedora kernel;

15 years, 11 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers December 2008