November 2009 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 478] New: Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 Summary: Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/ OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: solarflow99(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2,30 Estimated Hours: 0.0 DOSEMU is a PC Emulator that allows Linux to run a DOS operating system in a virtual x86 machine. This allows you to run all kinds of different DOS programs including DPMI applications. Enjoy running your DOS programs forever! http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/ I think the package is complete, just have to get it into rpmfusion since it was discovered it couldn't quite make it into Fedora (reason is listed below). This is my first package, the original Fedora review is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 we're not saying it's illegal. It just doesn't grant the user the freedom to modify the program to suit his needs. See the thread on packaging list for discussion on this [1]: [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-March/msg00056.html -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

8
42
0 / 0

[Bug 562] New: Review request: catalyst-kmod - AMD display driver kernel module

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562 Summary: Review request: catalyst-kmod - AMD display driver kernel module Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: s.adam(a)diffingo.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 1.0 Description: The catalyst 9.4 display driver kernel module. SPEC: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/catalyst-kmod.spec SRPM: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/catalyst-kmod-9.4-1.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint output: akmod-catalyst.x86_64: W: no-documentation kmod-catalyst-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64.x86_64: W: no-documentation kmod-catalyst.x86_64: W: no-documentation > No documentation needs to be included in these packages kmod-catalyst-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized catalyst kernel module(s) for 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64 > due to kmodtool kmod-catalyst-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64.x86_64: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet kmod-catalyst-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64-9.4-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm > Not a big deal: the file can be renamed if it's going to be used on Joliet-formatted media. kmod-catalyst-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64/extra/catalyst/fglrx.ko > Set this intentionally as part of the debuginfo workaround: sed -i -e 's|strict=true|strict=false|' find-debuginfo.sh -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
14
0 / 0

[Bug 582] New: Review Request: libtxc_dxtn - S3 Texture Compression support libraries for Mesa

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582 Summary: Review Request: libtxc_dxtn - S3 Texture Compression support libraries for Mesa Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: andreas(a)bawue.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SRPM: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/libtxc_dxtn/libtxc_dxtn-0.0.0.070518-1.fc7.src.rpm SPEC: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/libtxc_dxtn/libtxc_dxtn.spec Description: S3 Texture Compression (S3TC) (sometimes also called DXTn or DXTC) is a group of related lossy image compression algorithms originally developed by S3 Graphics, Ltd. Currently, s3tc is supported by libtxc_dxtn on all graphic cards which use the radeon, r200, i830 and i915 driver. Other DRI drivers are not supported, even if the hardware could do it, at least not until someone writes the code for it. Not eligible for fedora: S3TC is patented. rpmlint: [andreas@workstation result]$ rpmlint -v *.rpm libtxc_dxtn.i586: I: checking libtxc_dxtn.i586: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libtxc_dxtn.so libtxc_dxtn.src: I: checking libtxc_dxtn-debuginfo.i586: I: checking 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. no-soname is a shame, but I didn't want to meddle with upstream code as the version number is horrible anyway. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 985] New: Review request: ProjectX-0.90.4.00-2

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=985 Summary: Review request: ProjectX-0.90.4.00-2 Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: goeran(a)uddeborg.se CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 European digital radio & television uses the DVB standard to broadcast its data. Project X gives you a look behind the transmissions and tries its best to handle & repair many stream types and shows what went wrong on reception. In particular, it is able to demultiplex the different streams in a transmission. It can not be included in Fedora for patent reasons, see the thread at https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-April/msg00020.html Rpmlint is happy except that it complains about missing buildroot tag. But I'm only aiming for F12 and the guidelines doesn't require any such tag any more. (Since it is ignored anyway.) This is the first time I package for RPM Fusion. (But I have packaged for Fedora before, although just a single package, ttf2pt1, so I'm already sponsored.) Spec: ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/ProjectX/ProjectX.spec Source: ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/ProjectX/ProjectX-0.90.4.00-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

14 years, 2 months

1
39
0 / 0

[Bug 461] New: Review Request: openmotif - Open Motif runtime libraries and executables

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461 Summary: Review Request: openmotif - Open Motif runtime libraries and executables Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: Jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/openmotif/openmotif.spec SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/openmotif/openmotif-2.3.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is the Open Motif 2.3.2 runtime environment. It includes the Motif shared libraries, needed to run applications which are dynamically linked against Motif, and the Motif Window Manager "mwm". You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/s4504kr This is the Open Motif 2.3.2 runtime environment. It includes the Motif shared libraries, needed to run applications which are dynamically linked against Motif, and the Motif Window Manager "mwm". You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/s4504kr This is the Open Motif 2.3.2 runtime environment. It includes the Motif shared libraries, needed to run applications which are dynamically linked against Motif, and the Motif Window Manager "mwm". You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/s4504kr $ rpmlint openmotif-devel-2.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm openmotif-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license Open Group Public License 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint openmotif-demos-2.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm openmotif-demos.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/Xm/fontsel/creation-c.c openmotif-demos.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/Xm/earth/earth.c openmotif-demos.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/Xm/wsm/wsm_cb.h openmotif-demos.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/Xm/todo/io.c $ rpmlint openmotif-mwm-2.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm openmotif-mwm.x86_64: W: invalid-license Open Group Public License 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Why not in Fedora? Package contains a nonfree license: Plese refer: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RexDieter/openmotif Known issues: opemmotif-devel has a conflict with lesstif-devel. But mesa-libGLw-devel depends on lesstif-devel. So we need a virtual provides 'motif-devel' on lesstif-devel and mesa-libGLw-devel. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

14 years, 3 months

1
36
0 / 0

[Bug 794] New: Review-request: r5u87x-loader - R5U87x webcam firmware loader

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=794 Summary: Review-request: r5u87x-loader - R5U87x webcam firmware loader Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/r5u87x-loader.spec SRPM: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/r5u87x-loader-0.2.0-1.32a27008b8b9.fc1... This package contains a firmware load tool and udev rules to load the firmware needed to make cameras based on Ricoh R5U87x chipsets work with the uvcvideo driver. Why RPMFusion ? -> Non Free Why Non Free -> because of the firmware microcode files -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

14 years, 4 months

1
20
0 / 0

[Bug 782] New: Review Request: sonic-visualiser-freeworld - A program for viewing and exploring audio data

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782 Summary: Review Request: sonic-visualiser-freeworld - A program for viewing and exploring audio data Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: Michael.Silvanus(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 spec: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/rpmfusion/sonic-visualiser-freeworl... srpm: http://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/rpmfusion/sonic-visualiser-freeworl... This is the Fedora package, additionally with MP3 support which cannot be shipped in Fedora. >From package description: Sonic Visualiser is an application for viewing and analysing the contents of music audio files. The aim of Sonic Visualiser is to be the first program you reach for when want to study a musical recording rather than simply listen to it. As well as a number of features designed to make exploring audio data as revealing and fun as possible, Sonic Visualiser also has powerful annotation capabilities to help you to describe what you find, and the ability to run automated annotation and analysis plugins in the Vamp analysis plugin format – as well as applying standard audio effects. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

14 years, 4 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 802] New: Review request: openafs - Enterprise Network File System

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=802 Summary: Review request: openafs - Enterprise Network File System Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jjneely(a)ncsu.edu CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 This is my first RPM Fusion package, however I am a Fedora sponsored packager. These packages contain the userland bits for OpenAFS which depends on a 3rd party kernel module. http://www4.ncsu.edu/~jjneely/SPECS/openafs.spec http://www4.ncsu.edu/~jjneely/SRPMS/openafs-1.4.11-3.fc11.src.rpm $ rpmlint openafs-1.4.11-3.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint openafs-1.4.11-3.fc11.i586.rpm openafs.i586: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/libafssetpag.so.1.0 openafs.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libafsrpc.so.1.1 exit(a)GLIBC_2.0 openafs.i586: W: executable-stack /usr/lib/libafsrpc.so.1.1 openafs.i586: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libafsauthent.so.1.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.0 openafs.i586: W: dangerous-command-in-%preun rm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. Library issues: If we need to find/open a bug with the OpenAFS's bugtracker we can, but I don't think it wise to make API/ABI chages only in the version supplied by rpmfusion. dangerous-command-in-%preun: Required to clean up the OpenAFS cache in /var/cache/openafs $ rpmlint openafs-client-1.4.11-3.fc11.i586.rpm openafs-client.i586: W: no-documentation openafs-client.i586: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/cache/openafs 0700 Documentation provided in parent package. The cache directory must only be readable by root to avoid users being able to see other users' data. $ rpmlint openafs-devel-1.4.11-3.fc11.i586.rpm openafs-devel.i586: W: no-documentation openafs-devel.i586: E: zero-length /usr/include/afs/osi_inode.h I can remove osi_inode.h if needed. It is empty in the distribution tar ball. $ rpmlint openafs-server-1.4.11-3.fc11.i586.rpm openafs-server.i586: W: no-documentation -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

14 years, 6 months

2
38
0 / 0

[Bug 803] New: Review request: openafs-kmod - Kernel Modules

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=803 Summary: Review request: openafs-kmod - Kernel Modules Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jjneely(a)ncsu.edu CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 This is the matching kernel module for the OpenAFS packages. http://www4.ncsu.edu/~jjneely/SPECS/openafs-kmod.spec http://www4.ncsu.edu/~jjneely/SRPMS/openafs-kmod-1.4.11-1.fc11.src.rpm $ rpmlint openafs-kmod-1.4.11-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint kmod-openafs-1.4.11-1.fc11.i586.rpm kmod-openafs.i586: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint kmod-openafs-2.6.29.6-217.2.16.fc11.i686.PAE-1.4.11-1.fc11.i686.rpm kmod-openafs-2.6.29.6-217.2.16.fc11.i686.PAE.i686: W: summary-not-capitalized openafs kernel module(s) for 2.6.29.6-217.2.16.fc11.i686.PAE kmod-openafs-2.6.29.6-217.2.16.fc11.i686.PAE.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.29.6-217.2.16.fc11.i686.PAE/extra/openafs/openafs.ko kmod-openafs-2.6.29.6-217.2.16.fc11.i686.PAE.i686: W: no-documentation 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. I believe the above rpmlintage is pretty normal for kmods. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

14 years, 6 months

1
24
0 / 0

[Bug 828] New: Review Request: omnibook-kmod - Kernel module for HP Omnibook/Pavillon, Toshiba Satellite and Compal laptops

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=828 Summary: Review Request: omnibook-kmod - Kernel module for HP Omnibook/Pavillon, Toshiba Satellite and Compal laptops Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: rpm(a)greysector.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL:http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/omnibook-kmod.spec SRPM URL:http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/omnibook-kmod-2.20090714-0.1.s... Description: Linux kernel module for many HP Omnibook/Pavillon, Toshiba Satellite (with Phoenix BIOS) and Compal laptops. It is based on the module found in the 'omke' project. And the -common package: Spec URL:http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/omnibook-kmod-common.spec SRPM URL:http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/omnibook-kmod-common-2.2009071... rpmlint output: kmod-omnibook.x86_64: W: no-documentation kmod-omnibook-2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized omnibook kernel module(s) for 2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64 kmod-omnibook-2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64/extra/omnibook/omnibook.ko kmod-omnibook-2.6.30.5-43.fc11.x86_64.x86_64: W: no-documentation 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

14 years, 6 months

2
16
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers November 2009