September 2009 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 195] New: Review request: perl-Crypt-IDEA - Perl interface to IDEA block cipher

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195 Summary: Review request: perl-Crypt-IDEA - Perl interface to IDEA block cipher Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Crypt-IDEA/ OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: paul(a)city-fan.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Crypt-IDEA/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec SRPM URL: http://www.city-fan.org/~paul/extras/perl-Crypt-IDEA/perl-Crypt-IDEA-1.08... This perl extension is an implementation of the IDEA block cipher algorithm. The module implements the Crypt::BlockCipher interface. The IDEA algorithm is patented in Europe and the United States by Ascom-Tech AG. The package is rpmlint-clean. This is my first RPM Fusion package; I am a sponsor in Fedora and have already been sponsored for RPM Fusion cvs access by Thorsten Leemhuis. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 5 months

3
22
0 / 0

[Bug 118] New: Review Request: cinelerra-cv - Advanced audio and video capturing, compositing, and editing

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118 Summary: Review Request: cinelerra-cv - Advanced audio and video capturing, compositing, and editing Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: matthias(a)rpmforge.net, rpmfusion-package- review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 SRPMS: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/cinelerra-cv/cinelerra-cv-2.1-22.g... SPECS: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/cinelerra-cv/cinelerra-cv.spec Summary: Advanced audio and video capturing, compositing, and editing I would like to help merging cinelerra-cv within RPM Fusion. Few notes: cinelerra need to be renamed to cinelerra-cv because the cinelerra name is from Herroine-Virtual, Hence there is a need to avoid conflicting namespace.(it remains to have the locale renamed along with some internals libraries dropped). --with libmpeg3_system is meant to be used with libmpeg3 from current rawhide. F-8/F-9 will use the current internal snapshot. This is the most recent patch. Might need the same patch for mpeg2enc (will needs more testing). Some of the patches still bundled was already submitted upstream. But unfortunately, the "community upstream" failed to understand why they are needed. I will give a re-try today. @Matthias I would like to co-maintain cinelerra-cv with you. But the current way bugzilla works for now, assume the primary owner to be the default assigned e-mail to any bugreport. Would you agree if I'm this primary owner ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

2
33
0 / 0

[Bug 585] New: Review Request: z-push - ActiveSync over-the-air implementation for mobile syncing

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=585 Summary: Review Request: z-push - ActiveSync over-the-air implementation for mobile syncing Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: rpmfusion-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: [Will come very soon] SRPM URL: [Will come very soon] Description: Z-push is an implementation of the ActiveSync protocol which is used 'over-the-air' for multi platform ActiveSync devices, including Windows Mobile, iPhone, Sony Ericsson and Nokia mobile devices. With Z-push any groupware can be connected and synced with these devices. For use cases of Z-push with the Zarafa Outlook Sharing and Open Source Collaboration, please use the prepared package zarafa-z-push. I'll add the spec file and source rpm this evening or so, then I also will set RF_NEW blocker. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=498194 is a blocker dependency as well. Before that, this package unluckily doesn't make that much sense. Of course z-push is nice with IMAP and so as well, but the main purpose is with Zarafa. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 6 months

2
40
0 / 0

[Bug 789] New: Review request: moc - Music on Console

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789 Summary: Review request: moc - Music on Console Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: http://raylu.no-ip.org/moc/ OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: rayllu(a)yahoo.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2,30 Estimated Hours: 0.0 http://raylu.no-ip.org/moc/moc-2.4.4-1.fc11.src.rpm http://raylu.no-ip.org/moc/moc.spec Description: MOC (music on console) is a console audio player for LINUX/UNIX. This package is a modified version of the Fedora packages linked to from here: http://moc.daper.net/download MOC includes MP3 playback capabilities, which is why it's not eligible for the Fedora repositories. Like the 2.4.0 i386 packages, I could split the decoder plugins up and submit the MOC core to Fedora and the decoder plugins to RPM Fusion (though I'm not clear on exactly what functionality is and isn't allowed). Also to note is this review request in Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490210 The patch that I include allows the FFmpeg decoder plugin to build when ffmpeg-devel is installed, but it seems a bit hackish. $ rpmlint SRPMS/moc-2.4.4-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/moc-2.4.4-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. However, I should note that the debug package gets: $ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/moc-debuginfo-2.4.4-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm moc-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/moc-2.4.4/libltdl/.libs moc-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/moc-2.4.4/libltdl/.libs 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. I am seeking a sponsor since this is my first package. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 7 months

1
18
0 / 0

[Bug 459] New: Review request: nvidia-cuda-toolkit - NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit libraries

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459 Summary: Review request: nvidia-cuda-toolkit - NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit libraries Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: xjakub(a)fi.muni.cz CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/nvidia-cuda-toolki... SRPM: http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/nvidia-cuda-toolki... Description: NVIDIA(R)CUDA(TM) is a general purpose parallel computing architecture that leverages the parallel compute engine in NVIDIA graphics processing units (GPUs) to solve many complex computational problems in a fraction of the time required on a CPU. It includes the CUDA Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) and the parallel compute engine in the GPU. To program to the CUDATM architecture, developers can, today, use C, one of the most widely used high-level programming languages, which can then be run at great performance on a CUDATM enabled processor. Other languages will be supported in the future, including FORTRAN and C++. Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: Not open source. rpmlint output: >rpmlint ../SRPMS/nvidia-cuda-toolkit-2.1-1.src.rpm nvidia-cuda-toolkit.src:53: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib This is ok, even moving file from the hardcoded path. nvidia-cuda-toolkit.src: W: no-%build-section Nothing to build. This, however, implies no stripping & no debuginfo. Unfortunately, debuginfo creation fails because the binaries don't contatin build id. I don't know whether there is something I could do with this. >rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/nvidia-cuda-toolkit-* nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/bec nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/inline nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/be nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/gfec nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/nvopencc See the previous comment. nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libcufft.so.2.1 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libcufftemu.so.2.1 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libcudart.so.2.1 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 Again, there is nothing we can do with this, AFAIK. This is my first RPM Fusion package, I'm already a Fedora packager (both FAS names are mjakubicek). My primary motivation to package this is that I maintain a CUDA-enabled application, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487981. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 8 months

1
30
0 / 0

[Bug 775] New: Review request: xorg-x11-drv-psb - Intel GMA500 (Poulsbo) video driver (and associated packages)

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775 Summary: Review request: xorg-x11-drv-psb - Intel GMA500 (Poulsbo) video driver (and associated packages) Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: adamwill(a)shaw.ca CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Requesting a review for xorg-x11-drv-psb and several associated packages. This is a driver for the Intel GMA 500 graphics chipset. The associated packages are all required for the driver to work. This is the same driver I have been publishing for a while on my blog at http://www.happyassassin.net/ . SRPMs: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/poulsbo/src/xorg-x11-drv-psb-0.31.0-8.fc... http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/poulsbo/src/libdrm-poulsbo-2.3.0-7.fc11.... http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/poulsbo/src/psb-firmware-0.30-2.fc11.src... http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/poulsbo/src/psb-kmod-4.41.1-5.fc11.src.rpm http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/poulsbo/src/xpsb-glx-0.18-3.fc11.src.rpm SPECs: http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/xorg-x11-drv-psb.spec http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/libdrm-poulsbo.spec http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/psb-firmware.spec http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/psb-kmod.spec http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/xpsb-glx.spec The driver needs to go in RPM Fusion due to licensing issues. The driver itself, the modified libdrm it requires (libdrm-poulsbo) and the kernel module it requires (psb-kmod) are open source. However, the driver is entirely non-functional without the proprietary (but redistributable) packages psb-firmware and xpsb-glx. I believe therefore that psb-firmware and xpsb-glx should go in rpmfusion-nonfree. I'm not sure if the other packages should go in rpmfusion-free or rpmfusion-nonfree. Since the driver has to contain explicit Requires: for the firmware and xpsb-glx packages, I guess it should go in nonfree, since dependencies from free to nonfree are probably not desirable. Notes: this driver is the one from Ubuntu's custom edition that comes pre-installed on Dell netbooks. libdrm-poulsbo is a customized build of libdrm which is required (the X driver and kernel module won't build against a stock libdrm). It is packaged to co-exist with the official libdrm package, but when libdrm-poulsbo is installed, anything which is just linked against libdrm.so will be using this customized version. In practice, it works well, I've been running my own Poulsbo system with this setup for quite a while now. psb-kmod is the kernel module (it's needed for the driver to work at all). psb-firmware is some firmware which is required for the driver to work. xpsb-glx contains a pre-built X.org library which is required for the driver to work, a pre-built DRI library which is required for 3D acceleration to work, and a pre-built module for 2D video playback acceleration via libva (I intend to submit a libva package to Fedora main repos some time soon). All of these are only available in pre-built form. rpmlint notes: akmod-psb.i586: E: devel-dependency libdrm-poulsbo-devel akmod-psb.i586: E: explicit-lib-dependency libdrm-poulsbo-devel akmod-psb.i586: W: no-documentation the dependency is correct; the module needs libdrm-poulsbo-devel to be present to build, so the akmod package must obviously require it. no-documentation - I think this is normal for a kmod package? If not, please advise how to add docs. libdrm-poulsbo.i586: E: explicit-lib-dependency libdrm libdrm-poulsbo.i586: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ld.so.conf.d/psb.conf the explicit lib dependency is intended; the main libdrm package includes a couple of binary tools, and it's better to have libdrm-poulsbo require it rather than have it also ship the tools and conflict with it. The config file is also intended: there's no reason an end user should modify this file. psb-firmware.i586: E: no-binary psb-firmware.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/psb-firmware-0.30/COPYING it's just a firmware file. The package is arched because I believe the firmware to be arch specific, not that there's ever going to be a Poulsbo graphics chip in anything but an i586 system. I don't believe it's good practice to do a character set conversion on a license file. xorg-x11-drv-psb.i586: E: explicit-lib-dependency libdrm-poulsbo xorg-x11-drv-psb.i586: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/modprobe.d/poulsbo.conf xorg-x11-drv-psb.i586: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/psb xorg-x11-drv-psb.i586: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/psb $name xorg-x11-drv-psb.i586: W: incoherent-init-script-name psb ('xorg-x11-drv-psb', 'xorg-x11-drv-psbd') the explicit lib dep is again intentional: it's the only way to ensure the customized libdrm, not the main one, is used when the driver is installed. the config file not being marked as a config file is intentional: there's no reason for an end user to modify it, it simply causes the module to be loaded automatically when a Poulsbo graphics chip is found. I'm not quite sure what the incoherent-subsys warning means, but the script in question is based directly on the one from the NVIDIA package. Ditto the incoherent-init-script-name warning, I'm following the conventions from the NVIDIA package. This will be my first RPM Fusion package (set), if accepted. However, I am a sponsored packager for Fedora itself, I maintain congruity and gst-mixer there. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
32
0 / 0

[Bug 539] New: Review request: mythtv-status - Get the current status of your MythTV system at the command line

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=539 Summary: Review request: mythtv-status - Get the current status of your MythTV system at the command line Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpmfusion/mythtv-status.spec SRPM: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpmfusion/mythtv-status-0.9.0... Description This Perl script will display the current status of your MythTV system at the command line. It can optionally append it to the system message of the day (MOTD) on a regular basis. The package is not eligible for Fedora, since mythtv is in RPMFusion. This is my first RPMFusion package. I am a Fedora Packager, see links at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jussilehtola for my packages & reviews. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 740] New: Review request: meka - Multi machine emulator for MS-DOS, MS-Windows and GNU/Linux

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740 Summary: Review request: meka - Multi machine emulator for MS- DOS, MS-Windows and GNU/Linux Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: musuruan(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/meka.spec http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/meka-0.73-0.1.20080619.fc10.... * Description: MEKA is a multi machine emulator, originally started as a Sega Master System emulator, and generally very oriented toward Z80-based Sega 8-bit systems. MEKA officially emulates the following systems: - Sega Game 1000 / SG-1000 / Japan, Oceania - Sega Computer 3000 / SC-3000 / Japan, Oceania, Europe - Super Control Station / SF-7000 / Japan, Oceania, Europe - Sega Mark III / MK3 / Japan + FM Unit Extension / MK3+FM / Japan - Sega Master System / SMS / World Wide - Sega Game Gear / GG / World Wide - ColecoVision / COLECO / America, Europe - Othello Multivision / OMV / Japan You can play other systems on it only if you are smart enough to figure how. And if you are, I doubt you will want to play Nintendo games. So forget it. * Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: It requires ROMs (or image files in any format) of copyrighted material to be useful and the owners of those copyrights and patents have not given their express written permission. * Rpmlint output: meka.i386: W: invalid-license Distributable meka.src: W: invalid-license Distributable -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
29
0 / 0

[Bug 478] New: Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 Summary: Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/ OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: solarflow99(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2,30 Estimated Hours: 0.0 DOSEMU is a PC Emulator that allows Linux to run a DOS operating system in a virtual x86 machine. This allows you to run all kinds of different DOS programs including DPMI applications. Enjoy running your DOS programs forever! http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/ I think the package is complete, just have to get it into rpmfusion since it was discovered it couldn't quite make it into Fedora (reason is listed below). This is my first package, the original Fedora review is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 we're not saying it's illegal. It just doesn't grant the user the freedom to modify the program to suit his needs. See the thread on packaging list for discussion on this [1]: [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-March/msg00056.html -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

14 years

8
42
0 / 0

[Bug 562] New: Review request: catalyst-kmod - AMD display driver kernel module

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562 Summary: Review request: catalyst-kmod - AMD display driver kernel module Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: s.adam(a)diffingo.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 1.0 Description: The catalyst 9.4 display driver kernel module. SPEC: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/catalyst-kmod.spec SRPM: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/catalyst-kmod-9.4-1.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint output: akmod-catalyst.x86_64: W: no-documentation kmod-catalyst-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64.x86_64: W: no-documentation kmod-catalyst.x86_64: W: no-documentation > No documentation needs to be included in these packages kmod-catalyst-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized catalyst kernel module(s) for 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64 > due to kmodtool kmod-catalyst-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64.x86_64: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet kmod-catalyst-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64-9.4-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm > Not a big deal: the file can be renamed if it's going to be used on Joliet-formatted media. kmod-catalyst-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64/extra/catalyst/fglrx.ko > Set this intentionally as part of the debuginfo workaround: sed -i -e 's|strict=true|strict=false|' find-debuginfo.sh -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

14 years

1
14
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers September 2009