February 2010 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 993] New: Review request: openshot - GNOME Non-linear video editor

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=993 Summary: Review request: openshot - GNOME Non-linear video editor Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: zarko.pintar(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-12/openshot.spec SRC: http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-12/openshot-0.9.54-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: OpenShot Video Editor is a free, open-source, non-linear video editor, based on Python, GTK, and MLT. It can edit video and audio files, composite and transition video files, and mix multiple layers of video and audio together and render the output in many different formats. Why is not on Fedora: It depend of MLT Framework Rpmlint output: openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/de_DE/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/es_ES/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/fr_FR/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/it_IT/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/nl_NL/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/pt_PT/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/sv_SE/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. I tried to use %find_lang OpenShot macro but without effects. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 7 months

1
92
0 / 0

[Bug 775] New: Review request: xorg-x11-drv-psb - Intel GMA500 (Poulsbo) video driver (and associated packages)

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775 Summary: Review request: xorg-x11-drv-psb - Intel GMA500 (Poulsbo) video driver (and associated packages) Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: adamwill(a)shaw.ca CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Requesting a review for xorg-x11-drv-psb and several associated packages. This is a driver for the Intel GMA 500 graphics chipset. The associated packages are all required for the driver to work. This is the same driver I have been publishing for a while on my blog at http://www.happyassassin.net/ . SRPMs: http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/poulsbo/src/xorg-x11-drv-psb-0.31.0-8.fc... http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/poulsbo/src/libdrm-poulsbo-2.3.0-7.fc11.... http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/poulsbo/src/psb-firmware-0.30-2.fc11.src... http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/poulsbo/src/psb-kmod-4.41.1-5.fc11.src.rpm http://adamwill.fedorapeople.org/poulsbo/src/xpsb-glx-0.18-3.fc11.src.rpm SPECs: http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/xorg-x11-drv-psb.spec http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/libdrm-poulsbo.spec http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/psb-firmware.spec http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/psb-kmod.spec http://www.happyassassin.net/extras/xpsb-glx.spec The driver needs to go in RPM Fusion due to licensing issues. The driver itself, the modified libdrm it requires (libdrm-poulsbo) and the kernel module it requires (psb-kmod) are open source. However, the driver is entirely non-functional without the proprietary (but redistributable) packages psb-firmware and xpsb-glx. I believe therefore that psb-firmware and xpsb-glx should go in rpmfusion-nonfree. I'm not sure if the other packages should go in rpmfusion-free or rpmfusion-nonfree. Since the driver has to contain explicit Requires: for the firmware and xpsb-glx packages, I guess it should go in nonfree, since dependencies from free to nonfree are probably not desirable. Notes: this driver is the one from Ubuntu's custom edition that comes pre-installed on Dell netbooks. libdrm-poulsbo is a customized build of libdrm which is required (the X driver and kernel module won't build against a stock libdrm). It is packaged to co-exist with the official libdrm package, but when libdrm-poulsbo is installed, anything which is just linked against libdrm.so will be using this customized version. In practice, it works well, I've been running my own Poulsbo system with this setup for quite a while now. psb-kmod is the kernel module (it's needed for the driver to work at all). psb-firmware is some firmware which is required for the driver to work. xpsb-glx contains a pre-built X.org library which is required for the driver to work, a pre-built DRI library which is required for 3D acceleration to work, and a pre-built module for 2D video playback acceleration via libva (I intend to submit a libva package to Fedora main repos some time soon). All of these are only available in pre-built form. rpmlint notes: akmod-psb.i586: E: devel-dependency libdrm-poulsbo-devel akmod-psb.i586: E: explicit-lib-dependency libdrm-poulsbo-devel akmod-psb.i586: W: no-documentation the dependency is correct; the module needs libdrm-poulsbo-devel to be present to build, so the akmod package must obviously require it. no-documentation - I think this is normal for a kmod package? If not, please advise how to add docs. libdrm-poulsbo.i586: E: explicit-lib-dependency libdrm libdrm-poulsbo.i586: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/ld.so.conf.d/psb.conf the explicit lib dependency is intended; the main libdrm package includes a couple of binary tools, and it's better to have libdrm-poulsbo require it rather than have it also ship the tools and conflict with it. The config file is also intended: there's no reason an end user should modify this file. psb-firmware.i586: E: no-binary psb-firmware.i586: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/psb-firmware-0.30/COPYING it's just a firmware file. The package is arched because I believe the firmware to be arch specific, not that there's ever going to be a Poulsbo graphics chip in anything but an i586 system. I don't believe it's good practice to do a character set conversion on a license file. xorg-x11-drv-psb.i586: E: explicit-lib-dependency libdrm-poulsbo xorg-x11-drv-psb.i586: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/modprobe.d/poulsbo.conf xorg-x11-drv-psb.i586: W: service-default-enabled /etc/rc.d/init.d/psb xorg-x11-drv-psb.i586: W: incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/psb $name xorg-x11-drv-psb.i586: W: incoherent-init-script-name psb ('xorg-x11-drv-psb', 'xorg-x11-drv-psbd') the explicit lib dep is again intentional: it's the only way to ensure the customized libdrm, not the main one, is used when the driver is installed. the config file not being marked as a config file is intentional: there's no reason for an end user to modify it, it simply causes the module to be loaded automatically when a Poulsbo graphics chip is found. I'm not quite sure what the incoherent-subsys warning means, but the script in question is based directly on the one from the NVIDIA package. Ditto the incoherent-init-script-name warning, I'm following the conventions from the NVIDIA package. This will be my first RPM Fusion package (set), if accepted. However, I am a sponsored packager for Fedora itself, I maintain congruity and gst-mixer there. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 10 months

1
32
0 / 0

[Bug 539] New: Review request: mythtv-status - Get the current status of your MythTV system at the command line

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=539 Summary: Review request: mythtv-status - Get the current status of your MythTV system at the command line Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpmfusion/mythtv-status.spec SRPM: http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpmfusion/mythtv-status-0.9.0... Description This Perl script will display the current status of your MythTV system at the command line. It can optionally append it to the system message of the day (MOTD) on a regular basis. The package is not eligible for Fedora, since mythtv is in RPMFusion. This is my first RPMFusion package. I am a Fedora Packager, see links at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Jussilehtola for my packages & reviews. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 10 months

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 740] New: Review request: meka - Multi machine emulator for MS-DOS, MS-Windows and GNU/Linux

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740 Summary: Review request: meka - Multi machine emulator for MS- DOS, MS-Windows and GNU/Linux Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: musuruan(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/meka.spec http://www.webalice.it/musuruan/RPMS/reviews/meka-0.73-0.1.20080619.fc10.... * Description: MEKA is a multi machine emulator, originally started as a Sega Master System emulator, and generally very oriented toward Z80-based Sega 8-bit systems. MEKA officially emulates the following systems: - Sega Game 1000 / SG-1000 / Japan, Oceania - Sega Computer 3000 / SC-3000 / Japan, Oceania, Europe - Super Control Station / SF-7000 / Japan, Oceania, Europe - Sega Mark III / MK3 / Japan + FM Unit Extension / MK3+FM / Japan - Sega Master System / SMS / World Wide - Sega Game Gear / GG / World Wide - ColecoVision / COLECO / America, Europe - Othello Multivision / OMV / Japan You can play other systems on it only if you are smart enough to figure how. And if you are, I doubt you will want to play Nintendo games. So forget it. * Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: It requires ROMs (or image files in any format) of copyrighted material to be useful and the owners of those copyrights and patents have not given their express written permission. * Rpmlint output: meka.i386: W: invalid-license Distributable meka.src: W: invalid-license Distributable -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 10 months

1
29
0 / 0

[Bug 1034] New: Review request: sinthgunt - An easy to use GUI for ffmpeg

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1034 Summary: Review request: sinthgunt - An easy to use GUI for ffmpeg Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jfsaucier(a)infoglobe.ca CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2,30 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://rpms.infoglobe.ca/packages/sinthgunt.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.infoglobe.ca/packages/sinthgunt-2.0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: Sinthgunt is an open source graphical user interface for ffmpeg, a computer program that can convert digital audio and video into numerous formats. Using pre-configured conversion settings, it makes the task of converting between different media formates very easy. This package is not eligible in Fedora because it depends on ffmpeg from rpmfusion-free repository. $ rpmlint -v SPECS/sinthgunt.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -v SRPMS/sinthgunt-2.0.2-1.fc12.src.rpm sinthgunt.src: I: checking 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint -v RPMS/noarch/sinthgunt-2.0.2-1.fc12.noarch.rpm sinthgunt.noarch: I: checking sinthgunt.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/Sinthgunt/app.py 0644 /usr/bin/python 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. I think the only error is a false positive because app.py doesn't need to be executable by itself. This is my first submitted package for RPM Fusion and I need a sponsor. I'm not currently sponsored in Fedora neither but I have submitted 2 packages for review. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 478] New: Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=478 Summary: Review Request: dosemu - dos emulator for Linux Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/ OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: solarflow99(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2,30 Estimated Hours: 0.0 DOSEMU is a PC Emulator that allows Linux to run a DOS operating system in a virtual x86 machine. This allows you to run all kinds of different DOS programs including DPMI applications. Enjoy running your DOS programs forever! http://jzygmont.fedorapeople.org/ I think the package is complete, just have to get it into rpmfusion since it was discovered it couldn't quite make it into Fedora (reason is listed below). This is my first package, the original Fedora review is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456190 we're not saying it's illegal. It just doesn't grant the user the freedom to modify the program to suit his needs. See the thread on packaging list for discussion on this [1]: [1] https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2009-March/msg00056.html -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

8
42
0 / 0

[Bug 562] New: Review request: catalyst-kmod - AMD display driver kernel module

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=562 Summary: Review request: catalyst-kmod - AMD display driver kernel module Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: s.adam(a)diffingo.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 1.0 Description: The catalyst 9.4 display driver kernel module. SPEC: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/catalyst-kmod.spec SRPM: http://downloads.diffingo.com/rpmfusion/catalyst-kmod-9.4-1.fc10.src.rpm rpmlint output: akmod-catalyst.x86_64: W: no-documentation kmod-catalyst-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64.x86_64: W: no-documentation kmod-catalyst.x86_64: W: no-documentation > No documentation needs to be included in these packages kmod-catalyst-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized catalyst kernel module(s) for 2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64 > due to kmodtool kmod-catalyst-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64.x86_64: W: filename-too-long-for-joliet kmod-catalyst-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64-9.4-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm > Not a big deal: the file can be renamed if it's going to be used on Joliet-formatted media. kmod-catalyst-2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /lib/modules/2.6.27.19-170.2.35.fc10.x86_64/extra/catalyst/fglrx.ko > Set this intentionally as part of the debuginfo workaround: sed -i -e 's|strict=true|strict=false|' find-debuginfo.sh -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
14
0 / 0

[Bug 582] New: Review Request: libtxc_dxtn - S3 Texture Compression support libraries for Mesa

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=582 Summary: Review Request: libtxc_dxtn - S3 Texture Compression support libraries for Mesa Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: andreas(a)bawue.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SRPM: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/libtxc_dxtn/libtxc_dxtn-0.0.0.070518-1.fc7.src.rpm SPEC: http://home.bawue.de/~ixs/libtxc_dxtn/libtxc_dxtn.spec Description: S3 Texture Compression (S3TC) (sometimes also called DXTn or DXTC) is a group of related lossy image compression algorithms originally developed by S3 Graphics, Ltd. Currently, s3tc is supported by libtxc_dxtn on all graphic cards which use the radeon, r200, i830 and i915 driver. Other DRI drivers are not supported, even if the hardware could do it, at least not until someone writes the code for it. Not eligible for fedora: S3TC is patented. rpmlint: [andreas@workstation result]$ rpmlint -v *.rpm libtxc_dxtn.i586: I: checking libtxc_dxtn.i586: W: no-soname /usr/lib/libtxc_dxtn.so libtxc_dxtn.src: I: checking libtxc_dxtn-debuginfo.i586: I: checking 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. no-soname is a shame, but I didn't want to meddle with upstream code as the version number is horrible anyway. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 11 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 985] New: Review request: ProjectX-0.90.4.00-2

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=985 Summary: Review request: ProjectX-0.90.4.00-2 Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: goeran(a)uddeborg.se CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 European digital radio & television uses the DVB standard to broadcast its data. Project X gives you a look behind the transmissions and tries its best to handle & repair many stream types and shows what went wrong on reception. In particular, it is able to demultiplex the different streams in a transmission. It can not be included in Fedora for patent reasons, see the thread at https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-legal-list/2009-April/msg00020.html Rpmlint is happy except that it complains about missing buildroot tag. But I'm only aiming for F12 and the guidelines doesn't require any such tag any more. (Since it is ignored anyway.) This is the first time I package for RPM Fusion. (But I have packaged for Fedora before, although just a single package, ttf2pt1, so I'm already sponsored.) Spec: ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/ProjectX/ProjectX.spec Source: ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/ProjectX/ProjectX-0.90.4.00-3.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

14 years, 2 months

1
39
0 / 0

[Bug 461] New: Review Request: openmotif - Open Motif runtime libraries and executables

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=461 Summary: Review Request: openmotif - Open Motif runtime libraries and executables Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: Jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/openmotif/openmotif.spec SRPM: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/openmotif/openmotif-2.3.2-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: This is the Open Motif 2.3.2 runtime environment. It includes the Motif shared libraries, needed to run applications which are dynamically linked against Motif, and the Motif Window Manager "mwm". You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/s4504kr This is the Open Motif 2.3.2 runtime environment. It includes the Motif shared libraries, needed to run applications which are dynamically linked against Motif, and the Motif Window Manager "mwm". You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/s4504kr This is the Open Motif 2.3.2 runtime environment. It includes the Motif shared libraries, needed to run applications which are dynamically linked against Motif, and the Motif Window Manager "mwm". You have new mail in /var/spool/mail/s4504kr $ rpmlint openmotif-devel-2.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm openmotif-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license Open Group Public License 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint openmotif-demos-2.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm openmotif-demos.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/Xm/fontsel/creation-c.c openmotif-demos.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/Xm/earth/earth.c openmotif-demos.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/Xm/wsm/wsm_cb.h openmotif-demos.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/Xm/todo/io.c $ rpmlint openmotif-mwm-2.3.2-1.fc10.x86_64.rpm openmotif-mwm.x86_64: W: invalid-license Open Group Public License 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Why not in Fedora? Package contains a nonfree license: Plese refer: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RexDieter/openmotif Known issues: opemmotif-devel has a conflict with lesstif-devel. But mesa-libGLw-devel depends on lesstif-devel. So we need a virtual provides 'motif-devel' on lesstif-devel and mesa-libGLw-devel. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

14 years, 3 months

1
36
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers February 2010