[Bug 899] New: REVIEW: imagination - a DVD Slide Show Creator
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=899
Summary: REVIEW: imagination - a DVD Slide Show Creator
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: alsadi(a)ojuba.org
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Estimated Hours: 0.0
hi, this is my first trial to pack something for rpmfusion
why not in fedora, because it depends on ffmpeg so it should be in
rpmfusion-free
the package is from http://imagination.sourceforge.net/
It's packing was straight forward.
here is the .src.rpm
http://www.ojuba.org/downloads/updates/3/SRPMS/imagination-2.1-1.oj3.src.rpm
I build it on ojuba 3 (fedora 11)
[alsadi@pc1 imagination]$ rpmlint
/opt/rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/imagination-2.1-1.oj3.i586.rpm
imagination.i586: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 2.1-1 ['2.1-1.oj3',
'2.1-1.oj3']
imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo
imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo
imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/en_GB/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo
imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo
imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo
imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo
imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo
imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo
imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo
imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/sl_SI/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo
imagination.i586: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/sv/LC_MESSAGES/imagination.mo
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 12 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 9 months
[Bug 1257] New: Review request - gpac - MPEG-4 multimedia framework
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1257
Summary: Review request - gpac - MPEG-4 multimedia framework
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: lucas.jacobs(a)mines.sdsmt.edu
CC: kwizart(a)gmail.com, rpmfusion-package-
review(a)rpmfusion.org
Estimated Hours: 1.5
Created an attachment (id=427)
--> (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=427)
Diff from old SRPM to new SRPM, without the new CVS tarball
SRPM: http://vidya.dyndns.org/stuff/gpac-0.4.6-0.4cvs20100527.fc13.src.rpm
SPEC: http://vidya.dyndns.org/stuff/gpac.spec
Description:
GPAC is a multimedia framework based on the MPEG-4 Systems standard developed
from scratch in ANSI C. The original development goal is to provide a clean,
small and flexible alternative to the MPEG-4 Systems reference software.
GPAC features the integration of recent multimedia standards (SVG/SMIL, VRML,
X3D, SWF, 3GPP(2) tools and more) into a single framework. GPAC also features
MPEG-4 Systems encoders/multiplexers, publishing tools for content distribution
for MP4 and 3GPP(2) files and many tools for scene descriptions
(MPEG4 <-> VRML <-> X3D converters, SWF -> MPEG-4, etc).
Short version:
This package is already in RPM Fusion, (patent concerns?) and used to include
MP4Box, a popular muxing tool. Currently the binary RPM doesn't include MP4Box,
and the source RPM doesn't build. This submission will fix that.
rpmlint mentions some harmless comments in the spec file that I didn't remove
because they were present in the previous version, and missing manpages for
some binaries - manpages for mp4box and mp4client are provided, however.
There's also the source tarball pulled straight from gpac's CVS repository
which needs to be hosted somewhere.
I've been using MP4Box built from this SRPM for a while, and it seems to work
fine. Osmo4 crashes on start, but that's nothing new. I haven't tried the rest
yet. I just finished getting the SRPM to cross-compile for a 32-bit target on a
64-bit platform, so that should be okay.
This is my first RPM Fusion package.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 9 months
[Bug 459] New: Review request: nvidia-cuda-toolkit - NVIDIA CUDA Toolkit libraries
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459
Summary: Review request: nvidia-cuda-toolkit - NVIDIA CUDA
Toolkit libraries
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: xjakub(a)fi.muni.cz
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
Estimated Hours: 0.0
SPEC:
http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/nvidia-cuda-toolki...
SRPM:
http://mjakubicek.fedorapeople.org/nvidia-cuda-toolkit/nvidia-cuda-toolki...
Description:
NVIDIA(R)CUDA(TM) is a general purpose parallel computing architecture
that leverages the parallel compute engine in NVIDIA graphics
processing units (GPUs) to solve many complex computational problems
in a fraction of the time required on a CPU. It includes the CUDA
Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) and the parallel compute engine in
the GPU. To program to the CUDATM architecture, developers can, today,
use C, one of the most widely used high-level programming languages,
which can then be run at great performance on a CUDATM enabled
processor. Other languages will be supported in the future, including
FORTRAN and C++.
Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora:
Not open source.
rpmlint output:
>rpmlint ../SRPMS/nvidia-cuda-toolkit-2.1-1.src.rpm
nvidia-cuda-toolkit.src:53: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib
This is ok, even moving file from the hardcoded path.
nvidia-cuda-toolkit.src: W: no-%build-section
Nothing to build. This, however, implies no stripping & no debuginfo.
Unfortunately, debuginfo creation fails because the binaries don't contatin
build id. I don't know whether there is something I could do with this.
>rpmlint ../RPMS/x86_64/nvidia-cuda-toolkit-*
nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/bec
nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/inline
nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/be
nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/gfec
nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/nvopencc
See the previous comment.
nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libcufft.so.2.1
exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
/usr/lib64/libcufftemu.so.2.1 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
nvidia-cuda-toolkit.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit
/usr/lib64/libcudart.so.2.1 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
Again, there is nothing we can do with this, AFAIK.
This is my first RPM Fusion package, I'm already a Fedora packager (both FAS
names are mjakubicek). My primary motivation to package this is that I maintain
a CUDA-enabled application, see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487981.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 9 months
[Bug 993] New: Review request: openshot - GNOME Non-linear video editor
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=993
Summary: Review request: openshot - GNOME Non-linear video editor
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: zarko.pintar(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
Estimated Hours: 0.0
SPEC:
http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-12/openshot.spec
SRC:
http://wiki.open.hr/~zpintar/fedora-12/openshot-0.9.54-1.fc12.src.rpm
Description:
OpenShot Video Editor is a free, open-source, non-linear video editor, based on
Python, GTK, and MLT. It can edit video and audio files, composite and
transition video files, and mix multiple layers of video and audio together and
render the output in many different formats.
Why is not on Fedora:
It depend of MLT Framework
Rpmlint output:
openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/de_DE/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo
openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/es_ES/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo
openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/fr_FR/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo
openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/it_IT/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo
openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/nl_NL/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo
openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/pt_PT/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo
openshot.noarch: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/openshot/locale/sv_SE/LC_MESSAGES/OpenShot.mo
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings.
I tried to use %find_lang OpenShot macro but without effects.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 9 months
[Bug 1153] New: Review request: m2vmp2cut - MPEG2 frame accurate cutter
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1153
Summary: Review request: m2vmp2cut - MPEG2 frame accurate cutter
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: goeran(a)uddeborg.se
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Depends on: 985
Estimated Hours: 0.0
SRPM: ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/m2vmp2cut/m2vmp2cut-0.79-1.fc12.src.rpm
SPEC: ftp://ftp.uddeborg.se/pub/m2vmp2cut/m2vmp2cut.spec
Description:
m2vmp2cut is frame accurate (currently PAL) mpeg2 video (m2v file)
with accompanied mp2 audio (mp2 file) cutter.
Frame accuracy is achieved by re-encoding video around cutpoints.
Audio is cut from separate mp2 file at positions that keep a/v sync as
good as possible (maximum sync difference is around 10-15
milliseconds).
Very handy to cut out commercials from recordings of DVB transmissions! :-)
Why not Fedora:
This package depends on several other packages from RPM Fusion like libmpeg2.
One of them, ProjectX, has not yet passed the review, bug 985, so there is a
dependency between these two requests.
Rpmlint messages:
m2vmp2cut.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) bildprecis -> baldrics,
baldric's, boldface's
This and a number of similar complaints about the spelling is because of a
rpmbuild bug (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=578299). In the
SRPM, the English description and summary contain the Swedish text.
There are some spelling-error warnings for the binary RPM too. Both about the
Swedish and the English description. They, I believe, are indeed correctly
spelled. Mostly it's about unknown acronyms
m2vmp2cut.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
m2vmp2cut.src: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %clean
m2vmp2cut.src: W: no-buildroot-tag
m2vmp2cut.src: W: no-%clean-section
I'm aiming this package for Fedora 13 and later, and in F13 these are no longer
needed.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 10 months
[Bug 1638] New: Review request: gargoyle - multi-format interactive fiction interpreter
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1638
Summary: Review request: gargoyle - multi-format interactive
fiction interpreter
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: ct.spammable(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2,30
Estimated Hours: 0.0
spec: http://carlolab.appspot.com/files/gargoyle.spec
SRPM: http://carlolab.appspot.com/files/gargoyle-2010.1-1.fc14.src.rpm
Description:
---
Gargoyle is an interpreter for interactive fiction (text adventure) story files
which supports all major formats. It puts special emphasis on excellent text
display.
See http://ifdb.tads.org/ and http://www.ifarchive.org/ for many free works.
This package excludes the Alan 2, Alan 3 and Hugo interpreters due to licensing
restrictions.
---
This package cannot be in Fedora because it depends on smpeg-libs, which is
only in RPM Fusion.
rpmlint on SRPM:
gargoyle.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://ccxvii.net/gargoyle/ <urlopen error
[Errno 111] Connection refused>
gargoyle.src: W: invalid-url Source0: gargoyle-2010.1.tar.bz2
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
rpmlint on RPM:
gargoyle.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency liberation-mono-fonts
gargoyle.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency smpeg-libs
gargoyle.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://ccxvii.net/gargoyle/ <urlopen error
[Errno 111] Connection refused>
gargoyle.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/gargoyle/libgarglk.so
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 3 warnings.
My defences:
* http://ccxvii.net/gargoyle/ is certainly a valid URL, not sure what's going
on
* I'm using my own packaged version of the source code than just an URL because
the official source package contains some code under licenses which are not
Fedora-compliant. See below for background information.
* For some reason, it only complains about the explicit dependency on
liberation-mono-fonts but not linux-libertine-fonts. I'm including both because
these are the fonts the interpreter uses (can be changed via a config file); if
they are not present, the interpreter aborts.
* If I don't list smpeg-libs as an explicit dependency, a mock build fails
because of -lsmpeg
* I don't know why rpmbuild fails to strip libgarglk.so. It does manage to
strip all the executables in the package.
Since this is my first package (Fedora or RPM Fusion), I require a sponsor.
Some further background: Gargoyle (http://ccxvii.net/gargoyle/) bundles
interpreters for several interactive fiction story file formats, including
Z-code, TADS and others. It uses the same subpixel text rendering presentation
for all of these; it does not expose the UI for any of the bundled
interpreters, but only the interpreter core. It's been around for a few years
and is very popular in the Interactive Fiction community. It's already in
several other distros: http://code.google.com/p/garglk/wiki/Packages
The bundled interpreters have a variety of licenses. A couple don't have
Fedora-approved licenses, so these had to be left out even from the SRPM. The
license situation may change in the future, so they may be included in a future
version.
Many thanks,
Carlo
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 11 months
[Bug 1615] New: openni-nite - OpenNI-based toolbox for hand movement tracking
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1615
Summary: openni-nite - OpenNI-based toolbox for hand movement
tracking
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: tim(a)niemueller.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Proposing OpenNI NITE middleware for inclusion to RPMfusion. It is unacceptable
for Fedora because it contains binary-only, proprietary software by PrimeSense,
which they distribute free of charge. A license key is distributed on their
website at
http://www.openni.org/downloadfiles/12-openni-compliant-middleware-binaries.
Therefore from my understanding we can redistribute that package and get
everything setup ready-to-go in Fedora in a package.
This review request depends on Fedora bug #674006
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674006), which is OpenNI, the free
and open source framework the NITE hand tracker is based on.
Spec URL: http://www.niemueller.de/share/openni-nite.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.niemueller.de/share/openni-nite-1.3.0.18-1.fc14.src.rpm
Project URL: http://www.openni.org
Description:
NITE is a toolbox to allow application to build flows based on the user's hands
movement. The hand movement is understood as gestures and is tracked, to
provide hand points. NITE works over OpenNI.
rpmlint:
openni-nite.src: W: invalid-url Source1: NITE-Bin-Linux32-v1.3.0.18.tar.bz2
openni-nite.src: W: invalid-url Source0: NITE-Bin-Linux64-v1.3.0.18.tar.bz2
- download URLs do not contain filename (strange content management system
URLs)
openni-nite.x86_64: W: invalid-license Proprietary
openni-nite-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license Proprietary
openni-nite-examples.x86_64: W: invalid-license Proprietary
- what should it be?
openni-nite.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libXnVFeatures.so
openni-nite.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libXnVFeatures.so
exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
openni-nite.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/lib64/libXnVFeatures.so
openni-nite.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libXnVHandGenerator.so
openni-nite.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libXnVHandGenerator.so
exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
openni-nite.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libXnVCNite.so
openni-nite.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libXnVNite.so
openni-nite.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libXnVNite.so
exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
- shared libs are binary only, therefore cannot remove the exit calls or add
soname.
openni-nite.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/openni/XnVFeatures/FeatureExtraction.ini
openni-nite.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/openni/XnVFeatures/h.dat
openni-nite.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/openni/XnVFeatures/s.dat
openni-nite.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc
/etc/openni/XnVHandGenerator/Nite.ini
- these are, in fact, config files
openni-nite-examples.x86_64: W: no-documentation
openni-nite-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary NiteSingleControl
openni-nite-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary NiteCircleControl
openni-nite-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary NiteBoxes
openni-nite-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary NitePointViewer
openni-nite-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary NiteTrackPad
openni-nite-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary NitePlayers
openni-nite-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary NiteSceneAnalysis
openni-nite-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary NitePointServer
- None in the source tarballs.
4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 31 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 11 months
Push F-13 Testing OpenAFS Packages Please
by Jack Neely
Folks,
The 1.4.14 openafs packages in teh F-13 tree are currently broken. The
1.4.14 userland packages have been pushed to the updates tree, but not the
kmod-openafs packages. They are still in the testing tree.
Can someone push the kmod-openafs packages in updates-testing to updates
for F13?
Jack Neely
--
Jack Neely <jjneely(a)ncsu.edu>
Linux Czar, OIT Campus Linux Services
Office of Information Technology, NC State University
GPG Fingerprint: 1917 5AC1 E828 9337 7AA4 EA6B 213B 765F 3B6A 5B89
13 years, 11 months
Outage Notification: 2011-03-01
by Xavier Lamien
There will be an outage starting on tomorrow morning 2011-03-01, 08:00 -
11:00 UTC .
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
Affected Services:
CVS (including cvsview)
FAS
Database
Build System
Wiki
Bugzilla
dns
puppet
Unaffected Services:
MirrorManager
Reason for Outage:
We will be moving the servers (VM only) to a another physical host.
That should take around 5 or 10min between servers but we prefer to take
some window to test that everything will be back online and work fine.
Contact Information:
#rpmfusion-admin in irc.freenode.net or respond to this email to
track the status of this outage.
--
Xavier.t Lamien
--
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/XavierLamien
GPG-Key ID: F3903DEB
Fingerprint: 0F2A 7A17 0F1B 82EE FCBF 1F51 76B7 A28D F390 3DEB
13 years, 11 months
Fwd: Build Error (Job 9114): desmume-0_9_7-1_fc15 on fedora-development-rpmfusion_free
by Andrea Musuruane
Hi all,
I can't understand why this job fails on RPM Fusion buildsys. The
RPM is built fine with mock "fedora-rawhide-x86_64-rpmfusion_free" and
"fedora-rawhide-x86_64" profiles. Can somebody help? Thanks.
Regards,
Andrea.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <rpmfusion-buildsys(a)lists.rpmfusion.org>
Date: Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at 6:41 PM
Subject: Build Error (Job 9114): desmume-0_9_7-1_fc15 on
fedora-development-rpmfusion_free
To: musuruan(a)gmail.com
Job failed on arch i686
Build logs may be found at
http://buildsys.rpmfusion.org/logs/fedora-development-rpmfusion_free/9114...
-------------------------------------------------
g++ -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
-fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i686
-mtune=atom -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -rdynamic -o desmume-glade
glade-xml.o callbacks.o callbacks_IO.o desmume.o keyval_names.o main.o
gdk_gl.o callbacks_1_ioregs.o callbacks_2_memview.o
callbacks_3_palview.o callbacks_4_tileview.o gdk_3Demu.o sndsdl.o
ctrlssdl.o driver.o ../libdesmume.a -lSDL -lpthread
-Wl,--export-dynamic -pthread -lgtkglext-x11-1.0 -lgdkglext-x11-1.0
-lGLU -lGL -lXmu -lXt -lSM -lICE -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lpangox-1.0 -lX11
-lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0 -lgio-2.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lpangocairo-1.0
-lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpng12 -lm -lcairo -lpango-1.0 -lfreetype
-lfontconfig -lgobject-2.0 -lgmodule-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lglib-2.0
-pthread -lglade-2.0 -lgtk-x11-2.0 -lxml2 -lgdk-x11-2.0 -latk-1.0
-lgio-2.0 -lpangoft2-1.0 -lpangocairo-1.0 -lgdk_pixbuf-2.0 -lpng12 -lm
-lcairo -lpango-1.0 -lfreetype -lfontconfig -lgobject-2.0
-lgmodule-2.0 -lgthread-2.0 -
lrt -lglib-2.0 -pthread -lgthread-2.0 -lrt -lglib-2.0 -lasound
-lagg -lGL -ldl -lzzip -lz -lGLU
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.6.0/../../../libgtkglext-x11-1.0.so:
undefined reference to `GTK_WIDGET_REALIZED'
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.6.0/../../../libgtkglext-x11-1.0.so:
undefined reference to `GTK_WIDGET_TOPLEVEL'
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-redhat-linux/4.6.0/../../../libgtkglext-x11-1.0.so:
undefined reference to `GTK_WIDGET_NO_WINDOW'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [desmume-glade] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/desmume-0.9.7/src/gtk-glade'
make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/desmume-0.9.7/src/gtk-glade'
make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/desmume-0.9.7/src'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.a4A9gF (%build)
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.a4A9gF (%build)
RPM build errors:
Child returncode was: 1
EXCEPTION: Command failed. See logs for output.
# ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target i686 --nodeps
builddir/build/SPECS/desmume.spec']
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mock/trace_decorator.py", line
70, in trace
result = func(*args, **kw)
File "/usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/mock/util.py", line 345, in do
raise mock.exception.Error, ("Command failed. See logs for
output.\n # %s" % (command,), child.returncode)
Error: Command failed. See logs for output.
# ['bash', '--login', '-c', 'rpmbuild -bb --target i686 --nodeps
builddir/build/SPECS/desmume.spec']
LEAVE do --> EXCEPTION RAISED
13 years, 11 months
