[Bug 25] New: truecrypt - Free Open-Source Disk Encryption Software
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25
Summary: truecrypt - Free Open-Source Disk Encryption Software
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: dominik(a)greysector.net
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Spec URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/truecrypt.spec
SRPM URL: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/truecrypt-5.0a-1.src.rpm
Main Features:
- Creates a virtual encrypted disk within a file and mounts it as a
real disk.
- Encrypts an entire hard disk partition or a storage device such as
USB flash drive.
- Encryption is automatic, real-time (on-the-fly) and transparent.
- Provides two levels of plausible deniability, in case an adversary
forces you to reveal the password:
1) Hidden volume (steganography).
2) No TrueCrypt volume can be identified (volumes cannot be
distinguished from random data).
- Encryption algorithms: AES-256, Blowfish (448-bit key), CAST5,
Serpent, Triple DES, and Twofish. Mode of operation: LRW (CBC
supported as legacy).
Why not in Fedora?
Problematic licence.
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock//fedora-development-i386/result
truecrypt.i386: W: invalid-license Truecrypt License
truecrypt-debuginfo.i386: W: invalid-license Truecrypt License
truecrypt.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 49, tab: line 1)
truecrypt.src: W: invalid-license Truecrypt License
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 1 month
[Bug 1718] New: Review request: spek - Free acoustic spectrum analyzer
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1718
Summary: Review request: spek - Free acoustic spectrum analyzer
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
URL: http://www.spek-project.org/
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: tnorth(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
Estimated Hours: 0.0
SPEC URL: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/spek.spec
SRPM URL: http://tnorth.fedorapeople.org/spek-0.7-1.fc14.src.rpm
Based on the spec from RH BZ#597888, updated to 0.7.
Description:
Spek helps to analyze your audio files by showing their spectrogram.
Spectrograms are used to analyze the quality of audio files, you can easily
detect lossy re-encodes, web-rips and other badness by just looking at the
spectrogram. Spek uses ffmpeg to read audio files which means it supports
most file formats you can think of.
This package is not eligible to be included in Fedora because it relies on
ffmpeg.
rpmlint output:
rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/spek-0.7-1.fc14.src.rpm
rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/spek-0.7-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm
rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/spek-debuginfo-0.7-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm
spek.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lossy -> loss, glossy, flossy
spek.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ffmpeg -> MPEG, imperf
spek.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://spek.googlecode.com/files/spek-0.7.tar.bz2 HTTP Error 404: Not Found
spek.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US lossy -> loss, glossy,
flossy
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
Source0 cannot be found by rpmlint, but the file actually exists (must be a
redirect error)
This is my first RPMFusion package.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 1 month
[Bug 476] New: Review request: blender-nonfree - Additonal package which contains non-free parts of blender
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=476
Summary: Review request: blender-nonfree - Additonal package
which contains non-free parts of blender
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: Jochen(a)herr-schmitt.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Estimated Hours: 0.0
SPEC: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/blender-nonfree/blender-nonfree.spec
SRPM:
http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/blender-nonfree/blender-nonfree-2.48a-1.fc...
Description:
Blender is the essential software solution you need for 3D, from modeling,
animation, rendering and post-production to interactive creation and playback.
Professionals and novices can easily and inexpensively publish stand-alone,
secure, multi-platform content to the web, CD-ROMs, and other media.
This package contains the non-free parts which you will get, if you are
building blender with ffmpeg support. This Package requires the free
blender package from the Fedora project.
Why not in Fedora:
This packages contains part of the blender package which you will get if you
may build blender with ffmpget. This part which depend on ffmpeg can't be
included into Fedora caused by potential patent issues.
Rpmlit output:
$ rpmlint blender-nonfree-2.48a-1.fc11.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint blender-nonfree-2.48a-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint blenderplayer-nonfree-2.48a-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint blender-nonfree-debuginfo-2.48a-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 1 month
[Bug 746] New: Lives - Linux Video Editing System
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746
Summary: Lives - Linux Video Editing System
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: leigh123linux(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Estimated Hours: 0.0
The Linux Video Editing System (LiVES) is intended to be a simple yet powerful
video effects and editing system. It uses common tools for most of its work
(mplayer, ImageMagick, GTK+, sox).
SPEC: http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/Lives/1/lives.spec
SRPM:
http://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/Lives/1/lives-1.0.0-1.fc...
rpmlint lives-1.0.0-1.fc11.src.rpm lives-1.0.0-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm
lives-devel-1.0.0-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm lives-debuginfo-1.0.0-1.fc11.x86_64.rpm
lives-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
I have added this as I am to lazy to use mock.
sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool
sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool
I expect this will be unnecessary for mock or buildsystem builds.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
13 years, 1 month