[Bug 1127] New: Review request: ailurus - makes Linux easier to use
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1127
Summary: Review request: ailurus - makes Linux easier to use
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: homer.xing(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2,30
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Dear all,
I have a review request.
Spec: http://github.com/homerxing/Ailurus/raw/master/ailurus.spec
SRPM: http://ailurus.googlecode.com/files/ailurus-10.03.2-1.src.rpm
Description:
Ailurus is an application which makes Linux easier to use.
Its features
* Help users study some Linux skills
* Install/remove some nice applications
* Enable/disable some third party repositories
* Display information about BIOS, motherboard, CPU and battery
* Show/Hide Computer, Home folder, Trash icon and Network icon on desktop
* Configure Nautilus thumbnail cache
* Configure Nautilus context menu
* Configure Window behavior
* Configure GNOME auto-start applications
* Show/Hide GNOME splash screen
Why this package is not eligible:
This package is not eligible to be included in Fedora. Because it can enable
third party repositories, such as Adobe repository. Tom Callaway <tcallawa AT
redhat.com> replys:
" This isn't going to pass the FE-Legal check. We cannot include anything
in the Fedora repositories that points to these third party repositories, this
crosses the line from information to contributory infringement. "
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=553615
rpmlint:
rpmlint is silent on SPEC and SRPM.
About me:
I am not an RPM Fusion sponsored packager, and I am seeking a sponsor. This is
my first RPM fusion package. I hope to receive advice. Thank you very much!
Best regards,
Homer
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12 years, 6 months
[Bug 679] New: Review request: HandBrake - Multithreaded DVD to MPEG-4 converter
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679
Summary: Review request: HandBrake - Multithreaded DVD to MPEG-4
converter
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: bjohnson(a)symetrix.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Estimated Hours: 0.0
SPEC: http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/rpmfusion/HandBrake.spec
SRPM:
http://www.symetrix.com/~bjohnson/projects/rpmfusion/HandBrake-0.9.3-1.fc...
Description:
HandBrake is an open-source, GPL-licensed, multiplatform, multithreaded video
transcoder, available for MacOS X, Linux and Windows.
Supported sources:
* Any DVD-like source: VIDEO_TS folder, DVD image or real DVD
(unencrypted--protection methods including CSS are not supported
internally and must be handled externally with third-party software and
libraries), and some .VOB and .TS files
* Most any multimedia file it can get libavformat to read and libavcodec to
decode.
Outputs:
* File format: MP4, MKV, AVI or OGM
* Video: MPEG-4, H.264, or Theora (1 or 2 passes or constant quantizer/rate
encoding)
* Audio: AAC, MP3, Vorbis or AC-3 pass-through (supports encoding of
several audio tracks)
Misc features:
* Chapter selection
* Basic subtitle support (burned into the picture)
* Integrated bitrate calculator
* Picture deinterlacing, cropping and scaling
* Grayscale encoding
Why not Fedora?: Many reasons, one of which is the need for codecs in
rpmfusion.
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint *rpm
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$
This is a *preview* of a package in development. Known problems:
- Private libraries (at this point in time, F11/rpmfusion, there is no way
around this)
- Doesn't honor compile flags
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12 years, 6 months
[Bug 639] New: Review request: gtkmm-utils-0.4.0 & gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0 - Library for use with paperbox.
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639
Summary: Review request: gtkmm-utils-0.4.0 & gtkmm-utils-devel-
0.4.0 - Library for use with paperbox.
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: gareth.l.john(a)googlemail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2,30
Estimated Hours: 0.0
FILES:
http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils.spec
http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-fc10.src.rpm
http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils-devel.spec
http://garethsrpms.googlecode.com/files/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0-fc10.src.rpm
DESCRIPTION:
High level utility functions, classes and widgets written on top of gtkmm
and glibmm.
* logging framework
* option parsing, date and string utilities
* tile widgets (see a Paperbox screenshot)
* dialog helpers
The package consists of two shared libraries which will be installed
to your pkg-config path, glibmm-utils and gtkmm-utils. Gtkmm is the
official C++ API for GTK+, a graphical user interface toolkit used
in the GNOME desktop. glibmm is a C++ API for GLib.
FEDORA?
Im not too sure if the package can be included in fedora repos, I am new to
this packaging thing as I usually compile myself i thought i should make an
effort to help, assumed that if it was capable of being in fedora repos it
would be.
RPMLINT SAYS:
$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-fc10.i386.rpm
gtkmm-utils.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4.0-FC10 ['0.4.0-fc10',
'0.4.0-fc10']
gtkmm-utils.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib/libglibmm-utils.so.2.0.0
gtkmm-utils.i386: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0
gtkmm-utils.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/libglibmm-utils.so
gtkmm-utils.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/libgtkmm-utils.so
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i386/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0-fc10.i386.rpm
gtkmm-utils-devel.i386: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.4.0-FC10
['0.4.0-fc10', '0.4.0-fc10']
gtkmm-utils-devel.i386: E: no-binary
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/gtkmm-utils-0.4.0-fc10.src.rpm
gtkmm-utils.src:18: W: hardcoded-packager-tag Gareth
gtkmm-utils.src:33: W: setup-not-quiet
gtkmm-utils.src:37: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build if [ -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT ];
then rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT; fi
gtkmm-utils.src:38: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build mkdir -p $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
gtkmm-utils.src:39: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
gtkmm-utils.src:69: E: hardcoded-library-path in
/usr/lib/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0
gtkmm-utils.src:72: E: hardcoded-library-path in
/usr/lib/libgtkmm-utils.so.2.0.0
gtkmm-utils.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab: line 6)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 6 warnings.
$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/gtkmm-utils-devel-0.4.0-fc10.src.rpm
gtkmm-utils-devel.src:18: W: hardcoded-packager-tag Gareth
gtkmm-utils-devel.src:33: W: setup-not-quiet
gtkmm-utils-devel.src:37: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build if [ -d $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
]; then rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT; fi
gtkmm-utils-devel.src:38: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build mkdir -p
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
gtkmm-utils-devel.src:39: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
gtkmm-utils-devel.src: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 6, tab:
line 6)
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
This is my first package and first fusion package, also I am not a sponsored
packager!
I hope its not too shabby I have improved on as many errors as possible with
google and some knowledge and some guess work. I did not notice the white space
error but will fix that as for other errors some evade me and i cannot
understand the issue after searching such as "unstripped-binary-or-object" i
also left the apparent devel files as i had a feeling that they were sym links
and might have been needed for normal operation. Again this has produced errors
in the src.rpm which i have no idea about. Thanks!
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12 years, 6 months
[Bug 547] New: review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in Fedora
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=547
Summary: review request: LCD patches from Ubuntu finally in
Fedora
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: david(a)hlacik.eu
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2,30
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Hello guys,
I have finally prepared patched libraries for Fedora, which will provide
beautiful fonts experience from Ubuntu to Fedora.
I am writing about LCD patches which are applied to cairo, libXft and
fontconfig libraries and bring us patented subpixel hinting technology for
drawing beautiful fonts on LCD .
Little history :
David Tuner of freetype created some excellent patches which provide superior
subpixel redering which very much improves the appearance of fonts. At one
time, these patches were readily available and could be applied to the packages
of the day. Since then, David Turner made the decision that these patches could
infringe on patents and so since then, these patches have not been maintained
and upgraded to the latest packages. The freetype portion of the patches does
exist in current freetype packages, but is shipped disabled. Unfortunately,
there are 2 other areas where patches are needed and these are not maintained:
cairo and Xft. Without the cairo and Xft patches, I could not get acceptable
subpixel rendering.
Here are the sample screens from my desktop Fedora 10 on Gnome
http://power.polarion.com/_review/screen1.png
http://power.polarion.com/_review/screen2.png
I prepared four packages, freetype-lcd , cairo-lcd, libXft-lcd, fontconfig-lcd.
As all packages are required they do depend on self.
Of course to met package guidelines i am not replacing any current packages nor
files in Fedora. Instead of this I am overriding paths to libraries using
ld.so.conf.d (some as freetype-freeworld does)
freetype-lcd
SPEC: http://power.polarion.com/_review/freetype-lcd.spec
SRPM: http://power.polarion.com/_review/freetype-lcd-2.3.9-4.1.fc10.src.rpm
cairo-lcd
SPEC: http://power.polarion.com/_review/cairo-lcd.spec
SRPM: http://power.polarion.com/_review/cairo-lcd-1.8.6-1.2.fc10.src.rpm
libXft-lcd
SPEC: http://power.polarion.com/_review/libXft-lcd.spec
SRPM: http://power.polarion.com/_review/libXft-lcd-2.1.13-3.1.fc10.src.rpm
fontconfig-lcd
SPEC: http://power.polarion.com/_review/fontconfig-lcd.spec
SRPM: http://power.polarion.com/_review/fontconfig-lcd-2.6.0-1.12.fc10.src.rpm
I believe this is a revolutionary enhancement for us. Why? Try those packages
by yourself :
http://power.polarion.com/_x86_64/freetype-lcd-2.3.9-4.1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
http://power.polarion.com/_x86_64/libXft-lcd-2.1.13-3.1.fc10.x86_64.rpm
http://power.polarion.com/_x86_64/cairo-lcd-1.8.6-1.2.fc10.x86_64.rpm
http://power.polarion.com/_x86_64/fontconfig-lcd-2.6.0-1.12.fc10.x86_64.rpm
After installed, log out and log in, go to Gnome System -> Preferences -> Look
and Feel -> Appearance . Go to Fonts Tab and enable Subpixel smoothing (LCDs)
I would like to have an short wiki page on rpmfusion.org where I will describe
all possible font settings, hintings (slight,medium,full) as well as other
configurations to make fonts look superb.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12 years, 6 months
[Bug 545] New: Review request: nuvexport - Export MythTV .nuv and .mpeg files to other formats
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545
Summary: Review request: nuvexport - Export MythTV .nuv and .mpeg
files to other formats
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: jussi.lehtola(a)iki.fi
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Spec:
http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpmfusion/nuvexport.spec
SRPM:
http://theory.physics.helsinki.fi/~jzlehtol/rpmfusion/nuvexport-0.5-1.0.2...
rpmlint output:
nuvexport.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency id3lib
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/MP4.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/nuv_export/cli.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/DVCD.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/XviD.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/NUV_SQL.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/transcode/VCD.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/mencoder.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/generic.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/PSP.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/ASF.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/nuv_export/ui.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/nuv_export/shared_utils.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/mencoder/XviD.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/mythtv/recordings.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/transcode/SVCD.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/nuv_export/task.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/nuv_export/help.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/DivX.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/transcode.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/VCD.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/transcode/XviD.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/transcode/DVD.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/transcode/DVCD.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/SVCD.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/MP3.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/mythtv/nuvinfo.pm
nuvexport.noarch: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/nuvexport/export/ffmpeg/DVD.pm
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 29 errors, 0 warnings.
The explicit lib dependency error is caused by the name of id3lib, and doesn't
cause any concern. The rest are script-without-shebang warnings, which
shouldn't cause any concern. In fact, two of the files (export/ffmpeg/MP4.pm
and nuv_export/help.pm) have shebangs "#!/usr/bin/perl -w" but still cause
rpmlint errors.
The ffmpeg and transcode dependencies are in development but not yet in F10.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12 years, 6 months
[Bug 534] New: scourge-Rogue-like RPG
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=534
Summary: scourge-Rogue-like RPG
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
URL: http://scourgeweb.org/tiki-index.php
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: leadgolem(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2,30
Estimated Hours: 0.0
http://leadgolem.homeip.net/scourge-0.21.1-2.src.rpm
http://leadgolem.homeip.net/scourge.spec
S.C.O.U.R.G.E. is a rogue-like game in the fine tradition of NetHack
and Moria It sports a graphical front-end, similar to glHack or the
Falcon's eye. I tried to design the 3D UI as a best of both worlds
from old to new: It lets you rotate the view, zoom in/out, view
special effects, etc. On the other hand I've always liked the
old-school isometric games like Exult or Woodward.
The above description makes it sound like I developed the code in this program.
I didn't.
The scourge-data package which is required for this to run is licensing mess.
None of it is actually ripped off, as far as I can tell. However many of the
content files are either undocumented or no license is actually stated.
There are no rpmlint errors or warnings from spec, src.rpm, or binary rpms.
This is my first rpmfusion package and I am seeking a sponsor.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12 years, 6 months
