April 2011 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 303] New: Review request: Mupen64Plus - A Nintendo64 Emulator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303 Summary: Review request: Mupen64Plus - A Nintendo64 Emulator Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: i386 OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: uncholowapo(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec file URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/179957695/Mupen64Plus.spec SRPM URL: http://rapidshare.com/files/179957623/Mupen64Plus-1.5-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Mupen64Plus is a plugin-based N64 emulator for Linux which is capable of accurately playing many games. Included are four MIPS R4300 CPU emulators, with dynamic recompilers for 32-bit x86 and 64-bit amd64 systems, and necessary plugins for audio, graphical rendering (RDP), signal co-processor (RSP), and input. There are 3 OpenGL video plugins included: glN64, RiceVideoLinux, and Glide64. This can not eligible to be in Fedora because it is an emulator for a commercial game console. rpmlint of spec file: [Juan@shadowtracer SPECS]$ rpmlint Mupen64Plus.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rplint of SRPM: [Juan@shadowtracer SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/Mupen64Plus* Mupen64Plus.src: E: description-line-too-long Mupen64Plus is a plugin-based N64 emulator for Linux which is capable of accurately playing many games. Included are four MIPS R4300 CPU emulators, with dynamic recompilers for 32-bit x86 and 64-bit amd64 systems, and necessary plugins for audio, graphical rendering (RDP), signal co-processor (RSP), and input. There are 3 OpenGL video plugins included: glN64, RiceVideoLinux, and Glide64. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. I chose to ignore this message because it is just the description and does not effect the building and compiling of the package. This is my first RPM Fusion package. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
22
0 / 0

[Bug 302] New: Review request: shorten - Fast, low complexity audio compressor

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302 Summary: Review request: shorten - Fast, low complexity audio compressor Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: bjohnson(a)symetrix.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/shorten.spec SRPM: http://fedorapeople.org/~bjohnson/shorten-3.6.1-1.fc10.src.rpm Description: Shorten is a fast, low complexity waveform coder (i.e. audio compressor), originally written by Tony Robinson at SoftSound. It can operate in both lossy and lossless modes. Why not Fedora?: Package license contains limitations on commercial use. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint *rpm shorten.i386: W: invalid-license Distributable, Non-commercial Use Only shorten.src: W: invalid-license Distributable, Non-commercial Use Only shorten-debuginfo.i386: W: invalid-license Distributable, Non-commercial Use Only 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. I was unsure what to put for the license tag since it doesn't fit a "standard" license. This is my first rpmfusion package - although I have packages in Fedora proper. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 283] New: revel - Really easy video encoding library

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=283 Summary: revel - Really easy video encoding library Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: fabian(a)bernewireless.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://bernewireless.net/files/rpms/revel.spec SRPM URL: http://bernewireless.net/files/rpms/revel-1.1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm Project URL: http://revel.sourceforge.net/ Description: Revel is a library designed to be the shortest, simplest path between your application and high-quality well-compressed video output. Any program that generates a series of successive images (e.g. video games, 3D graphics applications, media players, animation packages) can use Revel to output a compressed AVI video, without having to know hardly anything about the overwhelming esoterica of video encoding. Revel is implemented in C++, but the public API is in plain old C for maximum compatibility. Why not in Fedora? Because xvidcore is not in Fedora. rpmlint output: [fab@laptop024 i386]$ rpmlint revel* revel.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/revel.h revel.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/librevel.a 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. I'm not able to build a proper -debuginfo file because of that I added '%define debug_package %{nil}' to suppress the rpmlint warning about this. [fab@laptop024 SRPMS]$ rpmlint revel-1.1.0-1.fc9.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This is my first package for RPMFusion. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 248] New: Review Request: rar - RAR archiver to create and manage RAR archives

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=248 Summary: Review Request: rar - RAR archiver to create and manage RAR archives Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/rar/rar.spec SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/rar/rar-3.8.0-1.src.rpm Summary: RAR archiver to create and manage RAR archives This package is Shareware (nonfree), but we might ask if it is redistribuable for our needs. I know there is also an open source implementation of the rar archiver. But it is incomplete (as discussed previously on this list). This last version could also be packaged. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
27
0 / 0

[Bug 167] New: Review request: anyremote-J2ME-client - J2ME client for anyRemote

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167 Summary: Review request: anyremote-J2ME-client - J2ME client for anyRemote Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: http://anyremote.sf.net OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: anyremote(a)mail.ru CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 anyRemote is bluetooth remote control software. anyremote-J2ME-client is J2ME client for anyRemote. This J2ME client should be installed on JSR-82 capabled cell phone. SRPM http://downloads.sourceforge.net/anyremote/anyremote-J2ME-client-4.10-1.f... Beware: Actually to build anyremote-J2ME-client it needs to install Sun WTK and Proguard. So, if possible i can specify SRPM and .spec for package which contains prebuild java midlet. This can simplify package build process by elimination of Sun WTK-Proguard toolchain. This package can not be included into Fedora because it uses for build Sun WTK toolkit, which is free, but not open source. This is my first RPM Fusion package (and i have 4 packages in Fedora repo). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 48] New: Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on Linux

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48 Summary: Review Request: freej - a vision mixer for video DJs on Linux Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All URL: http://freej.dyne.org OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: loupgaroublond(a)gmail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 SRPM: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo.nonfree/freej-0.10-8.20080726.fc9.src... SPEC: http://ynemoy.fedorapeople.org/repo.nonfree/freej.spec FreeJ is a digital instrument for video livesets, featuring realtime rendering of multilayered video and chained effect filtering directly on the screen. It plays with video4linux devices, DIVX/AVI files, and PNG images, letting you dynamically apply on each layer a chain of effect plugins. NOTE: This package is hard-coded to require an MMX capable processor. RPMLINT: freej.i386: I: checking freej.i386: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/freej/pan_joy.js "/usr/local/bin/freej" freej.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/freej/pan_joy.js 0644 freej.i386: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/share/freej/pan.js "/usr/local/bin/freej" freej.i386: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/freej/pan.js 0644 freej.i386: W: executable-stack /usr/bin/freej freej.src: I: checking freej.src:97: W: macro-in-%changelog __make freej-debuginfo.i386: I: checking freej-devel.i386: I: checking freej.spec:97: W: macro-in-%changelog __make 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 3 warnings. FreeJ has a built in javascript interpreter. rpmlint is not intelligent enough to realize this. The rest is a silly warning. This package depends on libffmpeg which is not available in Fedora. Note: First time submitter. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

2
13
0 / 0

[Bug 1316] New: Review Request: ffms2 - An FFmpeg based source library for easy frame accurate access

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1316 Summary: Review Request: ffms2 - An FFmpeg based source library for easy frame accurate access Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: rpm(a)greysector.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 SPEC: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/ffms2.spec SRPM: http://rathann.fedorapeople.org/review/ffms2-2.13-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: FFmpegSource (usually known as FFMS or FFMS2) is a cross-platform wrapper library around FFmpeg, plus some additional components to deal with file formats FFmpeg's libavformat has (or used to have) problems with. It gives you an easy, convenient way to say "open and decompress this media file for me, I don't care how you do it" and get frame- and sample-accurate access (usually), without having to bother with the sometimes less than straightforward and less than perfectly documented FFmpeg API. The library is written in C++, but the public API is C-friendly and it should be possible to simply include and link directly with a pure C application. The source is available under the MIT license, but the binaries are GPL licensed because they need to be linked against a GPL'd FFmpeg. Why not in Fedora? It's a wrapper around FFmpeg with strict dependency. $ rpmlint ffms2* ffms2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libavformat -> informative, malformation, informatics ffms2.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://ffmpegsource.googlecode.com/files/ffms2-2.13_src.7z HTTP Error 404: Not Found ffms2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libavformat -> informative, malformation, informatics ffms2.x86_64: W: no-documentation ffms2-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ffms -> fums, ff ms, ff-ms ffms2-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ffms -> fums, ff ms, ff-ms ffms2-tools.x86_64: W: no-documentation ffms2-tools.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ffmsindex 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 2 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 1453] New: Review Request: libaacs - Open implementation of AACS specification

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1453 Summary: Review Request: libaacs - Open implementation of AACS specification Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: xavier(a)bachelot.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/libaacs.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/libaacs-0.1-0.1.20100817.fc13.src.rpm Description: This library is an open implementation of the AACS specification. It can be dlopen'ed by libbluray if present and allows decryption of AACS protected bluray disc. The keys are NOT provided. This package was rejected by Red Hat Legal team. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625603 It depends on libbluray, which is under review for Fedora. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=625602 I'm already a Fedora packager, but I don't maintain any package for RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 2 months

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 1595] New: Review request: tarsnap - Online encrypted backup service (client)

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1595 Summary: Review request: tarsnap - Online encrypted backup service (client) Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: ricky(a)rzhou.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/tarsnap/tarsnap.spec SRPM: http://ricky.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/tarsnap/tarsnap-1.0.27-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Tarsnap is an online encrypted backup service. It presents a tar-like command-line interface, but stores data online rather than locally; using ideas taken from the author's FreeBSD Update and Portsnap utilities, it maximizes performance by recognizing duplicate data and only storing it once, and cryptographically encrypts and signs archives using locally-held keys in order to guarantee that nobody without access to the key file (including the author) can read or modify archives. Reason it cannot be in Fedora: This package cannot be included in Fedora because it contains code under the following license: Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, without modification, is permitted for the sole purpose of using the "tarsnap" backup service provided by Colin Percival. rpmlint output: tarsnap-1.0.27-1.fc14.src.rpm: tarsnap.src: W: invalid-license Tarsnap License 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. tarsnap-1.0.27-1.fc14.x86_64.rpm: tarsnap.x86_64: W: invalid-license Tarsnap License tarsnap.x86_64: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/tarsnap.conf.sample 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. This is my first RPM Fusion package (I am a Fedora packager). -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 3 months

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 1171] New: Review request: rtmpdump - Toolkit for RTMP streams

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1171 Summary: Review request: rtmpdump - Toolkit for RTMP streams Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: dwmw2(a)infradead.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec: http://david.woodhou.se/rtmpdump.spec SRPM: http://david.woodhou.se/rtmpdump-2.2c-1.fc12.src.rpm Description: rtmpdump is a toolkit for RTMP streams. All forms of RTMP are supported, including rtmp://, rtmpt://, rtmpe://, rtmpte://, and rtmps://. Not suitable for Fedora because it was subject to a DMCA takedown request because it "can be used to download copyrighted works"... much like a web browser can: http://www.chillingeffects.org/anticircumvention/notice.cgi?NoticeID=25159 rpmlint whines about spelling errors on the names of the various rtmp-based protocols, but has no valid objections. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 3 months

1
8
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers April 2011