January 2012 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 1992] Review Request: winetricks - Package manager for Win32 DLLs and applications on POSIX

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992 --- Comment #19 from T.C. Hollingsworth <tc(a)tchol.org> 2012-01-19 10:43:28 CET --- (In reply to comment #18) > > (In reply to comment #16) > > > Having a graphical prompt asking for the root password is a security hole? > > pkexec requests the currently running user's password (like sudo), and will > > fail if the logged in user doesn't have authorization for the requested task > > via PolicyKit. > No, it will require the root password, and only this password, unless a > specific PolicyKit conf. file is written to change this behaviour (according to > « man pkexec »). That might be PolicyKit upstream's default, but in Fedora it always asks for the current user's password. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1992] Review Request: winetricks - Package manager for Win32 DLLs and applications on POSIX

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992 --- Comment #18 from Mohamed El Morabity <pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com> 2012-01-19 10:28:39 CET --- > (In reply to comment #16) > > Having a graphical prompt asking for the root password is a security hole? > pkexec requests the currently running user's password (like sudo), and will > fail if the logged in user doesn't have authorization for the requested task > via PolicyKit. No, it will require the root password, and only this password, unless a specific PolicyKit conf. file is written to change this behaviour (according to « man pkexec »). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1992] Review Request: winetricks - Package manager for Win32 DLLs and applications on POSIX

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992 --- Comment #17 from T.C. Hollingsworth <tc(a)tchol.org> 2012-01-19 10:23:05 CET --- (In reply to comment #15) > Maybe one last reason: if gksudo or kdesudo is not present, winetricks will use > sudo. Fedora doesn't provide gksudo, neither kdesudo. If winetricks is launched > through the menu and need to mount an ISO image, the sudo prompt will be > obviously invisible to the user and then discarded... How will you manage it > then? On Ubuntu, gksudo and kdesudo are just symlinks to gksu and kdesu, upstream tools that work with both su and sudo. I'll file a bug upstream to get them to use those instead for better cross-distro compatibility. > Since sudo/gksudo/kdesudo in winetricks is only called with /bin/mount to mount > ISO files, maybe we could avoid to ask any root permission try to mount ISO > images without requiring root rights (using fuse for example, with fuseiso). That's an even better solution which also should be suggested upstream. (In reply to comment #16) > Having a graphical prompt asking for the root password is a security hole? pkexec requests the currently running user's password (like sudo), and will fail if the logged in user doesn't have authorization for the requested task via PolicyKit. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1992] Review Request: winetricks - Package manager for Win32 DLLs and applications on POSIX

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992 --- Comment #16 from Mohamed El Morabity <pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com> 2012-01-19 10:03:55 CET --- (In reply to comment #14) > That checkbox must be checked for the user to be able to gain root access via > PolicyKit too. (To do otherwise would be a massive security hole. Anybody > could get root easily!) Having a graphical prompt asking for the root password is a security hole? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1992] Review Request: winetricks - Package manager for Win32 DLLs and applications on POSIX

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992 --- Comment #15 from Mohamed El Morabity <pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com> 2012-01-19 09:58:49 CET --- (In reply to comment #14) > That checkbox just adds users to the "wheel" group. Both sudo and PolicyKit are > configured in modern Fedora to grant root access to users in that group. I > don't see any reason to prefer one over the other. Maybe one last reason: if gksudo or kdesudo is not present, winetricks will use sudo. Fedora doesn't provide gksudo, neither kdesudo. If winetricks is launched through the menu and need to mount an ISO image, the sudo prompt will be obviously invisible to the user and then discarded... How will you manage it then? Since sudo/gksudo/kdesudo in winetricks is only called with /bin/mount to mount ISO files, maybe we could avoid to ask any root permission try to mount ISO images without requiring root rights (using fuse for example, with fuseiso). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1992] Review Request: winetricks - Package manager for Win32 DLLs and applications on POSIX

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992 --- Comment #14 from T.C. Hollingsworth <tc(a)tchol.org> 2012-01-19 04:08:29 CET --- (In reply to comment #13) > > Since Fedora 15 anyone marked as an > > administrator has sudo access from the command line. > If I remember well, it's not enabled by default (a checkbox in the Anaconda > post-installation wizard must be enabled). That checkbox must be checked for the user to be able to gain root access via PolicyKit too. (To do otherwise would be a massive security hole. Anybody could get root easily!) That checkbox just adds users to the "wheel" group. Both sudo and PolicyKit are configured in modern Fedora to grant root access to users in that group. I don't see any reason to prefer one over the other. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1992] Review Request: winetricks - Package manager for Win32 DLLs and applications on POSIX

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992 --- Comment #13 from Mohamed El Morabity <pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com> 2012-01-19 00:10:42 CET --- > Are you taking over the review request from T.C. then? No, I just wanted to bring a different view on the package. It's still T.C.'s review, and I'm not a sponsor here ^^. > Do you mean a graphical sudo here? Not exactly, since pkexec doesn't rely on sudo, put on PolicyKit. As called in winetricks, sudo seems to be used in a Ubuntu-centric context (that is to say as a root substitute, whatever the command called with it). With PolicyKit, we don't need anymore sudo to be configured. > Since Fedora 15 anyone marked as an > administrator has sudo access from the command line. If I remember well, it's not enabled by default (a checkbox in the Anaconda post-installation wizard must be enabled). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

13 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

Fedora 15 system OpenAFS upgrade problem

by Dan Scott

Hi, I have a Fedora 15 system with OpenAFS 1.6.0 installed. When I 'yum update', I get the following error: Error: Package: kmod-openafs-2.6.41.9-1.fc15.x86_64-1.6.1-0.pre1.fc15.3.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free-updates) Requires: openafs-kmod-common >= 1.6.1 Installed: openafs-client-1.6.0-1.fc15.x86_64 (@rpmfusion-free-updates) openafs-kmod-common = 1.6.0 Available: openafs-client-1.6.0-0.pre4.fc15.x86_64 (rpmfusion-free) openafs-kmod-common = 1.6.0 You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodiges Is this a problem with my system, or the packages? Can someone help me fix it? Thanks, Dan Scott

13 years, 1 month

3
4
0 / 0

RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2012-01-18

by rpmfusion-pkgs-report＠rpmfusion.org

============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/16: 1 mame-0.144u6-1.fc16 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/15: 1 mame-0.144u6-1.fc15 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: 1 mame-0.144u6-1.fc17 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/16: mame-0.144u6-1.fc16 ------------------- * Mon Jan 16 2012 Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.144u6-1 - Updated to 0.144u6 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) testing/15: mame-0.144u6-1.fc15 ------------------- * Mon Jan 16 2012 Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.144u6-1 - Updated to 0.144u6 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) development: mame-0.144u6-1.fc17 ------------------- * Mon Jan 16 2012 Julian Sikorski <belegdol(a)fedoraproject.org> - 0.144u6-1 - Updated to 0.144u6

13 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2012-01-18

by rpmfusion-pkgs-report＠rpmfusion.org

============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 16: 1 openafs-1.6.1-0.pre1.1.fc16 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 15: 1 openafs-1.6.1-0.pre1.1.fc15 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: 1 openafs-1.6.1-0.pre1.1.fc17 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 16: openafs-1.6.1-0.pre1.1.fc16 --------------------------- * Mon Jan 16 2012 Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com> 0:1.6.1-0.pre1.1 - Log an error if we couldn't load the kernel module (RF BZ #2006) - Fix setserverprefs for vlservers (http://gerrit.openafs.org/5465) - Fix xstat_cm_test (http://gerrit.openafs.org/5237) ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 15: openafs-1.6.1-0.pre1.1.fc15 --------------------------- * Mon Jan 16 2012 Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com> 0:1.6.1-0.pre1.1 - Log an error if we couldn't load the kernel module (RF BZ #2006) - Fix setserverprefs for vlservers (http://gerrit.openafs.org/5465) - Fix xstat_cm_test (http://gerrit.openafs.org/5237) * Fri Jan 06 2012 Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com> 0:1.6.1-0.pre1 - Update to OpenAFS 1.6.1 pre-release 1 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) development: openafs-1.6.1-0.pre1.1.fc17 --------------------------- * Mon Jan 16 2012 Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com> 0:1.6.1-0.pre1.1 - Log an error if we couldn't load the kernel module (RF BZ #2006) - Fix setserverprefs for vlservers (http://gerrit.openafs.org/5465) - Fix xstat_cm_test (http://gerrit.openafs.org/5237) * Fri Jan 06 2012 Ken Dreyer <ktdreyer(a)ktdreyer.com> 0:1.6.1-0.pre1 - Update to OpenAFS 1.6.1 pre-release 1

13 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers January 2012