January 2012 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 2140] New: bombono-dvd - DVD authoring program with nice and clean GUI

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2140 Bug #: 2140 Summary: bombono-dvd - DVD authoring program with nice and clean GUI Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leamas.alec(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Bombono DVD is an easy to use program for making DVD-Video. The main features are an excellent MPEG viewer with time line, a real WYSIWYG menu editor with live thumbnails and monitor, and comfortable Drag-N-Drop support. Authoring to folder, making an ISO-image or burning directly to DVD as well as re-authoring by importing video from DVD discs is also supported. Why not Fedora: package linked to ffmpeg libs. rpmplint: 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This is my first RPMfusion package, I need a sponsor. I have tried to do my homework by checking the review guidelines, see http://sourceforge.net/projects/bombono/files/tmp/review.txt/download. Besides other possible problems, here are issues on bundled libraries which need to be resolved in a review process. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
56
0 / 0

[Bug 2161] New: Review request: pcsxr - A plugin based PlayStation (PSX) emulator with high compatibility

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2161 Bug #: 2161 Summary: Review request: pcsxr - A plugin based PlayStation (PSX) emulator with high compatibility Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: alexjnewt(a)hotmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org PCSX-Reloaded (A.K.A. PCSXR) is an advanced PlayStation (PSX) emulator, which uses a plugin architecture to provide full support for all components of the PSX. It has full emulation support for game pads, videos, sound, memory cards, and other important PSX components, and is able to play many games without problems. Why it's not in Fedora: Emulators of video game systems seem to have legal problems, thus this excluded from the fedora repos. Note that PCSX is in the wishlist, but PCSX is no longer being developed or mantained. PCSXR on the other hand is a continuation and further development of PCSX than is being actively developed. Also note this is an svn snapshot; there is an official release for 1.9.92 but it's relatively old and the svn is fairly stable with significant improvements. I am not a sponsored packager, so I also am looking for a sponsor for this and my other two packages: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2098 https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2101 SPEC URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/pcsxr.spec SOURCE RPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/pcsxr-1.9.92-1.20120128svn.fc16.src.rpm RPMLINT WARNINGS: >pcsxr.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/pcsxr-1.9.92/COPYING >pcsxr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/pcsxr/plugins >gxvideo/draw.c >... >pcsxr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/pcsxr/plugins >/gxvideo/fps.h >pcsxr-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/pcsxr/plugins >/dfxvideo/hq3x.h >2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 33 errors, 0 warnings. I plan to post a bug report upstream to fix this, until the errors are fixed upstream, I figured they can be ignored. >pcsxr.src: W: invalid-url Source0: pcsxr-73976.zip >1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. There is no direct download link, so this warning can be also ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

12 years, 11 months

1
38
0 / 0

[Bug 2104] New: Review request: TestU01 - Utilities for the statistical testing of uniform random number generators

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2104 Bug #: 2104 Summary: Review request: TestU01 - Utilities for the statistical testing of uniform random number generators Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: hladky.jiri(a)googlemail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org SPEC file: http://jhladky.fedorapeople.org/TestU01.spec SRPM: http://jhladky.fedorapeople.org/TestU01-1.2.3-1.fc16.src.rpm =============================Description===================================== TestU01 is a software library, implemented in the ANSI C language, and offering a collection of utilities for the empirical statistical testing of uniform random number generators. The library implements several types of random number generators in generic form, as well as many specific generators proposed in the literature or found in widely-used software. It provides general implementations of the classical statistical tests for random number generators, as well as several others proposed in the literature, and some original ones. These tests can be applied to the generators predefined in the library and to user-defined generators. Specific tests suites for either sequences of uniform random numbers in [0,1] or bit sequences are also available. Basic tools for plotting vectors of points produced by generators are provided as well. Additional software permits one to perform systematic studies of the interaction between a specific test and the structure of the point sets produced by a given family of random number generators. That is, for a given kind of test and a given class of random number generators, to determine how large should be the sample size of the test, as a function of the generator's period length, before the generator starts to fail the test systematically. =============================Description===================================== Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora ? =========================================================== Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted without a fee for private, research, academic, or other non-commercial purposes. Any use of this software by a commercial enterprise requires a written licence from the copyright owner. =========================================================== rpmlint output: TestU01.src: W: invalid-license Redistributable, with restrictions => I'm not sure what license I should use in this case. Full license text is available at http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~simardr/testu01/copyright.html Please advice. TestU01.i686: W: shared-lib-calls-exit => I have contacted developers to fix it in the next release This is my first RPM Fusion package. However, I'm a Fedora sponsored packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

12 years, 11 months

1
26
0 / 0

[Bug 2101] New: Review request: vbam - Gameboy Advance Emulator combining features of all VBA forks

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2101 Bug #: 2101 Summary: Review request: vbam - Gameboy Advance Emulator combining features of all VBA forks Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: alexjnewt(a)hotmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org I'm already submitted this under a different package name but I changed the name to something more suitable, thus I closed the other request and opened this. VBA-M is a fork from the now inactive VisualBoy Advance project, with goals to improve the compatibility and features of the emulator with: Improved Save Handling, Improved Archive Support, Improved Input Capabilities, New built-in Pixel Filters, KEGA Fusion Filter Plugin Support, Blargg's GB_APU, UPS Patch support, and JoyBus support. Why it's not in Fedora: Emulators of video game systems seem to have legal problems, which is not a new story for such applications, thus this excluded from the fedora repos. This package is already posted in the Wishlist by the way (under VisualBoyAdvance Merge (VBA-M)), and is licensed as FOSS (GPL2). This is my second RPM Fusion package, the first of which has yet to be accepted https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2098). As well, I would assume I would want a sponsor for this. I left a bunch of comments in the SPEC file for easer review. Note that this is a pre-release, no stable versions exist, though this release is very stable (RC quality). Also note that there is a newer pre-lease than this (1.8.0.1042), I'm currently trying to figure out how to build it without errors (has a SVN Error stating it's not a working copy). SPEC URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/vbam.spec SOURCE RPM URL: (though f16, should be distribution agnostic) http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/vbam-1.8.0.1001-1.fc16.src.rpm RPMLINT WARNINGS: Gameboy is not in the dictionary, thus this error is expected: vbam.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Gameboy -> Game boy, Game-boy, Homeboy I'm pretty sure man pages are optional, and I don't think they exist for vba-m, so I ignored these: vbam.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gvbam vbam.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary vbam I was unsure if I should add a patch for this or ignore it, it functions just fine with the error: vbam.x86_64: E: invalid-desktopfile /usr/share/applications/gvbam.desktop value "Application;Game;Emulator;GTK" for string list key "Categories" in group "Desktop Entry" does not have a semicolon (';') as trailing character the source rpm only gives the dictionary warning -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

12 years, 11 months

1
31
0 / 0

[Bug 2036] New: Review Request: chromaprint-tools - Chromaprint audio fingerprinting tools

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2036 Bug #: 2036 Summary: Review Request: chromaprint-tools - Chromaprint audio fingerprinting tools Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: ismael(a)olea.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://olea.org/tmp/chromaprint-tools-rpms/chromaprint-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://olea.org/tmp/chromaprint-tools-rpms/chromaprint-tools-0.5-2.fc15.s... Description: Chromaprint library is the core component of the AcoustID project. It's a client-side library that implements a custom algorithm for extracting fingerprints from raw audio sources. This is a set of Chromaprint tools related to acoustic fingerprinting, featuring fpcalc, an standalone AcoustID tool used by Picard. Why this package is not in Fedora: Because it links with ffmpeg This would be my first package here. I'm Fedora contributor: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/olea I'm proposing Chromaprint itself to Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755066 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

12 years, 11 months

1
31
0 / 0

smplayer new release

by Sérgio Basto

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2113 Sebastian Vahl is active ? or smplayer have co-maintainers? , bug report have one month Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B.

12 years, 11 months

3
4
0 / 0

F17 mass rebuild

by Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello

Fedora team is planning a F17 mass rebuild with the move to GCC 4.7.0. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-December/160723.html Today in RPM Fusion rawhide 'free' we have fc10: 4 fc11: 62 fc12: 19 fc13: 3 fc14: 23 fc15: 23 fc16: 236 fc17: 79 and in 'nonfree' fc10: 1 fc11: 34 fc12: 8 fc13: 7 fc14: 12 fc15: 36 fc16: 84 fc17: 23 Shouldn't RPM Fusion follow the mass rebuild? I ask because this ausil's message http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-January/160733.html Marcos

12 years, 12 months

5
7
0 / 0

What license tag should I use for TestU01 package?

by Jiri Hladky

Hello, I'm not sure what license tag I should for a license which restricts free usage for non-commercial usage only: *Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, are permitted without a fee for private, research, academic, or other non-commercial purposes. Any use of this software by a commercial enterprise requires a written licence from the copyright owner.* http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~simardr/testu01/copyright.html Currently I have used: *License: Custom (Non-Commercial Use Only)* Is this correct? Would be anybody interested in finishing review of the following BZ: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2104 Review has been already done by Jeremy Newton but he is no proven packager... Thanks Jirka

12 years, 12 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Bug 1615] openni-nite - OpenNI-based toolbox for hand movement tracking

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1615 Gianluca Sforna <giallu(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|3 |4 --- Comment #5 from Gianluca Sforna <giallu(a)gmail.com> 2012-02-01 00:28:05 CET --- So, package builds in mock correctly. I'd really prefer using full Source URLS so we can avoid the comment and the rpmlint warning. I checked and "spectool -g openni-nite.spec" works as expected with the following: Source0: http://www.openni.org/downloads/NITE-Bin-Linux64-v%{version}.tar.bz2 Source1: http://www.openni.org/downloads/NITE-Bin-Linux32-v%{version}.tar.bz2 Also, you can just use: URL: http://www.openni.org License is correct, however they are likely to add a proper license file in the future (see http://bit.ly/x2nyAO for details) so remember to double check it on updates. You can save another rpmlint warning by fixing the a tab/space issue at line 71 I think these are all minor points, so the package is APPROVED, but please apply those changes before importing it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1615] openni-nite - OpenNI-based toolbox for hand movement tracking

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1615 Gianluca Sforna <giallu(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Blocks| |3 AssignedTo|rpmfusion-package-review@rp |giallu(a)gmail.com |mfusion.org | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

12 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers January 2012