January 2012 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 2146] New: Review Request: multicat - Simple and efficient multicast and transport stream manipulation

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2146 Bug #: 2146 Summary: Review Request: multicat - Simple and efficient multicast and transport stream manipulation Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/vlc/multicat-2.0-1.fc16.src.rpm SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/vlc/multicat.spec Summary: Simple and efficient multicast and transport stream manipulation Depends on bitstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

9 years, 5 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 2081] New: wto - WebTv Orange standalone client

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2081 Bug #: 2081 Summary: wto - WebTv Orange standalone client Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: casper.le.fantom(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://fantom.fedorapeople.org/wto.spec SRPM URL: http://fantom.fedorapeople.org/wto-1.0.5-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: WTO (WebTvOrange) is a free software to watch Orange's WebTV channels without using a web browser. WTO is programmed in Python with the GTK+ library (for its GUI). Please note that this application is in no way related to Orange group. Hello, I'm submiting this new package. Have a nice day. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 2098] New: Review request: dolphin-emu - Gamecube / Wii / Triforce Emulator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2098 Bug #: 2098 Summary: Review request: dolphin-emu - Gamecube / Wii / Triforce Emulator Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: alexjnewt(a)hotmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Dolphin is a Gamecube, Wii and Triforce (the arcade machine based on the Gamecube) emulator which supports many extra features and abilities not present on the original consoles. Why it's not in Fedora: Emulators of video game systems seem to have legal problems, which is not a new story for such applications, thus this excluded from the fedora repos. I left a bunch of comments in the SPEC file for easer review. As well, no source code changes should be required between distribution versions (e.g. f15 and f16), thus the source rpm should be quite agnostic. Although, it does need to be build every major change in dependency versions (e.g. SDL 1.2.X to 1.3.X or glew 1.6.X to 1.7.X), which should only happen every distribution upgrade anyway. This package is already posted in the Wishlist by the way, and is licensed as FOSS (GPL2). This is my first RPM Fusion package and I would assume I would want a sponsor? Though I'm not sure what that is to be honest. SPEC URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/dolphin-emu.spec SOURCE RPM URL: (though f16, should be distribution agnostic) http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/dolphin-emu-3.0-1.fc16.src.rpm RPMLINT WARNINGS: Gamecube is not in the dictionary, hence this warning: dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Gamecube -> Game cube, Game-cube, Gamecock I'm pretty sure this is required, hence why I left it in: dolphin-emu.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/dolphin-emu/user/GameConfig/WBEEJV.ini I don't believe a manpage is required or even existent. Should I convert the readme file to a manpage? dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dolphin-emu I'm unfamiliar with this error and rpmlint -I file-not-in-%lang provides no explanation. Dolphin seems to run fine, but any help/feedback would be great. dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/ar/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/el/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/he/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/hu/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/ko/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/nb/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/sr/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 3 months

1
78
0 / 0

[Bug 2112] New: Review request: SMESH - OpenCascade based MESH framework

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2112 Bug #: 2112 Summary: Review request: SMESH - OpenCascade based MESH framework Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: hobbes1069(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 SPEC: SRPM: A complete OpenCascade based MESH framework. This package can not be included in Fedora because it links with the non-free package OCE. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint *.rpm smesh.src: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exception smesh.src: W: invalid-url Source0: smesh-5.1.2.2-svn54.tar.gz smesh.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exception smesh.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/smesh-5.1.2.2/LICENCE.lgpl.txt smesh-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exception smesh-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exception smesh-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation smesh-doc.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exception 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings. All warnings are rpmlint being pedantic and I have reported the wrong FSF address error upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 7 months

1
24
0 / 0

[Bug 2017] New: Review request: gnome-shell-extension-weather - An extension for displaying weather notifications in GNOME Shell

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 Bug #: 2017 Summary: Review request: gnome-shell-extension-weather - An extension for displaying weather notifications in GNOME Shell Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: hal8600(a)hotmail.it CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/39458594/Fedora%20packages/gnome-shell-extension-... SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/39458594/Fedora%20packages/gnome-shell-extension-... Description: gnome-shell-extension-weather is a simple extension for displaying weather notifications in GNOME Shell. Currently, the weather report including forecast for today and tomorrow is fetched from Yahoo! Weather. This package is not eligible to be included in Fedora due to the terms of use of Yahoo! Weather, on which this extension relies to retrieve information about the weather (see http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2011-May/001633.html ). Output of "rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-weather.spec": 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Output of "rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-weather-0-0.1.git4cdda9a.fc16.src.rpm": 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Output of "rpmlint nuova/gnome-shell-extension-weather-0-0.1.git4cdda9a.fc16.noarch.rpm": gnome-shell-extension-weather.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary weather-extension-configurator 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I've ignored this warning because the binary actually has not a manual page. This is my first RPMFusion package. ***I am seeking for a sponsor.*** Please consider that this package has already been positively reviewed (although "unofficially") on the Fedora Bugzilla (from which it has been rejected because of the above-mentioned legal reasons): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751537 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 7 months

3
63
0 / 0

[Bug 2133] New: Review Request: libspotify - Official Spotify API

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2133 Bug #: 2133 Summary: Review Request: libspotify - Official Spotify API Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jdieter(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/libspotify.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/libspotify-10.1.16-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: libspotify is the official Spotify API. Applications can use this API to play music using a user's Spotify account, provided that the user has a Spotify Premium Account. Why not in Fedora: libspotify is available under a proprietary license for non-commercial use only -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 9 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 2126] New: Review Request: libva-vdpau-driver - HW video decode support for VDPAU platforms

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2126 Bug #: 2126 Summary: Review Request: libva-vdpau-driver - HW video decode support for VDPAU platforms Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/libva-vdpau-driver.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/libva-vdpau-driver-0.7.3-2.fc16.sr... Description: HW video decode support for VDPAU platforms This package should be acceptable for Fedora "code wise", even some opensource backend implementation "exists" (not tested yet). But the review can fail or take time. This is the alternate review to replace vdpau-video-freeworld. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771254 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 9 months

1
11
0 / 0

RHEL6 mplayer, vlc and codecs for Totem

by Colin Simpson

Hi I have been using rpmfusion for Fedora for ages and I have recently introduced it here for RHEL6. However one thing it seems to lack are any multimedia tools. For me these would include mplayer, VLC and the codecs Totem looks for when asked to play non-built in file types. Any plans to build these for RHEL6? Thanks Colin This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the original recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error, and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender and delete the original.

10 years, 11 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Bug 2127] New: Review Request: libdvbcsa - DVB Common Scrambling Algorithm with encryption and decryption capabilities

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2127 Bug #: 2127 Summary: Review Request: libdvbcsa - DVB Common Scrambling Algorithm with encryption and decryption capabilities Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/libdvbcsa/libdvbcsa-1.1.0-1.fc16.s... SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/libdvbcsa/libdvbcsa.spec Summary: DVB Common Scrambling Algorithm with encryption and decryption capabilities This package is eligible for RPM Fusion free. The DVB scrambling algorithm requires a license to use. That been said, the specification is freely available, same as the implementation. No package requires this library at this time. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 12 months

1
5
0 / 0

Unmaintained packages list in RPM Fusion

by Nicolas Chauvet

Hi, Here is a list of packages that needs either a primary or co-maintainer: iscsitarget iscsitarget-kmod }- already orphaned but upstream active ndiswrapper ndiswrapper-kmod }- new primary maintainer omnibook omnibook-kmod}- last requester didn't make the update open-vm-tools open-vm-tools-kmod }- current maintainer busy xtables-addons xtables-addons-kmod }- new primary maintainer smpeg - new primary maintainer mplayer - comaintainer welcomed and needed. ffmpeg - comaintainer welcomed gstreamer-\* - comaintainer welcomed lame - update needed in rawhide If you want to volunteer for one of this package, you need to submit a valid bug report that contain a unified patch against the rawhide branch. If you want to volunteer for a package not on this list and have already suggested a patch to a bugreport assigned to the current maintainer. Please escalate this to me. BTW, I'm experimenting a tracker to solve issue that aren't solved in a timely manner. https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2152 Nicolas (kwizart)

10 years, 12 months

5
8
0 / 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers January 2012