February 2012 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 2054] New: Review request: OCE - OpenCASCADE Community Edition

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2054 Bug #: 2054 Summary: Review request: OCE - OpenCASCADE Community Edition Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: hobbes1069(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Created attachment 760 --> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=760 Rpmlint output of installed library. SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/OCE/OCE.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/OCE/OCE-0.7.0-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: OpenCASCADE Community Edition (OCE) is a suite for 3D surface and solid modeling, visualization, data exchange and rapid application development. It is an excellent platform for development of numerical simulation software including CAD/CAM/CAE, AEC and GIS, as well as PDM applications. rpmlint output from SRPM: $ rpmlint mockbuild/15/OCE/OCE-0.7.0-1.fc15.src.rpm OCE.src: W: invalid-license Open CASCADE Technology Public License OCE.src: W: invalid-url Source0: tpaviot-oce-OCE-0.7.0-0-ga384024.tar.gz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. rpmlint doesn't know about this specific license. The source URL is in the comments because it's a github release. This is not permitted in Fedora because the license is considered non-free[1] and if approved will need to go into the non-free repository. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/Open_CASCADE_Technology_Public_L... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 11 months

1
18
0 / 0

Moving xine-lib and dependent apps to RPM Fusion Free for F17?

by Kevin Kofler

Hi, the current xine-lib maintainer speaking. :-) The Xine project: http://www.xine-project.org/home has recently released a new major version, version 1.2.0. Unfortunately, among the list of changes: http://sourceforge.net/projects/xine/files/xine-lib/1.2.0/README.txt.asc/... there are these new "features": * Use libavutil-provided implementations for CRC, SHA1 and BASE64 algorithms, this makes use of libavutil even outside the FFmpeg decoding plugin, but avoid duplication of algorithms between different plugins. * Use av_mallocz() when xine_xmalloc_aligned() wouldn't be needed. * FFmpeg is now required as an external dependency; if you want to build xine-lib from source, please download a copy of FFmpeg from their SVN server. which basically mean that xine-lib now has a global, non-optional dependency on FFmpeg's libavutil library. So there are 4 possible ways forward: (a) Stick with 1.1.x forever. I don't think that's a good idea in the long run, upstream won't be providing security fixes for the old branch forever. (b) Package libavutil (and only libavutil) from FFmpeg in Fedora. (I don't think libavutil, as opposed to libavcodec, is actually patent-encumbered, though that'd also have to be checked.) The issue there is that FFmpeg upstream obviously doesn't support this. It would need some more black packaging magic of the kind already done in xine-lib, and more legal auditing. I don't think I want to investigate going down that road. (c) Bundle parts or all of libavutil with xine-lib. Yuck!!! (d) Move the whole thing (back) to RPM Fusion (where it originally was, before we started needing xine-lib for Amarok and Phonon, which both no longer use it). It would go to the Free section, of course. My proposal is to go with (d). The following packages currently depend on xine-lib: * gxine * (k9copy – already in RPM Fusion, not affected) * kaffeine (my package, the reason why I maintain xine-lib in the first place) * oxine * xine-plugin * xine-ui These packages would have to move to RPM Fusion along with xine-lib. In Kaffeine's case, upstream is switching from xine-lib to MPlayer in their git repository, so it will likely have to move to RPM Fusion sooner or later anyway. This means the affected packages are basically *xine*. So my plan is to retire (for my packages, resp. have the respective maintainer retire) the listed packages in Fedora for Fedora ≥ 17 and get (or have the respective maintainer get) them into RPM Fusion Free instead. (I'd take care of xine-lib and kaffeine myself, I hope the maintainers of the other packages will take care of them.) Comments? Objections? Kevin Kofler

11 years, 1 month

5
11
0 / 0

[Bug 2146] New: Review Request: multicat - Simple and efficient multicast and transport stream manipulation

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2146 Bug #: 2146 Summary: Review Request: multicat - Simple and efficient multicast and transport stream manipulation Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/vlc/multicat-2.0-1.fc16.src.rpm SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/vlc/multicat.spec Summary: Simple and efficient multicast and transport stream manipulation Depends on bitstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

11 years, 2 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 2081] New: wto - WebTv Orange standalone client

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2081 Bug #: 2081 Summary: wto - WebTv Orange standalone client Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: casper.le.fantom(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://fantom.fedorapeople.org/wto.spec SRPM URL: http://fantom.fedorapeople.org/wto-1.0.5-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: WTO (WebTvOrange) is a free software to watch Orange's WebTV channels without using a web browser. WTO is programmed in Python with the GTK+ library (for its GUI). Please note that this application is in no way related to Orange group. Hello, I'm submiting this new package. Have a nice day. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

11 years, 9 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 2098] New: Review request: dolphin-emu - Gamecube / Wii / Triforce Emulator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2098 Bug #: 2098 Summary: Review request: dolphin-emu - Gamecube / Wii / Triforce Emulator Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: alexjnewt(a)hotmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Dolphin is a Gamecube, Wii and Triforce (the arcade machine based on the Gamecube) emulator which supports many extra features and abilities not present on the original consoles. Why it's not in Fedora: Emulators of video game systems seem to have legal problems, which is not a new story for such applications, thus this excluded from the fedora repos. I left a bunch of comments in the SPEC file for easer review. As well, no source code changes should be required between distribution versions (e.g. f15 and f16), thus the source rpm should be quite agnostic. Although, it does need to be build every major change in dependency versions (e.g. SDL 1.2.X to 1.3.X or glew 1.6.X to 1.7.X), which should only happen every distribution upgrade anyway. This package is already posted in the Wishlist by the way, and is licensed as FOSS (GPL2). This is my first RPM Fusion package and I would assume I would want a sponsor? Though I'm not sure what that is to be honest. SPEC URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/dolphin-emu.spec SOURCE RPM URL: (though f16, should be distribution agnostic) http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/dolphin-emu-3.0-1.fc16.src.rpm RPMLINT WARNINGS: Gamecube is not in the dictionary, hence this warning: dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Gamecube -> Game cube, Game-cube, Gamecock I'm pretty sure this is required, hence why I left it in: dolphin-emu.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/dolphin-emu/user/GameConfig/WBEEJV.ini I don't believe a manpage is required or even existent. Should I convert the readme file to a manpage? dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dolphin-emu I'm unfamiliar with this error and rpmlint -I file-not-in-%lang provides no explanation. Dolphin seems to run fine, but any help/feedback would be great. dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/ar/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/el/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/he/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/hu/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/ko/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/nb/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/sr/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang /usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

12 years

1
78
0 / 0

[Bug 2112] New: Review request: SMESH - OpenCascade based MESH framework

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2112 Bug #: 2112 Summary: Review request: SMESH - OpenCascade based MESH framework Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: hobbes1069(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 SPEC: SRPM: A complete OpenCascade based MESH framework. This package can not be included in Fedora because it links with the non-free package OCE. rpmlint output: $ rpmlint *.rpm smesh.src: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exception smesh.src: W: invalid-url Source0: smesh-5.1.2.2-svn54.tar.gz smesh.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exception smesh.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/smesh-5.1.2.2/LICENCE.lgpl.txt smesh-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exception smesh-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exception smesh-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation smesh-doc.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exception 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings. All warnings are rpmlint being pedantic and I have reported the wrong FSF address error upstream. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

12 years, 3 months

1
24
0 / 0

[Bug 2017] New: Review request: gnome-shell-extension-weather - An extension for displaying weather notifications in GNOME Shell

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 Bug #: 2017 Summary: Review request: gnome-shell-extension-weather - An extension for displaying weather notifications in GNOME Shell Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: hal8600(a)hotmail.it CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/39458594/Fedora%20packages/gnome-shell-extension-... SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/39458594/Fedora%20packages/gnome-shell-extension-... Description: gnome-shell-extension-weather is a simple extension for displaying weather notifications in GNOME Shell. Currently, the weather report including forecast for today and tomorrow is fetched from Yahoo! Weather. This package is not eligible to be included in Fedora due to the terms of use of Yahoo! Weather, on which this extension relies to retrieve information about the weather (see http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2011-May/001633.html ). Output of "rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-weather.spec": 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Output of "rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-weather-0-0.1.git4cdda9a.fc16.src.rpm": 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Output of "rpmlint nuova/gnome-shell-extension-weather-0-0.1.git4cdda9a.fc16.noarch.rpm": gnome-shell-extension-weather.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary weather-extension-configurator 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I've ignored this warning because the binary actually has not a manual page. This is my first RPMFusion package. ***I am seeking for a sponsor.*** Please consider that this package has already been positively reviewed (although "unofficially") on the Fedora Bugzilla (from which it has been rejected because of the above-mentioned legal reasons): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751537 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

12 years, 4 months

3
63
0 / 0

[Bug 2133] New: Review Request: libspotify - Official Spotify API

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2133 Bug #: 2133 Summary: Review Request: libspotify - Official Spotify API Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jdieter(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/libspotify.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/libspotify-10.1.16-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: libspotify is the official Spotify API. Applications can use this API to play music using a user's Spotify account, provided that the user has a Spotify Premium Account. Why not in Fedora: libspotify is available under a proprietary license for non-commercial use only -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 2200] New: Review request: get-flash-videos - Download vflash videos from websites

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2200 Bug #: 2200 Summary: Review request: get-flash-videos - Download vflash videos from websites Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leamas.alec(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17870887/get-flash-videos-4/get-flash-videos.spec http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17870887/get-flash-videos-4/get-flash-videos-1.24... Download videos from various Flash-based video hosting sites, without having to use the Flash player. Handy for saving videos for watching offline, and means you don't have to keep upgrading Flash for sites that insist on a newer version of the player. It's similar to youtube-dl, but covers a larger set of websites, including some where I live :) It's on RPMFusion's wishlist. Why not fedora: It's been rejected because of the rtmpdump dependency (RHBZ 794990) Section: free rpmlint is quiet besides weird spelling-errors warnings (also on installed package) and a warning about a properly commented source URL. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3801176 (f17) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
17
0 / 0

[Bug 2126] New: Review Request: libva-vdpau-driver - HW video decode support for VDPAU platforms

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2126 Bug #: 2126 Summary: Review Request: libva-vdpau-driver - HW video decode support for VDPAU platforms Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/libva-vdpau-driver.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/libva-vdpau-driver-0.7.3-2.fc16.sr... Description: HW video decode support for VDPAU platforms This package should be acceptable for Fedora "code wise", even some opensource backend implementation "exists" (not tested yet). But the review can fail or take time. This is the alternate review to replace vdpau-video-freeworld. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771254 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

12 years, 6 months

1
11
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers February 2012