[Bug 2224] New: Review request: HeeksCNC - CAM add-on for HeeksCAD
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2224
Bug #: 2224
Summary: Review request: HeeksCNC - CAM add-on for HeeksCAD
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: SpikeFedora(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
Spec URL:
http://spike.fedorapeople.org/HeeksCNC/HeeksCNC.spec
SRPM URL:
http://spike.fedorapeople.org/HeeksCNC/HeeksCNC-0.18.0-0.1.20111215git272...
Description:
Written in C++, HeeksCNC is an add-on for HeeksCAD. The user can add machining
operations. These can then be output to NC code. The NC code is then shown as
red and green lines on the screen. The NC code is generated using Python
script, so it can be configured for different machines.
HeeksCNC uses OpenCAMLib for the "Zig Zag" operation HeeksCNC uses libarea for
the "Pocket" operation
Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora:
HeeksCNC depends on OCE (HeeksCNC->HeeksCAD-devel->OCE-devel), which is
considered non-free
[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Bad_Licenses
rpmlint output:
SPECS/HeeksCNC.spec:39: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/heekscnc/nc/iso_codes.py
SPECS/HeeksCNC.spec:48: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/heekscnc
SPECS/HeeksCNC.spec:49: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libheekscnc*
SPECS/HeeksCNC.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: HeeksCNC-svnHEAD.tar.bz2
HeeksCNC.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libarea -> lib area,
lib-area, millibar
HeeksCNC.src:39: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/heekscnc/nc/iso_codes.py
HeeksCNC.src:48: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/heekscnc
HeeksCNC.src:49: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libheekscnc*
HeeksCNC.src: W: invalid-url Source0: HeeksCNC-svnHEAD.tar.bz2
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 3 warnings.
The hardcoded-library-path error probably needs to be fixed. A friendly cmake
expert would be very much appreciated.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
11 years, 5 months
[Bug 2286] New: Review request: mari0 - A recreation of the original Super Mario Bros with a portal gun
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2286
Bug #: 2286
Summary: Review request: mari0 - A recreation of the original
Super Mario Bros with a portal gun
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: alexjnewt(a)hotmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
A complete from scratch recreation of the original Super Mario Bros.
game with a focus on perfectly imitating the feel the 1985 classic
gave us but with a portal gun and puzzle game mechanics from the
popular Value game, Portal. Mari0 also has a 4-player coop mode, with
everyone having their own Portal gun. This game is made with LOVE.
Why not in Fedora: The license is non-free cannot be included in Fedora
(CC-BY-NC-SA)
SPEC:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/mari0.spec
SPRM:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/mari0-1.6-1.fc16.src.rpm
RPMLint:
mari0.src: W: invalid-license CC-BY-NC-SA
mari0.noarch: W: invalid-license CC-BY-NC-SA
This can be ignored, as RPMLint doesn't recognize this specific License
mari0.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mari0
Not vital and can be fixed later.
mari0.src: W: invalid-url Source0: mari0-extra.tar.xz
Source0 is custom made: just a desktop file
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
11 years, 10 months
[Bug 2098] New: Review request: dolphin-emu - Gamecube / Wii / Triforce Emulator
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2098
Bug #: 2098
Summary: Review request: dolphin-emu - Gamecube / Wii /
Triforce Emulator
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: alexjnewt(a)hotmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Dolphin is a Gamecube, Wii and Triforce (the arcade machine based on the
Gamecube) emulator which supports many extra features and abilities not present
on the original consoles.
Why it's not in Fedora: Emulators of video game systems seem to have legal
problems, which is not a new story for such applications, thus this excluded
from the fedora repos.
I left a bunch of comments in the SPEC file for easer review. As well, no
source code changes should be required between distribution versions (e.g. f15
and f16), thus the source rpm should be quite agnostic. Although, it does need
to be build every major change in dependency versions (e.g. SDL 1.2.X to 1.3.X
or glew 1.6.X to 1.7.X), which should only happen every distribution upgrade
anyway.
This package is already posted in the Wishlist by the way, and is licensed as
FOSS (GPL2). This is my first RPM Fusion package and I would assume I would
want a sponsor? Though I'm not sure what that is to be honest.
SPEC URL:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/dolphin-emu.spec
SOURCE RPM URL: (though f16, should be distribution agnostic)
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/dolphin-emu-3.0-1.fc16.src.rpm
RPMLINT WARNINGS:
Gamecube is not in the dictionary, hence this warning:
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Gamecube -> Game cube,
Game-cube, Gamecock
I'm pretty sure this is required, hence why I left it in:
dolphin-emu.x86_64: E: zero-length
/usr/share/dolphin-emu/user/GameConfig/WBEEJV.ini
I don't believe a manpage is required or even existent. Should I convert the
readme file to a manpage?
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dolphin-emu
I'm unfamiliar with this error and rpmlint -I file-not-in-%lang provides no
explanation. Dolphin seems to run fine, but any help/feedback would be great.
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/ar/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/ca/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/el/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/es/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/he/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/hu/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/it/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/ja/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/ko/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/nb/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/nl/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/pl/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/pt_BR/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/ru/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/sr/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/tr/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/zh_CN/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
dolphin-emu.x86_64: W: file-not-in-%lang
/usr/share/locale/zh_TW/LC_MESSAGES/dolphin-emu.mo
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12 years
[Bug 2325] New: vdr-mp3 - Sound playback plugin for VDR
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2325
Bug #: 2325
Summary: vdr-mp3 - Sound playback plugin for VDR
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
The MP3 plugin adds audio playback capability to VDR.
SRPM URL:
https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-mp3/vdr-mp3-0.10.2-...
Spec URL:
https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-mp3/vdr-mp3.spec?a=...
rpmlint output:
rpmlint vdr-mp3-0.10.2-8.fc17.x86_64.rpm
vdr-mp3.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
vdr-mp3.x86_64: W: percent-in-%post
vdr-mp3.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%post mv
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
rpmlint vdr-mplayer-0.10.2-8.fc17.x86_64.rpm
vdr-mplayer.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
vdr-mplayer.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/vdr/DVD-VCD/DVD
vdr-mplayer.x86_64: E: zero-length /usr/share/vdr/DVD-VCD/VCD
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings.
rpmlint vdr-mp3-0.10.2-8.fc17.src.rpm
vdr-mp3.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12 years, 2 months
[Bug 2343] New: Review Request: 0ad-data - The Data Files for 0 AD
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2343
Bug #: 2343
Summary: Review Request: 0ad-data - The Data Files for 0 AD
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/0ad-data.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/0ad-data-r11863-1.fc18.src.rpm
Description:
0 A.D. (pronounced "zero ey-dee") is a free, open-source, cross-platform
real-time strategy (RTS) game of ancient warfare. In short, it is a
historically-based war/economy game that allows players to relive or rewrite
the history of Western civilizations, focusing on the years between 500 B.C.
and 500 A.D. The project is highly ambitious, involving state-of-the-art 3D
graphics, detailed artwork, sound, and a flexible and powerful custom-built
game engine.
The game has been in development by Wildfire Games (WFG), a group of volunteer,
hobbyist game developers, since 2001. The code and data are available under the
GPL license, and the art, sound and documentation are available under CC-BY-SA.
In short, we consider 0 A.D. an an educational celebration of game development
and ancient history.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12 years, 2 months
[Bug 2342] New: Review Request: 0ad - Cross-Platform RTS Game of Ancient Warfare
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2342
Bug #: 2342
Summary: Review Request: 0ad - Cross-Platform RTS Game of
Ancient Warfare
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/0ad.spec
SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/0ad-r11863-3.fc18.src.rpm
Description: 0 A.D. (pronounced "zero ey-dee") is a free, open-source,
cross-platform
real-time strategy (RTS) game of ancient warfare. In short, it is a
historically-based war/economy game that allows players to relive or rewrite
the history of Western civilizations, focusing on the years between 500 B.C.
and 500 A.D. The project is highly ambitious, involving state-of-the-art 3D
graphics, detailed artwork, sound, and a flexible and powerful custom-built
game engine.
The game has been in development by Wildfire Games (WFG), a group of volunteer,
hobbyist game developers, since 2001.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12 years, 2 months
libbluray/libaacs not functional?
by Julian Sikorski
Hi,
I have recently tried to use blu-ray functionality in vlc-2.0.
Unfortunately, it does not seem to be working:
libaacs/crypto.c:430: _aacs_verify: gcry_pk_verify failed. error was:
Invalid public key algorithm
libaacs/crypto.c:430: _aacs_verify: gcry_pk_verify failed. error was:
Invalid public key algorithm
libaacs/crypto.c:430: _aacs_verify: gcry_pk_verify failed. error was:
Invalid public key algorithm
libaacs/crypto.c:430: _aacs_verify: gcry_pk_verify failed. error was:
Invalid public key algorithm
I have followed the instructions linked to from mplayer homepage. Any
suggestions are welcome.
Regards,
Julian
12 years, 3 months
[Bug 2112] New: Review request: SMESH - OpenCascade based MESH framework
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2112
Bug #: 2112
Summary: Review request: SMESH - OpenCascade based MESH
framework
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: hobbes1069(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
SPEC:
SRPM:
A complete OpenCascade based MESH framework.
This package can not be included in Fedora because it links with the non-free
package OCE.
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint *.rpm
smesh.src: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exception
smesh.src: W: invalid-url Source0: smesh-5.1.2.2-svn54.tar.gz
smesh.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exception
smesh.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/doc/smesh-5.1.2.2/LICENCE.lgpl.txt
smesh-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exception
smesh-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exception
smesh-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
smesh-doc.noarch: W: invalid-license GPL+ with exception
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings.
All warnings are rpmlint being pedantic and I have reported the wrong FSF
address error upstream.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
12 years, 3 months
