May 2012 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 2017] New: Review request: gnome-shell-extension-weather - An extension for displaying weather notifications in GNOME Shell

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2017 Bug #: 2017 Summary: Review request: gnome-shell-extension-weather - An extension for displaying weather notifications in GNOME Shell Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: hal8600(a)hotmail.it CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Spec URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/39458594/Fedora%20packages/gnome-shell-extension-... SRPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/39458594/Fedora%20packages/gnome-shell-extension-... Description: gnome-shell-extension-weather is a simple extension for displaying weather notifications in GNOME Shell. Currently, the weather report including forecast for today and tomorrow is fetched from Yahoo! Weather. This package is not eligible to be included in Fedora due to the terms of use of Yahoo! Weather, on which this extension relies to retrieve information about the weather (see http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/legal/2011-May/001633.html ). Output of "rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-weather.spec": 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Output of "rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-weather-0-0.1.git4cdda9a.fc16.src.rpm": 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Output of "rpmlint nuova/gnome-shell-extension-weather-0-0.1.git4cdda9a.fc16.noarch.rpm": gnome-shell-extension-weather.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary weather-extension-configurator 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. I've ignored this warning because the binary actually has not a manual page. This is my first RPMFusion package. ***I am seeking for a sponsor.*** Please consider that this package has already been positively reviewed (although "unofficially") on the Fedora Bugzilla (from which it has been rejected because of the above-mentioned legal reasons): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751537 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

12 years, 4 months

3
63
0 / 0

[Bug 2300] New: Review request: freecad - A general purpose 3D CAD modeler

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2300 Bug #: 2300 Summary: Review request: freecad - A general purpose 3D CAD modeler Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: hobbes1069(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/freecad/freecad.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/freecad/freecad-0.12-2.fc16.src.rpm Description: FreeCAD is a general purpose Open Source 3D CAD/MCAD/CAx/CAE/PLM modeler, aimed directly at mechanical engineering and product design but also fits a wider range of uses in engineering, such as architecture or other engineering specialties. It is a feature-based parametric modeler with a modular software architecture which makes it easy to provide additional functionality without modifying the core system. This package can not be in Fedora because it links with OCE which is non-free. Consequently, this package, which approved, must also go into the non-free repository. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

2
45
0 / 0

[Bug 2347] New: Review request: nvidia-texture-tools - Collection of image processing and texture manipulation tools

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2347 Bug #: 2347 Summary: Review request: nvidia-texture-tools - Collection of image processing and texture manipulation tools Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andrade(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org The NVIDIA Texture Tools is a collection of image processing and texture manipulation tools, designed to be integrated in game tools and asset conditioning pipelines. The primary features of the library are mipmap and normal map generation, format conversion and DXT compression. DXT compression is based on Simon Brown's squish library. The library also contains an alternative GPU-accelerated compressor that uses CUDA and is one order of magnitude faster. Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/nvidia-texture-tools.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~pcpa/nvidia-texture-tools-2.0.8-2.fc18.src.rpm The package is blocked in FE-LEGAL due to possible patent infringement on s3tc, original fedora review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823096 This package should help in providing a higher quality 0ad package, that I also have as a review request, with positive comments, at: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2342 and its noarch datafiles: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2343 Note that I made a minor change in this review request, renaming the -tools subpackage to -progs, to have nvidia-texture-tools-progs instead of nvidia-texture-tools-tools with helper programs for texture manipulation (required for tasks like manipulating or creating new textures for game mods, custom maps, etc). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 2133] New: Review Request: libspotify - Official Spotify API

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2133 Bug #: 2133 Summary: Review Request: libspotify - Official Spotify API Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jdieter(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/libspotify.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/libspotify-10.1.16-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: libspotify is the official Spotify API. Applications can use this API to play music using a user's Spotify account, provided that the user has a Spotify Premium Account. Why not in Fedora: libspotify is available under a proprietary license for non-commercial use only -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 2200] New: Review request: get-flash-videos - Download vflash videos from websites

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2200 Bug #: 2200 Summary: Review request: get-flash-videos - Download vflash videos from websites Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leamas.alec(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17870887/get-flash-videos-4/get-flash-videos.spec http://dl.dropbox.com/u/17870887/get-flash-videos-4/get-flash-videos-1.24... Download videos from various Flash-based video hosting sites, without having to use the Flash player. Handy for saving videos for watching offline, and means you don't have to keep upgrading Flash for sites that insist on a newer version of the player. It's similar to youtube-dl, but covers a larger set of websites, including some where I live :) It's on RPMFusion's wishlist. Why not fedora: It's been rejected because of the rtmpdump dependency (RHBZ 794990) Section: free rpmlint is quiet besides weird spelling-errors warnings (also on installed package) and a warning about a properly commented source URL. koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3801176 (f17) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

12 years, 5 months

1
17
0 / 0

[Bug 2126] New: Review Request: libva-vdpau-driver - HW video decode support for VDPAU platforms

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2126 Bug #: 2126 Summary: Review Request: libva-vdpau-driver - HW video decode support for VDPAU platforms Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews Spec URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/libva-vdpau-driver.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.fedorapeople.org/review/libva-vdpau-driver-0.7.3-2.fc16.sr... Description: HW video decode support for VDPAU platforms This package should be acceptable for Fedora "code wise", even some opensource backend implementation "exists" (not tested yet). But the review can fail or take time. This is the alternate review to replace vdpau-video-freeworld. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771254 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

12 years, 6 months

1
11
0 / 0

ffmpeg-0.11

by Julian Sikorski

Dear RPM Fusion developers, ffmpeg-0.11 was released a few days ago. Do you think we should try to push it to Fedora 17? Regards, Julian

12 years, 6 months

8
33
0 / 0

Bundled libs (revisited)

by Alec Leamas

Hi all! I have found yet another bundled lib in my review request 2140 (bombono). The lib is Adobe Source Libraries (ASL), a large, general-purpose addon to STL and boost. The situation: - bombono includes some files from ASL, clearly a bundling situation. - ASL depends on boost 1.44, two versions behind current 1.46. - The nature of ASL (large, general-purpose) probably means that they will always lag boost by one or more versions. At least, this is what the release history shows. So, packaging ASL means dependencies on an outdated boost version. To be frank, I have no idea how to handle this. Any ideas, out there? --alec

12 years, 6 months

5
8
0 / 0

[Bug 2306] New: Rename VirtualBox-OSE to VirtualBox

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2306 Bug #: 2306 Summary: Rename VirtualBox-OSE to VirtualBox Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: sergio(a)serjux.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://www.serjux.com/virtualbox/VirtualBox.spec SRPM URL: http://www.serjux.com/virtualbox/VirtualBox-4.1.14-3.fc16.src.rpm As bug #1826 reports, VirtualBox-OSE has change name to VirtualBox. Changelog: - Rename to VirtualBox, rfbz #1826 - Review spec with fedora-review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

12 years, 6 months

1
20
0 / 0

unrar update

by Marcos Felipe Rasia de Mello

Can someone take a look? https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2338 I tested it in file-roller with: - single volume rar files - multi-volume rar files - password protected rar files If I didn't screw up, it's just a matter of complete the changelog info. The header bug is https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1988 Regards, Marcos

12 years, 6 months

3
3
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers May 2012