July 2012 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 718] New: Review Request: gns3 - Graphical network simulator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=718 Summary: Review Request: gns3 - Graphical network simulator Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: andrew(a)topdog.za.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/gns3/gns3.spec SRPM URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/gns3/gns3-0.6.1-1.fc11.sr... Description: Graphical network simulator that allows you to design complex network topologies. You may run simulations or configure devices ranging from simple workstations to powerful Cisco routers. It uses Dynamips, an IOS emulator and PEMU, a PIX emulator which allow users to run IOS and PIX binary images from Cisco Systems. * rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gns3-0.6.1-1.fc11.i586.rpm gns3.i586: E: no-binary 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. - ignoring the error because this is written in python so does not contain any binary. * rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/gns3-0.6.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/gns3.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This is my first rpmfusion package but i am a fedora package maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 2 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 2433] New: Review request: qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld - A set of extra plugins for Qmmp

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2433 Bug #: 2433 Summary: Review request: qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld - A set of extra plugins for Qmmp Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kvolny(a)redhat.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld.spec SRPM URL: http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.sr... Description: Plugins for Qmmp from Qmmp Plugin Pack that cannot be included in Fedora. * MPG123 - MPEG v1/2 layer1/2/3 decoder using of libmpg123 library I guess the reason why not in Fedora is obvious after reading the Description ... mp3 stuff. The rest of the plugins was submitted into Fedora here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844740 rpmlint output: [kvolny@kvolny SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [kvolny@kvolny x86_64]$ rpmlint -i qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-debuginfo-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1/COPYING The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. - I've asked Ilja via email to resolve the license issue upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 10 months

2
26
0 / 0

[Bug 2429] New: Review request: gens-gs - Sega Genesis, Sega CD, and Sega 32X emulator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2429 Bug #: 2429 Summary: Review request: gens-gs - Sega Genesis, Sega CD, and Sega 32X emulator Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: alexjnewt(a)hotmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Gens/GS is a Sega Mega Drive emulator derived from Gens and maintained by GerbilSoft. Project goals include clean source code, combined features from various developments of Gens, and improved platform portability. Why it's not in Fedora: Emulators of video game systems seem to have legal problems. This should be eligible for free, rather than non-free. I don't quite understand why gens is in non-free, but gens-gs is GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+, requiring nothing that is non-free, or at least to my knowledge. SPEC URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/gens-gs.spec SOURCE RPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/gens-gs-2.16.7-1.fc17.src.rpm RPMLINT OUTPUT (all seem negligible): gens-gs.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/gens-gs-2.16.7/COPYING.txt gens-gs.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mdp_test gens-gs.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gens gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale2x/scale2x.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale4x/scalebit_4x.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale2x/scalebit_2x.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale2x/scalebit_2x.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale4x/scalebit_4x_mmx.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale4x/scalebit_4x_mmx.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale2x/scale2x.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale3x/scale3x.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale3x/scalebit_3x.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale3x/scale3x.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale2x/scalebit_2x_mmx.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale2x/scalebit_2x_mmx.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale3x/scalebit_3x.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale4x/scalebit_4x.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale4x/scale2x.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale4x/scale2x.c 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 17 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years

1
18
0 / 0

[Bug 2125] New: Review Request: libva-intel-driver - HW video decode support for Intel integrated graphics

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2125 Bug #: 2125 Summary: Review Request: libva-intel-driver - HW video decode support for Intel integrated graphics Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/libva-intel-driver/libva-intel-dri... SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/libva-intel-driver/libva-intel-dri... Summary: HW video decode support for Intel integrated graphics This is the replacement for libva-freeword with the new vaapi repository name for backend. I have resubmitted a review within fedora in the case this update pass: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770371 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 2319] New: vdr-markad - Advanced commercial detection for VDR

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2319 Bug #: 2319 Summary: vdr-markad - Advanced commercial detection for VDR Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org MarkAd marks advertisements in VDR recordings. Spec URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-markad/vdr-markad.s... SRPM URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-markad/vdr-markad-0... rpmlint output: rpmlint vdr-markad-0.1.3-1.20120310git.fc17.x86_64.rpm vdr-markad.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US vdr-markad.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/vdr/libvdr-markad.so.1.7.27 vdr-markad.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/markad vdr-markad.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /etc/vdr/plugins/markad vdr vdr-markad.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/sk_SK/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-markad.mo vdr vdr-markad.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/it_IT/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-markad.mo vdr vdr-markad.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/de_DE/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-markad.mo vdr vdr-markad.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/es_ES/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-markad.mo vdr vdr-markad.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/fi_FI/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-markad.mo vdr vdr-markad.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary markad 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 6 months

1
24
0 / 0

[Bug 2054] New: Review request: OCE - OpenCASCADE Community Edition

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2054 Bug #: 2054 Summary: Review request: OCE - OpenCASCADE Community Edition Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: hobbes1069(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Created attachment 760 --> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=760 Rpmlint output of installed library. SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/OCE/OCE.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/OCE/OCE-0.7.0-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: OpenCASCADE Community Edition (OCE) is a suite for 3D surface and solid modeling, visualization, data exchange and rapid application development. It is an excellent platform for development of numerical simulation software including CAD/CAM/CAE, AEC and GIS, as well as PDM applications. rpmlint output from SRPM: $ rpmlint mockbuild/15/OCE/OCE-0.7.0-1.fc15.src.rpm OCE.src: W: invalid-license Open CASCADE Technology Public License OCE.src: W: invalid-url Source0: tpaviot-oce-OCE-0.7.0-0-ga384024.tar.gz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. rpmlint doesn't know about this specific license. The source URL is in the comments because it's a github release. This is not permitted in Fedora because the license is considered non-free[1] and if approved will need to go into the non-free repository. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/Open_CASCADE_Technology_Public_L... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 10 months

1
18
0 / 0

Moving xine-lib and dependent apps to RPM Fusion Free for F17?

by Kevin Kofler

Hi, the current xine-lib maintainer speaking. :-) The Xine project: http://www.xine-project.org/home has recently released a new major version, version 1.2.0. Unfortunately, among the list of changes: http://sourceforge.net/projects/xine/files/xine-lib/1.2.0/README.txt.asc/... there are these new "features": * Use libavutil-provided implementations for CRC, SHA1 and BASE64 algorithms, this makes use of libavutil even outside the FFmpeg decoding plugin, but avoid duplication of algorithms between different plugins. * Use av_mallocz() when xine_xmalloc_aligned() wouldn't be needed. * FFmpeg is now required as an external dependency; if you want to build xine-lib from source, please download a copy of FFmpeg from their SVN server. which basically mean that xine-lib now has a global, non-optional dependency on FFmpeg's libavutil library. So there are 4 possible ways forward: (a) Stick with 1.1.x forever. I don't think that's a good idea in the long run, upstream won't be providing security fixes for the old branch forever. (b) Package libavutil (and only libavutil) from FFmpeg in Fedora. (I don't think libavutil, as opposed to libavcodec, is actually patent-encumbered, though that'd also have to be checked.) The issue there is that FFmpeg upstream obviously doesn't support this. It would need some more black packaging magic of the kind already done in xine-lib, and more legal auditing. I don't think I want to investigate going down that road. (c) Bundle parts or all of libavutil with xine-lib. Yuck!!! (d) Move the whole thing (back) to RPM Fusion (where it originally was, before we started needing xine-lib for Amarok and Phonon, which both no longer use it). It would go to the Free section, of course. My proposal is to go with (d). The following packages currently depend on xine-lib: * gxine * (k9copy – already in RPM Fusion, not affected) * kaffeine (my package, the reason why I maintain xine-lib in the first place) * oxine * xine-plugin * xine-ui These packages would have to move to RPM Fusion along with xine-lib. In Kaffeine's case, upstream is switching from xine-lib to MPlayer in their git repository, so it will likely have to move to RPM Fusion sooner or later anyway. This means the affected packages are basically *xine*. So my plan is to retire (for my packages, resp. have the respective maintainer retire) the listed packages in Fedora for Fedora ≥ 17 and get (or have the respective maintainer get) them into RPM Fusion Free instead. (I'd take care of xine-lib and kaffeine myself, I hope the maintainers of the other packages will take care of them.) Comments? Objections? Kevin Kofler

11 years, 1 month

5
11
0 / 0

[RPM Fusion] Issue with fedora's openssl package for libbluray/libaacs

by Nicolas Chauvet

Hi, As you may know, the libaacs package from RPM Fusion rely on openssl functions that have been disabled in the fedora package for some reason. This lead the libaacs package to be partially unuseable for it's target usage. I would like to list what would be possible workarounds for this issue. We likely need to build a openssl-freeworld package: - Build a similar package and drop a file in ld.conf.d to make it system wide ? (the freetype-freeworld way) This seems unpractical as we may produce unknown behavior and un-certified code path with others applications. - Build a shared object with another SONAME so packages liked with the freeworld version will not conflict with package linked with the fedora version. (It will eventually be possible to relink the so to the the fedora SONAME manually in a second step). - Build the freeworld version statically. The question to sync the patch between fedora and RPM Fusion VCS is a big question until we move to git, so I hope that progress will be made in this area soon. If not we may experiment an openssl-freeworld to be possibily behind the fedora version. Any thoughts on that ? Nicolas (kwizart).

11 years, 1 month

6
25
0 / 0

[Bug 2146] New: Review Request: multicat - Simple and efficient multicast and transport stream manipulation

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2146 Bug #: 2146 Summary: Review Request: multicat - Simple and efficient multicast and transport stream manipulation Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/vlc/multicat-2.0-1.fc16.src.rpm SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/vlc/multicat.spec Summary: Simple and efficient multicast and transport stream manipulation Depends on bitstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

11 years, 1 month

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 2401] New: catalyst-legacy-kmod

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2401 Bug #: 2401 Summary: catalyst-legacy-kmod Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leigh123linux(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org catalyst-legacy-kmod SPEC: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6907158/catalyst-legacy/catalyst-legacy-kmod.spec SRPM: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/6907158/catalyst-legacy/catalyst-legacy-kmod-12.... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

11 years, 4 months

1
11
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers July 2012