September 2012 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 472] New: Review request: dynamips - IOS Emulator/Hypervisor

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472 Summary: Review request: dynamips - IOS Emulator/Hypervisor Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: cooly(a)gnome.eu.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SRPM: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/dynamips-0.2.7-5.fc10.x86_64.rpm SPEC: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/dynamips.spec Description: Dynamips is an IOS emulator with hypervisor, allowing users to run several IOS images (in particular 3600 and 7200 series) as fully functional routers Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: This is an emulator and requires IOS images. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 2 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 718] New: Review Request: gns3 - Graphical network simulator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=718 Summary: Review Request: gns3 - Graphical network simulator Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: andrew(a)topdog.za.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/gns3/gns3.spec SRPM URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/gns3/gns3-0.6.1-1.fc11.sr... Description: Graphical network simulator that allows you to design complex network topologies. You may run simulations or configure devices ranging from simple workstations to powerful Cisco routers. It uses Dynamips, an IOS emulator and PEMU, a PIX emulator which allow users to run IOS and PIX binary images from Cisco Systems. * rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gns3-0.6.1-1.fc11.i586.rpm gns3.i586: E: no-binary 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. - ignoring the error because this is written in python so does not contain any binary. * rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/gns3-0.6.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/gns3.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This is my first rpmfusion package but i am a fedora package maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 2 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 2433] New: Review request: qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld - A set of extra plugins for Qmmp

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2433 Bug #: 2433 Summary: Review request: qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld - A set of extra plugins for Qmmp Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kvolny(a)redhat.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld.spec SRPM URL: http://kvolny.fedorapeople.org/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.sr... Description: Plugins for Qmmp from Qmmp Plugin Pack that cannot be included in Fedora. * MPG123 - MPEG v1/2 layer1/2/3 decoder using of libmpg123 library I guess the reason why not in Fedora is obvious after reading the Description ... mp3 stuff. The rest of the plugins was submitted into Fedora here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844740 rpmlint output: [kvolny@kvolny SRPMS]$ rpmlint -i qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [kvolny@kvolny x86_64]$ rpmlint -i qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-debuginfo-0.6.1-1.fc17.x86_64.rpm qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/qmmp-plugin-pack-freeworld-0.6.1/COPYING The Free Software Foundation address in this file seems to be outdated or misspelled. Ask upstream to update the address, or if this is a license file, possibly the entire file with a new copy available from the FSF. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. - I've asked Ilja via email to resolve the license issue upstream -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 10 months

2
26
0 / 0

[Bug 2444] New: Review request: mp3fs - A dynamic MP encoding fuse file-system

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2444 Bug #: 2444 Summary: Review request: mp3fs - A dynamic MP encoding fuse file-system Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: stuart(a)gathman.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 30 My first rpmfusion package submission (seeking a sponsor): SPEC: http://spidey2.bmsi.com/linux/fc16/mp3fs.spec SRPM: http://spidey2.bmsi.com/linux/fc16/mp3fs-0.32-1.fc16.src.rpm MP3FS is a read-only FUSE file-system which trans-codes audio formats (currently FLAC) to MP3 on the fly when opened and read. This was written to enable me to use my FLAC collection with software and/or hardware which only understands MP3. e.g. "GMediaServer" to a Netgear MP101 mp3 player. It is also a novel alternative to traditional mp3 encoder applications. Just use your favorite file browser to select the files you want encoded and copy them somewhere! This package cannot be part of Fedora because it uses MP3 encoding, which is encumbered. $ rpmlint ../RPMS/i686/mp3fs*0.32* ../SRPMS/*0.32* *spec mp3fs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/mp3fs-0.32/src/fuseops.c mp3fs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/mp3fs-0.32/src/transcode.h mp3fs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/mp3fs-0.32/src/mp3fs.c mp3fs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/mp3fs-0.32/src/transcode.c 3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 0 warnings. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700095 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

9 years, 10 months

1
14
0 / 0

[Bug 2429] New: Review request: gens-gs - Sega Genesis, Sega CD, and Sega 32X emulator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2429 Bug #: 2429 Summary: Review request: gens-gs - Sega Genesis, Sega CD, and Sega 32X emulator Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: alexjnewt(a)hotmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Gens/GS is a Sega Mega Drive emulator derived from Gens and maintained by GerbilSoft. Project goals include clean source code, combined features from various developments of Gens, and improved platform portability. Why it's not in Fedora: Emulators of video game systems seem to have legal problems. This should be eligible for free, rather than non-free. I don't quite understand why gens is in non-free, but gens-gs is GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+, requiring nothing that is non-free, or at least to my knowledge. SPEC URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/gens-gs.spec SOURCE RPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/gens-gs-2.16.7-1.fc17.src.rpm RPMLINT OUTPUT (all seem negligible): gens-gs.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/gens-gs-2.16.7/COPYING.txt gens-gs.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mdp_test gens-gs.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gens gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale2x/scale2x.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale4x/scalebit_4x.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale2x/scalebit_2x.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale2x/scalebit_2x.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale4x/scalebit_4x_mmx.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale4x/scalebit_4x_mmx.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale2x/scale2x.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale3x/scale3x.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale3x/scalebit_3x.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale3x/scale3x.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale2x/scalebit_2x_mmx.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale2x/scalebit_2x_mmx.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale3x/scalebit_3x.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale4x/scalebit_4x.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale4x/scale2x.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale4x/scale2x.c 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 17 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years

1
18
0 / 0

[Bug 2125] New: Review Request: libva-intel-driver - HW video decode support for Intel integrated graphics

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2125 Bug #: 2125 Summary: Review Request: libva-intel-driver - HW video decode support for Intel integrated graphics Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/libva-intel-driver/libva-intel-dri... SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/libva-intel-driver/libva-intel-dri... Summary: HW video decode support for Intel integrated graphics This is the replacement for libva-freeword with the new vaapi repository name for backend. I have resubmitted a review within fedora in the case this update pass: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770371 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 2319] New: vdr-markad - Advanced commercial detection for VDR

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2319 Bug #: 2319 Summary: vdr-markad - Advanced commercial detection for VDR Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org MarkAd marks advertisements in VDR recordings. Spec URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-markad/vdr-markad.s... SRPM URL: https://www.disk.dsl.o2online.de/FclyPlh/RPMS/VDR/vdr-markad/vdr-markad-0... rpmlint output: rpmlint vdr-markad-0.1.3-1.20120310git.fc17.x86_64.rpm vdr-markad.x86_64: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found en_US vdr-markad.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/vdr/libvdr-markad.so.1.7.27 vdr-markad.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/markad vdr-markad.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /etc/vdr/plugins/markad vdr vdr-markad.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/sk_SK/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-markad.mo vdr vdr-markad.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/it_IT/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-markad.mo vdr vdr-markad.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/de_DE/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-markad.mo vdr vdr-markad.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/es_ES/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-markad.mo vdr vdr-markad.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /usr/share/locale/fi_FI/LC_MESSAGES/vdr-markad.mo vdr vdr-markad.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary markad 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 7 months

1
24
0 / 0

[Bug 2054] New: Review request: OCE - OpenCASCADE Community Edition

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2054 Bug #: 2054 Summary: Review request: OCE - OpenCASCADE Community Edition Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: hobbes1069(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Created attachment 760 --> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=760 Rpmlint output of installed library. SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/OCE/OCE.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/OCE/OCE-0.7.0-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: OpenCASCADE Community Edition (OCE) is a suite for 3D surface and solid modeling, visualization, data exchange and rapid application development. It is an excellent platform for development of numerical simulation software including CAD/CAM/CAE, AEC and GIS, as well as PDM applications. rpmlint output from SRPM: $ rpmlint mockbuild/15/OCE/OCE-0.7.0-1.fc15.src.rpm OCE.src: W: invalid-license Open CASCADE Technology Public License OCE.src: W: invalid-url Source0: tpaviot-oce-OCE-0.7.0-0-ga384024.tar.gz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. rpmlint doesn't know about this specific license. The source URL is in the comments because it's a github release. This is not permitted in Fedora because the license is considered non-free[1] and if approved will need to go into the non-free repository. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/Open_CASCADE_Technology_Public_L... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 11 months

1
18
0 / 0

[Bug 2455] New: Review request: pcsx2 - A Sony Playstation2 emulator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2455 Bug #: 2455 Summary: Review request: pcsx2 - A Sony Playstation2 emulator Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: gbirchley(a)blueyonder.co.uk CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org The SPEC file and SRPM of this package are available at the following URLs (the files are compressed as tarballs to upload to forum)- SRPM: http://forums.pcsx2.net/attachment.php?aid=39887 SPEC - http://forums.pcsx2.net/attachment.php?aid=39888 Description: PCSX2 is an open source Playstation 2 emulator. It requires a dump of a real Playstation 2 BIOS, which is not included. Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: Fedora does not allow emulators The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages: $ rpmlint pcsx2-1.0-2.fc16.src.rpm pcsx2.src:23: E: buildarch-instead-of-exclusivearch-tag i686 [Comment: needs i686 packages to compile, will run in x86_64] pcsx2.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://pcsx2.googlecode.com/svn/branches/1.0/pcsx2-1.0.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found [Comment: Compiled from subversion - have included shell script to build a tarball as a source and instructions for in comments] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint pcsx2-1.0-2.fc16.i686.rpm pcsx2.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pcsx2_ZZCGReplayLoader [Comment:this is a debugging tool as pcsx2 is a WIP. Will help development to include this package, so users can follow debug insructions from developers but no man page available] pcsx2.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pcsx2_ZZReplayLoader [Comment:ditto above comment] pcsx2.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pcsx2_GSReplayLoader [Comment:ditto above comment] 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. This is my first RPM fusion package. It is built with the help of a packager on fedora forums - I am a packaging novice - and then maintained by me on the fedora forum for about a year] I am seeking a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 11 months

1
69
0 / 0

Moving xine-lib and dependent apps to RPM Fusion Free for F17?

by Kevin Kofler

Hi, the current xine-lib maintainer speaking. :-) The Xine project: http://www.xine-project.org/home has recently released a new major version, version 1.2.0. Unfortunately, among the list of changes: http://sourceforge.net/projects/xine/files/xine-lib/1.2.0/README.txt.asc/... there are these new "features": * Use libavutil-provided implementations for CRC, SHA1 and BASE64 algorithms, this makes use of libavutil even outside the FFmpeg decoding plugin, but avoid duplication of algorithms between different plugins. * Use av_mallocz() when xine_xmalloc_aligned() wouldn't be needed. * FFmpeg is now required as an external dependency; if you want to build xine-lib from source, please download a copy of FFmpeg from their SVN server. which basically mean that xine-lib now has a global, non-optional dependency on FFmpeg's libavutil library. So there are 4 possible ways forward: (a) Stick with 1.1.x forever. I don't think that's a good idea in the long run, upstream won't be providing security fixes for the old branch forever. (b) Package libavutil (and only libavutil) from FFmpeg in Fedora. (I don't think libavutil, as opposed to libavcodec, is actually patent-encumbered, though that'd also have to be checked.) The issue there is that FFmpeg upstream obviously doesn't support this. It would need some more black packaging magic of the kind already done in xine-lib, and more legal auditing. I don't think I want to investigate going down that road. (c) Bundle parts or all of libavutil with xine-lib. Yuck!!! (d) Move the whole thing (back) to RPM Fusion (where it originally was, before we started needing xine-lib for Amarok and Phonon, which both no longer use it). It would go to the Free section, of course. My proposal is to go with (d). The following packages currently depend on xine-lib: * gxine * (k9copy – already in RPM Fusion, not affected) * kaffeine (my package, the reason why I maintain xine-lib in the first place) * oxine * xine-plugin * xine-ui These packages would have to move to RPM Fusion along with xine-lib. In Kaffeine's case, upstream is switching from xine-lib to MPlayer in their git repository, so it will likely have to move to RPM Fusion sooner or later anyway. This means the affected packages are basically *xine*. So my plan is to retire (for my packages, resp. have the respective maintainer retire) the listed packages in Fedora for Fedora ≥ 17 and get (or have the respective maintainer get) them into RPM Fusion Free instead. (I'd take care of xine-lib and kaffeine myself, I hope the maintainers of the other packages will take care of them.) Comments? Objections? Kevin Kofler

11 years, 1 month

5
11
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers September 2012