[Bug 2455] New: Review request: pcsx2 - A Sony Playstation2 emulator
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2455
Bug #: 2455
Summary: Review request: pcsx2 - A Sony Playstation2 emulator
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: gbirchley(a)blueyonder.co.uk
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
The SPEC file and SRPM of this package are available at the following URLs (the
files are compressed as tarballs to upload to forum)-
SRPM: http://forums.pcsx2.net/attachment.php?aid=39887
SPEC - http://forums.pcsx2.net/attachment.php?aid=39888
Description: PCSX2 is an open source Playstation 2 emulator. It requires a dump
of a real Playstation 2 BIOS, which is not included.
Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: Fedora does not
allow emulators
The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages:
$ rpmlint pcsx2-1.0-2.fc16.src.rpm
pcsx2.src:23: E: buildarch-instead-of-exclusivearch-tag i686
[Comment: needs i686 packages to compile, will run in x86_64]
pcsx2.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://pcsx2.googlecode.com/svn/branches/1.0/pcsx2-1.0.tar.gz HTTP Error 404:
Not Found
[Comment: Compiled from subversion - have included shell script to build a
tarball as a source and instructions for in comments]
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint pcsx2-1.0-2.fc16.i686.rpm
pcsx2.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pcsx2_ZZCGReplayLoader
[Comment:this is a debugging tool as pcsx2 is a WIP. Will help development to
include this package, so users can follow debug insructions from developers but
no man page available]
pcsx2.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pcsx2_ZZReplayLoader
[Comment:ditto above comment]
pcsx2.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pcsx2_GSReplayLoader
[Comment:ditto above comment]
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
This is my first RPM fusion package. It is built with the help of a packager on
fedora forums - I am a packaging novice - and then maintained by me on the
fedora forum for about a year]
I am seeking a sponsor.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
10 years, 11 months
Non-redistributable packages: Skype, spotify, ...
by Alec Leamas
On the wishlist and/or dead reviews we have some re-distributable
packages such as skype, spotify and msttcore-fonts. After scratching my
head over these I've hacked some silly scripts , called them lpf (Local
package Factory) and made a package of it. It's on it's way into fedora,
currently in rawhide, f20 and f19 updates-testing.
Using this package it should be simpler to package a thing like spotify.
The downloader lpf-spotfy-client is also on it's way into fedora,
lpf-skype needs a review. The overall idea here is to have a common
framework for these packages simplifying for both users and packagers.
Since they by definition don't contain any upstream stuff they go into
fedora rather than rpmfusion, although they are on the rpmfusion wishlist.
I don't know if this is a good idea. Time will tell,
--alec
PS:
Blogpost:
http://leamasblog.wordpress.com/2013/10/30/getting-spotify-and-skype-into...
Upstream: https://github.com/leamas/lpf
11 years
i686 binary packages in the x86_64 repository
by Simone Caronni
Hello,
the Steam review has been taken, however the reviewer wonders if the
infrastructure can cope with i686 binary packages being pushed to the
x86_64 repository. I thought it was possible, but this is my first review
in RPMFusion so I don't know details of the infrastructure.
When installing in a x86_64 system, the package pulls in the correct 32 bit
dependencies. Currently I'm using Steam with 65 games on a 64 bit Fedora 19
host.
The same package is the currently suggested one [1] from Valve for running
Steam on both i386 and x86_64 hosts. The package was created by me and
adjusted based on feedback from the Steam community forum with users
providing additional information and testing pulling from my personal
repository page [2]. In fact, 99% of the users run a 64 bit distribution.
It would be a shame not to see this appear in RPMFusion just for a limit of
the infrastructure.
Can the i686 be pushed also to the x86_64 repository once reviewed?
Thanks & regards,
--Simone
[1] https://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Steam_under_Linux#Fedora
[2] http://negativo17.org/steam/
--
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of
the shore (R. W. Emerson).
http://xkcd.com/229/
http://negativo17.org/
11 years
wl-kmod for F-18
by Nicolas Viéville
Hello,
There seems that last F-18 build for wl-kmod stayed stuck in buildsys
and was not pushed in corresponding testing repository.
As I'm not the original submitter of the build job 18707 on buildsys,
plague refuse me to resubmit this job.
I wonder if it was possible to make something without submitting a new
build process (without bumping release number), probably in running the
script that pushes these packages once there are correctly built. I
would be very grateful if someone could point to me the correct command
to achieve this task if possible.
Cordially,
--
NVieville
11 years
[Bug 2979] New: Review request: steam - Installer for the Steam software distribution service
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2979
Bug #: 2979
Summary: Review request: steam - Installer for the Steam
software distribution service
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: negativo17(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
Installer for the Steam software distribution service.
Steam is a software distribution service with an online store, automated
installation, automatic updates, achievements, SteamCloud synchronized
savegame and screenshot functionality, and many social features.
Spec URL: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/steam.spec
SRPM URL: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/steam-1.0.0.42-1.fc19.src.rpm
This package cannot be in Fedora as it's not free and comes as a binary package
only. The package is i686 only but installs perfectly fine on an x86_64 system
just using yum. It's in the Fedora RPMFusion wishlist.
$ rpmlint steam.spec
steam.spec:31: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
steam.spec:32: W: macro-in-comment %{_isa}
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
These macro in comments are for the command line required for generating
dependencies on Steam downloaded binaries; it is nice to have them at hand to
check for new dependencies whenever a new Steam client is automatically
downloaded.
$ rpmlint steam-1.0.0.42-1.fc19.i686.rpm
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libICE(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libSM(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libX11(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXau(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXcomposite(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXcursor(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXdamage(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXdmcp(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXext(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXfixes(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXi(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXinerama(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXrandr(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXrender(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXtst(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libasyncns(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libattr(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libcap(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libcom_err(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libdrm(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libffi(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libgcc(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libgcrypt(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libgpg-error(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libgudev1(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libogg(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libpng12(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libselinux(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libsndfile(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libstdc++(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libusbx(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libuuid(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libvorbis(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libwayland-client(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libwayland-server(x86-32)
steam.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxcb(x86-32)
steam.i686: W: name-repeated-in-summary C steam
steam.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US savegame -> save game,
save-game, pregame
steam.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US screenshot -> screen shot,
screen-shot, screens hot
steam.i686: W: invalid-license Steam License Agreement
steam.i686: E: no-binary
steam.i686: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
steam.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/steam-1.0.0.42/steam_install_agreement.txt
steam.i686: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/steam.desktop
/usr/bin/steam
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 37 errors, 7 warnings.
Notes on rpmlint on the binary package: the explicit-lib-dependency can be
ignored; these are the dependencies used by the Steam client itself, and need
to be on the system BEFORE the actual Steam client is downloaded. The package
itself contains only a script; so the last errors are related to the fact that
the desktop files etc. point to a script and not a binary.
The package sets STEAM_RUNTIME=0 in /etc/profile.d/steam.*; so the download
client and the Steam client itself do NOT use Ubuntu libraries (the Steam
runtime) for running; but instead use the Fedora system provided ones.
For additional details on the setup please see here:
http://negativo17.org/steam/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
11 years
