November 2013 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 2577] New: Review request: pithos - A native Linux client for Pandora

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2577 Bug #: 2577 Summary: Review request: pithos - A native Linux client for Pandora Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: greg.hellings(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec file: http://dl.thehellings.com/pithos/pithos.spec SRPM file: http://dl.thehellings.com/pithos/pithos-20121123-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Pithos is a native Pandora Radio client for Linux. It's much more lightweight than the Pandora.com web client, and integrates with desktop features such as media keys, notifications, and the sound menu. Ineligible for Fedora: relies on gstreamer-plugins-bad for codecs which are no provided in gstreamer-plugins-bad-free $ rpmlint results_pithos/20121123/1.fc17/pithos-20121123-1.fc17.*rpm pithos.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pithos pithos.src: W: invalid-url Source0: pithos-20121123.tar.xz 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. no-manual-page-for-binary pithos --- Ignored because none is provided by upstream invalid-url Source0 --- Ignored because upstream does not make tarball releases This is my first RPM Fusion package. I am a Fedora packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 7 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 3043] New: Review request: lfp-flash-plugin - Adobe Flash Player package bootstrap

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3043 Bug #: 3043 Summary: Review request: lfp-flash-plugin - Adobe Flash Player package bootstrap Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: negativo17(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 spec: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/lpf-flash-plugin.spec srpm: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/lpf-flash-plugin-11.2.202.327-1.fc19.src... Bootstrap package allowing the lpf system to build the non-redistributable flash-plugin package. rpmlint: lpf-flash-plugin.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US redistributable -> redistribute, redistribution, attributable lpf-flash-plugin.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/lpf/packages/flash-plugin/state pkg-build lpf-flash-plugin.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/lpf/packages/flash-plugin/state pkg-build lpf-flash-plugin.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/lpf/packages/flash-plugin pkg-build lpf-flash-plugin.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/lpf/packages/flash-plugin pkg-build --> Package depends on lpf which creates this user and group lpf-flash-plugin.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/lpf/packages/flash-plugin 0775L --> Needed so that users can access files owned by lpf lpf-flash-plugin.noarch: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/lpf-flash-plugin.desktop setsid --> Command setsid is in the base system (util-linux) lpf-flash-plugin.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US redistributable -> redistribute, redistribution, attributable 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 8 months

1
28
0 / 0

[Bug 3034] New: Review Request: lpf-skype: Skype internet phone client package bootstrap

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3034 Bug #: 3034 Summary: Review Request: lpf-skype: Skype internet phone client package bootstrap Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: negativo17(a)gmail.com CC: leamas.alec(a)gmail.com, rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 spec: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/lpf-skype/4/lpf-skype.spec srpm: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/lpf-skype/4/lpf-skype-4.2.0.11-4.fc20.src.rpm Bootstrap package allowing the lpf system to build the non-redistributable skype package. This cannot go to fedora per fpc decision: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/362. The package has already been reviewed for fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023714 rpmlint: lpf-skype.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US redistributable -> redistribute, redistribution, attributable lpf-skype.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/lpf/packages/skype/state pkg-build lpf-skype.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/lpf/packages/skype/state pkg-build --> package depends on lpf which creates this user and group lpf-skype.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/lpf/packages/skype/SOURCES/skype-wrapper 0644L /bin/sh --> should not be executable lpf-skype.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/lpf/packages/skype pkg-build lpf-skype.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/lpf/packages/skype pkg-build lpf-skype.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/lpf/packages/skype 0775L --> Needed so that users can access files owned by lpf -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 8 months

1
30
0 / 0

[Bug 2803] New: Review request: opencv - Collection of algorithms for computer vision

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2803 Bug #: 2803 Summary: Review request: opencv - Collection of algorithms for computer vision Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org SPEC/SRPM: http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/opencv-rpmfusion/opencv.spec http://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/opencv-rpmfusion/opencv-2.4.4-3.fc20.s... Description: OpenCV means Intel® Open Source Computer Vision Library. It is a collection of C functions and a few C++ classes that implement some popular Image Processing and Computer Vision algorithms. fas username: ankursinha (package maintainer) This package includes only the nonfree and gpu shared objects that aren't available in the fedora package. I haven't been able to build the CUDA related stuff yet. It's my first rpmfusion package :) [ankur@ankur-pc SRPMS]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/*.rpm ../SPECS/opencv.spec ./opencv-2.4.4-3.fc19.src.rpm opencv-free.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Nonfree -> Non free, Non-free, Freon opencv-free.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nonfree -> non free, non-free, Freon opencv-free.x86_64: W: no-documentation opencv-free-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Nonfree -> Non free, Non-free, Freon opencv-free-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US nonfree -> non free, non-free, Freon opencv-free-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation opencv-nonfree.x86_64: W: no-documentation opencv-nonfree-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation opencv.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://downloads.sourceforge.net/opencvlibrary/OpenCV-2.4.4a.tar.bz2 timed out 7 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. [ankur@ankur-pc SRPMS]$ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 8 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 3035] New: Review request: dhewm3 - Dhewm's Doom 3 engine

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3035 Bug #: 3035 Summary: Review request: dhewm3 - Dhewm's Doom 3 engine Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: negativo17(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 SPEC: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/dhewm3.spec SRPM: http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/dhewm3-1.3.1.1304-20.git6d8108c5.fc19.sr... dhewm3 3 is a Doom 3 GPL source modification. The goal of %{name} 3 is bring DOOM 3 with the help of SDL to all suitable platforms. Bugs present in the original DOOM 3 will be fixed (when identified) without altering the original game-play. Why it's not in Fedora? Packaging guidelines prohibit engines where the content is not available. The engine is fully Open Source. Note: Information on the package and on the game content is inside the README.txt file. $ rpmlint *rpm dhewm3.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Dhewm's -> Hewer's dhewm3.src: W: strange-permission dhewm3-git-checkout.sh 0751L dhewm3.src: W: invalid-url Source0: dhewm3-1.3.1.1304-git6d8108c5.tar.bz2 dhewm3.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Dhewm's -> Hewer's dhewm3.x86_64: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/dhewm3-1.3.1.1304/COPYING.txt dhewm3.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dhewm3ded dhewm3.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dhewm3 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. > dhewm3.src: W: strange-permission dhewm3-git-checkout.sh 0751L > dhewm3.src: W: invalid-url Source0: dhewm3-1.3.1.1304-git6d8108c5.tar.bz2 Script used to generate the Source0 main file. This is legitimate in Fedora packaging guidelines. The rest can be ignored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 8 months

1
12
0 / 0

[Bug 2921] New: Review request: openmw - Unofficial open source engine re-implementation of the game Morrowind

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2921 Bug #: 2921 Summary: Review request: openmw - Unofficial open source engine re-implementation of the game Morrowind Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: nobrakal(a)fedoraproject.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Url: SRPM: http://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/openmw-0.25.0-1.fc19.src.rpm Spec: http://nobrakal.fedorapeople.org/openmw.spec Description: Unofficial open source engine re-implementation of the game Morrowind Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: openmw requieres Cg and libmpg123. And openmw need Morrowind : The Elder Scrolls III to work (but openmw is opensource). Rpmlint output: openmw.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency libsndfile openmw.i686: W: no-documentation openmw.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/games/openmw/resources/materials/underwater.h openmw.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/games/openmw/resources/materials/core.h openmw.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/games/openmw/resources/materials/shadows.h openmw.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/games/openmw/resources/materials/watersim_common.h openmw.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary esmtool openmw.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary omwlauncher openmw.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary opencs openmw.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mwiniimport openmw.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openmw It's my first package in the RPM Fusion Project. And I seeking a sponsor, It's my first package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 8 months

1
39
0 / 0

FYI: Copr (from the fedora-devel list)

by Ankur Sinha

-------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: Miroslav Suchý <msuchy(a)redhat.com> > Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora > <devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> > To: devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Copr > Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 13:54:40 +0100 > > Dear developers and Fedora contributors, > > let me introduce Copr: > > http://copr-fe.cloud.fedoraproject.org/ > > Copr is a build system for third party repositories. It is intended for: > * upstream teams - to make nightly and test builds > * layered applications - if you build on top of Fedora, but you are not part of Fedora > * packages not yet ready to be included in official Fedora repositories > > How it works? You provide src.rpm, we will provide resulting yum repo for RHEL 5,6 and Fedora 18, 19, 20... But see > WARNING on bottom of this mail. > > I prepared quick tutorial for you: > https://fedorahosted.org/copr/wiki/ScreenshotsTutorial > and FAQ: > https://fedorahosted.org/copr/wiki/UserDocs#FAQ > > Everybody with FAS account can build there. If you want to use command line client, you should install copr-cli from > updates-testing. > > If you have ideas, questions, comments feel free to use one of our communication channels > https://fedorahosted.org/copr/#Communications > (mailing list is prefered) > > WARNING: > Please do not rely on this service in production. This is very early release (following "release early, release often"). > First of all, this service works in simple set-up, where resulting yum repos are *not* backed up. Yet. This is not yet > officially part of Fedora infrastructure, so when Copr fails, it can take several hours to be restored. > And yes, our WebUI is not perfect. It's work in progress. And since Copr can build packages already, I decided to > publicly announce it, so you can experiment with it. > > We are working on Copr on full steam and in upcoming days you can expect: > * improvements in WebUI > * ability to build Software Collections there > > -- > Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS > Red Hat, Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys > -- > devel mailing list > devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur (FranciscoD) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Join Fedora! Come talk to us! http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG

10 years, 9 months

3
2
0 / 0

[Bug 2054] New: Review request: OCE - OpenCASCADE Community Edition

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2054 Bug #: 2054 Summary: Review request: OCE - OpenCASCADE Community Edition Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: hobbes1069(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Created attachment 760 --> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=760 Rpmlint output of installed library. SPEC: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/OCE/OCE.spec SRPM: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34775202/OCE/OCE-0.7.0-1.fc15.src.rpm Description: OpenCASCADE Community Edition (OCE) is a suite for 3D surface and solid modeling, visualization, data exchange and rapid application development. It is an excellent platform for development of numerical simulation software including CAD/CAM/CAE, AEC and GIS, as well as PDM applications. rpmlint output from SRPM: $ rpmlint mockbuild/15/OCE/OCE-0.7.0-1.fc15.src.rpm OCE.src: W: invalid-license Open CASCADE Technology Public License OCE.src: W: invalid-url Source0: tpaviot-oce-OCE-0.7.0-0-ga384024.tar.gz 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. rpmlint doesn't know about this specific license. The source URL is in the comments because it's a github release. This is not permitted in Fedora because the license is considered non-free[1] and if approved will need to go into the non-free repository. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing/Open_CASCADE_Technology_Public_L... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 9 months

1
18
0 / 0

[Bug 3033] New: Review request: lpf-spotify-client - Spotify music player native client package bootstrap

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3033 Bug #: 3033 Summary: Review request: lpf-spotify-client - Spotify music player native client package bootstrap Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leamas.alec(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org spec: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/lpf-spotify-client/4/lpf-spotify-client.spec srpm: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/lpf-spotify-client/4/lpf-spotify-client-0.... Bootstrap package allowing the lpf system to build the non-redistributable spotify-client package. This cannot go to fedora per fpc decision: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/362. The package wraps the spotify-client spec which have been reviewed as bug #2565. The package has been reviewed for fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973069 rpmlint: lpf-spotify-client.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US r redistributable -> redistribute, redistribution, attributable --> void as far as I understnd, no native speaker. lpf-spotify-client.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/lpf/packages/spotify-client/state pkg-build lpf-spotify-client.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/lpf/packages/spotify-client/state pkg-build lpf-spotify-client.noarch: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/lpf/packages/spotify-client pkg-build lpf-spotify-client.noarch: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/lpf/packages/spotify-client pkg-build --> package depends on lpf which creates this user and group. lpf-spotify-client.noarch: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/lpf/packages/spotify-client 0775L --> Needed so that users can access files owned by lpf lpf-spotify-client.noarch: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/lpf-spotify-client.desktop setsid --> void, setsid is a shell built-in. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 10 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 2565] New: Review-Request: spotify-client - streaming music player

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2565 Bug #: 2565 Summary: Review-Request: spotify-client - streaming music player Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leamas.alec(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Native linux client for Spotify's streaming music service. Spec: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/17870887/spotify/spotify-client.spec Srpm: https://dl.dropbox.com/u/17870887/spotify/spotify-client-0.8.4.103.g9cb17... Description: Think of Spotify as your new music collection. Your library. Only this time your collection is vast: millions of tracks and counting. Spotify comes in all shapes and sizes, available for your PC, Mac, home audio system and mobile phone. Wherever you go, your music follows you. And because the music plays live, there’s no need to wait for downloads and no big dent in your hard drive. Why not Fedora: closed source. Section: nonfree (closed source) rpmlint ~/Dropbox/Public/spotify/* 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 10 months

1
25
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers November 2013