May 2013 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 2775] New: Review request: Mplayer2 - An advanced general-purpose video player.

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2775 Bug #: 2775 Summary: Review request: Mplayer2 - An advanced general-purpose video player. Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kprasad(a)gmx.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org # Full URLs to the spec file and source rpm of the package. http://www.freeuploadsite.com/do.php?id=10717 # A short description for the package. mplayer2 is an advanced general-purpose video player. A fork of the original MPlayer project, it contains significant further development and supports a number of features not available in other Unix players. # Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora. This package does not meet Fedora's strict license policy. This package functionality is equivalent to the original Mplayer (mplayer v1). # The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages. Explain for each message why you've chosen to ignore it. $rpmlint mplayer2.spec ../SRPMS/mplayer2-2.0-20130309git.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/mplayer2-* mplayer2.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 20130309git ['2.0-20130309git', '2.0-20130309git'] (I guess this is due to initial version) mplayer2.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary midentify.sh (There's no doc file associated with this script in the source) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. # Mention if this is your first RPM Fusion package. Yes, this is my first package submission. # Mention that you are seeking a sponsor if you are not a Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. Since I'm not sponsored packager, I need a sponsor. Thanks, Prasad -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

11 years, 5 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 2686] New: Review request: profile-sync-daemon - Offload browser profiles to RAM for speed a wear reduction

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2686 Bug #: 2686 Summary: Review request: profile-sync-daemon - Offload browser profiles to RAM for speed a wear reduction Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: graysky(a)archlinux.us CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30 *Spec file: http://repo-ck.com/private/profile-sync-daemon.spec *Source rpm: http://repo-ck.com/private/profile-sync-daemon-5.22-1.fc18.src.rpm *Description: Symlinks and syncs browser profiles to RAM via tmpfs which will reduce HDD/SDD calls and speed-up browsers. *Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: I believe that it is eligible. *The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages: profile-sync-daemon.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Symlinks -> Slinks profile-sync-daemon.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tmpfs -> tamps profile-sync-daemon.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib profile-sync-daemon.noarch: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/psd.conf profile-sync-daemon.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Symlinks -> Slinks profile-sync-daemon.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tmpfs -> tamps profile-sync-daemon.src:39: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 39, tab: line 1) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings. *Explain for each message why you've chosen to ignore it: The spelling errors are not correct as typed. I do not understand the warning on line 3 or on line 4. The warning on line 6 refers to my use of tabs throughout in the main body of the spec file but not in my %post scriptlet. *This is by first RPM Fusion package and I am seeking sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

11 years, 5 months

1
2
0 / 0

[Bug 2528] New: Review request: librcc - Russian Charset Conversion Library

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2528 Bug #: 2528 Summary: Review request: librcc - Russian Charset Conversion Library Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: anto.trande(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Depends on: 2527 Blocks: 2, 30 Provides possibility to automatically convert considered encoding (a lot of languages is supported, not only Russian one) to/from UTF-8. The library is part of RUSXMMS patch. http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/librcc.spec http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/librcc-0.2.9-0.fc17.src.rpm $ rpmlint librcc-0.2.9-0.fc17.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint librcc-0.2.9-0.fc17.i686.rpm librcc.i686: E: explicit-lib-dependency librcd librcc.i686: W: non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/rcc-config 0644L librcc.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/bin/rcc-config librcc.i686: E: non-executable-script /usr/bin/rcc-config 0644L /bin/bash 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 2 warnings. I think, rcc-config stuff is related to other tools. $ cat /usr/bin/rcc-config #!/bin/bash echo "Configuration UI is not available!" This is my first package; please, I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

11 years, 5 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 2527] New: Review request:librcd - Russian Encoding Detection Library

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2527 Bug #: 2527 Summary: Review request:librcd - Russian Encoding Detection Library Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: anto.trande(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30 Automatic encoding detection library for Russian/Ukrainian languages. Optimized for very small words and phrases. http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/librcd.spec http://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/librcd-0.1.13-0.fc17.src.rpm Together with librcc, librcd is a dependence for MOC 'Music On Console Player'. $ rpmlint librcd-0.1.13-0.fc17.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint librcd-0.1.13-0.fc17.i686.rpm librcd.i686: E: zero-length /usr/share/doc/librcd-0.1.13/NEWS 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. '/usr/share/doc/librcd-0.1.13/NEWS' is empty from upstream. This is my first RPM Fusion package; please, I need a sponsor. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

11 years, 5 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 2471] New: Review request: vo-amrwbenc - VisualOn Adaptive Multi Rate Wideband speech encoder

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2471 Bug #: 2471 Summary: Review request: vo-amrwbenc - VisualOn Adaptive Multi Rate Wideband speech encoder Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Spec: http://jwrdegoede.danny.cz/vo-amrwbenc.spec SRPM: http://jwrdegoede.danny.cz/vo-amrwbenc-0.1.2-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Library of VisualOn implementation of Adaptive Multi Rate Wideband (AMR-WB) encoder. Why not Fedora: possibly patented codec rpmlint: vo-amrwbenc-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

11 years, 5 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 2470] New: Review request: vo-aacenc - VisualOn Advanced Audio Coding (AAC) encoder

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2470 Bug #: 2470 Summary: Review request: vo-aacenc - VisualOn Advanced Audio Coding (AAC) encoder Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Spec: http://jwrdegoede.danny.cz/vo-aacenc.spec SRPM: http://jwrdegoede.danny.cz/vo-aacenc-0.1.2-1.fc19.src.rpm Description: Library of VisualOn implementation of Advanced Audio Coding (AAC) encoder. Why not Fedora: possibly patented codec rpmlint: vo-aacenc-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

11 years, 5 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 2224] New: Review request: HeeksCNC - CAM add-on for HeeksCAD

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2224 Bug #: 2224 Summary: Review request: HeeksCNC - CAM add-on for HeeksCAD Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: SpikeFedora(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Spec URL: http://spike.fedorapeople.org/HeeksCNC/HeeksCNC.spec SRPM URL: http://spike.fedorapeople.org/HeeksCNC/HeeksCNC-0.18.0-0.1.20111215git272... Description: Written in C++, HeeksCNC is an add-on for HeeksCAD. The user can add machining operations. These can then be output to NC code. The NC code is then shown as red and green lines on the screen. The NC code is generated using Python script, so it can be configured for different machines. HeeksCNC uses OpenCAMLib for the "Zig Zag" operation HeeksCNC uses libarea for the "Pocket" operation Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: HeeksCNC depends on OCE (HeeksCNC->HeeksCAD-devel->OCE-devel), which is considered non-free [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#Bad_Licenses rpmlint output: SPECS/HeeksCNC.spec:39: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/heekscnc/nc/iso_codes.py SPECS/HeeksCNC.spec:48: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/heekscnc SPECS/HeeksCNC.spec:49: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libheekscnc* SPECS/HeeksCNC.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: HeeksCNC-svnHEAD.tar.bz2 HeeksCNC.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libarea -> lib area, lib-area, millibar HeeksCNC.src:39: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{buildroot}/usr/lib/heekscnc/nc/iso_codes.py HeeksCNC.src:48: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/heekscnc HeeksCNC.src:49: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libheekscnc* HeeksCNC.src: W: invalid-url Source0: HeeksCNC-svnHEAD.tar.bz2 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 6 errors, 3 warnings. The hardcoded-library-path error probably needs to be fixed. A friendly cmake expert would be very much appreciated. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

11 years, 5 months

1
2
0 / 0

OpenSSL with Elliptic Curve

by Jeff Mendoza

Hi, I have worked a bit on: Request: OpenSSL with Elliptic Curve, IDEA, MDC-2, RC5 crypto algorithms Summary: The OpenSSL toolkit provides support for secure communications between machines. URL: http://www.openssl.org/ Why not in Fedora: Because of the problem with software patents: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=319901 Notes: OpenSSL is included in Fedora but with Elliptic Curve, IDEA, MDC-2, RC5 crypto algorithms disabled. from the http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist. I have a building and working rpm, but I don't know what the name/version should be. Is there a standard for packages that replace one in Fedora? I thought of calling it openssl-ec, and having it conflict with openssl, but you can't use yum to replace it without removing openssl and all it's dependent packages. Using 'rpm -e --nodeps' and then installing the replacement works fine. Another option would be to add something to the revision (.ec?). The problem there is anyone with rpm fusion will get it with their next 'yum update' even if they don't want it. Also, it could be overwritten by the regular openssl with the next fedora update. Thoughts? Thanks, Jeff

11 years, 6 months

4
8
0 / 0

Need a sponsor

by Marco Casaroli

Hello, My name is Marco and I need a sponsor. I am from Brazil and I am willing to make some packages that I normally use on my Fedora deployments. Most are related to digital TV and DVB. this is my first submission: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2819 Thank you very much. Marco Casaroli

11 years, 6 months

1
1
0 / 0

RPM Fusion for Pidora (ARM6)

by Sergio Pascual

Hello, probably some of you are aware of Pidora [1], the Fedora Spin optimized for the Raspberry Pi. In comparation with the previous Pi spin from Seneca (which supported ARMv5), this one supports ARMv6. I have tested my luck after installing Pidora by installing rpmfusion, but it seems that there aren't packages for ARMv6 (there are for ARMv5). Are there plans to rebuild the ARM pacjkages for the ARMv6 architecture? Best regards, Sergio [1] http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/Pidora

11 years, 6 months

2
1
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers May 2013