September 2013 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 2550] New: Review request: wl-bcm43142-kmod - X86_64 Kernel module for Broadcom wireless devices BCM43142

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2550 Bug #: 2550 Summary: Review request: wl-bcm43142-kmod - X86_64 Kernel module for Broadcom wireless devices BCM43142 Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: nicolas.vieville(a)univ-valenciennes.fr CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org SPEC file: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/rpmfusion/F-18/wl-bcm43142-kmod/wl-bcm43... SRPMS file: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/rpmfusion/F-18/wl-bcm43142-kmod/wl-bcm43... Sources URL: http://jas.gemnetworks.com/wireless-bcm43142/ Description: These packages contain x86_64 Broadcom's IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n hybrid Linux device driver for use with Broadcom's BCM43142-based hardware also known as Broadcom bcm4365 or Dell 1704 wireless device. rpmlint wl-bcm43142-kmod.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint wl-bcm43142-kmod-6.20.55.19-1.fc18.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Package not eligible to be included in Fedora as it contains some non-modifiable binary. As the maintainer of the actual wl-kmod package for rpmfusion, a user asked me if I could provide the last broadcom wireless drivers for BCM43142-based hardware, because this chipset is not driven by the actual package. He pointed me to the actual maintainer site of this package for Debian, and these packages (broadcom-wl-bcm43142 review request will follow) are largely inspired from this site (http://jas.gemnetworks.com/wireless-bcm43142/). The original package was shipped with Ubuntu's Dell laptop, but as far as I know (digging the Web for 2 days) neither Broadcom or Dell provided on their websites any sources for this driver. The only source cited by the Debian packager is actually this site: http://wielki.tk/vostro/ According to message #60 in this thread http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688823#60, Broadcom will not update the official Broadcom STA driver (aka 5.100.82.112) as the new one was a Dell/Ubuntu specific only. While preparing these packages, I had to make some choices and I wonder if someone could review and comment them if needed: 1. These new package are x86_64 architecture only. Broadcom/Dell didn't provided any binary library for i386 (32 bits) platform. I had to make these packages x86_64 platform only by adding a "ExclusiveArch: x86_64" directive in the SPEC file, and adding checking in the %prep section of this file too. Is this correct? 2. As this new driver doesn't work with some older Broadcom chipset (mine is bcm4313 and doesn't work with it for example) that still work correctly with 5.100.82.112 driver, I didn't choice to use conflict directive in the SPEC file. If one has a new chipset in his laptop and plug-in an old one via USB port the problem will be unsolvable. I preferred to rename the new build module with a different name to let users deal with there configuration more smoothly (I hope that modifying some udev rules might be necessary to get them working). So the new build module was rename from wl.ko to wl_bcm43142.ko at build time. Is this correct, or am I wrong? 3. As stated by all the users owning such laptop and wanting to upgrade their original Ubuntu 11.10 to the last 12.04 or 12.10, this chipset is hybrid but actually no bluetooth is working. Some efforts are made by Ubuntu developers to get it working, but for the moment this part of the chipset is not supported (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863051/+index?commen...). What is the best thing to do to inform users of such a limitation in this package? 4. After all, is it worth packaging this driver? I can provide rawhide SPEC and SRPMS files if needed. I plan to make it available since F-17 if accepted. Same request made for the broadcom-wl-bcm43142 package. As I do not own myself such a device, I would not be able to test new packages as they would be build. Are there any volunteers to achieve this task? Last question: as I'm already a rpmfusion packager, but not so experienced, do I need a sponsor? Thanks in advance for your comments. Cordially, -- NVieville -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 6 months

1
19
0 / 0

[Bug 2549] New: Review request: broadcom-wl-bcm43142 - Common files for Broadcom 802.11 STA driver for BCM43142 devices

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2549 Bug #: 2549 Summary: Review request: broadcom-wl-bcm43142 - Common files for Broadcom 802.11 STA driver for BCM43142 devices Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: nicolas.vieville(a)univ-valenciennes.fr CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org SPEC file: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/rpmfusion/F-18/broadcom-wl-bcm43142/broa... SRPMS file: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/25699833/rpmfusion/F-18/broadcom-wl-bcm43142/broa... Sources URL: http://jas.gemnetworks.com/wireless-bcm43142/ Description: This package contains the license, copyright and configuration files for the Broadcom 802.11 Linux STA Driver for WiFi, a Linux device driver for use with Broadcom's BCM43142-based hardware also known as Broadcom bcm4365 or Dell 1704 wireless device. rpmlint broadcom-wl-bcm43142.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint broadcom-wl-bcm43142-6.20.55.19-1.fc18.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Package not eligible to be included in Fedora as it contains some non-modifiable binary. As the maintainer of the actual broadcom-wl package for rpmfusion, a user asked me if I could provide the last broadcom wireless drivers for BCM43142-based hardware, because this chipset is not driven by the actual package. He pointed me to the actual maintainer site of this package for Debian, and these packages (wl-bcm43142-kmod review request will follow) are largely inspired from this site (http://jas.gemnetworks.com/wireless-bcm43142/). The original package was shipped with Ubuntu's Dell laptop, but as far as I know (digging the Web for 2 days) neither Broadcom or Dell provided on their websites any sources for this driver. The only source cited by the Debian packager is actually this site: http://wielki.tk/vostro/ According to message #60 in this thread http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=688823#60, Broadcom will not update the official Broadcom STA driver (aka 5.100.82.112) as the new one was a Dell/Ubuntu specific only. While preparing these packages, I had to make some choices and I wonder if someone could review and comment them if needed: 1. These new package are x86_64 architecture only. Broadcom/Dell didn't provided any binary library for i386 (32 bits) platform. I had to make these packages x86_64 platform only by adding a "ExclusiveArch: x86_64" directive in the SPEC file, and adding checking in the %prep section of this file too. Is this correct? 2. As this new driver doesn't work with some older Broadcom chipset (mine is bcm4313 and doesn't work with it for example) that still work correctly with 5.100.82.112 driver, I didn't choice to use conflict directive in the SPEC file. If one has a new chipset in his laptop and plug-in an old one via USB port the problem will be unsolvable. I preferred to rename the new build module with a different name to let users deal with there configuration more smoothly (I hope that modifying some udev rules might be necessary to get them working). So the new build module was rename from wl.ko to wl_bcm43142.ko at build time. Is this correct, or am I wrong? 3. As stated by all the users owning such laptop and wanting to upgrade their original Ubuntu 11.10 to the last 12.04 or 12.10, this chipset is hybrid but actually no bluetooth is working. Some efforts are made by Ubuntu developers to get it working, but for the moment this part of the chipset is not supported (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/863051/+index?commen...). What is the best thing to do to inform users of such a limitation in this package? 4. After all, is it worth packaging this driver? I can provide rawhide SPEC and SRPMS files if needed. I plan to make it available for F-17 if accepted. Same request made for the wl-bcm43142-kmod package. As I do not own myself such a device, I would not be able to test new packages as they would be build. Are there any volunteers to achieve this task? Last question: as I'm already a rpmfusion packager, but not so experienced, do I need a sponsor? Thanks in advance for your comments. Cordially, -- NVieville -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 6 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 2955] New: Review request: mate-applet-streamer - MATE online radio streamer applet

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2955 Bug #: 2955 Summary: Review request: mate-applet-streamer - MATE online radio streamer applet Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: chat-to-me(a)raveit.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://download.raveit.de/pub/Mate-Desktop/SPECS/mate-applet-streamer.spec SRPM URL: http://download.raveit.de/pub/Mate-Desktop/SRPM/mate-applet-streamer-0.0.... This is a MATE panel applet to let you play your favorite online radio station from your system tray or panel with a single click. Icecast directory listing in included. I choose rpmfusion-free for building because it needs nonfree codecs to play all stations from Icecast. Package needs those rpmfusion-free packages as runtime require. - gstreamer1-plugins-bad-freeworld - gstreamer1-plugins-ugly [rave@mother results]$ rpmlint -i mate-applet-streamer-0.0.1-2.fc21.src.rpm mate-applet-streamer.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Icecast -> Ice cast, Ice-cast, Icecap The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. [rave@mother mate-applet-streamer-0.0.1-2.fc21.src]$ rpmlint -i mate-applet-streamer.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 6 months

1
8
0 / 0

RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) Package Build Report 2013-09-29

by rpmfusion-pkgs-report＠rpmfusion.org

============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 19: 5 catalyst-kmod-13.8-0.2.beta1.fc19.7 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.37-3.fc19.1 nvidia-304xx-kmod-304.88-3.fc19.1 nvidia-kmod-319.32-3.fc19.1 wl-kmod-6.30.223.141-1.fc19.1 ============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 18: 4 catalyst-kmod-13.8-0.2.beta1.fc18.5 nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.37-2.fc18.7 nvidia-304xx-kmod-304.88-2.fc18.5 nvidia-kmod-319.32-2.fc18.5 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 19: catalyst-kmod-13.8-0.2.beta1.fc19.7 ----------------------------------- * Sun Sep 29 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 13.8-0.2.beta1.7 - Rebuilt for kernel * Wed Sep 25 2013 Leigh Scott <leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com> - 13.8-0.2.beta1.6 - Rebuilt for kernel * Fri Aug 30 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 13.8-0.2.beta1.5 - Rebuilt for kernel nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.37-3.fc19.1 ------------------------------------ * Sun Sep 29 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 173.14.37-3.1 - Rebuilt for kernel * Tue Sep 17 2013 Leigh Scott <leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com> - 173.14.37-3 - patch for 3.11 kernel * Fri Aug 30 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 173.14.37-2.6 - Rebuilt for kernel nvidia-304xx-kmod-304.88-3.fc19.1 --------------------------------- * Sun Sep 29 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 304.88-3.1 - Rebuilt for kernel * Tue Sep 17 2013 Leigh Scott <leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com> - 304.88-3 - patch for 3.11 kernel * Fri Aug 30 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 304.88-2.6 - Rebuilt for kernel nvidia-kmod-319.32-3.fc19.1 --------------------------- * Sun Sep 29 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 1:319.32-3.1 - Rebuilt for kernel * Tue Sep 17 2013 Leigh Scott <leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com> - 1:319.32-3 - patch for 3.11 kernel * Fri Aug 30 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 1:319.32-2.6 - Rebuilt for kernel wl-kmod-6.30.223.141-1.fc19.1 ----------------------------- * Sun Sep 29 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 6.30.223.141-1.1 - Rebuilt for kernel * Sat Sep 14 2013 Nicolas Viéville <nicolas.vieville(a)univ-valenciennes.fr> - 6.30.223.141-1 - Upstream update to 6.30.223.141 * Fri Aug 30 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 5.100.82.112-11.8 - Rebuilt for kernel ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - nonfree) 18: catalyst-kmod-13.8-0.2.beta1.fc18.5 ----------------------------------- * Wed Sep 25 2013 Leigh Scott <leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com> - 13.8-0.2.beta1.5 - Rebuilt for kernel * Sat Aug 31 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 13.8-0.2.beta1.4 - Rebuilt for kernel nvidia-173xx-kmod-173.14.37-2.fc18.7 ------------------------------------ * Wed Sep 25 2013 Leigh Scott <leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com> - 173.14.37-2.7 - Rebuilt for kernel * Sat Aug 31 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 173.14.37-2.6 - Rebuilt for kernel nvidia-304xx-kmod-304.88-2.fc18.5 --------------------------------- * Wed Sep 25 2013 Leigh Scott <leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com> - 304.88-2.5 - Rebuilt for kernel * Sat Aug 31 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 304.88-2.4 - Rebuilt for kernel nvidia-kmod-319.32-2.fc18.5 --------------------------- * Wed Sep 25 2013 Leigh Scott <leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com> - 1:319.32-2.5 - Rebuilt for kernel * Sat Aug 31 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 1:319.32-2.4 - Rebuilt for kernel

10 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) Package Build Report 2013-09-29

by rpmfusion-pkgs-report＠rpmfusion.org

============================================================================ Packages built and released for RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 18: 5 ndiswrapper-kmod-1.58-3.fc18.2 openafs-kmod-1.6.5-1.fc18.7 staging-kmod-3.10.5-2.fc18.6 VirtualBox-kmod-4.2.16-2.fc18.9 xtables-addons-kmod-2.3-1.fc18.6 ============================================================================ Changes in RPM Fusion (Fedora - free) 18: ndiswrapper-kmod-1.58-3.fc18.2 ------------------------------ * Sun Sep 29 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 1.58-3.2 - Rebuilt for kernel * Sun Sep 29 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 1.58-3.1 - Rebuilt for kernel * Wed Sep 25 2013 Leigh Scott <leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com> - 1.58-3 - Rebuilt for kernel - Patched for 3.10 kernel (abn) * Sat Aug 31 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 1.58-2.13 - Rebuilt for kernel * Thu Aug 22 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 1.58-2.12 - Rebuilt for kernel * Fri Aug 16 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 1.58-2.11 - Rebuilt for kernel * Tue Aug 13 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 1.58-2.10 - Rebuilt for kernel * Sat Aug 03 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 1.58-2.9 - Rebuilt for kernel openafs-kmod-1.6.5-1.fc18.7 --------------------------- * Sun Sep 29 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 1.6.5-1.7 - Rebuilt for kernel * Sun Sep 29 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 1.6.5-1.6 - Rebuilt for kernel * Sat Aug 31 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 1.6.5-1.5 - Rebuilt for kernel staging-kmod-3.10.5-2.fc18.6 ---------------------------- * Sun Sep 29 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 3.10.5-2.6 - Rebuilt for kernel * Sun Sep 29 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 3.10.5-2.5 - Rebuilt for kernel * Sat Aug 31 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 3.10.5-2.4 - Rebuilt for kernel VirtualBox-kmod-4.2.16-2.fc18.9 ------------------------------- * Sun Sep 29 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 4.2.16-2.9 - Rebuilt for kernel * Sun Sep 29 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 4.2.16-2.8 - Rebuilt for kernel * Sat Aug 31 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 4.2.16-2.7 - Rebuilt for kernel xtables-addons-kmod-2.3-1.fc18.6 -------------------------------- * Sun Sep 29 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 2.3-1.6 - Rebuilt for kernel * Sun Sep 29 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 2.3-1.5 - Rebuilt for kernel * Sat Aug 31 2013 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> - 2.3-1.4 - Rebuilt for kernel

10 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

freetype-freeworld build issues

by Kevin Kofler

Hi, my freetype-freeworld builds have been behaving strangely lately. Looking at buildsys.rpmfusion.org: * The Plague results for 2.5.0.1-1.fc20 built on Sep 16 show only a freetype-debuginfo.i686 RPM, no freetype.i686 nor any x86_64 builds. I got a mail that the build "succeeded" hours after issuing it, but this doesn't look like a success to me. I see a build log for i686 which shows a freetype.i686 RPM having been produced, why is it not in the plague results? And for x86_64, the build log is entirely AWOL. * For 2.5.0.1-2.fc20 and 2.4.11-3.fc19 built today, I see complete i686 output, but still no x86_64 one, even though again, the mails claimed "success", and this time they arrived in a timely manner. For the F19 build, the build log for x86_64 looks fine (so why is the output not in the Plague results?), for the F20 one, i686 has only job.log and state.log and the x86_64 directory is empty. * Today's 2.4.10-4.fc18 build failed, but I cannot find usable logs of the failure. For i686, build.log is only the first line with the Mock version, root.log is missing entirely, as is the whole x86_64 folder. This is on buildsys.rpmfusion.org; the failure e-mail gave links on builder1.rpmfusion.org, but those did not work at all. I think we have some serious issues transfering output to buildsys.rpmfusion.org. Kevin Kofler

10 years, 7 months

2
2
0 / 0

[Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Alexandre Moine <nobrakal(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|2921 | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

ACL problem again

by Martin Gansser

I cannot commit to CVS in the F-19 branches, Can someone add me or correct this? ? F-19/.cvsignore ? F-19/import.log cvs commit... Log message unchanged or not specified a)bort, c)ontinue, e)dit, !)reuse this message unchanged for remaining dirs Action: (continue) ? F-19/import.log ? F-19/.cvsignore **** Access denied: martinkg is not in ACL for rpms/vdr-burn/F-19 cvs commit: Pre-commit check failed cvs [commit aborted]: correct above errors first! Martin

10 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

cvstogit updates

by Ken Dreyer

Hi folks, I've made some improvements to my cvstogit shell script: http://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/rpmfusion-tools.git It has been a while since I last looked at this, so I ran it again and it converted all the CVS modules to individual Git repos in about three hours on my laptop. Today in IRC kwizart was asking about the list of packages that I have to skip, which prompted me to file a couple of new bugs with infrastructure this afternoon. https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/2946 - three packages cannot be checkout out of CVS https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/2947 - xmms-aac should be removed https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/2948 - vboxgtk is "free", not "nonfree" https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/2949 - vlc-phonon-backend should be removed Also, in case anyone's interested, kwizart also found that the script doesn't work on el6. I've been running it on Fedora, and we need newer features in Bash and Git that aren't available on the older versions. - Ken

10 years, 7 months

2
2
0 / 0

Broken dependency: Requires: libavcodec.so.54(LIBAVCODEC_54)(64bit)

by Ankur Sinha

Hi, Please forgive me if this is a known issue: > [asinha@ankur ~]$ sudo yum install mpd --skip-broken > [sudo] password for asinha: > Loaded plugins: langpacks, refresh-packagekit > Resolving Dependencies > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package mpd.x86_64 1:0.17.3-3.fc20 will be installed > --> Processing Dependency: libavcodec.so.54(LIBAVCODEC_54)(64bit) for package: 1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64 > --> Processing Dependency: libavformat.so.54(LIBAVFORMAT_54)(64bit) for package: 1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64 > --> Processing Dependency: libavcodec.so.54()(64bit) for package: 1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64 > --> Processing Dependency: libavformat.so.54()(64bit) for package: 1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64 > --> Processing Dependency: libaudiofile.so.1()(64bit) for package: 1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64 > --> Processing Dependency: libmikmod.so.3()(64bit) for package: 1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64 > --> Processing Dependency: libid3tag.so.0()(64bit) for package: 1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64 > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package audiofile.x86_64 1:0.3.6-2.fc20 will be installed > ---> Package libid3tag.x86_64 0:0.15.1b-17.fc20 will be installed > ---> Package libmikmod.x86_64 0:3.2.0-22.fc20 will be installed > ---> Package mpd.x86_64 1:0.17.3-3.fc20 will be installed > --> Processing Dependency: libavcodec.so.54(LIBAVCODEC_54)(64bit) for package: 1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64 > --> Processing Dependency: libavformat.so.54(LIBAVFORMAT_54)(64bit) for package: 1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64 > --> Processing Dependency: libavcodec.so.54()(64bit) for package: 1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64 > --> Processing Dependency: libavformat.so.54()(64bit) for package: 1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64 > > Packages skipped because of dependency problems: > 1:audiofile-0.3.6-2.fc20.x86_64 from fedora > libid3tag-0.15.1b-17.fc20.x86_64 from fedora > libmikmod-3.2.0-22.fc20.x86_64 from fedora > 1:mpd-0.17.3-3.fc20.x86_64 from rpmfusion-free-rawhide > [asinha@ankur ~]$ > Can I do anything to help fix this? I'd like my mpd server running ;) -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur (FranciscoD) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Join Fedora! Come talk to us! http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG

10 years, 7 months

3
13
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers September 2013