July 2014 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 2753] New: Review request: vhba-module-kmod - Virtual SCSI Host Bus Adapter kernel module

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2753 Bug #: 2753 Summary: Review request: vhba-module-kmod - Virtual SCSI Host Bus Adapter kernel module Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: opensource(a)zhasha.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Sponsor needed! Specs: http://home.zhasha.com/cdemu/vhba-module/vhba-module.spec http://home.zhasha.com/cdemu/vhba-module/vhba-module-kmod.spec SRPMS: http://home.zhasha.com/cdemu/vhba-module/vhba-module-20120422-1.fc18.src.rpm http://home.zhasha.com/cdemu/vhba-module/vhba-module-kmod-20120422-1.fc18... This is my first package submission and it's a series, so please bear with me if I'm way off. I'm not sure if this is packaged correctly. %description A kernel module implementing the Virtual Host Bus Adapter for the CDEmu daemon. This kernel module takes care of device emulation in the kernel; it registers a virtual device with the appropriate drivers and creates corresponding device nodes. It also creates a special character device that is used for communication with user space CDEmu. This package is not eligible for Fedora as it's a kernel module not in the vanilla tree. rpmlint: vhba-module.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://cdemu.sourceforge.net HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error vhba-module.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/vhba-module-20120422/COPYING kmod-vhba-module.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta package, Meta-package, Prepackage kmod-vhba-module.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://cdemu.sourceforge.net HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error kmod-vhba-module.x86_64: W: no-documentation kmod-vhba-module-3.8.5-201.fc18.x86_64.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized C vhba-module kernel module(s) for 3.8.5-201.fc18.x86_64 kmod-vhba-module-3.8.5-201.fc18.x86_64.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://cdemu.sourceforge.net HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error kmod-vhba-module-3.8.5-201.fc18.x86_64.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib/modules/3.8.5-201.fc18.x86_64/extra/vhba-module/vhba.ko kmod-vhba-module-3.8.5-201.fc18.x86_64.x86_64: W: no-documentation vhba-module-kmod-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://cdemu.sourceforge.net HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error vhba-module-kmod-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/vhba-module-20120422/_kmod_build_3.8.5-201.fc18.x86_64/vhba.c vhba-module.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://cdemu.sourceforge.net HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error vhba-module-kmod.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://cdemu.sourceforge.net HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 11 warnings. as akmod: vhba-module.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://cdemu.sourceforge.net HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error vhba-module.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/vhba-module-20120422/COPYING akmod-vhba-module.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://cdemu.sourceforge.net HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error akmod-vhba-module.x86_64: W: no-documentation kmod-vhba-module.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Metapackage -> Meta package, Meta-package, Prepackage kmod-vhba-module.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://cdemu.sourceforge.net HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error kmod-vhba-module.x86_64: E: useless-provides kmod-vhba-module kmod-vhba-module.x86_64: W: no-documentation vhba-module-kmod-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://cdemu.sourceforge.net HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error vhba-module-kmod-debuginfo.x86_64: E: empty-debuginfo-package vhba-module.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://cdemu.sourceforge.net HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error vhba-module-kmod.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://cdemu.sourceforge.net HTTP Error 500: Internal Server Error 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 9 warnings. Notes: 1) The URL is valid. 2) Lack of documentation in the -kmod package is per the Kmods2 standard. 3) The binary does in fact get stripped. I have no idea why it claims otherwise. 4) The kmod-* messages are generated because of the macros in the Kmods2 template, not sure I have much to say there. 5) I am not allowed to patch COPYING, however I have created patches for source headers and included them. I have also sent them to upstream developers, including a patch for the license files themselves. vhba.c does also get patched but apparently not included in the -debuginfo. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

9 years, 10 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 3282] New: Review Request: x265 - H.265/HEVC encoder

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3282 Bug #: 3282 Summary: Review Request: x265 - H.265/HEVC encoder Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: rpm(a)greysector.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://mokona.greysector.net/~rathann/rpmfusion/x265.spec SRPM URL: http://mokona.greysector.net/~rathann/rpmfusion/x265-1.2-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: The primary objective of x265 is to become the best H.265/HEVC encoder available anywhere, offering the highest compression efficiency and the highest performance on a wide variety of hardware platforms. Why not in Fedora? http://x265.readthedocs.org/en/1.2/introduction.html#legal-notices The GNU GPL v2 license or the x265 commercial license agreement govern your rights to access the copyrighted x265 software source code, but do not cover any patents that may be applicable to the function of binary executable software created from the x265 source code. You are responsible for understanding the laws in your country, and for licensing all applicable patent rights needed for use or distribution of software applications created from the x265 source code. A good place to start is with the Motion Picture Experts Group - Licensing Authority - HEVC Licensing Program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

9 years, 11 months

1
26
0 / 0

[Bug 3152] New: Review request: dropbox-repo - 3rd-party repo package for Dropbox client

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3152 Bug #: 3152 Summary: Review request: dropbox-repo - 3rd-party repo package for Dropbox client Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leamas.alec(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org spec: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/dropbox-repo/1/dropbox-repo.spec srpm: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/dropbox-repo/1/dropbox-repo-0-1.fc20.src.rpm Why not in fedora: There is a FPC decision to not allow packaged, foreign repositories in Fedora. see: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/advisory-board/2014-January/012... rpmlint: Clean besides spelling errors. Description: ------ This repo package makes it possible to easily download and install the newest Dropbox desktop client (linux.dropbox.com/). The package uses system-config-repo to provide a graphical interface to the file in /etc/yum.repos.d. Using the GUI user can inspect and modify whether the repository is enabled and/or signed. It's also possible to view the underlying file. ------- This package is kind of a test about the legal status for including a foreign, packaged repository in rpmfusion. Since it refers to non-free software itshould go to the non-ree section Package contains a trademarked logo. I have a permission to use it in this context. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

9 years, 11 months

4
73
0 / 0

[Bug 2429] New: Review request: gens-gs - Sega Genesis, Sega CD, and Sega 32X emulator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2429 Bug #: 2429 Summary: Review request: gens-gs - Sega Genesis, Sega CD, and Sega 32X emulator Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: alexjnewt(a)hotmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Gens/GS is a Sega Mega Drive emulator derived from Gens and maintained by GerbilSoft. Project goals include clean source code, combined features from various developments of Gens, and improved platform portability. Why it's not in Fedora: Emulators of video game systems seem to have legal problems. This should be eligible for free, rather than non-free. I don't quite understand why gens is in non-free, but gens-gs is GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+, requiring nothing that is non-free, or at least to my knowledge. SPEC URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/gens-gs.spec SOURCE RPM URL: http://dl.dropbox.com/u/42480493/gens-gs-2.16.7-1.fc17.src.rpm RPMLINT OUTPUT (all seem negligible): gens-gs.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/gens-gs-2.16.7/COPYING.txt gens-gs.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mdp_test gens-gs.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary gens gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale2x/scale2x.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale4x/scalebit_4x.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale2x/scalebit_2x.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale2x/scalebit_2x.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale4x/scalebit_4x_mmx.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale4x/scalebit_4x_mmx.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale2x/scale2x.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale3x/scale3x.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale3x/scalebit_3x.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale3x/scale3x.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale2x/scalebit_2x_mmx.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale2x/scalebit_2x_mmx.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale3x/scalebit_3x.c gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale4x/scalebit_4x.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale4x/scale2x.h gens-gs-debuginfo.i686: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gens-gs-r7/src/mdp/render/scale4x/scale2x.c 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 17 errors, 2 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years

1
18
0 / 0

[Bug 2125] New: Review Request: libva-intel-driver - HW video decode support for Intel integrated graphics

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2125 Bug #: 2125 Summary: Review Request: libva-intel-driver - HW video decode support for Intel integrated graphics Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews SRPM: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/libva-intel-driver/libva-intel-dri... SPEC: http://rpms.kwizart.net/fedora/reviews/libva-intel-driver/libva-intel-dri... Summary: HW video decode support for Intel integrated graphics This is the replacement for libva-freeword with the new vaapi repository name for backend. I have resubmitted a review within fedora in the case this update pass: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770371 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 3138] New: New package: qarte

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3138 Bug #: 3138 Summary: New package: qarte Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: nalimilan(a)club.fr CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Created attachment 1259 --> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1259 qarte.spec This is a package to browse and download videos from the French and German arte TV channel. It's been requested in the whishlist. Cannot be included in Fedora because it requires rtmpdump. This .spec file is based on the Mageia package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 1 month

1
12
0 / 0

[Bug 3278] New: Review request: mingw-libmad - MPEG audio decoder library

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3278 Bug #: 3278 Summary: Review request: mingw-libmad - MPEG audio decoder library Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: valtri(a)civ.zcu.cz CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Spec URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/mingw-libmad-0.15.1b-1/mingw-libmad.spec SRPM URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/mingw-libmad-0.15.1b-1/mingw-libmad-0.15.... Description: MAD is a high-quality MPEG audio decoder. It currently supports MPEG-1 and the MPEG-2 extension to Lower Sampling Frequencies, as well as the so-called MPEG 2.5 format. All three audio layers (Layer I, Layer II, and Layer III a.k.a. MP3) are fully implemented. Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: mp3 rpmlint output: mingw32-libmad-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw64-libmad-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources -> that's normal for MinGW packages mingw32-libmad.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/mingw32-libmad/COPYING mingw32-libmad.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/mingw32-libmad/COPYRIGHT mingw32-libmad.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/mad.h mingw64-libmad.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/mingw64-libmad/COPYING mingw64-libmad.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/mad.h mingw64-libmad.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/mingw64-libmad/COPYRIGHT -> upstream not updated for a long time and there are bigger issues This is my first RPM Fusion package. I'm already Fedora packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 2 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 3289] New: Review request: libopenshot-audio1 - Audio library used by OpenShot

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3289 Bug #: 3289 Summary: Review request: libopenshot-audio1 - Audio library used by OpenShot Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jonathan(a)openshot.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30 OpenShot Audio Library (libopenshot-audio) is an open-source project powered by JUCE, and enables high-quality audio editing and playback for libopenshot. SPEC & SRPM files: https://launchpad.net/libopenshot/0.0/0.0.2/+download/libopenshot-audio.spec https://launchpad.net/libopenshot/0.0/0.0.2/+download/libopenshot-audio1-... Not eligible for Fedora due to FFmpeg / LibAV dependencies. This is my first RPM Fusion package, and I look forward to learning from this experience. I am also the main developer of OpenShot Video Editor, and look forward to getting these packages reviewed and posted in RPM Fusion. =) I am seeking a sponsor for this package, and a related package (libopenshot) soon to be filed in another bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

10 years, 2 months

1
12
0 / 0

Fedora 21 and EL 7

by Ken Dreyer

Hi folks, Is anyone planning to do a mass rebuild for F21 similar to what was done in Fedora recently? Also, will we have support for EL 7 packages? - Ken

10 years, 3 months

4
7
0 / 0

Appdata for RPMFusion (again)

by Ankur Sinha

Hi, I had brought up the subject of appdata for rpmfusion packages a couple of months ago. With F21 coming up fast, it'll be good to make some headway in this regard. A bug is already filed here[1]. Could rpmfusion package maintainers please give their suggestions there? Like I've said in the bug, I'll be happy to maintain an appdata package if that's the way to go for the time being. [1] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2998 -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur (FranciscoD) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Join Fedora! Come talk to us! http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG

10 years, 3 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers July 2014