October 2015 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 3177] New: Review Request:lpf-mscore-fonts - Microsoft core TrueType fonts for better Windows Compatibility

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3177 Bug #: 3177 Summary: Review Request:lpf-mscore-fonts - Microsoft core TrueType fonts for better Windows Compatibility Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leamas.alec(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org TrueType core fonts for the web that prior to 2002 was available from http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fontpack/ , updated in the European Union Expansion Update circa May 2007, still available on the Microsoft website. This is a meta package pulling in the different fonts making the complete set. The Tahoma font (often distributed with the fonts in this package) is in a separate package mscore-tahoma-fonts due to different license terms. --- spec: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/mscore-fonts/1/lpf-mscore-fonts.spec srpm: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/mscore-fonts/1/lpf-mscore-fonts-2.2-1.fc20... Target spec and srpmat: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/mscore-fonts/1/ These fonts are not redistributable, hence the lpf wrapper. rpmlint is clean for both lpf and target package besides spelling errors and the target package license. This is about building a non-free package, so this should go to the non-free section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 3178] New: Review Request: lpf-cleartype-fonts - Microsoft ClearType fonts for better Windows Compatibility

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3178 Bug #: 3178 Summary: Review Request: lpf-cleartype-fonts - Microsoft ClearType fonts for better Windows Compatibility Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leamas.alec(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Cleartype fonts made available to the public in the PowerPoint Viewer package around 2006. This is a meta package pulling in the different fonts making the complete set. spec: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/cleartype-fonts/1/lpf-cleartype-fonts.spec srpm: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/cleartype-fonts/1/lpf-cleartype-fonts-1.0-... target spec and srpm in: http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/cleartype-fonts/1 rpmlint is clean for both lpf and target package besides spelling errors and the target package license. This lpf package builds a non-free target and should thus go to the non-free section. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 3601] New: Review request: spread - High performance messaging service

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601 Bug #: 3601 Summary: Review request: spread - High performance messaging service Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: holcapek(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org - spec file: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/holcapek/spread-rpm/master/spread.spec - src rpm: https://github.com/holcapek/spread-rpm/raw/master/spread-4.2.0-1.fc21.src... - descriptoion (common to main package and all subpackages): Spread is an open source toolkit that can be used in many distributed applications that require high reliability, high performance, and robust communication among various subsets of members. The toolkit is designed to encapsulate the challenging aspects of asynchronous networks and enable the construction of reliable and scalable distributed applications. - why not in Fedora: Spread Open-Source License is not considered a Good License, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077081#c9 - is this my first rpmfusion package no, I've already filed another package: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3600 - am I seeking a sponsor: no, I am Fedora sponsored packager - rpmlint on src rpm: spread.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable, callable, calculable > this is exactly what http://www.spread.org/ reads spread.src: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License > this is why Fedora don't accept the package spread.src: W: invalid-url Source0: spread-src-4.2.0.tar.gz > source tarball cannot be downloaded directly, only through a web form - rpmlint on rpms: spread.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable, callable, calculable > dtto as above spread.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License > dtto as above spread-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License > dtto as above spread-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable, callable, calculable > dtto as above spread-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License > dtto as above spread-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib > -devel only contains unversioned .so, which is a symlink to versioned .so in -libs spread-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/SP_multicast.3.gz 28: warning: macro `TB' not defined > no idea, suggestions welcome spread-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning /usr/share/man/man3/FL_multicast.3.gz 50: warning: macro `TB' not defined > no idea, suggestions welcome spread-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable, callable, calculable > dtto as above spread-libs.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License > dtto as above spread-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libspread.so.3.0.0 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 > let's believe the upstream they know what they're doing spread-static.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable, callable, calculable > dtto as above spread-static.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License > dtto as above -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 2421] New: booh - Static web-album generator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2421 Bug #: 2421 Summary: booh - Static web-album generator Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: casper.le.fantom(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://fantom.fedorapeople.org/booh.spec SRPM URL: http://fantom.fedorapeople.org/booh-0.9.3-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: Yet another Web-Album generator. Highlights: * automatic rotation of portrait images thanks to information put by digital camera in .jpg file (EXIF) * immediate display of images (preloading in browser) * keep position of "next/previous" hyperlinks in browser between images * full video support (including thumbnailing) * clever use of the whole space of a typical browser window (the need to scroll portrait images is stupid) * themability * sub-albums support * remember your preferred size of thumbnails accross sub-albums * multi-processor support to speed up thumbnails generation * smooth integration of panoramic images in thumbnails pages * multi-languages web-album navigation (navigation links are automatically shown in user's language) * a GUI to input captions, rotate, reorder and remove images FAST (extensive use of keyboard shortcuts) * another GUI to classify photos and videos in a powerful manner Hello, this a new package for rpmfusion-free repository Have a nice day -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 2677] New: Review request: al-anvar - A cross-platform Quran Study Software

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2677 Bug #: 2677 Summary: Review request: al-anvar - A cross-platform Quran Study Software Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: nanopqr(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Address of spec file: http://dpnano.com/rpm/al-anvar-0.5.0-1.fc18.src.rpm address of source rpm file: http://dpnano.com/rpm/al-anvar.spec About al-anvar: Al-Anvar is a cross-platform Quran Study Software. It uses "Tanzil.net" and "Zekr.org" database as its database, It has lots of features: - Text of the Quran - Adding different translations of the Quran - Adding interpretation of the Quran - ... I didn't try to put this package in fedora, but one of guys said that religious software couldn't be in fedora. Output of rpmlint: $rpmlint al-anvar-0.5.0-1.fc18.i686.rpm al-anvar.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sura -> aura, supra, sure al-anvar.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/al-anvar-0.5.0/README al-anvar.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary al-anvar 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. $rpmlint al-anvar-0.5.0-1.fc18.src.rpm al-anvar.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sura -> aura, supra, sure 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. "sura" is the name of each part of Quran, I don't know why it isn't in spell checker. This is my first rpm in rpmfusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 3092] New: libchardet - Mozilla's Universal Charset Detector C/C++ API

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3092 Bug #: 3092 Summary: libchardet - Mozilla's Universal Charset Detector C/C++ API Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: thebenj88(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30, 3090 libchardet is required by cmplayer (see #3090) SRPM: http://breed808.com/rpmfusion-submission/libchardet-1.0.2-1.fc20.src.rpm spec: http://breed808.com/rpmfusion-submission/libchardet.spec rpmlint -i libchardet-1.0.2-1.fc20.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint -i libchardet-1.0.2-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint -i libchardet-devel-1.0.2-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm libchardet-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary chardet-config Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ^^ Unsure what to do about this. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 2483] New: Review request: msttcore-fonts - TrueType core fonts for the web

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2483 Bug #: 2483 Summary: Review request: msttcore-fonts - TrueType core fonts for the web Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: janes.rob(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org spec file: https://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/mscorefonts2/specs/msttcore-fon... Source rpm: no source rpm. there is no source, the microsoft eula doesn't allow distribution of the fonts with the rpm. rpm: https://downloads.sourceforge.net/project/mscorefonts2/rpms/msttcore-font... ======================================================================== Description: This provides the TrueType core fonts for the web that were once available from http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fontpack/ prior to 2002, and most recently updated in the European Union Expansion Update circa May 2007, still available on the Microsoft website. With this rpm the actual font cab files are downloaded from a Sourceforge project mirror and unpacked at install time. Therefore this package technically does not 'redistribute' the fonts. The fonts are then added to the core X fonts system as well as the Xft font system. These are the cab files downloaded: andale32.exe, arialb32.exe, comic32.exe, courie32.exe, georgi32.exe, impact32.exe, webdin32.exe, EUupdate.EXE, wd97vwr32.exe These cab files are only downloaded if EUupdate.EXE cannot be downloaded, since the EUupdate.EXE cab contains updates for the fonts in these cabs: arial32.exe, times32.exe, trebuc32.exe, verdan32.exe These are the fonts added: 1998 Andale Mono 2006 Arial: bold, bold italic, italic, regular 1998 Arial: black 1998 Comic: bold, regular 2000 Courier: bold, bold italic, italic, regular 1998 Impact 2006 Times: bold, bold italic, italic, regular 2006 Trebuchet: bold, bold italic, italic, regular 2006 Verdana: bold, bold italic, italic, regular 1998 Webdings ======================================================================== Fedora eligibility: I haven't tried, but I assume licensing restrictions on the fonts would be an issue, although the fonts are not a part of the rpm. ======================================================================== rpmlint: ======================================================================== This is my first rpmfusion package ======================================================================== I am seeking a sponsor. [ I think that's what I'm supposed to do ] -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
55
0 / 0

[Bug 2717] New: Review Request: pianobar - Command-line Pandora Internet radio client

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2717 Bug #: 2717 Summary: Review Request: pianobar - Command-line Pandora Internet radio client Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: greg.hellings(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec File: http://dl.thehellings.com/pianobar/pianobar.spec SRPM File: http://dl.thehellings.com/pianobar/pianobar-2012.12.01-2.fc18.src.rpm Description: Pianobar is a command-line Pandora client which allows you to play and manage your Internet radio options Ineligible for Fedora: While not hard dependencies, faad2 is required for playing nearly all Pandora audio and libmad is required for some Pandora One (premium, paid account) material. $ rpmlint pianobar-2012.12.01-2.fc18.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint x86_64/pianobar-{,debuginfo-}2012.12.01-2* pianobar-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. The debuginfo-without-sources seems to appear whenever binary and debug RPMs are generated separately from one another. This is not my first package proposal for RPMFusion but the previous ended up being a duplicate, so - if approved - this will be my first RPMFusion package. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 2384] New: Review request: vlcj - Java framework for the vlc media player

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2384 Bug #: 2384 Summary: Review request: vlcj - Java framework for the vlc media player Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: mefoster(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Created attachment 914 --> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=914 build.log from local mock build Spec file: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/vlcj.spec SRPM: http://mef.fedorapeople.org/vlcj-2.1.0-1.fc17.src.rpm Description: The vlcj project is an Open Source project that provides Java bindings for the excellent vlc media player from VideoLAN. The bindings can be used to build media player client and server software using Java - everything from simply playing local media files to a full-blown video-on-demand streaming server is possible. Not eligible for Fedora because: it depends on vlc, which is in rpmfusion rather than Fedora % rpmlint vlcj-2.1.0-1.fc17.src.rpm noarch/vlcj-2.1.0-1.fc17.noarch.rpm noarch/vlcj-javadoc-2.1.0-1.fc17.noarch.rpm vlcj.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) vlc -> vac, VLF vlcj.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vlc -> vac, VLF vlcj.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) vlc -> vac, VLF vlcj.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US vlc -> vac, VLF 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. ==> Ignored because vlc is the correct name of the package This is my first rpmfusion package, but I maintain several packages (mainly Java packages) in Fedora and am active in the Fedora Java SIG. Note that this package requires a patch to be applied to the "jna" library in Fedora as described here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=833786 I will attach a mock build.log from building this package in mock on my local machine against a patched version of jna. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 3090] New: Review request: cmplayer - a Qt-based multimedia player utilizing the MPV video back-end.

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3090 Bug #: 3090 Summary: Review request: cmplayer - a Qt-based multimedia player utilizing the MPV video back-end. Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: thebenj88(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30 Package contains the CMPlayer multimedia player, a GUI for mpv. rpmlint -i cmplayer-0.8.6-1.fc20.src.rpm cmplayer.src: W: invalid-url Source0: https://github.com/xylosper/cmplayer/releases/download/v0.8.6/cmplayer-0.... HTTP Error 403: Forbidden The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ^^ I'm not sure what's causing this problem, as this URL works both with a web browser and wget. rpmlint -i cmplayer-0.8.6-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm cmplayer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cmplayer Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. ^^ Unsure what to do about this. You'll notice that the spec file refers to 'libchardet-devel' in the BuildRequires, as I've also packaged libchardet. However, the upstream developer has included scripts to download and build libchardet statically if needed. I'm unsure if libchardet should be packaged as well, so I guess this is up to the reviewer. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 2 months

1
17
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers October 2015