September 2015 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 1992] New: Review Request: winetricks - Package manager for Win32 DLLs and applications on POSIX

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1992 Summary: Review Request: winetricks - Package manager for Win32 DLLs and applications on POSIX Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: tc(a)tchol.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec: http://tchol.org/rpmfusion/winetricks.spec SRPM: http://tchol.org/rpmfusion/winetricks-20110629-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Winetricks is an easy way to work around problems in Wine. It has a menu of supported games/apps for which it install all workarounds automatically. It also lets you install missing DLLs or tweak various Wine settings individually. It can be used via a GUI or the command line, whichever you prefer. The command line mode is particularly useful as a building block in fancier Wine front-ends and in automated regression testing. $ rpmlint SPECS/winetricks.spec SPECS/winetricks.spec: W: no-%build-section 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. $ rpmlint RPMS/noarch/winetricks-20110629-1.fc16.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This package is not eligible for Fedora because, while it is free itself, it is used to install numerous non-free software packages. Typically it downloads an installer from an official source and simply runs its via Wine, so users have the opportunity to review the EULA of individual packages to see if the terms are legal and/or acceptable to them before installing non-free software on their systems. I'm not a current RPMFusion or Fedora packager. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 2 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 472] New: Review request: dynamips - IOS Emulator/Hypervisor

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472 Summary: Review request: dynamips - IOS Emulator/Hypervisor Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: cooly(a)gnome.eu.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 SRPM: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/dynamips-0.2.7-5.fc10.x86_64.rpm SPEC: http://lucilanga.fedorapeople.org/dynamips.spec Description: Dynamips is an IOS emulator with hypervisor, allowing users to run several IOS images (in particular 3600 and 7200 series) as fully functional routers Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: This is an emulator and requires IOS images. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 2 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 718] New: Review Request: gns3 - Graphical network simulator

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=718 Summary: Review Request: gns3 - Graphical network simulator Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: andrew(a)topdog.za.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/gns3/gns3.spec SRPM URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/gns3/gns3-0.6.1-1.fc11.sr... Description: Graphical network simulator that allows you to design complex network topologies. You may run simulations or configure devices ranging from simple workstations to powerful Cisco routers. It uses Dynamips, an IOS emulator and PEMU, a PIX emulator which allow users to run IOS and PIX binary images from Cisco Systems. * rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gns3-0.6.1-1.fc11.i586.rpm gns3.i586: E: no-binary 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. - ignoring the error because this is written in python so does not contain any binary. * rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/gns3-0.6.1-1.fc11.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. * rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/gns3.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This is my first rpmfusion package but i am a fedora package maintainer. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 2 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 3438] New: Review request: clipgrab - A free video downloader and converter

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3438 Bug #: 3438 Summary: Review request: clipgrab - A free video downloader and converter Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/clipgrab.spec SRPM URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/clipgrab-3.4.8-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: ClipGrab is a free downloader and converter for YouTube, Vimeo, Dailymotion and many other online video sites. Fedora Account System Username: martinkg rpmlint clipgrab-3.4.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm clipgrab.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) downloader -> downloaded, down loader, down-loader clipgrab.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US downloader -> downloaded, down loader, down-loader clipgrab.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary clipgrab 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. rpmlint clipgrab-3.4.8-1.fc20.src.rpm clipgrab.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) downloader -> downloaded, down loader, down-loader clipgrab.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US downloader -> downloaded, down loader, down-loader 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. %changelog * Sat Dec 06 2014 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> - 3.4.8-1 - rebuild for new version -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 3 months

1
16
0 / 0

[Bug 3740] New: Review request: gstreamer1-plugins-bad-nonfree - GStreamer 1.0 streaming media framework "bad" non-free plug-ins

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3740 Bug #: 3740 Summary: Review request: gstreamer1-plugins-bad-nonfree - GStreamer 1.0 streaming media framework "bad" non-free plug-ins Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Spec: http://jwrdegoede.danny.cz/gstreamer1-plugins-bad-nonfree.spec SRPM: http://jwrdegoede.danny.cz/gstreamer1-plugins-bad-nonfree-1.4.5-1.fc19.sr... Description: GStreamer is a streaming media framework, based on graphs of elements which operate on media data. This package contains plug-ins that depend on libraries which use a non-free license. This package is not eligible for Fedora because it depends on packages from rpmfusion-nonfree. gstreamer1-plugins-bad-nonfree-debuginfo.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C This package provides debug information for package gstreamer1-plugins-bad-nonfree. 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings. The rpmlint error can be ignored as it is in an automatically generated sub-package. I'm already a rpmfusion packager. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 3429] New: Review request: frobtads - Text interpreter for Tads games

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3429 Bug #: 3429 Summary: Review request: frobtads - Text interpreter for Tads games Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: valtri(a)civ.zcu.cz CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/frobtads-1.2.3-1/frobtads.spec SRPM URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/frobtads-1.2.3-1/frobtads-1.2.3-1.fc22.sr... Description: TADS stands for "Text Adventure Development System". It's a set of tools that allow easy implementation of text adventures, or "Interactive Fiction". Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: non-commercial license of the bundled parts (tads2, tads3) Rpmlint: frobtads.src: W: invalid-license non-commercial frobtads.src:12: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(md5-deutsch-c++) frobtads.src:13: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(sha2-gladman) frobtads.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial frobtads.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary frob frobtads-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial frobtads-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial frobtads-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tadsc frobtads-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary t3make 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings. invalid-license: non-free licenses are not known to rpmlint unversioned-explicit-provides: this bundled pieces has no version (it is also in other packages) no-manual-page-for-binary: not strictly required by guidelines :-) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
12
0 / 0

[Bug 3493] New: Review request: mp3splt - GTK3 GUI that uses libmp3splt

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3493 Bug #: 3493 Summary: Review request: mp3splt - GTK3 GUI that uses libmp3splt Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: tuxor1337(a)web.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org mp3splt-gtk - a GTK3 GUI that uses libmp3splt http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/mp3splt-gtk-0.9.2-1.fc21.src.rpm http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/mp3splt-gtk.spec mp3splt is not eligible to be included in Fedora because it depends on libmad at build time which uses patented technology (mp3 codec). rpmlint output: mp3splt-gtk.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog mp3splt-gtk.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog mp3splt-gtk-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. This is my first RPM fusion package. I'm seeking a sponsor since I'm not a Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. I basically took the package hosted at ATrpms without major changes (http://packages.atrpms.net/name/mp3splt/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 3335] New: Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec implementation

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3335 Bug #: 3335 Summary: Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec implementation Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: mail(a)joachim-bauch.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://www.joachim-bauch.de/static/fedora/libde265.spec SRPM URL: http://www.joachim-bauch.de/static/fedora/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: libde265 is an open source implementation of the H.265 video codec. It is written from scratch for simplicity and efficiency. Its simple API makes it easy to integrate it into other software. The package was rejected for Fedora (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129691) because "HEVC implementations (of which h265 is one) have exactly the same legal problems as previous codecs backed by the MPEG consortium.". See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129691 for further information. Feedback from comment #2 of that bug has been incorporated. This is my first RPM fusion package, I'm looking for somebody to review and sponsor it. rpmlint output for the RPMs: ----- $ rpmlint -i ../SRPMS/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.src.rpm libde265.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. libde265.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. -> "codec" is just fine for this. libde265.src: W: invalid-url Source0: https://github.com/strukturag/libde265/releases/download/v0.8/libde265-0.... HTTP Error 403: Forbidden The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL. -> This seems to be a bug in either rpmlint or on Github, I can download the package just fine with wget or curl. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. ----- $ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm libde265.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. libde265.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. -> see above 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. ----- $ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-debuginfo-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. ----- $ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-devel-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm libde265-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. libde265-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. -> see above libde265-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share. -> The arch-specific "pkginfo" file must be installed to /usr/lib*, so that's fine. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. ----- $ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-examples-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm libde265-examples.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. libde265-examples.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. -> see above libde265-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary libde265-sherlock265 Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. libde265-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary libde265-dec265 Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page. -> As these are just simple examples, I didn't bother writing man pages yet. Both applications can print their usage information on the commandline. 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. ----- -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
55
0 / 0

[Bug 3492] New: Review request: mp3splt - Command line program from the mp3splt-project

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3492 Bug #: 3492 Summary: Review request: mp3splt - Command line program from the mp3splt-project Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: tuxor1337(a)web.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org mp3splt - the command line program from the mp3splt-project http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/mp3splt-2.6.2-1.fc21.src.rpm http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/mp3splt.spec mp3splt is not eligible to be included in Fedora because it depends on libmad at build time which uses patented technology (mp3 codec). rpmlint output: mp3splt.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog mp3splt.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog mp3splt-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. This is my first RPM fusion package. I'm seeking a sponsor since I'm not a Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. I basically took the package hosted at ATrpms without major changes (http://packages.atrpms.net/name/mp3splt/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
13
0 / 0

[Bug 3491] New: Review request: libmp3splt - Library created from mp3splt

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3491 Bug #: 3491 Summary: Review request: libmp3splt - Library created from mp3splt Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: tuxor1337(a)web.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org libmp3splt - a library created from mp3splt http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/libmp3splt-0.9.2-1.fc21.src.rpm http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/libmp3splt.spec libmp3splt is not eligible to be included in Fedora because it depends on libmad at build time which uses patented technology (mp3 codec). rpmlint output: libmp3splt.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog libmp3splt.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog libmp3splt-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog libmp3splt-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on libmp3splt/libmp3splt-libs/liblibmp3splt libmp3splt-devel.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. This is my first RPM fusion package. I'm seeking a sponsor since I'm not a Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. I basically took the package hosted at ATrpms without major changes (http://packages.atrpms.net/name/mp3splt/). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 4 months

1
19
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers September 2015