[Bug 3658] New: Review request: rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data - Appstream metadata for the RPMFusion nonfree repository
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3658
Bug #: 3658
Summary: Review request: rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data -
Appstream metadata for the RPMFusion nonfree
repository
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC:
http://ankursinha.in/files/misc/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-dat...
SRPM:
http://ankursinha.in/files/misc/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-dat...
Description:
Appstream metadata for packages in the RPMFusion free repository
Not eligible for Fedora since it's metadata from RPMFusion packages.
[asinha@cs-as14aho-2-herts-ac-uk noarch]$ rpmlint
./rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data-22-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
../../SRPMS/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data-22-1.fc22.src.rpm
../../SPECS/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.spec
rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US)
metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal
rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l
en_US metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal
rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.noarch: W: no-documentation
rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata
-> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal
rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal
rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{reponame}
rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{repoversion}
rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src: W: invalid-url Source1:
rpmfusion-nonfree-22-icons.tar.gz
../../SPECS/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment
%{reponame}
../../SPECS/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment
%{repoversion}
../../SPECS/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment
%{version}
../../SPECS/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.spec: W: invalid-url Source1:
rpmfusion-nonfree-22-icons.tar.gz
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings.
Nothing substantial here either.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 10 months
[Bug 3657] New: Review request: rpmfusion-free-appstream-data - Appstream metadata for the RPMFusion free repository
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3657
Bug #: 3657
Summary: Review request: rpmfusion-free-appstream-data -
Appstream metadata for the RPMFusion free repository
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC:
http://ankursinha.in/files/misc/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.spec
SRPM:
http://ankursinha.in/files/misc/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data-2...
Description:
Appstream metadata for packages in the RPMFusion free repository
Not eligible for Fedora since it's metadata from RPMFusion packages.
RPMLINT OUTPUT:
[asinha@cs-as14aho-2-herts-ac-uk noarch]$ rpmlint
./rpmfusion-free-appstream-data-22-1.fc22.noarch.rpm
../../SRPMS/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data-22-1.fc22.src.rpm
../../SPECS/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.spec
rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata
-> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal
rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal
rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.noarch: W: no-documentation
rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata ->
meta data, meta-data, metatarsal
rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal
rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{reponame}
rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{repoversion}
rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.src: W: invalid-url Source1:
rpmfusion-free-22-icons.tar.gz
../../SPECS/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment
%{reponame}
../../SPECS/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment
%{repoversion}
../../SPECS/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment
%{version}
../../SPECS/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.spec: W: invalid-url Source1:
rpmfusion-free-22-icons.tar.gz
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings.
Nothing substantial here.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 10 months
Migrated Wiki + RPM Fusion installation Process
by Nicolas Chauvet
FYI, the wiki was migrated yesterday and it's now SSL enabled.
This is a good news since this was very important security concern for
some users.
Unfortunately it was not relevant to enable SSL directly on the old
virtual machine running the wiki. So the service was migrated to a new
guest behind a reverse proxy. All is ansible managed and with Selinux
in Enforcing.
Wiki now waits for Contributors content! Please consider having a
HowTo for your package.
There are area of improvements, as I've tried to make moinmoin to work
with OpenID so we can re-use our FAS (or even allow for the fedora
FAS). It would be a very good to have.
Right now the contribution process requires to create an account, but
one need the password to make any contribution.
One last issue related to security process is about how the RPM Fusion
installation process should work securely.
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3677
If you have any suggestion, please share.
Thx
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
7 years, 11 months
[Bug 4155] New: Review Request: bcg729 - Opensource implementation of the G.729 codec
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4155
Bug #: 4155
Summary: Review Request: bcg729 - Opensource implementation of
the G.729 codec
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: manisandro(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/bcg729.spec
SRPM URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/bcg729-1.0.0-2.fc25.src.rpm
Description: Opensource implementation of the G.729 codec
Not in Fedora because: "ITU G729 usage is governed by a patent license to be
acquired from Sipro Lab"
Rpmlint:
$ rpmlint bcg729-1.0.0-2.fc25.src.rpm
bcg729.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Opensource -> Open source,
Open-source, Outsource
bcg729.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes
bcg729.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US opensource -> open source,
open-source, outsource
bcg729.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes
bcg729.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
$ rpmlint bcg729-1.0.0-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm
bcg729.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Opensource -> Open source,
Open-source, Outsource
bcg729.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes
bcg729.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US opensource -> open
source, open-source, outsource
bcg729.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code,
codes
bcg729.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti
bcg729.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/bcg729/COPYING
$ rpmlint bcg729-devel-1.0.0-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm
bcg729-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
bcg729-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
bcg729-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/bcg729/encoder.h
bcg729-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/bcg729/decoder.h
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 51 errors, 7 warnings.
The incorrect FSF address was reported upstream at [1]. Remaining issues are
non-issues.
[1] http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/linphone-developers/2016-07/index.html
This is my first RPM Fusion package, I'm already a Fedora sponsored packager
(FAS: smani)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 11 months
AMDGPU-Pro
by Germano Massullo
Hi everybody. I have just bought a Radeon RX480 and I started looking if
AMDGPU-Pro (propertary drivers) package is available in Fedora RPMFusion
repositories, but it is not.
There are SRPMs into RHEL7 AMDGPU-Pro drivers, so I was wondering how
much effort would require converting them for Fedora...
This morning we had a discussion on Freenode about it, but it's better
to restart it here, so we can better keep track of what we need to
accomplish the work of including them into RPMFusion.
Best regards
[1]: https://www2.ati.com/drivers/linux/rhel7/amdgpu-pro-16.40-348864.tar.xz
8 years
About chromium packaging
by Nicolas Chauvet
Hello,
I've just saw that chromium was banned to RPM Fusion whislist
http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist
I haven't see any message from the developers mailing list where this
has been discussed.
To be, the only valid reason why a software can be banned from the
repo is that it cannot be redistributed.
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
8 years
Re: [akmods: 3/3] Merge branch 'el7'
by Nicolas Chauvet
2016-11-23 0:38 GMT+01:00 Sérgio M. Basto <sergiomb(a)rpmfusion.org>:
> commit 580f919341f903be8383f4159a5b47b3d0c78dd2
> Merge: 3673a38 2d1568a
> Author: Sérgio M. Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com>
> Date: Tue Nov 22 23:35:20 2016 +0000
>
> Merge branch 'el7'
HOW IS THAT even possible that you merge back and forth el7 branch to devel.
STOP doing that this is totally insane!
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
8 years