[Bug 3965] New: Review request: miam-player - Miam-Player is a cross-platform open source music player
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3965
Bug #: 3965
Summary: Review request: miam-player - Miam-Player is a
cross-platform open source music player
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/miam-player.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/miam-player-0.8.0-0.1git45...
Description: Miam-Player is a cross-platform open source music player based on
qt5.
Fedora Account System Username: martinkg
rpmlint -i miam.spec ../SRPMS/miam-player-0.8.0-0.1git458b183.fc23.src.rpm
../RPMS/x86_64/miam-player-*
(none): E: no installed packages by name miam.spec
miam-player.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US flac -> flax, lac,
flack
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
miam-player.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ogg -> egg, org, Gog
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
miam-player.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US oga -> ago, toga, boga
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
miam-player.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US asf -> as, sf, ass
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
miam-player.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US flac -> flax, lac,
flack
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
miam-player.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ogg -> egg, org,
Gog
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
miam-player.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US oga -> ago, toga,
boga
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
miam-player.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US asf -> as, sf, ass
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
miam-player.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/libmiam-uniquelibrary.so.1.0.0
This executable should be stripped from debugging symbols, in order to take
less space and be loaded faster. This is usually done automatically at
buildtime by rpm. Check the build logs and the permission on the file (some
implementations only strip if the permission is 0755).
miam-player.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/libmiam-tabplaylists.so.1.0.0
This executable should be stripped from debugging symbols, in order to take
less space and be loaded faster. This is usually done automatically at
buildtime by rpm. Check the build logs and the permission on the file (some
implementations only strip if the permission is 0755).
miam-player.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/libmiam-core.so.1.0.0
This executable should be stripped from debugging symbols, in order to take
less space and be loaded faster. This is usually done automatically at
buildtime by rpm. Check the build logs and the permission on the file (some
implementations only strip if the permission is 0755).
miam-player.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/libmiam-library.so.1.0.0
This executable should be stripped from debugging symbols, in order to take
less space and be loaded faster. This is usually done automatically at
buildtime by rpm. Check the build logs and the permission on the file (some
implementations only strip if the permission is 0755).
miam-player.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/miam-player
This executable should be stripped from debugging symbols, in order to take
less space and be loaded faster. This is usually done automatically at
buildtime by rpm. Check the build logs and the permission on the file (some
implementations only strip if the permission is 0755).
miam-player.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary miam-player
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
miam-player-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
miam-player-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 16 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 2 months
[Bug 3912] New: Review request: lives - LiVES is a Video Editing System
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3912
Bug #: 3912
Summary: Review request: lives - LiVES is a Video Editing
System
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: anto.trande(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/lives/lives.spec
SRPM: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/lives/lives-2.4.6-1.fc23.src.rpm
Description:
LiVES began in 2002 as the Linux Video Editing System.
Since it now runs on more operating systems: LiVES is a Video Editing System.
It is designed to be simple to use, yet powerful.
It is small in size, yet it has many advanced features.
It's not eligible in Fedora because requires 'ffmpeg' and other packages
outside Fedora repos.
Note:
I seen previous request (https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1936),
I have chose to install 'libweed' as private library in /usr/lib/lives because
it's used only by LiVES, and also distributed in LiVES's source archive only.
/usr/lib/lives directory also cointains 'weed' header files.
'Exec' key in the .desktop file is changed in order to point the LIBRARY_PATH
to new location of private libraries.
src package provides an appdata file.
frei0r.so library seems missing, I can't find it in Fedora so 'frei0r' support
is disabled yet.
Still unavailable some libraries like faad2 and libdca (and others) in
RPMFusion Free for Fedora 23, therefore some Requires packages (mencoder,
mplayer) cannot be installed together with LiVES.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 3 months
[Bug 3438] New: Review request: clipgrab - A free video downloader and converter
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3438
Bug #: 3438
Summary: Review request: clipgrab - A free video downloader and
converter
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/clipgrab.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/clipgrab-3.4.8-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description: ClipGrab is a free downloader and converter for YouTube, Vimeo,
Dailymotion and many other online video sites.
Fedora Account System Username: martinkg
rpmlint clipgrab-3.4.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
clipgrab.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) downloader -> downloaded,
down loader, down-loader
clipgrab.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US downloader ->
downloaded, down loader, down-loader
clipgrab.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary clipgrab
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
rpmlint clipgrab-3.4.8-1.fc20.src.rpm
clipgrab.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) downloader -> downloaded, down
loader, down-loader
clipgrab.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US downloader -> downloaded,
down loader, down-loader
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
%changelog
* Sat Dec 06 2014 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> - 3.4.8-1
- rebuild for new version
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 3 months
[Bug 4013] New: Review request: devedeng - A program to create video DVDs and CDs (VCD, sVCD or CVD)
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4013
Bug #: 4013
Summary: Review request: devedeng - A program to create video
DVDs and CDs (VCD, sVCD or CVD)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: musuruan(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
Spec file:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/devedeng.spec
Source RPM:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/devedeng-4.6.1.tar.gz
Description:
DevedeNG is a program to create video DVDs and CDs (VCD, sVCD or CVD),
suitable for home players, from any number of video files, in any of the
formats supported by FFMpeg.
The suffix NG is because it is a rewrite from scratch of the old Devede, to
work with Python3 and Gtk3, and with a new internal architecture that allows
to expand it and easily add new features.
Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora?
It depends on other packages in RPM Fusion.
Rpmlint:
$ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/devedeng-4.6.1-1.fc23.src.rpm
devedeng.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) sVCD -> scud
devedeng.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sVCD -> scud
devedeng.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US suitables -> suitable,
suitable s, suitably
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
$ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/devedeng-4.6.1-1.fc23.noarch.rpm
devedeng.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python3-urllib3
devedeng.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) sVCD -> scud
devedeng.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sVCD -> scud
devedeng.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US suitables -> suitable,
suitable s, suitably
devedeng.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary devede_ng.py
devedeng.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary copy_files_verbose.py
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.
The "explicit-lib-dependency" error is erroneously raised by rpmlint because it
the package name has lib in its name.
Warnings can be safely ignored.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 3 months
[Bug 3985] New: Review request: kisslicer - Keep It Simple Slicer
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3985
Bug #: 3985
Summary: Review request: kisslicer - Keep It Simple Slicer
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mhroncok(a)redhat.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/kisslicer.spec
SRPM: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/kisslicer-1.1.0-1.fc23.src.rpm
%description
KISSlicer is a fast, easy-to-use, cross-platform program that takes 3D files
(STL) and generates path information (G-code) for a 3D Printer. This FREE
version has all the features needed for the hobbyist who uses a single-head
machine.
Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: nonfree
The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages. Explain for
each message why you've chosen to ignore it:
> kisslicer.x86_64: W: invalid-license Redistributable
valid in nonfree
> kisslicer.x86_64: W: no-documentation
upstream provides none
> kisslicer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary KISSlicer
> kisslicer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary kisslicer
upstream provides none, also a GUI so not really needed
> kisslicer.src: W: invalid-license Redistributable
valid in nonfree
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 4 months
[Bug 3429] New: Review request: frobtads - Text interpreter for Tads games
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3429
Bug #: 3429
Summary: Review request: frobtads - Text interpreter for Tads
games
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: valtri(a)civ.zcu.cz
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/frobtads-1.2.3-1/frobtads.spec
SRPM URL:
http://scientific.zcu.cz/fedora/frobtads-1.2.3-1/frobtads-1.2.3-1.fc22.sr...
Description: TADS stands for "Text Adventure Development System". It's a set of
tools that allow easy implementation of text adventures, or "Interactive
Fiction".
Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: non-commercial
license of the bundled parts (tads2, tads3)
Rpmlint:
frobtads.src: W: invalid-license non-commercial
frobtads.src:12: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(md5-deutsch-c++)
frobtads.src:13: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(sha2-gladman)
frobtads.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
frobtads.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary frob
frobtads-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
frobtads-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license non-commercial
frobtads-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tadsc
frobtads-devel.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary t3make
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 9 warnings.
invalid-license: non-free licenses are not known to rpmlint
unversioned-explicit-provides: this bundled pieces has no version (it is also
in other packages)
no-manual-page-for-binary: not strictly required by guidelines :-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 4 months
[Bug 3335] New: Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec implementation
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3335
Bug #: 3335
Summary: Review Request: libde265 - Open H.265 video codec
implementation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mail(a)joachim-bauch.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://www.joachim-bauch.de/static/fedora/libde265.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.joachim-bauch.de/static/fedora/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.src.rpm
Description:
libde265 is an open source implementation of the H.265 video codec.
It is written from scratch for simplicity and efficiency. Its simple
API makes it easy to integrate it into other software.
The package was rejected for Fedora
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129691) because "HEVC
implementations (of which h265 is one) have exactly the same legal problems as
previous codecs backed by the MPEG consortium.". See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129691 for further information.
Feedback from comment #2 of that bug has been incorporated.
This is my first RPM fusion package, I'm looking for somebody to review and
sponsor it.
rpmlint output for the RPMs:
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../SRPMS/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.src.rpm
libde265.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libde265.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code,
codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
-> "codec" is just fine for this.
libde265.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
https://github.com/strukturag/libde265/releases/download/v0.8/libde265-0....
HTTP Error 403: Forbidden
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.
-> This seems to be a bug in either rpmlint or on Github, I can download the
package just fine with wget or curl.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
libde265.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libde265.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code,
codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
-> see above
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-debuginfo-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-devel-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
libde265-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code,
codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libde265-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex,
code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
-> see above
libde265-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
-> The arch-specific "pkginfo" file must be installed to /usr/lib*, so that's
fine.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
-----
$ rpmlint -i ../RPMS/x86_64/libde265-examples-0.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm
libde265-examples.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex,
code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
libde265-examples.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec ->
codex, code, codes
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
-> see above
libde265-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary libde265-sherlock265
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
libde265-examples.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary libde265-dec265
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
-> As these are just simple examples, I didn't bother writing man pages yet.
Both applications can print their usage information on the commandline.
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
-----
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 4 months