April 2016 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 3762] New: libglvnd - The GL Vendor-Neutral Dispatch library

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3762 Bug #: 3762 Summary: libglvnd - The GL Vendor-Neutral Dispatch library Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews Spec URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libglvnd.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/libglvnd-0.0.0-3git20150901.fc22.src.rpm Description: This is a work-in-progress implementation of the vendor-neutral dispatch layer for arbitrating OpenGL API calls between multiple vendors on a per-screen basis, as described by Andy Ritger's OpenGL ABI proposal. Currently, only the GLX window-system API and OpenGL are supported, but in the future this library may support EGL and OpenGL ES as well. Fedora Account System Username: kwizart This package is currently only supported on x86_64 i386 and armhfp This package has been submitted for fedora, specially as it might be used by mesa at some point. Until approved or if there is any other issue preventing, it will better makes senses in the nonfree section instead of the free section. This package is currenly usefull for the nvidia nonfree driver in optimus setup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 9 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 3687] New: AMD Catalyst 15.101 for Fedora 22 with X.Org X11 Server 1.16

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3687 Bug #: 3687 Summary: AMD Catalyst 15.101 for Fedora 22 with X.Org X11 Server 1.16 Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: hx(a)inbox.lv CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Here is full description of patches that needs to be applied: https://bluehatrecord.wordpress.com/2015/06/05/installing-the-proprietary... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 10 months

1
22
0 / 0

Github pull request

by Andrea Musuruane

Hi, I've made a pull request for Nestopia following: http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors_github Can this be merged and Nestopia built? Thanks. Andrea

7 years, 11 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Mark Harfouche <mark.harfouche(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |4041 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 12 months

1
0
0 / 0

new person

by Simon Adams

Hi, I am a long time windows developer and finally started developing in Linux. I have preferred Linux for years so I am not new to Linux. I have rewritten one of my utility programs from windows to use in Linux. I could use a sponser to help me get the package distributed for use. Steve

7 years, 12 months

2
1
0 / 0

Re: Attempted rebuild of RPM Fusion (free) for F24

by Sérgio Basto

Hello, this should be shared with all developers , I'm aware that many packages doesn't build on F24 or in other words with GCC6 PRs (pull requests) that fix the builds for F24 and still applicable on F23 , are welcome , IMHO. And doesn't change the scheduled of the other tasks. I can't say if we will have F24 branch soon , but kwizart and Xavier are working on it ... On Qua, 2016-04-06 at 08:20 +0200, Adrian Reber wrote: > I tried to rebuild all packages from RPM Fusion F23 free for Fedora > 24 > and published the results here: > > http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/pub/fusion-24/RPMS/ > > This is a brute force rebuild of all packages using a simple script. > Which loops over all existing SRPMS and tries to rebuild them in > mock. > The script ran 3 or 4 times to make sure all packages are rebuilt > against the newest version of the required libraries. > > In a second run the script looped over all SRPMS and rebuilt the > packages from git if newer versions were found. > > The logs of the builds (some are missing) can be found here: > > http://ftp-stud.hs-esslingen.de/pub/fusion-24/logs/ > > I categorized the failures like this: > > C++ errors: > audacious-plugins-freeworld-3.6.2-1.fc24.src.rpm > bombono-dvd-1.2.2-11.fc24.src.rpm proposed to be retired > desmume-0.9.11-1.fc24.src.rpm > k9copy-3.0.3-2.fc24.src.rpm > kodi-16.0-1.fc24.src.rpm > mixxx-2.0.0-2.fc24.src.rpm > mpd-0.19.14-1.fc24.src.rpm > Nestopia-1.45-2.fc24.src.rpm > sonic-visualiser-freeworld-2.1-2.fc24.src.rpm > terminatorX-3.90-3.fc24.src.rpm > xvst-2.5.2-4.20140804gitcbfafe4.fc24.src.rpm > > Patch does not apply: > avidemux-2.6.12-5.fc24.src.rpm updated, the real version is avidemux-2.6.12-1 > vlc does not build: > phonon-backend-vlc > > Other build errors: > dvd95-1.6p0-7.fc24.src.rpm > gstreamer-plugins-ugly-0.10.19-18.fc24.src.rpm > gtetrinet-0.7.11-7.fc24.src.rpm > kaffeine-1.2.2-8.fc24.src.rpm > mamory-0.2.25-8.fc24.src.rpm > mythtv-0.27.6-3.fc24.src.rpm > ndiswrapper-kmod-1.59-8.fc24.src.rpm > yabause-0.9.14-1.fc24.src.rpm > > And for the following packages I have local git modifications: > k3b-extras-freeworld: git changes, still doesn't compile > x265: git changes > oxine: git changes proposed to be retired > vlc: git changes, still doesn't compile > > I will create PRs to get the local git changes into the RPM Fusion > github repository. > > Adrian -- Sérgio M. B.

8 years

1
1
0 / 0

Not sure what license tag to use

by Miro Hrončok

Hi, given the following terms: * MAY be used for commercial applications * MAY be shared freely * MUST NOT be reverse engineered What kind of license tag is supposed to be used? The ideas are: * Redistributable, no modification permitted * Redistributable * Distributable (The package belongs to nonfree.) Thanks for help. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

8 years

2
4
0 / 0

I'm not receivng emails

by Sérgio Basto

In my email sergio(a)serjux.com , I don't have any email since 26 of March , no emails from bugzilla or mailing lists . So if I miss some replies let me know please ... Thanks, -- Sérgio M. B.

8 years

3
2
0 / 0

test for gmail account

by Sérgio Basto

please ignore, just testing my gmail account . -- Sérgio M. B.

8 years

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 1638] Review request: gargoyle - multi-format interactive fiction interpreter

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1638 Andrew Engelbrecht <andrew.e.7327(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Andrew Engelbrecht <andrew.e.7327(a)gmail.com> 2016-04-05 07:00:47 CEST --- gargoyle might actually be acceptable according to Fedora's new Bundling Policy: * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Software_policy So gargoyle probably doesn't belong in RPM Fusion right now unless it gets rejected again. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers April 2016