[Bug 3827] New: Review request: rfpkg - RPMFusion utility for working with dist-git
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3827
Bug #: 3827
Summary: Review request: rfpkg - RPMFusion utility for working
with dist-git
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: anto.trande(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Description:
RPMFusion utility for working with dist-git.
SPEC: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/rfpkg/rfpkg.spec
SRPM:
https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/rfpkg/rfpkg-1.20-1.20151027git62a8b0.fc...
$ rpmlint rfpkg-1.20-1.20151027git62a8b0.fc23.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint rfpkg-rpmfusion-free-1.20-1.20151027git62a8b0.fc23.noarch.rpm
rfpkg-rpmfusion-nonfree-1.20-1.20151027git62a8b0.fc23.noarch.rpm
rfpkg-1.20-1.20151027git62a8b0.fc23.noarch.rpm
rfpkg-rpmfusion-free.noarch: W: no-documentation
rfpkg-rpmfusion-nonfree.noarch: W: no-documentation
rfpkg.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/rfpkg/COPYING
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.
Notes:
I don't know if this package must be packaged in EPEL5 too; impossible for
missing packages (pyrpkg).
It can be built in Fedora and EPEL6.
I added same Requires package from fedpkg, since rfpkg is a fork project;
unsure if it's correct.
bash-completion file seems automatically installed in datadir in Fedora 23, in
/etc/bash_completion.d in Fedora 24 and EPEL.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 5 months
ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)
by Simone Caronni
Hello,
i'm getting the following error in Koji:
ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (build_from_srpm)
when trying to build packages in Koji. Is there any step I missed when
setting up my client?
It does not seem so as Koji login with the certificates works.
Thanks,
--Simone
--
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose
sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson).
http://xkcd.com/229/
http://negativo17.org/
8 years, 5 months
How much RAM do the arm builders have?
by Julian Sikorski
Hi list,
first of all thank you to Nicolas, Sergio and others for setting up the
new infra! Keep up the good work guys!
May I ask how much memory do the arm build servers have available? My
qmc2 and mame builds have both failed due to memory exhaustion. While I
am in the process of moving them to Fedora proper, this issue might end
up affecting other packages as well. Both qmc2 and mame built fine on
i686 and on x86_64 so this could be used as an indication of how much
memory is sufficient.
Thank you for the information in advance.
Best regards,
Julian
8 years, 5 months
Self Introduction Roy Rankin
by rrankin＠ihug.com.au
I am Roy Rankin and I have been a Fedora packager since early 2009.
Currently I am a packager for gpsim, gputils, sdcc, gtk+extra and
denmo in Fedora.
I am also a developer and the de facto release manager for gpsim which
is a simulator for Microchip PIC devices.
I have submitted a review request for rpmfusion nonfree for
sdcc-nofree bugzilla #4105.
Sdcc has files with a nonfree license because they are based of files
from Microchip which have a restriction that their use is for
Microchip devices only.
The package sdcc-nonfree is to package the nonfree part of sdcc which
is not allowed in Fedora.
8 years, 5 months
Updated nvidia drivers?
by Richard Shaw
The 358 series are no longer listed on the UNIX download page and I'm
having problems with both it and the 340 series drivers.
358 shifts my screen on my MythTV box on my TV to the left and it's not
possible to shift it back, no workaround.
340 works fine until I try to reboot and segfaults and prevents shutdown
from completing so I have to power off the machine.
I am going to try to build the latest long life package myself but there's
somewhat of a complicated dependency between packages. Is there a
particular order it has to be done in? Or is there a bootstrapping process?
Thanks,
Richard
8 years, 5 months
new rfpkg 1.23.3
by Nicolas Chauvet
Hi,
There is a new rfpkg that aims to fix new-sources, build target and srpm
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=833
rfpkg-free and rfpkg-nonfree will be removed.
One note is that I've only tested with a separate account (my main
account has shell issue with gitolite so it does not behave normally)
but on a separate unix user (so I've symlinked the fedora.cert to the
rpmfusion.cert, I don't know if it's required).
if you previously have updated a package to the new infra but you've
avoided to upload the source archive, please do so and commit the new
source file.
It's still not possible to submit build, this is under investigation
but might be related to the koji infra (builder or else) reviewer
welcomed.
Thx
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
8 years, 5 months
