[Bug 3491] New: Review request: libmp3splt - Library created from mp3splt
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3491
Bug #: 3491
Summary: Review request: libmp3splt - Library created from
mp3splt
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: tuxor1337(a)web.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
libmp3splt - a library created from mp3splt
http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/libmp3splt-0.9.2-1.fc21.src.rpm
http://tovotu.de/data/rpmfusion/libmp3splt.spec
libmp3splt is not eligible to be included in Fedora because it depends on
libmad at build time which uses patented technology (mp3 codec).
rpmlint output:
libmp3splt.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
libmp3splt.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
libmp3splt-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
libmp3splt-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on
libmp3splt/libmp3splt-libs/liblibmp3splt
libmp3splt-devel.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings.
This is my first RPM fusion package. I'm seeking a sponsor since I'm not a
Fedora sponsored packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager.
I basically took the package hosted at ATrpms without major changes
(http://packages.atrpms.net/name/mp3splt/).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 5 months
[Bug 4112] New: Review request: rfpkg-minimal - Fork of fedpkg-minimal for RPM Fusion
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4112
Bug #: 4112
Summary: Review request: rfpkg-minimal - Fork of fedpkg-minimal
for RPM Fusion
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: rosser.bjr(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/rfpkg/rfpkg-minimal.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/rfpkg/rfpkg-minimal-0.1.0-1.fc23.src.rpm
Description:
rfpkg-minimal contains a script for use in RPM Fusion's Koji instance
to download the sources of a package. It is based on (and is a fork of)
fedpkg-minimal.
FAS Account Name: tc01
note: I'm a sponsored Fedora packager, but with no packages currently in RPM
Fusion (though I do have some reviews open).
Why not in Fedora: (potentially) part of RPM Fusion's buildsystem.
rpmlint output is just a couple of warnings (about spellings and the lack of a
man page for this version of rfpkg):
[bjr@tuchanka SPECS]$ rpmlint
../RPMS/noarch/rfpkg-minimal-0.1.0-1.fc23.noarch.rpm
rfpkg-minimal.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fedpkg -> fed pkg,
fed-pkg, feedbag
rfpkg-minimal.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fedpkg -> fed
pkg, fed-pkg, feedbag
rfpkg-minimal.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rfpkg
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
[bjr@tuchanka SPECS]$ rpmlint ../SRPMS/rfpkg-minimal-0.1.0-1.fc23.src.rpm
rfpkg-minimal.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) fedpkg -> fed pkg, fed-pkg,
feedbag
rfpkg-minimal.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fedpkg -> fed pkg,
fed-pkg, feedbag
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
8 years, 5 months
strange koji error
by Sérgio Basto
6409 build (rawhide-free, /free/VirtualBox-
kmod:c14771bf9f717d5866c564759e7bc95cad68823d): open (arm-
builder02.scaleway.rpmfusion.net) -> FAILED: BuildError: Error running
GIT command "git clone -n git://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/free/VirtualBox-kmod
/var/lib/mock/f25-free-build-1565-371/root/tmp/scmroot/VirtualBox-
kmod", see checkout.log for details
Kwizart, maybe he should look at permissions on Git , when you commit
with kwizart user and with gittolise problem , I think we need fix all,
other users commit don't really fix all cgit permissions to read , I
suggest look permissions and owner of files .git directories .
I don't know much
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
8 years, 5 months
Plan to push packages early on friday
by Nicolas Chauvet
Hi,
I plan to push packages for rawhide, f24 and f23 early in the morning
this friday. Please try to prepare your "urgents" push by then.
I will be moving to the south of France over the week-end and I have a
week off for the installation. As a consequence, I don't know when
would be the next push. (not before the middle of the next week).
BTW, It would be fine to have updates available for the 4.6.x kernel
for f23 (nvidia fixes and all)
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
8 years, 5 months