August 2016 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 3465] New: nautilus-dropbox - Dropbox extension for nautilus

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3465 Bug #: 3465 Summary: nautilus-dropbox - Dropbox extension for nautilus Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leigh123linux(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/nautilus-dropbox/1/naut... SRPM URL: https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/nautilus-dropbox/1/naut... Description: Dropbox extension for nautilus file manager Fedora Account System Username: leigh123linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 9 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 3658] New: Review request: rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data - Appstream metadata for the RPMFusion nonfree repository

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3658 Bug #: 3658 Summary: Review request: rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data - Appstream metadata for the RPMFusion nonfree repository Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org SPEC: http://ankursinha.in/files/misc/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-dat... SRPM: http://ankursinha.in/files/misc/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-dat... Description: Appstream metadata for packages in the RPMFusion free repository Not eligible for Fedora since it's metadata from RPMFusion packages. [asinha@cs-as14aho-2-herts-ac-uk noarch]$ rpmlint ./rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data-22-1.fc22.noarch.rpm ../../SRPMS/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data-22-1.fc22.src.rpm ../../SPECS/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.spec rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.noarch: W: no-documentation rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{reponame} rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{repoversion} rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{version} rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.src: W: invalid-url Source1: rpmfusion-nonfree-22-icons.tar.gz ../../SPECS/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{reponame} ../../SPECS/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{repoversion} ../../SPECS/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ../../SPECS/rpmfusion-nonfree-appstream-data.spec: W: invalid-url Source1: rpmfusion-nonfree-22-icons.tar.gz 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings. Nothing substantial here either. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 10 months

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 3657] New: Review request: rpmfusion-free-appstream-data - Appstream metadata for the RPMFusion free repository

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3657 Bug #: 3657 Summary: Review request: rpmfusion-free-appstream-data - Appstream metadata for the RPMFusion free repository Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org SPEC: http://ankursinha.in/files/misc/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.spec SRPM: http://ankursinha.in/files/misc/rpmfusion/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data-2... Description: Appstream metadata for packages in the RPMFusion free repository Not eligible for Fedora since it's metadata from RPMFusion packages. RPMLINT OUTPUT: [asinha@cs-as14aho-2-herts-ac-uk noarch]$ rpmlint ./rpmfusion-free-appstream-data-22-1.fc22.noarch.rpm ../../SRPMS/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data-22-1.fc22.src.rpm ../../SPECS/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.spec rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.noarch: W: no-documentation rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US metadata -> meta data, meta-data, metatarsal rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{reponame} rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{repoversion} rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.src:26: W: macro-in-comment %{version} rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.src: W: invalid-url Source1: rpmfusion-free-22-icons.tar.gz ../../SPECS/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{reponame} ../../SPECS/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{repoversion} ../../SPECS/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.spec:26: W: macro-in-comment %{version} ../../SPECS/rpmfusion-free-appstream-data.spec: W: invalid-url Source1: rpmfusion-free-22-icons.tar.gz 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings. Nothing substantial here. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 10 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 4155] New: Review Request: bcg729 - Opensource implementation of the G.729 codec

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4155 Bug #: 4155 Summary: Review Request: bcg729 - Opensource implementation of the G.729 codec Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: manisandro(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/bcg729.spec SRPM URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/bcg729-1.0.0-2.fc25.src.rpm Description: Opensource implementation of the G.729 codec Not in Fedora because: "ITU G729 usage is governed by a patent license to be acquired from Sipro Lab" Rpmlint: $ rpmlint bcg729-1.0.0-2.fc25.src.rpm bcg729.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Opensource -> Open source, Open-source, Outsource bcg729.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes bcg729.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US opensource -> open source, open-source, outsource bcg729.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes bcg729.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. $ rpmlint bcg729-1.0.0-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm bcg729.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Opensource -> Open source, Open-source, Outsource bcg729.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codec -> codex, code, codes bcg729.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US opensource -> open source, open-source, outsource bcg729.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US codec -> codex, code, codes bcg729.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti bcg729.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/bcg729/COPYING $ rpmlint bcg729-devel-1.0.0-2.fc25.x86_64.rpm bcg729-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib bcg729-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation bcg729-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/bcg729/encoder.h bcg729-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/bcg729/decoder.h 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 51 errors, 7 warnings. The incorrect FSF address was reported upstream at [1]. Remaining issues are non-issues. [1] http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/linphone-developers/2016-07/index.html This is my first RPM Fusion package, I'm already a Fedora sponsored packager (FAS: smani) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 11 months

1
27
0 / 0

About chromium packaging

by Nicolas Chauvet

Hello, I've just saw that chromium was banned to RPM Fusion whislist http://rpmfusion.org/Wishlist I haven't see any message from the developers mailing list where this has been discussed. To be, the only valid reason why a software can be banned from the repo is that it cannot be redistributed. -- - Nicolas (kwizart)

8 years

9
21
0 / 0

[Bug 3443] New: Review request: nemo-dropbox - Dropbox extension for nemo

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3443 Bug #: 3443 Summary: Review request: nemo-dropbox - Dropbox extension for nemo Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leigh123linux(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/nemo-dropbox/1/nemo-dro... SRPM URL: https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/nemo-dropbox/1/nemo-dro... Description: Dropbox extension for nemo file manager Dropbox allows you to sync your files online and across your computers automatically Fedora Account System Username: leigh123linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years

1
23
0 / 0

[Bug 3999] New: Review request: xt7-player-mpv - Qt/Gambas gui to mpv media player

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3999 Bug #: 3999 Summary: Review request: xt7-player-mpv - Qt/Gambas gui to mpv media player Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/xt7-player-mpv.spec SRPM URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/xt7-player-mpv-0.14.384-1.... Description: Aims to be an (in)complete graphical interface to mpv, focused on usability. It also provides extra features like youtube and shoutcast integration, dvbt, media tagging, library and playlist managment and a lot more. Fedora Account System Username: martinkg This package is not eligible to be included in Fedora, because it depends on mpv. rpmlint -v xt7-player-mpv.spec ../SRPMS/xt7-player-mpv-0.14.384-1.fc24.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/xt7-player-mpv-0.14.384-1.fc24.noarch.rpm xt7-player-mpv.spec: I: checking xt7-player-mpv.spec: I: checking-url https://github.com/kokoko3k/xt7-player-mpv/archive/0.14.384.tar.gz#/xt7-p... (timeout 10 seconds) xt7-player-mpv.src: I: checking xt7-player-mpv.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) gui -> GUI, goo, gun xt7-player-mpv.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US youtube -> you tube, you-tube, YouTube xt7-player-mpv.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shoutcast -> sh outcast, sh-outcast, shout cast xt7-player-mpv.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dvbt -> debt xt7-player-mpv.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US playlist -> play list, play-list, pluralist xt7-player-mpv.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US managment -> management, engagement, Mantegna xt7-player-mpv.src: I: checking-url http://xt7-player.sourceforge.net/xt7forum/ (timeout 10 seconds) xt7-player-mpv.src: I: checking-url https://github.com/kokoko3k/xt7-player-mpv/archive/0.14.384.tar.gz#/xt7-p... (timeout 10 seconds) xt7-player-mpv.noarch: I: checking xt7-player-mpv.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) gui -> GUI, goo, gun xt7-player-mpv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US youtube -> you tube, you-tube, YouTube xt7-player-mpv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US shoutcast -> sh outcast, sh-outcast, shout cast xt7-player-mpv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dvbt -> debt xt7-player-mpv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US playlist -> play list, play-list, pluralist xt7-player-mpv.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US managment -> management, engagement, Mantegna xt7-player-mpv.noarch: I: checking-url http://xt7-player.sourceforge.net/xt7forum/ (timeout 10 seconds) xt7-player-mpv.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary xt7-player-mpv.gambas 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 30] New: Tracker : Sponsorship Request

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Summary: Tracker : Sponsorship Request Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: lxtnow(a)gmail.com CC: lxtnow(a)gmail.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 This is a tracker bug for sponsorship requests in RPM Fusion. All new RPM Fusion contributors who need to be sponsored should block this bug. SPONSORS: When you accept the responsibility of sponsoring, please take it off of this list. Note: All members who already contribute to the Fedora Project (Packaging Side) no need to request for sponsorship. -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 1 month

1
87
0 / 0

[Bug 351] New: Review request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351 Summary: Review request: vmware-requirements - Installs packages needed for VMware's virtualization programs to run Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: dtimms(a)iinet.net.au CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Estimated Hours: 0.0 Spec URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requiremen... SRPM URL: http://members.iinet.net.au/~timmsy/vmware-requirements/vmware-requiremen... Description: Use this package to install the packages required to run vmware locally. This package does not include the free vmware-server or vmware-server-console package itself. They can be obtained from the vmware website. Can't be in Fedora: - it's a meta package - it enables use of non fedora software - the proper packaging should really be done by the upstream author. - the upstream is not open source - the upstream do not support the fedora distribution - FESCO discussed it recently, and voted that helper packages for third party apps shall be blocked from Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007#c17 The original Fedora review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478007 FESCO item tracking: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/35 FESCO discussion should show up soon for 2009-01-30: http://bpepple.fedorapeople.org/fesco/ ===== rpmlint: vmware-requirements.src:34: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib/security/pam_unix.so vmware-requirements.src:51: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 vmware-requirements.src:53: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libX11.so.6 vmware-requirements.src:55: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libXtst.so.6 vmware-requirements.src:57: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libXt.so.6 vmware-requirements.i386: W: no-documentation vmware-requirements.i386: E: no-binary vmware-requirements-server.i386: W: no-documentation vmware-requirements-server.i386: E: devel-dependency kernel-devel 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 2 warnings. ===== So, do we want to allow helper packages like this in RPM Fusion ? Note it does not Require: any packages external to Fedora/RPM Fusion, nor does it attempt to download them. Others have mentioned that other external no source apps might include skype etc, that could receive similar RPM Fusion packaging assistance ? -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

8 years, 1 month

1
9
0 / 0

review report

by Sérgio Basto

Hello, Here is a report what I found that remains more or less lost :), I'm writing down, for better organization . npapi-vlc http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=171 ufoai http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=417 being transfer to fedora https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157255 e-uae, wait for some package be published in f24 ... http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=322 vdr-dxr3 http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=251 last build Fedora 14 https://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=vdr-dxr3&submit=Sea rch+...&system=&arch= kmediafactory http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=101 acoustid-fingerprinter http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=2 last build Fedora 21 https://rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=acoustid-fingerprin ter&submit=Search+...&system=&arch= cmus http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=26 miro http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=147 mamory http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=140 kodi-pvr-addons (to be retired ?) http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=104 also today https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/?q=slmodem slmodem appears today on github.com/rpmfusion latest build Fedora 12 https://www.rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=slmodem-kmod-de buginfo slmodem should be orphaned, but the package wasn't properly converted from cvs, nothing to worry in the short term. I hope that can call this the last review report :) , all other packages seems that are rolling out !. Best regards and thanks, -- Sérgio M. B.

8 years, 1 month

2
3
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers August 2016