[Bug 718] New: Review Request: gns3 - Graphical network simulator
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=718
Summary: Review Request: gns3 - Graphical network simulator
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: andrew(a)topdog.za.net
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Spec URL: http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/gns3/gns3.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.topdog-software.com/oss/SRPMS/fedora/gns3/gns3-0.6.1-1.fc11.sr...
Description:
Graphical network simulator that allows you to design complex
network topologies. You may run simulations or configure devices
ranging from simple workstations to powerful Cisco routers.
It uses Dynamips, an IOS emulator and PEMU, a PIX emulator which
allow users to run IOS and PIX binary images from Cisco Systems.
* rpmlint rpmbuild/RPMS/i586/gns3-0.6.1-1.fc11.i586.rpm
gns3.i586: E: no-binary
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.
- ignoring the error because this is written in python so does not contain any
binary.
* rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/gns3-0.6.1-1.fc11.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
* rpmlint rpmbuild/SPECS/gns3.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
This is my first rpmfusion package but i am a fedora package maintainer.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 7 months
ffmpeg for EL7
by Orion Poplawski
Does anyone here have any ffmpeg knowledge that would give a reason for
preferring anything other than the current ffmpeg 3.1.1 for EL7? Does ffmpeg
have a long-term-support branch?
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com
7 years, 8 months
review all packages published, retired and added since F16
by Sérgio Basto
After yesterday verify , if versions are correct in all branches.
Today I after new builds of jwrdegoede , I started to check the
packages that was removed and add to repos, I checked since F16 to F26
(rawhide), and now I found some issues , see file in attach, we got
some strange results, basically forgotten packages ...
The top of strange, is:
- xine-ui
koji -c /etc/koji/rpmfusion-config list-pkgs --package xine-ui
only on F23 and F24 !
ans is not in pkgdb
https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/packages/xine%2A/
- dega-sdl is not published since f22, but built on koji
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=315
- Packages like acoustid-fingerprinter, jad , unace , are missing since
f22 ...
I will check all packages in this list, if they are marked as orphan ,
and have dead.package in cgit , I will send another list with what is
not correct.
Best regards,
--
Sérgio M. B.
7 years, 8 months
[Bug 4009] New: Review request: qmplay2 - A Qt based media player, streamer and downloader
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4009
Bug #: 4009
Summary: Review request: qmplay2 - A Qt based media player,
streamer and downloader
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/qmplay2.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/qmplay2-16.03.08-2.fc24.sr...
Description:
qmplay2 is a video player, it can play and stream all formats supported by
ffmpeg and libmodplug (including J2B). It has an integrated Youtube browser.
Fedora Account System Username: martinkg
This package is not eligible to be included in Fedora, because it depends on
ffmpeg.
rpmlint -i qmplay2.spec ../SRPMS/qmplay2-16.03.08-2.fc24.src.rpm
../RPMS/x86_64/qmplay2-16.03.08-2.fc24.x86_64.rpm
../RPMS/noarch/qmplay2-kde-integration-16.03.08-2.fc24.noarch.rpm
../RPMS/x86_64/qmplay2-devel-16.03.08-2.fc24.x86_64.rpm
../RPMS/x86_64/qmplay2-debuginfo-16.03.08-2.fc24.x86_64.rpm
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
qmplay2.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) downloader -> downloaded, down
loader, down-loader
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
qmplay2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ffmpeg -> MPEG
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
qmplay2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libmodplug
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
qmplay2.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) downloader -> downloaded, down
loader, down-loader
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
qmplay2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ffmpeg -> MPEG
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
qmplay2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libmodplug
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
qmplay2.x86_64: W: no-soname /usr/lib64/libqmplay2.so
qmplay2.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary QMPlay2
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
qmplay2-kde-integration.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) subpackage ->
sub package, sub-package, package's
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
qmplay2-kde-integration.noarch: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
qmplay2-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 8 months
[Bug 3964] New: Review request: qtav - A media playback framework based on Qt and FFmpeg
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3964
Bug #: 3964
Summary: Review request: qtav - A media playback framework
based on Qt and FFmpeg
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/qtav.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/qtav-1.9.0-0.1gitfafd3b0.f...
Description: QtAV is a multimedia playback library based on Qt and FFmpeg.
It can help you to write a player with less effort than ever before.
Fedora Account System Username: martinkg
This package is not eligible to be included in Fedora, because it depends on
ffmpeg.
rpmlint -i qtav.spec ../SRPMS/qtav-1.9.0-0.1gitfafd3b0.fc23.src.rpm
../RPMS/x86_64/qtav-*
qtav-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/src/debug/QtAV-fafd3b042707ad4e67b6cb71db32ec6748146f16/build/.rcc
The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete
it from the package if not.
qtav-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/src/debug/QtAV-fafd3b042707ad4e67b6cb71db32ec6748146f16/build/.rcc
The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete
it from the package if not.
qtav-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/src/debug/QtAV-fafd3b042707ad4e67b6cb71db32ec6748146f16/build/.moc
The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete
it from the package if not.
qtav-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/src/debug/QtAV-fafd3b042707ad4e67b6cb71db32ec6748146f16/build/.moc
The file or directory is hidden. You should see if this is normal, and delete
it from the package if not.
qtav-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
There are only non binary files in /usr/lib so they should be in /usr/share.
qtav-players.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/QtAV.svg
This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for
executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is
meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the
executable bits or move the file elsewhere.
qtav-players.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary player
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
qtav-players.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary QMLPlayer
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
5 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 8 months
RPM Fusion for Fedora 25 is signed
by Nicolas Chauvet
Hello,
With the release of Fedora 25 alpha today I'd like to mention that our
repository in now signed for fedora 25. Signed packages have been
pushed few hours ago (so mirrors are going to sync for few hours
still).
As a side effect, packages built for the f25-free and f25-nonfree
target won't appear in the new buildroot automatically. This could be
implemented using koji (see
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4226 ) instead of bodhi
. That makes me wonder if there is really a need to implement bodhi
for updates, or if the 3/ 4 days before to push can hold the workflow
as it is ?
Thx for all the work done !
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
7 years, 8 months
