September 2016 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 2144] Review Request: bitstream - Simpler access to binary structures such as specified by MPEG, DVB, IETF,

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2144 Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX --- Comment #4 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> --- accepted in fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Workaround of some buildroot failure and ffmpeg

by Nicolas Chauvet

There are still some issues with buildroot, some of theses are - ffmpeg is broken in rawhide. probably because of some header changes with opencv. There is a need for someone to look into for a real fix. - Missing buildroot dependencies. This is a known issue with koji when using external repos (for fedoras package), I can only say that this is a known issue and here is the suggested fix: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3024 The workaround still need to be implemented, but it won't work as fine as on the pre-infra where I was the only one to submit build job (and kick a new createrepo task if there are any failure). - Errror with groupadd, should be workarounded, (origial bugzilla is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060811) - rfpkg needs to be removed from the default buildroot and use rfpkg-minimal instead. This is a simple task that anyone can take. (convert and create rfpkg-minimal rpm package based on fedpkg-minimal) Don't forget that you need rfpkg-1.23.4 from koji.rpmfusion.org to submit build correctly. I will push them before this week-end (hopefully with ffmpeg fixed for rawhide). Thx -- - Nicolas (kwizart)

7 years, 7 months

5
8
0 / 0

[Bug 4225] Review Request: ffms2 - Wrapper library around libffmpeg

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4225 Michal Ambroz <rebus(a)seznam.cz> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |ffms2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 4255] New: Review request: ffms2 - cross-platform wrapper library around FFmpeg/libav

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4255 Bug ID: 4255 Summary: Review request: ffms2 - cross-platform wrapper library around FFmpeg/libav Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 URL: https://github.com/FFMS/ffms2 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: rebus(a)seznam.cz CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 SPEC: https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPEC/ffms2.spec SRPM: https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/ffms2-2.22-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: FFmpegSource (usually known as FFMS or FFMS2) is a cross-platform wrapper library around FFmpeg/libav. It gives you an easy, convenient way to say "open and decompress this media file for me, I don't care how you do it" and get frame- and sample-accurate access (usually), without having to bother with the sometimes less than straightforward and less than perfectly documented libav API. Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: it compiles with ffmpeg. It is needed to package the aegisub. $ rpmlint ffms2.spec ../SRPMS/ffms2-2.22-1.fc23.src.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/ffms2-2.22-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/ffms2-devel-2.22-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm ../RPMS/x86_64/ffms2-debuginfo-2.22-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm ffms2.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libav -> lib av, lib-av, Libya ffms2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libav -> lib av, lib-av, Libya ffms2.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libav -> lib av, lib-av, Libya ffms2.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libav -> lib av, lib-av, Libya ffms2.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ffmsindex ffms2-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib 4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Bogus errors - mostly spelling errors and having devel files in /usr/lib64. I am Fedora packager already. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 7 months

1
6
0 / 0

Re: what happened with rawhide/i386

by Sérgio Basto

(switch ML) On Ter, 2016-09-27 at 14:45 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > 2016-09-27 14:33 GMT+02:00 Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com>: > > > > Hi, > > I'm getting errors when build in i386 of rawhide and check that > > master > > and mirror haven't i386 [1] had I missing something ? , this is a > > bug > > or a feature ? > > > > [1] https://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora/development/rawhide/Everythin > > g/ > i386 was moved to fedora-secondary, is there updated mock config > files ? > https://mirrors.kernel.org/fedora-secondary/development/rawhide/Every > thing/ we have mock based on mirror metalink [1] and it is updated [1] https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=rawhide&arch=i386 > @sergio > I will update our config, thx for the reminder. So, now, I think the problem is in koji, >From : http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/6039/36039/mergerepos.log C_CREATEREPOLIB: Critical: cr_get_remote_metadata: curl_easy_perform failed: HTTP response code said error: The requested URL returned error: 404 Not Found Warning: Downloading of repodata failed: http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pu b/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/i386/os/ -- Sérgio M. B.

7 years, 7 months

2
1
0 / 0

libdvdcss in RPM Fusion ?

by Xavier Bachelot

Hi, It's been a few years we did not discuss hosting libdvdcss in RPM Fusion, and as Livna seems to be really dead now, I'd like to have this discussion again. As this has already been discussed many time, I gathered some information in a wiki page : http://rpmfusion.org/libdvdcss Any comments are welcome, I'll enhance the wiki page with them. I'm especially interested in comments _against_ hosting libdvdcss in RPM Fusion, with facts on why it would be bad. Once we'll have enough input, we can then collectively try to reach a decision on what to do with libdvdcss. Regards, Xavier

7 years, 7 months

10
17
0 / 0

[Bug 4214] Review Request: simplescreenrecorder - screen recorder for Linux

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4214 --- Comment #12 from Vasiliy Glazov <vascom2(a)gmail.com> --- SPEC: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/RussianFedora/simplescreenrecorder/mast... SRPM: http://koji.russianfedora.pro/kojifiles/work/tasks/9301/89301/simplescree... Libs subpackage removed. Dependencies are ok with obsoletes simplescreenrecorder-libs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

koji-rpmfusion command and other new koji features

by Sérgio Basto

Hello. Last week we have done koji-rpmfusion command (you have to install at least rfpkg-1.25.1-1 and rpmfusion-packager-0.5.2-1 ) Now we may do one "Buildroot override request" like in bodhi of Fedora proper [1], see [2] for more information, I just have updated the wiki page. [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/ [2] http://rpmfusion.org/Contributors Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B.

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Buildroot override request

by Nicolas Chauvet

Hi, You can now use koji-rpmfusion tag-build f2?-{,non}free-override your_rpmfusion_build_nvr for rpmfusion build to request an override tag. This will trigger a regen-repo task (if there is a metadata issue, that migh be possible to workaround to force a regen-repo task). It's not possible to tag a fedora package, (that's a manual task), so please ask on bugzilla and assign the request to me if needed. Untag is not possible yet, I will need to fix the koji-hub policy This should be reported in our wiki. Thx -- - Nicolas (kwizart)

7 years, 7 months

3
3
0 / 0

Akmods run RPM install as service?

by Richard Shaw

I've had a few failures but not really sure as to the cause, but I've been toying around with doing the final RPM install with a systemd service instead of calling dnf directly with the kernel posttrans script. Thoughts? Pitfalls? I'm trying to make sure that the install happens. Using a service would at least allow me to enforce a conflict with shutdown and may have other benefits. Thanks, Richard

7 years, 7 months

3
11
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers September 2016