November 2017 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 4645] New: Review request: medialibrary - Cross platform media library

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4645 Bug ID: 4645 Summary: Review request: medialibrary - Cross platform media library Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: free SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/medialibrary.spec SRPM: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/medialibrary-0.1.0-1.fc26.src.rpm Summary: Cross platform media library This package rely on vlc-devel, so it can be in the rpmfusion free section -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 1 month

1
10
0 / 0

[Bug 2222] New: Review request: libactp - Adaptive Clearing Tool Path Library

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2222 Bug #: 2222 Summary: Review request: libactp - Adaptive Clearing Tool Path Library Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: SpikeFedora(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 Spec URL: http://spike.fedorapeople.org/libactp/libactp.spec SRPM URL: http://spike.fedorapeople.org/libactp/libactp-0.0.2-0.1.20111219giteb97a6... Description: The libactp (Adaptive Clearing Tool Path Library) is an implementation of the GPL'ed algorithm demonstrated in FreeSteel as a set of C library functions Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora: "Some software is not functional or useful without the presence of external code dependencies in the runtime operating system environment. When those external code dependencies are non-free, legally unacceptable, or binary-only [...], then the dependent software is not acceptable for inclusion in Fedora"[1] Since atm only HeeksCNC uses this lib and HeeksCNC depends on OCE (HeeksCNC->HeeksCAD-devel->OCE-devel), which is considered non-free, I assume the term "not useful" applies here. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines rpmlint output: SPECS/libactp.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: libactp-svnHEAD.tar.bz2 libactp.src: W: invalid-url Source0: libactp-svnHEAD.tar.bz2 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Upstream doesn't provide a release package tarball. Careful: I usually don't do any python packaging. Here be dragons! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 1 month

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 2363] New: jitsi - Open Source Video Calls and Chat

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2363 Bug #: 2363 Summary: jitsi - Open Source Video Calls and Chat Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: fedora(a)marionline.it CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org SPEC: http://marionline.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/jitsi.spec SRPMS: http://marionline.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/jitsi-1.1-1.nightly.bui... Description: Jitsi (previously SIP Communicator) is an audio/video and chat communicator that supports protocols such as SIP, XMPP/Jabber, AIM/ICQ, Windows Live, Yahoo! and many other useful features. Why here: This package cannot be shipped into official fedora repository because upstream use ffmpeg library. Rpmlint: jitsi.src: W: invalid-url Source4: portaudio-hotplug-r1838.tar.gz jitsi.src: W: invalid-url Source3: jdic-r1736.tar.gz jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/libportaudio.a jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/portaudio.h jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/pkgconfig/portaudio-2.0.pc jitsi.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/include/portaudio-hotplug-r1838/pa_linux_alsa.h jitsi.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jitsi 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. I think jdic and portaudio branch hotplug for now is useful just for jitsi so I include them directly in this package. There are not official releases of this two packages, I checkout the code from svn repository. This is not my first RPM package. I just open another review request here for another SIP software, homer: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2237 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 1 month

1
3
0 / 0

nVidia howto question or solution

by Sérgio Basto

Hello, After on IRC another fellow, had problems on install nVidia drives on first installation and reboot, I also had a similar problem that make me think. And I think I found the issue, instead try blacklist nouveau on boot we should run: dracut -f /boot/initramfs-$(uname -r).img $(uname -r) xorg-x11-drv-nvidia package have blacklist-nouveau.conf [1] but just install a new kernel nouveau enter in blacklist isn't it ? , so after installing nVidia drives (for the first time) we should also run dracut to generate initramfs without nouveau module isn't it ? anyway like blacklist-nouveau.conf text says. Conclusion we should/need update https://rpmfusion.org/Howto/nVidia Best regards, [1] https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/nonfree/xorg-x11-drv-nvidia.git/tree/bl acklist-nouveau.conf -- Sérgio M. B.

6 years, 2 months

4
5
0 / 0

[Bug 4441] New: Review request: discord - All-in-one voice and text chat for gamers

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4441 Bug ID: 4441 Summary: Review request: discord - All-in-one voice and text chat for gamers Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: seancallaway(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org SPEC URL: https://seansblag.com/software/discord/discord.spec SRPM URL: https://seansblag.com/software/discord/discord-0.0.1-1.fc25.src.rpm DESCRIPTION: Discord is a free-of-cost proprietary VoIP application designed for gaming communities. WHY NOT IN FEDORA? Discord is a proprietary application *and* relies on nonfree libraries (such as ffmpeg), which the developer has bundled into the application. RPMLINT OUTPUT (SRPM): discord.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) gamers -> gamer, games, tamers discord.src: W: invalid-license Proprietary 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. RPMLINT OUTPUT (RPM): discord.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) gamers -> gamer, games, tamers discord.x86_64: W: invalid-license Proprietary discord.x86_64: W: binaryinfo-readelf-failed /usr/lib64/discord/resources/bootstrap/discord_voice.zip readelf: Error: Not an ELF file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start discord.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/discord/Discord ['$ORIGIN', '$ORIGIN/lib/'] discord.x86_64: W: binaryinfo-readelf-failed /usr/lib64/discord/resources/bootstrap/discord_toaster.zip readelf: Error: Not an ELF file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start discord.x86_64: W: binaryinfo-readelf-failed /usr/lib64/discord/resources/bootstrap/discord_utils.zip readelf: Error: Not an ELF file - it has the wrong magic bytes at the start discord.x86_64: W: no-documentation discord.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary Discord discord.x86_64: W: desktopfile-without-binary /usr/share/applications/discord.desktop /usr/bin/Discord JUSTIFICATIONS FOR ERRORS AND WARNINGS: * spelling-error: gamers is the proper plural of gamer. * invalid-license: rpmlint doesn't seem to support nonfree licenses * binaryinfo-readelf-failed: It's right. There's aren't ELF binaries, as they're ZIP files. Not sure how to remove this error, but am more than willing to do something to fix this. * binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath: The developer has built their proprietary binary to use bundled libraries. It's not ideal, but it's what they've done. I can try to convince them to just include those libs as a requirement in their Linux release. * no-documentation and no-manual-page-for-binary: No documentation is provided for Discord outside of their website. * desktopfile-without-binary: /usr/bin/Discord is a symlink to /usr/lib64/discord/Discord due to the bundled libraries. NOTES: This is my first RPMFusion package (and first desktop application package), but not my first package. I package re2c and openvpn-auth-ldap for EPEL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 2 months

1
30
0 / 0

when running a fedora-review of a rpmfusion package, the review.log is always empty.

by Martin Gansser

Hi, when running a fedora-review of a rpmfusion package, the review.log is always empty. Only a fedora-review.log [1] was written. fedora-review --other-bz https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org -b 4670 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64-rpmfusion_free $ fedora-review --other-bz https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org -b 4670 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64-rpmfusion_free INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 4670 INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : 4670 INFO: --> SRPM url: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/shotcut-17.10-1.fc26.src.rpm INFO: --> Spec url: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/shotcut.spec INFO: Using review directory: /home/martin/rpmbuild/SPECS/4670-shotcut INFO: Downloading .spec and .srpm files INFO: Downloading (Source0): https://github.com/mltframework/shotcut/archive/v17.10.tar.gz#/shotcut-17... INFO: No upstream for (Source1): shotcut.appdata.xml INFO: Running checks and generating report INFO: Results and/or logs in: /home/martin/rpmbuild/SPECS/4670-shotcut/results ERROR: Exception down the road...(logs in /home/martin/.cache/fedora-review.log) [1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/shotcut/fedora-review/fedo...

6 years, 3 months

4
4
0 / 0

[Bug 3749] New: kodi-pvr-mythtv - MythTV PVR for Kodi

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3749 Bug #: 3749 Summary: kodi-pvr-mythtv - MythTV PVR for Kodi Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-pvr-mythtv/kodi-pvr-myth... SRPM URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-pvr-mythtv/kodi-pvr-myth... Description: Kodi frontend for MythTV (up to MythTV 0.28). Supports streaming of live TV & recordings, listening to radio channels, EPG and timers. Why not in Fedora? This package depends on Kodi, which is in RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

1
17
0 / 0

[Bug 3717] New: kodi-platform - Kodi platform support library

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3717 Bug #: 3717 Summary: kodi-platform - Kodi platform support library Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: pikachu.2014(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-platform/kodi-platform.spec SRPM URL: http://pikachu.2014.free.fr/public/packages/kodi-platform/kodi-platform-1... Description: Kodi platform support library. Why not in Fedora? This package depends on Kodi, which is in RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

1
14
0 / 0

[Bug 4029] New: fs-uae-arcade - Fullscreen game browser for FS-UAE

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4029 Bug #: 4029 Summary: fs-uae-arcade - Fullscreen game browser for FS-UAE Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: musuruan(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Depends on: 4027 Blocks: 2 Spec file: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/fs-uae-arcade.spec Source RPM: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/fs-uae-arcade-2.6.2-... Description: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/fs-uae-arcade-2.6.2-... Why is this package not eligible to be included in Fedora? It depends on FS-UAE. rpmlint output: [andrea@panoramix SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/fs-uae-arcade-2.6.2-1.fc23.src.rpm fs-uae-arcade.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Fullscreen -> Full screen, Full-screen, Firescreen fs-uae-arcade.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fullscreen -> full screen, full-screen, firescreen 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. [andrea@panoramix SPECS]$ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/fs-uae-arcade-2.6.2-1.fc23.noarch.rpm fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Fullscreen -> Full screen, Full-screen, Firescreen fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US fullscreen -> full screen, full-screen, firescreen fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: no-documentation fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fs-uae-arcade fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: uncompressed-zip /usr/share/fs-uae-arcade/fsbc/tests/zipfile/utf-8.zip fs-uae-arcade.noarch: W: uncompressed-zip /usr/share/fs-uae-arcade/fsbc/tests/zipfile/iso-8859-1.zip 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 4657] New: Review request: lpf-flash-plugin Flash player plugin

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4657 Bug ID: 4657 Summary: Review request: lpf-flash-plugin Flash player plugin Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: sergio(a)serjux.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: nonfree Hi here it is my propose, SPEC: https://www.serjux.com/rpms/lpf-flash-plugin.spec SRPM: https://www.serjux.com/rpms/lpf-flash-plugin-27.0.0.130-1.fc28.src.rpm in resume https://github.com/rpmfusion/lpf-flash-plugin/pull/5 , which means I proposing replace Npapi with Ppapi in same package , while adobe offer the 2 options , I think we should adopt only Ppapi solution , one of the reason is because using freshplayer seems to me that Firefox works better , we use more compiled source code. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 4 months

1
2
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers November 2017