March 2017 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 4285] Review request: telegram-desktop - Telegram Desktop official client

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4285 --- Comment #18 from Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart(a)gmail.com> --- Thx for your update on this review. I don't get if this was talked previously but it seems very annoying to bundle your own qt for such package. I don't see any link about which patches telegram upstream has applied to the bundled qt version. Can you look into it and document in the spec ? (please only update the spec if it's the only change). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 4285] Review request: telegram-desktop - Telegram Desktop official client

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4285 --- Comment #17 from Vitaly Zaitsev <vitaly(a)easycoding.org> --- Updated to 1.0.26. SPEC: https://github.com/xvitaly/tgbuild/raw/v1.0.27/telegram-desktop.spec SRPM: http://koji.russianfedora.pro/kojifiles/packages/telegram-desktop/1.0.27/... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

Fwd: Package: e-uae-0.8.29-0.19.wip4.fc26 Tag: f26-nonfree Status: complete Built by: kwizart

by Andrea Musuruane

7 years, 8 months

3
9
0 / 0

RPM Fusion is branched for f26

by Nicolas Chauvet

As the topic said, RPM Fusion is branched for f26. You should be able to checkout a f26 branch from your module with master pointing to f27 target. Thanks for everyone who helped with the mass-rebuild. There are still package FTBFS, but most have been done now. It should be fine to report a bug for the remaining ones, so it can be properly tracked. The f26 repos are signed with the f26 key and the related rpmfusion-*-release package have been made. If you are already on rawhide, everything should upgrade to f27. but if you want to switch to branch, you should probably verify to have the appropriate rpmfusion-26*-release package manually. Thx -- - Nicolas (kwizart)

7 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: About the update audacity in RPM Fusion

by Agnes Jones

On 25/03/17 23:00, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > If you update audacity in fedora, don't forget to update the freeworld > version along. > In the case there is no more interest in the -freeworld version, > please use rfpkg retire on the rpmfusion version and add the proper > obsoletes/provides in the fedora version. Started work on rpmfusion version tonight, but then realized Leigh already worked on it. Assuming working OK, unless someone needs me to test. Just wondered if not having identical n-v-r in rpmfusion is a problem ? Also, in Fedora I've only just submitted to "updates-testing". It will still be sometime before enough Karma or I push it. Is there a site for RPM Fusion for submitting / controlling the updates like in Fedora ? Dave.

7 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

Mass rebuild for f26 is almost finished

by Sérgio Basto

Hi, Almost all packages have been rebuilt, we have these FTBFS (so far) : ./bombono-dvd/ftbfs ./dhewm3/ftbfs ./libdvbcsa/ftbfs ./lightspark/ftbfs ./mythtv/ftbfs ./openmw/ftbfs ./qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld/ftbfs ./simplescreenrecorder/ftbfs ./sonic-visualiser-freeworld/ftbfs ./stella/ftbfs ./tvheadend/ftbfs ./xine-plugin/ftbfs ./zboy/ftbfs -- Sérgio M. B.

7 years, 8 months

6
6
0 / 0

Rebuilding ffmpeg for rawhide

by Vascom

Please pay attention to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4484 ffmpeg need rebuild because of change libbluray soname version. And need separate branch f26 in repos. Thanks.

7 years, 8 months

2
4
0 / 0

error: call of overloaded 'abs(unsigned int)' is ambiguous

by Martin Gansser

the build of vdr-mp3 fails during the fc26 mass build with this error: error: call of overloaded 'abs(unsigned int)' is ambiguous build.log: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/811/90811/build.log This is the part of the affected code: bool cOutputOss::Reset(unsigned int sr) { if(fd>=0) { CHECK(ioctl(fd,SNDCTL_DSP_SYNC,0)); int format=AFMT_S16_LE; CHECK(ioctl(fd,SNDCTL_DSP_SETFMT,&format)); if(format==AFMT_S16_LE) { int channels=2; CHECK(ioctl(fd,SNDCTL_DSP_CHANNELS,&channels)); if(channels==2) { int real=sr; CHECK(ioctl(fd,SNDCTL_DSP_SPEED,&real)); d(printf("oss: DSP samplerate now %d\n",real)) if((unsigned int)abs(real-sr)<sr/50) { outSr=sr; d(printf("mp3-oss: DSP reset done\n")) return true; } how can i fix this ?

7 years, 8 months

2
2
0 / 0

Mass rebuild for f26 has started (late)

by Nicolas Chauvet

As you might see the mass rebuild has started for f26. The reason it was late, despite my own time, is that I was waiting to access aarch64 builders. The builders are provided by Linaro and are now operating ! Also the ppc64/ppc64le builders are provided by OSUOSL. A big thanks for both Linaro and OSUOSL to have provided us such builders. So the mass rebuild will bring support for 3 more arches in RPM Fusion (along with the promotion of theses arches in the main koji on the fedora side). We now have ppc64, ppc64le and aarch64. For heading the mass rebuild, I'm using the same script fedora rel-eng uses adapted for rpmfusion. It means the builds are sorted alphabetically and not by dependencies. So the first pass expects packages having dependencies in RPM Fusion to fail. They will have to be resubmitted later. Some packages are already failing on x86_64, theses needs to be worked on , but please let the first pass finished before to resubmit packages that has any dependency on RPM Fusion. It's also possible that the packages are failing for various reason. In this case it's only a matter to have the job resubmitted. Please ask the list on which particular case (Sergio or Leigh will be able to resubmit). It's possible to submit new packages update (without deps), I'm trying to run the script only when the resources are available to avoid flooding the infra. I won't be much available next week (despite always connected on IRC), so if unsure, please ask on the mailing list. Thx -- - Nicolas (kwizart)

7 years, 8 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Bug 4256] Review request: aegisub - Tool for creating and modifying subtitles

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4256 --- Comment #19 from Xavier Bachelot <xavier(a)bachelot.org> --- You won't have to resubmit, the mass rebuild will do it for you. Regards, Xavier -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers March 2017