March 2017 - rpmfusion-developers

by Orion Poplawski

In a fit of madness, I bumped the rpmfusion-free-release to 27 before realizing that we hadn't branched yet. And I can't untag the build: $ koji-rpmfusion untag-build f26-free rpmfusion-free-release-27-0.1 ActionNotAllowed: policy violation (tag) Can some admin do this ASAP? So very sorry, I'm incredibly ashamed.. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion(a)nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com

7 years, 8 months

2
2
0 / 0

[Bug 4475] New: Review Request: comedi - Kernel Libraries and drivers for Linux Control and Measurement Interface API

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4475 Bug ID: 4475 Summary: Review Request: comedi - Kernel Libraries and drivers for Linux Control and Measurement Interface API Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 URL: http://comedi.org OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: daniel.naughton(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Created attachment 1748 --> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1748&action=edit Output of fedora-review in fedora-rawhide-x86_64 mock The srpms can be found here on copr https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/dnaughton/comedi/ Description: This rpm is the installation of the kernel modules and device drivers for the linux Control and Measurement Device Interface from comedi.org. These drivers are useful for using the various data acquisition cards and USB devices in linux. Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/davidjkrause/comedi-contec-rpm/master/c... SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/dnaughton/comedi/fedora-r... rpmlint warnings expected for kernel module This is my first rpm package. I am seeking a sponsor. I would like to become the maintainer of this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 8 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 4293] Review request: tilem - Emulator and debugger for Texas Instruments Z80-based graphing calculators

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4293 --- Comment #8 from Vasiliy Glazov <vascom2(a)gmail.com> --- If hicolor-icon-theme not added to BR then tilem will own whole directory. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 4293] Review request: tilem - Emulator and debugger for Texas Instruments Z80-based graphing calculators

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4293 --- Comment #7 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #6) > BuildRequires: - because this package should not be owner of > /usr/share/icons directory. In fact, 'tilem' must own '%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps/tilem.png' files only because '%{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/*/apps' are owned by 'hicolor-icon-theme'. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 3465] New: nautilus-dropbox - Dropbox extension for nautilus

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3465 Bug #: 3465 Summary: nautilus-dropbox - Dropbox extension for nautilus Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: leigh123linux(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/nautilus-dropbox/1/naut... SRPM URL: https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/review/nautilus-dropbox/1/naut... Description: Dropbox extension for nautilus file manager Fedora Account System Username: leigh123linux -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 8 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 4293] Review request: tilem - Emulator and debugger for Texas Instruments Z80-based graphing calculators

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4293 --- Comment #6 from Vasiliy Glazov <vascom2(a)gmail.com> --- BuildRequires: - because this package should not be owner of /usr/share/icons directory. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 4293] Review request: tilem - Emulator and debugger for Texas Instruments Z80-based graphing calculators

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4293 --- Comment #5 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande(a)gmail.com> --- (In reply to Vasiliy Glazov from comment #4) > Please add > BuildRequires: hicolor-icon-theme Requires: hicolor-icon-theme -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 4293] Review request: tilem - Emulator and debugger for Texas Instruments Z80-based graphing calculators

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4293 Vasiliy Glazov <vascom2(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vascom2(a)gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Vasiliy Glazov <vascom2(a)gmail.com> --- Please add BuildRequires: hicolor-icon-theme -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 4293] Review request: tilem - Emulator and debugger for Texas Instruments Z80-based graphing calculators

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4293 Antonio Trande <anto.trande(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|2 |3 --- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande <anto.trande(a)gmail.com> --- Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop- file-validate if there is such a file. Please, validate the .desktop file with 'desktop-file-validate' command. - update-desktop-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package contains desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry. Note: desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in tilem See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop- database 'update-desktop-database' must be invoked on Fedora < 25 only. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Scriptlets?rd=Packaging:Scriptle... - Source archive provides other files released under GPLv2+ and GPLv3+ licenses. Main license of 'tilem' is GPLv3, but GPLv3+ includes all three licenses. I guess, License tag can be GPLv3+ - .desktop and .appdata.xml files must be named with the same name of package; so, tilem.desktop, tilem.appdata.xml ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "zlib/libpng", "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "LGPL (v2.1 or later)". 64 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/sagitter/tilem/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [!]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package contains icons. Note: icons in tilem [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 5 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [?]: update-mime-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package stores mime configuration in /usr/share/mime/packages. Note: mimeinfo files in: tilem See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#mimeinfo This is valid for Fedora < 24 only. [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in tilem- debuginfo [ ]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 2365440 bytes in /usr/share [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). Rpmlint ------- Checking: tilem-2.0-3.fc27.x86_64.rpm tilem-debuginfo-2.0-3.fc27.x86_64.rpm tilem-2.0-3.fc27.src.rpm tilem.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tilem2 tilem-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/tilem-2.0/gui/skinops.c tilem-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/tilem-2.0/gui/skinops.h 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. Rpmlint (debuginfo) ------------------- Checking: tilem-debuginfo-2.0-3.fc27.x86_64.rpm tilem-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/tilem-2.0/gui/skinops.h tilem-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/tilem-2.0/gui/skinops.c 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory tilem-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/tilem-2.0/gui/skinops.c tilem-debuginfo.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/tilem-2.0/gui/skinops.h tilem.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary tilem2 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 1 warnings. Requires -------- tilem-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): tilem (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /bin/sh libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit) libfreetype.so.6()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) libticables2.so.7()(64bit) libticalcs2.so.12()(64bit) libticonv.so.8()(64bit) libtifiles2.so.10()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- tilem-debuginfo: tilem-debuginfo tilem-debuginfo(x86-64) tilem: appdata() appdata(tilem.appdata.xml) application() application(tilem2.desktop) mimehandler(application/x-ti73-app) mimehandler(application/x-ti73-backup) mimehandler(application/x-ti73-os) mimehandler(application/x-ti73-program) mimehandler(application/x-ti73-variables) mimehandler(application/x-ti81-program) mimehandler(application/x-ti82-backup) mimehandler(application/x-ti82-program) mimehandler(application/x-ti82-variables) mimehandler(application/x-ti83-backup) mimehandler(application/x-ti83-program) mimehandler(application/x-ti83-variables) mimehandler(application/x-ti83plus-app) mimehandler(application/x-ti83plus-os) mimehandler(application/x-ti83plus-program) mimehandler(application/x-ti83plus-variables) mimehandler(application/x-ti85-backup) mimehandler(application/x-ti85-program) mimehandler(application/x-ti85-variables) mimehandler(application/x-ti86-backup) mimehandler(application/x-ti86-program) mimehandler(application/x-ti86-variables) mimehandler(application/x-tigroup) tilem tilem(x86-64) Source checksums ---------------- http://www.ticalc.org/pub/unix/tilem.tar.bz2 : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : fc27235a402dfbee35a15a5aa7c9603211ffa5a1f8b1716310ce8f0b7f4743ad CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : fc27235a402dfbee35a15a5aa7c9603211ffa5a1f8b1716310ce8f0b7f4743ad Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -rn tilem-2.0-3.fc25.src.rpm Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++ Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, PHP Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3 [Bug 3] Tracker: Packages under review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

7 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 4293] Review request: tilem - Emulator and debugger for Texas Instruments Z80-based graphing calculators

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

7 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers March 2017