June 2017 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 2134] New: Review Request: pyspotify - Python bindings for libspotify

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2134 Bug #: 2134 Summary: Review Request: pyspotify - Python bindings for libspotify Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jdieter(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/pyspotify.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/pyspotify-1.6.1-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Python bindings for the official Spotify API Why not in Fedora: Requires libspotify which is proprietary -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 3 months

1
12
0 / 0

[Bug 2135] New: Review Request: mopidy - Music server that plays music from Spotify

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2135 Bug #: 2135 Summary: Review Request: mopidy - Music server that plays music from Spotify Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: jdieter(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Depends on: 2133, 2134 Spec URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/mopidy.spec SRPM URL: http://www.lesbg.com/jdieter/mopidy-0.6.1-1.fc16.src.rpm Description: Mopidy is a music server that plays music from a user's Spotify account, given that the user has a Spotify Premium Account. Any MPD clients can connect and control the server -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 3 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 3953] New: Review request: dwarffortress - A single-player procedurally generated fantasy game

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3953 Bug #: 3953 Summary: Review request: dwarffortress - A single-player procedurally generated fantasy game Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: rosser.bjr(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Source URL: https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/dwarffortress/rpmfusion/dwarffortress... SRPM URL: https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/dwarffortress/rpmfusion/dwarffortress... Description: Dwarf Fortress is a single-player fantasy game. You can control a dwarven outpost or an adventurer in a randomly generated, persistent world. Although Dwarf Fortress is still in a work in progress, many features have already been implemented. Dwarf Fortress is free to redistribute, but is not open source. Why rpmfusion(-nonfree): Dwarf Fortress is not open source, so cannot be included in Fedora. However, there is an open source component (the graphics library) that should be compiled and linked against the system libraries (rather than the bundled ones included in the download). Other comments: This work is mostly based on the work done for Arch Linux (see https://www.archlinux.org/packages/multilib/x86_64/dwarffortress/) As I mentioned on the list, this is my first rpmfusion package, but I *am* a sponsored Fedora packager. Since then, I've updated the spec for the newest upstream release of DF and also broken up the archive; rather than place it in /opt, I've opted to put the "binaries" into %_libexecdir and the data into %_datadir. The "dwarffortress" script originally written for Arch Linux has been adjusted; it creates a DF installation in ~/.dwarffortress from these locations and then executes out of there, using symlinks. Another thing to please note is that the package only builds on i686 so I have made use of the "ExclusiveArch" tag. rpmlint output: [bjr@irune SPECS]$ rpmlint ../RPMS/i686/dwarffortress-0.42.05-3.fc22.i686.rpm dwarffortress.i686: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) procedurally -> procedural dwarffortress.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dwarven -> warden dwarffortress.i686: W: invalid-license Dwarf Fortress dwarffortress.i686: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/libexec/dwarffortress/Dwarf_Fortress ['$ORIGIN'] dwarffortress.i686: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/libexec/dwarffortress/libgraphics.so dwarffortress.i686: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dwarffortress [bjr@irune SPECS]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-22-i386/result/dwarffortress-0.42.05-3.fc22.src.rpm dwarffortress.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) procedurally -> procedural dwarffortress.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dwarven -> warden dwarffortress.src: W: invalid-license Dwarf Fortress dwarffortress.src:45: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot} dwarffortress.src:77: W: macro-in-comment %{_libdir} dwarffortress.src:77: W: macro-in-comment %{buildroot} dwarffortress.src:77: W: macro-in-comment %{optdir} Of these, I think the main objections that aren't spelling errors or comments are: -The rpath/unstripped binary error/warning. Dwarf_Fortress is the actual "binary" that is closed-source; I don't think we can do anything about this. -The license. Is there a specific way I should reference a custom license? The Dwarf Fortress license text is as follows: "Copyright (c) 2002-2012. All rights are retained by Tarn Adams, save the following: you may redistribute the binary and accompanying files, unmodified, provided you do so free of charge. If you'd like to distribute a modified version of the game or portion of the archive and are worried about copyright infringement, please contact Tarn Adams at toadyone(a)bay12games.com. This software is still in development, and this means that there are going to be problems, including serious problems that, however unlikely, might damage your system or the information stored on it. Please be aware of this before playing." For testing purposes a RPM repository is available here: https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/dwarffortress/ (along with the public GPG key). I've tested these packages on both Fedora 22 and Fedora 23. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 3 months

1
19
0 / 0

[Bug 3508] New: Review request: grive-0.3.0.x86_64 - Grive for Fedora 21

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3508 Bug #: 3508 Summary: Review request: grive-0.3.0.x86_64 - Grive for Fedora 21 Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: shawn.lopresto(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Created attachment 1395 --> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/attachment.cgi?id=1395 Grive RPM This is my first rpmfusion package submission RPM for installing grive on Fedora 21 RPM - http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=26697798978464013831 SRPM - http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=98907194297236318947 SPEC File - http://s000.tinyupload.com/?file_id=19518635657234910713 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 3 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 3805] New: Review request: cannonball - An Enhanced OutRun Engine

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3805 Bug #: 3805 Summary: Review request: cannonball - An Enhanced OutRun Engine Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: musuruan(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/cannonball.spec https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/12575912/reviews/cannonball-0.3-1.fc2... Description: Cannonball is a program which allows you to play an enhanced version of Yu Suzuki's seminal arcade racer, OutRun, on a variety of systems: - 60 fps gameplay (smoother than the original game) - True widescreen mode (extend the play area by 25%) - High Resolution mode (improves sprite scaling) - Time Trial Mode - Cheats - Customisable Music - High Score Saving - Western, Japanese & prototype track support - Analog & Digital controllers supported - Force Feedback / Haptic support (Windows only) - Fixes bugs present in the original game Why not in Fedora: Emulators are not allowed in Fedora Rpmlint output: $ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/SRPMS/cannonball-0.3-1.fc21.src.rpm cannonball.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gameplay -> game play, game-play, nameplate cannonball.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US widescreen -> wide screen, wide-screen, windscreen cannonball.src: W: invalid-license Custom 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/cannonball-0.3-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm cannonball.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gameplay -> game play, game-play, nameplate cannonball.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US widescreen -> wide screen, wide-screen, windscreen cannonball.x86_64: W: invalid-license Custom cannonball.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary cannonball 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. $ rpmlint /home/andrea/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/cannonball-debuginfo-0.3-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm cannonball-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license Custom 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. AFAIK spelling is correct and the license is fine too since we are in RPM Fusion. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 4 months

1
25
0 / 0

[Bug 3600] New: ubuntu-fonts - The font family used in Ubuntu Linux

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3600 Bug #: 3600 Summary: ubuntu-fonts - The font family used in Ubuntu Linux Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: holcapek(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org - spec file: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/holcapek/ubuntu-fonts-rpm/master/ubuntu... - src rpm: https://github.com/holcapek/ubuntu-fonts-rpm/raw/master/ubuntu-fonts-0.80... - description: The Ubuntu Font Family are a set of matching new libre/open fonts. The development is being funded by Canonical on behalf the wider Free Software community and the Ubuntu project. The technical font design work and implementation is being undertaken by Dalton Maag. - why not in Fedora: Ubuntu Font License is considered non-free: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961642#c4 - rpmlint on src rpm: ubuntu-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libre -> lire, lib re, lib-re > %description is exactly what can be found at http://font.ubuntu.com/about/ ubuntu-fonts.src: W: invalid-license Ubuntu Font License > the reason I'd like to see the package in rpmfusion ubuntu-fonts.src: W: no-%build-section > there's nothing to build, thus no %build secion - rpmlint on binary rpm: ubuntu-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libre -> lire, lib re, lib-re ubuntu-fonts.noarch: W: invalid-license Ubuntu Font License - this is my first rpmfusion package - I am already a Fedora package maintainer: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/holcapek/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 4 months

1
4
0 / 0

rebuilding perl packages against perl 5.26.0

by Sérgio Basto

Hello , we should rebuild these packages [1] on rawhide . Best regards, [1] dnf --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rpmfusion-free-rawhide repoquery --available --whatrequ ires "perl(:MODULE_COMPAT*)" --alldeps --qf "%{sourcerpm}" --quiet | sed 's|$-[^-]\+$\{2\}src.rpm||' dvdrip get-flash-videos mythtv xmltv dnf --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo=rpmfusion-nonfree-rawhide repoquery --available --whatr equires "perl(:MODULE_COMPAT*)" --alldeps --qf "%{sourcerpm}" --quiet | sed 's|$-[^-]\+$\{2\}src.rpm||' pdflib-lite perl-IP-Country perl-PGPLOT -- Sérgio M. B.

7 years, 4 months

3
10
0 / 0

[Bug 4393] New: Review Request: zoneminder - A camera monitoring and analysis tool

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4393 Bug ID: 4393 Summary: Review Request: zoneminder - A camera monitoring and analysis tool Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: zonexpertconsulting(a)outlook.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30 %description ZoneMinder is a set of applications which is intended to provide a complete solution allowing you to capture, analyze, record and monitor any cameras you have attached to a Linux based machine. It is designed to run on kernels which support the Video For Linux (V4L) interface and has been tested with cameras attached to BTTV cards, various USB cameras and IP network cameras. It is designed to support as many cameras as you can attach to your computer without too much degradation of performance. A little background. Zoneminder currently lives in the Fedora 25 repo and the repo at zmrepo.zoneminder.com, which I am the maintainer of. In conversation with the Fedora team, we agree that, due to zoneminder's ffmpeg dependencies, it will be removed from the Fedora repo moving forward. In my opinion, the best place for the zoneminder package to live is at RPMFusion, because some of zoneminder's dependencies already exist here. This is my first RPMFusion package. Note that I am also part of the upstream zoneminder development team, and I do have a member of the Fedora packaging team willing to support/sponsor me. It does look like I still need an RPMFusion sponsor though. Please note that zoneminder will currently build against the RPMFusion repo, but it will not install, due to several missing dependencies. I am in the process of learning how to get the following dependencies into Fedora and EPEL, or failing that, RPMFusion: cambozola perl-Class-Std-Fast perl-IO-Socket-Multicast perl-SOAP-WSDL perl-X10-ActiveHome perl-Astro-SunTime All of these packages currently exist in zmrepo. zoneminder rpm specfile: https://gist.github.com/knnniggett/cf2e4e2169ed8d4147b6367d6a60a843 The following SRPM will build on EL6 (i386, x86_64), EL7 (x86_64), and Fedora (i386,x86_64,armhfp): https://zmrepo.zoneminder.com/f/testing/25/SRPMS/zoneminder-1.30.1-1.fc25... Here is a complete rpmlint output: https://gist.github.com/knnniggett/e944c47a5cfdfe71cf68d3ac2366afe2 What follows is a line-by-line response to what rpmlint found: invalid-url Source0: ZoneMinder-1.30.1.tar.gz Because zoneminder uses git submodules, the easiest thing for me to do is create the tarball from my own local git repo. Fedora packaging guidelines state this method is acceptable. However, please advise if a different method would be preferred. non-readable /etc/zm/zm.conf 640 This config file contains the mysql database login credentials. Hence the reason for the 640 permissions. This is by design. dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/zoneminder/www/cambozola.jar ../../java/cambozola.jar Zoneminder expects the cambozola.jar file to exist within zoneminder's web root. Hence the purpose of the symlink. explicit-lib-dependency libcurl libcurl is one of the methods zoneminder uses to receive a stream from a camera. If memory serves, rpmbuild does not autodetect this. explicit-lib-dependency libjpeg-turbo This is to ensure we have the turbo jpeg library rather than the legacy jpeg library. Older el6 distros can have both so we want to make sure the turbo library is installed. no-manual-page-for-binary zmXXXXX.xx These entries are incorrect. Zoneminder uses pod2man to dynamically create man pages for its executables. all the rest items under zoneminder's api folder Zoneminder uses cakephp 2.8 and these entries are all part of that framework. I am hesitant to do anything about these entries because they are from a different project. Please advise. Whew! Lots of information here, but I still feel like I am forgetting something. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 4 months

1
51
0 / 0

[Bug 4540] New: Review Request: nvidia-modprobe - Load the NVIDIA kernel module and create NVIDIA character device files

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4540 Bug ID: 4540 Summary: Review Request: nvidia-modprobe - Load the NVIDIA kernel module and create NVIDIA character device files Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews SRPM: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/nvidia-modprobe-381.22-1.fc27.src.rpm SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/nvidia-modprobe.spec Description: Load the NVIDIA kernel module and create NVIDIA character device files This package is for the nonfree section because it's only relevant along nvidia driver. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

7 years, 5 months

1
11
0 / 0

Using openh264 repository by default in RPM Fusion

by Nicolas Chauvet

Hello, I wonder if it would be relevant for us to rely on the openh264 repository in our infra ? It seems at least that the chromium freeworld flavor rely on a builtin version whereas it could use the fedora version, it's a case I wasn't aware. BTW, if you are interesed in chromium with all codecs, please have a look at this: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363#c31 Is there any others users on openh264-devel in RPM Fusion ? Is there any issue if the build has openh264 enabled, but the fedora repo isn't ? Thx -- - Nicolas (kwizart)

7 years, 5 months

4
6
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers June 2017