[Bug 4628] New: Review request: chromium-freeworld - A WebKit
(Blink) powered web browser
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4628
Bug ID: 4628
Summary: Review request: chromium-freeworld - A WebKit (Blink)
powered web browser
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: mhroncok(a)redhat.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rpmfusion/chromium-libs-media-freeworld...
(except renamed to chromium-freeworld.spec)
SRPM URL:
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/kojifiles/work/tasks/3445/153445/chromium-freew...
Description: Chromium is an open-source web browser, powered by WebKit (Blink).
Only the following subpackage is built:
chromium-libs-media-freeworld
Summary: Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs
Description: Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs. Chromium
is an
open-source web browser, powered by WebKit (Blink). This package replaces
the default chromium-libs-media package, which is limited in what it
can include.
Scratch build: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=153444
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint ./chromium-libs-media-freeworld-60.0.3112.90-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm
./chromium-freeworld-60.0.3112.90-1.fc26.src.rpm
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codecs
-> codes, coders, code's
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
codecs -> codes, coders, code's
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/chromium-browser/libffmpeg.so.freeworld
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object
/usr/lib64/chromium-browser/libmedia.so.freeworld
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.x86_64: W: no-documentation
chromium-freeworld.src: W: strange-permission chromium-browser.sh 755
chromium-freeworld.src: W: strange-permission chromium-latest.py 755
chromium-freeworld.src: W: strange-permission clean_ffmpeg.sh 755
chromium-freeworld.src: W: strange-permission get_free_ffmpeg_source_files.py
755
chromium-freeworld.src: W: strange-permission get_linux_tests_names.py 755
chromium-freeworld.src: E: invalid-spec-name
chromium-freeworld.src:300: E: hardcoded-library-path in /usr/lib/libc.so
chromium-freeworld.src:416: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(boringssl)
chromium-freeworld.src:418: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(bspatch)
chromium-freeworld.src:421: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(crashpad)
chromium-freeworld.src:422: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(dmg_fp)
chromium-freeworld.src:435: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(iccjpeg)
chromium-freeworld.src:466: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(mozc)
chromium-freeworld.src:475: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(re2)
chromium-freeworld.src:478: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(skia)
chromium-freeworld.src:489: W: unversioned-explicit-provides bundled(xdg-mime)
chromium-freeworld.src:490: W: unversioned-explicit-provides
bundled(xdg-user-dirs)
chromium-freeworld.src:1106: W: macro-in-comment %{target}
chromium-freeworld.src:1251: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
chromium-freeworld.src:1593: E: hardcoded-library-path in
/usr/lib/%{chromium_browser_channel}
chromium-freeworld.src:1594: E: hardcoded-library-path in
/usr/lib/%{chromium_browser_channel}/%{chromium_browser_channel}.sh
chromium-freeworld.src:1595: E: hardcoded-library-path in
/usr/lib/chrome-sandbox
chromium-freeworld.src:114: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 66,
tab: line 114)
chromium-freeworld.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch6:
chromium-47.0.2526.80-pnacl-fgnu-inline-asm.patch
chromium-freeworld.src: W: patch-not-applied Patch19:
chromium-52.0.2743.116-unset-madv_free.patch
chromium-freeworld.src: W: invalid-url Source2: depot_tools.git-master.tar.gz
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 26 warnings.
Note that tha package is *the same* as fedora's chromium.spec except the line:
%global freeworld 1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 2 months
[Bug 4532] New: "Review request: kodi-inputstream.adaptive -
Adaptive file addon for Kodi's InputStream interface
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4532
Bug ID: 4532
Summary: "Review request: kodi-inputstream.adaptive - Adaptive
file addon for Kodi's InputStream interface
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: development-K9RvgheM1OmXW9pm(a)dcrdev.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Hello,
I'd like to submit a package for the inputstream.adaptive Kodi plugin, to be
reviewed.
The spec file and source file can be found here:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dcrdev/rpm-kodi-inputstream.adaptive/ma...
https://github.com/dcrdev/rpm-kodi-inputstream.adaptive/releases/download...
A short description for the package (usually, the %description from the spec
file):
This is a bianry addon for Kodi that provides adaptive file functionality for
Kodi's new InputStream interface. It is now required by some of the larger VOD
plugins like iPlayer.
Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora.
This is an extension of Kodi and therefore for the same reasons as Kodi this
package is not eligible to be included in Fedora.
The output rpmlint gives on both the source and binary packages. Explain for
each message why you've chosen to ignore it.
No errors, no warnings.
Mention if this is your first RPM Fusion package.
This is my first time submitting a package to RPM Fusion.
Mention that you are seeking a sponsor if you are not a Fedora sponsored
packager or an RPM Fusion sponsored packager.
I am not a sponsored packager, so yes I am seeking a sponsor.
Thanks
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 2 months
[Bug 4152] New: Review Request: vdr-softhddevice-openglosd - A software and GPU emulated HD output device plugin for VDR
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4152
Bug #: 4152
Summary: Review Request: vdr-softhddevice-openglosd - A
software and GPU emulated HD output device plugin for
VDR
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: mgansser(a)alice.de
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-softhddevice-openglosd...
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-softhddevice-openglosd...
Description:
%description
A software and GPU emulated HD output device plugin for VDR.
With this version of the plugin softhddevice an OpenGL accelerated
OSD output was added. That works only with VDPAU output on NVidia cards.
Video decoder CPU / VDPAU
Video output VDPAU
Audio FFMpeg / Alsa / Analog
Audio FFMpeg / Alsa / Digital
Audio FFMpeg / OSS / Analog
HDMI/SPDIF pass-through
Software volume, compression, normalize and channel resample
VDR ScaleVideo API
Software deinterlacer Bob (VA-API only)
Autocrop
Grab image (VDPAU only)
Suspend / Dettach
Letterbox, Stretch and Center cut-out video display modes
atmo light support with plugin http://github.com/durchflieger/DFAtmo
PIP (Picture-in-Picture) (VDPAU only)
Fedora Account System Username: martinkg
This package cannot go into Fedoraproject because of ffmpeg code.
%changelog
* Tue Jul 19 2016 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> -
0.6.1-11.20160717git569fde5
- update for new git snapshot
* Tue Jun 28 2016 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> -
0.6.1-10.20160607gitdc8740b
- Added ffmpeg_2.9.patch
* Fri Jun 10 2016 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> -
0.6.1-9.20160607gitdc8740b
- update for new git snapshot
* Tue Mar 29 2016 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> -
0.6.1-8.20160327gitfd3db0b
- update for new git snapshot
* Sun Jan 31 2016 Martin Gansser <martinkg(a)fedoraproject.org> -
0.6.1-7.20160131gitefd60c8
- first build of softhddevice-openglosd version
rpmlint -i vdr-softhddevice-openglosd.spec
/home/martin/rpmbuild/SRPMS/vdr-softhddevice-openglosd-0.6.1-11.20160717git569fde5.fc24.src.rpm
/home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/vdr-softhddevice-openglosd-0.6.1-11.20160717git569fde5.fc24.x86_64.rpm
/home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/vdr-softhddevice-openglosd-debuginfo-0.6.1-11.20160717git569fde5.fc24.x86_64.rpm
vdr-softhddevice-openglosd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
resample -> re sample, re-sample, res ample
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
vdr-softhddevice-openglosd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
deinterlacer -> interlace, interlard, intercede
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
vdr-softhddevice-openglosd.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US atmo ->
atom, ammo, at mo
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
vdr-softhddevice-openglosd.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
resample -> re sample, re-sample, res ample
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
vdr-softhddevice-openglosd.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
deinterlacer -> interlace, interlard, intercede
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
vdr-softhddevice-openglosd.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US atmo
-> atom, ammo, at mo
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.
3 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 2 months
Mass rebuild and mass branch for f27 ?
by Sérgio Basto
Hello,
As tradition we should mass rebuild "every single package", like and
because Fedora did for this branch and after that we need mass
branching F27.
Also is usually between fedora branching and rpmfusion branching,
rawhide of rpmfusion builds with f27 (fedora branched) and not f28
(rawhide) , I notice that is done by builds that we have today in koji
of rpmfusion .
I also had prepare mock-rpmfusion configurations mock-rpmfusion-free-
27.0 and nonfree , I though if I should add Requires: mock >= 1.4.4
mock version where Fedora 27 configs have been added [1], as the logic
of the configuration depends on new configuration , i.e. mock-rpmfusion
configuration imports f27 fedora configuration ... (anyway all mock
configurations could be much more simpler, I just didn't had time to
expose a better solution (is in my TODO list)).
rfpkg and fedora-packager should work without any modification, I
guess.
So we need some coordination , (Nicolas) what is the plan ?
As already state, IMHO , mass rebuild should be done, first by
ImportantDependencyList [2] a next by alphabetic order excluding
package with kmods or related, very big packages and few more ones, for
curiosity the scripts of releng are [3]
[1]
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-1994f3c1e5
[2]
https://rpmfusion.org/ImportantDependencyLists#Mass_rebuild_when_bumpin
g_both_so_versions_of_x264_and_ffmpeg
[3]
https://pagure.io/releng/blob/master/f/scripts/mass-rebuild.py
https://pagure.io/releng/blob/master/f/scripts/find_failures.py
Cheers,
--
Sérgio M. B.
7 years, 2 months
[Bug 3601] New: Review request: spread - High performance messaging service
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601
Bug #: 3601
Summary: Review request: spread - High performance messaging
service
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: holcapek(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
- spec file:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/holcapek/spread-rpm/master/spread.spec
- src rpm:
https://github.com/holcapek/spread-rpm/raw/master/spread-4.2.0-1.fc21.src...
- descriptoion (common to main package and all subpackages):
Spread is an open source toolkit that can be used in many distributed
applications that require high reliability, high performance, and robust
communication among various subsets of members. The toolkit is designed
to encapsulate the challenging aspects of asynchronous networks and
enable the construction of reliable and scalable distributed applications.
- why not in Fedora:
Spread Open-Source License is not considered a Good License, see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077081#c9
- is this my first rpmfusion package
no, I've already filed another package:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3600
- am I seeking a sponsor:
no, I am Fedora sponsored packager
- rpmlint on src rpm:
spread.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable,
callable, calculable
> this is exactly what http://www.spread.org/ reads
spread.src: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License
> this is why Fedora don't accept the package
spread.src: W: invalid-url Source0: spread-src-4.2.0.tar.gz
> source tarball cannot be downloaded directly, only through a web form
- rpmlint on rpms:
spread.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable,
callable, calculable
> dtto as above
spread.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License
> dtto as above
spread-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License
> dtto as above
spread-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable ->
salable, callable, calculable
> dtto as above
spread-devel.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License
> dtto as above
spread-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
> -devel only contains unversioned .so, which is a symlink to versioned .so in -libs
spread-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning
/usr/share/man/man3/SP_multicast.3.gz 28: warning: macro `TB' not defined
> no idea, suggestions welcome
spread-devel.x86_64: W: manual-page-warning
/usr/share/man/man3/FL_multicast.3.gz 50: warning: macro `TB' not defined
> no idea, suggestions welcome
spread-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable ->
salable, callable, calculable
> dtto as above
spread-libs.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License
> dtto as above
spread-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libspread.so.3.0.0
exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
> let's believe the upstream they know what they're doing
spread-static.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable ->
salable, callable, calculable
> dtto as above
spread-static.x86_64: W: invalid-license Spread Open Source License
> dtto as above
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
7 years, 2 months