January 2018 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 4019] New: Review request: gnome-shell-extension-taskbar - GNOME Shell Extension TaskBar

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4019 Bug #: 4019 Summary: Review request: gnome-shell-extension-taskbar - GNOME Shell Extension TaskBar Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: zpydr(a)openmailbox.org CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org spec file URL: https://github.com/zpydr/gnome-shell-extension-taskbar-rpm/blob/master/gn... source rpm URL: https://github.com/zpydr/gnome-shell-extension-taskbar-rpm/blob/master/gn... Description: TaskBar displays icons of running applications on the top panel. rpmlint output spec file: 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. rpmlint output source rpm: 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This is my first RPM Fusion package and I am seeking a sponsor. https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/584/taskbar/ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 7 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 4647] New: Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647 Bug ID: 4647 Summary: Review Request: unifi - Ubiquiti UniFi controller Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: All OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: hobbes1069(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: nonfree SPEC: https://www.dropbox.com/s/dz2x7dlixt2qjju/unifi.spec SRPM: https://www.dropbox.com/s/gfgqyl499neltph/unifi-5.5.20-2.fc26.src.rpm Ubiquiti UniFi server is a centralized management system for UniFi suite of devices. After the UniFi server is installed, the UniFi controller can be accessed on any web browser. The UniFi controller allows the operator to instantly provision thousands of UniFi devices, map out network topology, quickly manage system traffic, and further provision individual UniFi devices. This software can not go into the free repository as I have only been given permission to package and redistribute. The source is not available and it also contain pre-built binaries. https://community.ubnt.com/t5/UniFi-Wireless/Unifi-Controller-software-li... rpmlint output: unifi.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Ubiquiti -> Ubiquity, Ubiquitous unifi.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary C UniFi unifi.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ubiquiti -> Ubiquity, Ubiquitous unifi.src: W: invalid-license Proprietary unifi.src: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.ubnt.com/unifi HTTP Error 404: Not Found unifi.src:84: E: use-of-RPM_SOURCE_DIR unifi.src:115: W: macro-in-comment %ghost unifi.src:144: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/firewalld/services unifi.src:145: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/firewalld/services/ unifi.src:242: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/firewalld/services/%{name}.xml unifi.src: W: no-%build-section unifi.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Ubiquiti -> Ubiquity, Ubiquitous unifi.x86_64: W: name-repeated-in-summary C UniFi unifi.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Ubiquiti -> Ubiquity, Ubiquitous unifi.x86_64: W: invalid-license Proprietary unifi.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: http://www.ubnt.com/unifi HTTP Error 404: Not Found unifi.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/unifi/lib/native/Linux/armhf/libubnt_webrtc_jni.so unifi.x86_64: W: executable-stack /usr/share/unifi/lib/native/Linux/armhf/libubnt_webrtc_jni.so unifi.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share /usr/share/unifi/lib/native/Linux/x86_64/libubnt_webrtc_jni.so unifi.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/logrotate.d/unifi unifi.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/unifi/bin/mongod /usr/bin/mongod unifi.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/unifi/webapps/ROOT/app-unifi/.version unifi.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/unifi unifi unifi.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/unifi unifi unifi.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/unifi/data unifi unifi.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/unifi/data unifi unifi.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/unifi/data/system.properties unifi unifi.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/unifi/data/system.properties unifi unifi.x86_64: E: non-readable /var/lib/unifi/data/system.properties 0 unifi.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/unifi/run unifi unifi.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/unifi/run unifi unifi.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/unifi/work unifi unifi.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/unifi/work unifi unifi.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/unifi unifi unifi.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/unifi unifi unifi.x86_64: W: dangerous-command-in-%pre mv unifi.x86_64: W: class-path-in-manifest /usr/share/unifi/lib/ace.jar 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 30 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 8 months

4
38
0 / 0

[Bug 4782] New: Review request: rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages - A package to obsolete retired packages from rpmfusion-free

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4782 Bug ID: 4782 Summary: Review request: rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages - A package to obsolete retired packages from rpmfusion-free Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: free SRPM: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages-28-1.fc26.s... SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages.spec Summary: A package to obsolete retired packages from rpmfusion-free This package belong to the free section because it's only relevant to rpmfusion-free content (the same package could be made for the nonfree section when needed). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 8 months

1
5
0 / 0

[Bug 4769] New: Review Request: qtox - Feature-rich Tox client

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4769 Bug ID: 4769 Summary: Review Request: qtox - Feature-rich Tox client Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: All OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: zebob.m(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 namespace: free Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/eclipseo/packaging/90fbe1b/qtox.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/tox/fedora-rawhi... Description: qTox is a powerful Tox client that follows the Tox design guidelines while running on all major platforms. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo $ rpmlint qtox-1.13.0-1.fc28.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint qtox-1.13.0-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm qtox.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib qtox.x86_64: W: gzipped-svg-icon /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/qtox.svgz qtox.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary qtox 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora? It requires FFMPEG. This is my first RPM Fusion package Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 8 months

1
12
0 / 0

[Bug 4639] New: dfhack - Memory hacking library for Dwarf Fortress and a set of tools that use it

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4639 Bug ID: 4639 Summary: dfhack - Memory hacking library for Dwarf Fortress and a set of tools that use it Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: rosser.bjr(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: nonfree Now that Dwarf Fortress is in the distribution, I guess I should submit this review request too. Spec URL: https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/dwarffortress/rpmfusion/dfhack.spec SRPM URL: https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/dwarffortress/rpmfusion/dfhack-0.43.0... Description: DFHack is a Dwarf Fortress memory access library, distributed with a wide variety of useful scripts and plugins. For users, it provides a significant suite of bugfixes and interface enhancements by default, and more can be enabled. There are also many tools (such as workflow or autodump) which can make life easier. You can even add third-party scripts and plugins to do almost anything! For modders, DFHack makes many things possible. Custom reactions, new interactions, magic creature abilities, and more can be set through Scripts for Modders and custom raws. Non-standard DFHack scripts and inits can be stored in the raw directory, making raws or saves fully self-contained for distribution - or for coexistence in a single DF install, even with incompatible components. For developers, DFHack unites the various ways tools access DF memory and allows easier development of new tools. As an open-source project under various copyleft licences, contributions are welcome. FAS Username: tc01 Namespace: nonfree Why not in Fedora: dfhack is fully open source. However it depends directly on Dwarf Fortress, a nonfree game (nonfree/dwarffortress); dfhack communicates directly with the running dwarffortess process. Thus it must be in nonfree. Notes: This package is a bit messy, which is one reason I've been hesitant to open a review request for it. There are a number of points to note, most of which are documented in the spec itself as well (it is quite well commented). 1. Upstream uses a lot of git submodules, but also the build fails if .git metadata isn't present. However, when I inquired upstream, they were not interested in releasing a "source tarball" from which DH could be built without doing additional git checkouts. Therefore I wrote a script (see link below) to *actually* generate the dfhack tarball for which I've been managing releases. That is why there is no source url. https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/dwarffortress/rpmfusion/build-dfhack-... 2. There are a number of bundled bits with no support for unbundling. Worse, many of the bundled bits have been forked by dfhack, meaning that it's basically never going to be possible to unbundle (the most egregious example is likely a dfhack fork of protobuf). 3. dfhack has a plugin (and script) architecture. Most plugins are included in dfhack itself, but some are distributed and maintained separately, somewhat like the Linux kernel. (Note that one of the in-tree plugins, stonesense, is distributed here as a subpackage, since it contains a fair amount of data specific to itself). I have been meaning to figure out a better way to do out-of-tree dfhack plugin builds, but for now I just have this package fill in and install a pkgconfig file. 4. ...unfortunately, dfhack plugins need to link statically against a helper library, "dfhack-version.a", and so a static devel package is needed too. 5. One of dfhack's plugins is an interpreter for ruby scripts, which works by directly trying to dlopen "libruby.so" (the intention was to ship a bundled libruby that would be downloaded during the build, but I upstreamed a patch to disable the download). Currently, therefore, I've made dfhack Require libruby-devel as a runtime dependency. While I guess I could patch this out, it would then mean that dfhack needs to be rebuilt whenever there's a ruby soname bump. I think those are the major pain points with the current state of the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 8 months

1
24
0 / 0

[Bug 4059] New: Review request: dwarftherapist - Management tool designed to run side-by-side with Dwarf Fortress

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4059 Bug #: 4059 Summary: Review request: dwarftherapist - Management tool designed to run side-by-side with Dwarf Fortress Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: rosser.bjr(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/dwarffortress/rpmfusion/dwarftherapis... SRPM URL: https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/dwarffortress/23/SRPMs/dwarftherapist... Description: Management tool designed to run side-by-side with Dwarf Fortress. Offers several views and interface improvements to Dwarf Fortress. Some features include: Persistent custom professions - import and manage any number of custom professions across all your forts. Assign multiple dwarves to a custom profession at once to unify active labors Manage labors and professions much more easily than in-game using a flexible UI, allowing quick review of all dwarves at-a-glance Display all pending changes before they're written to the game Sort labor columns by associated skill level Persistent and customizable display; change colors, reposition/hide information screens Group your dwarves by several criteria This is a heavily modified version of the original Dwarf Therapist that is still maintained for new versions of Dwarf Fortress. rpmlint output: dwarftherapist.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dwarves -> wharves dwarftherapist.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US customizable -> customization dwarftherapist.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reposition -> preposition, deposition, re position dwarftherapist.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dwarftherapist dwarftherapist.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary DwarfTherapist dwarftherapist.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US dwarves -> wharves dwarftherapist.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US customizable -> customization dwarftherapist.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US reposition -> preposition, deposition, re position dwarftherapist.src:62: W: rpm-buildroot-usage %build %qmake_qt5 PREFIX=%{buildroot}%{_prefix} The only questionable thing here is the rpm-buildroot-usage warning, and (for the moment) I'm ignoring that because there doesn't seem to be another way to change where the buildsystem installs (the DESTDIR option seems to be entirely ignored by "make install"). Why not in Fedora: dwarftherapist requires an installation of Dwarf Fortress on the system to be useful. I've added a Requires: dwarffortress(x86-32), meaning that this package would need to be in -nonfree. (The architecture dependency is needed because, at the moment, DF is only built for 32-bit systems, although that may be changing in the near future). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 8 months

1
11
0 / 0

[Bug 3255] New: Review Request: ldoce5viewer - Viewer Application for the Longman Dictionary (LDOCE 5)

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3255 Bug #: 3255 Summary: Review Request: ldoce5viewer - Viewer Application for the Longman Dictionary (LDOCE 5) Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: dwrobel(a)ertelnet.rybnik.pl CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Spec URL: http://dwrobel.fedorapeople.org/projects/rpmbuild/SPECS/ldoce5viewer.spec SRPM URL: http://dwrobel.fedorapeople.org/projects/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ldoce5viewer-2014... Description: The ldoce5viewer is an alternative dictionary viewer for the Longman Dictionary of Contemporary English 5th Edition (LDOCE 5). Fedora Account System Username: dwrobel According to the packaging guidelines [1] packages which are not useful without external bits are not acceptable for inclusion in Fedora. This is my first package for RPM Fusion. $ rpmlint ldoce5viewer-2014.02.24-1.fc20.src.rpm ldoce5viewer-2014.02.24-1.fc20.noarch.rpm ldoce5viewer.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ldoce5viewer 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. Manual page is optional. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Packages_which_are_not... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 8 months

1
7
0 / 0

[Bug 4659] New: Review request: crystalhd - Kernel module (kmod) for crystalhd

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4659 Bug ID: 4659 Summary: Review request: crystalhd - Kernel module (kmod) for crystalhd Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: free SRPM: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/crystalhd-20170515-1.fc28.src.rpm SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/crystalhd.spec Summary: Kernel module (kmod) for crystalhd This is the common part of an oot kernel module (was before in staging). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 8 months

1
4
0 / 0

[Bug 4660] New: Review request: crystalhd-kmod - Kernel module (kmod) for crystalhd

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4660 Bug ID: 4660 Summary: Review request: crystalhd-kmod - Kernel module (kmod) for crystalhd Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: free SRPM: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/crystalhd-kmod-20170515-1.fc28.src.rpm SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/crystalhd-kmod.spec Summary: Kernel module (kmod) for crystalhd OOT kernel module -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 8 months

1
3
0 / 0

[Bug 4645] New: Review request: medialibrary - Cross platform media library

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4645 Bug ID: 4645 Summary: Review request: medialibrary - Cross platform media library Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: free SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/medialibrary.spec SRPM: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/medialibrary-0.1.0-1.fc26.src.rpm Summary: Cross platform media library This package rely on vlc-devel, so it can be in the rpmfusion free section -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

6 years, 8 months

1
10
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers January 2018