[Bug 4363] New: Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
Bug ID: 4363
Summary: Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld -
Chromium media libraries built with all possible
codecs
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: alexjnewt(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC URL:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42480493/chromium-libs-media-freeworl...
SRPM URL:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42480493/chromium-libs-media-freeworl...
Description:
Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs. Chromium is an
open-source web browser, powered by WebKit (Blink). This package replaces
the default chromium-libs-media package, which is limited in what it
can include.
RPMlint output:
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codecs ->
codes, coders, code's
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
codecs -> codes, coders, code's
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src:227: E: hardcoded-library-path in
/usr/lib/libc.so
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src:879: W: macro-in-comment %{target}
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src:90: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces:
line 90, tab: line 60)
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src: W: invalid-url Source2:
depot_tools.git-master.tar.gz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.
None of this really matters too much. As for the hardcoded-library-path error,
please read the note in the spec for more details. The
mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs is trivial and will be fixed in the next revision.
This package is mostly based off of the chromium package but has been trimmed
down to only really include the two codec libraries that Fedora will not
provide for legal reasons. I'm sure I'm probably building too much and things
can be trimmed down.
Note that this package takes forever to compile, but as I said, the spec likely
needs to be cleaned up, but feedback is welcome for sure. This will likely go
into rpmfusion free, but I'll be honest, I need to look into the source a bit
more as there maybe some nonfree bits.
I'll continue to work on it, I just wanted to upload something that built, so I
can get feedback.
One issue that should be addressed though; chromium depends on
chromium-libs-media, which this package provides as an alternative to the
trimmed down fedora version. I would think if chromium updates without this
packaging being updated, this package would be removed by the updater, while if
this package updates before chromium, it would cause broken dependencies.
EItherway, having rpmfusion's packages out of sync with Fedora's would no so
nice.
Perhaps a "chromium-freeworld" package would be better? The maintainer for
chromium has made it painfully easy to package a freeworld version, so this
wouldn't be too bad. I'll run a build of a chromium-freeworld package overnight
for testing, as I'm sort of leaning towards this being a better option.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6 years
RPM Fusion update report 2018-12-02
by noreply＠rpmfusion.org
RPM Fusion update report
------------------------
Section free:
-------------
Fedora 27
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Fedora 28
-------------
Pushed to testing:
chromium-vaapi-70.0.3538.110-1.fc28
mlt-freeworld-6.12.0-1.fc28
qmplay2-18.11.20-1.fc28
xroar-0.35.2-1.fc28
Pushed to stable:
xroar-0.35.1-1.fc28
Fedora 29
-------------
Pushed to testing:
chromium-vaapi-70.0.3538.110-1.fc29
mlt-freeworld-6.12.0-1.fc29
qmplay2-18.11.20-1.fc29
xroar-0.35.2-1.fc29
Pushed to stable:
deepin-movie-3.2.14-1.fc29
deepin-screen-recorder-2.7.6-1.fc29
deepin-voice-recorder-1.3.8-1.fc29
kodi-18.0-0.18.rc1.fc29
mixxx-2.2.0-0.5.rc.20181126git9fb543c.fc29
xroar-0.35.1-1.fc29
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Section nonfree:
-------------
Fedora 27
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Fedora 28
-------------
Pushed to testing:
dfhack-0.44.12-0.r1.fc28.1
snes9x-1.57-1.fc28
steam-1.0.0.56-3.fc28
steam-1.0.0.56-4.fc28
Pushed to stable:
Fedora 29
-------------
Pushed to testing:
dfhack-0.44.12-0.r1.fc29.1
snes9x-1.57-1.fc29
steam-1.0.0.56-3.fc29
steam-1.0.0.56-4.fc29
Pushed to stable:
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Theses packages will be available in main mirror in few minutes. Wait for local mirrors to sync
Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org
6 years
Re: About cinelerra wip spec ?
by Sérgio Basto
yes I givup on cinelerra-cv stable version is from stone age .
Dadidva in Unitedrpms (BTW Unitedrpms is made only by him) had worked
on cinelerra-cv goodguy repo which is a lot updated and is from this
age and also opencv-freeworld , I checked it now and seems David opt
out by build full opencv , i.e . bring this to Fedora and to RPMFusion
will give many work (to follow Fedora packaging guidelines ) .
I helped him to enabled freeworld bits.
Unfortunately this is another weekend which I'm very busy and can't
dedicate time to this subject :( .
Thanks,
[1] https://github.com/UnitedRPMs/cinelerra
[2] https://github.com/UnitedRPMs/opencv-freeworld
On Sat, 2018-12-01 at 13:59 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I saw that you have worked on a cinelerra.spec, do you have a wip
> version ? (and patches).
> I've made a quick check and we will need at least the
> opencv-contrib-freeworld package for the xfeature2d, but it can be
> enabled later...
> I dont' plan to disable the contrib,but I may need to avoid
> requesting
> microsoft fonts if it's still requested...
>
> Thx for any input.
>
--
Sérgio M. B.
6 years
Fixed some issues with email and mailing list
by Nicolas Chauvet
Hi there,
For your information, I've fixed some infrastructure issues with smtp
and the mailing lists recently.
If you have sent an email on 30th November (and possibly older), you
may have to resend.
Thx
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
6 years
