Hi,
I removed these 2 messages [1] from homepage -> Browse available
packages , because to me are not correct anymore. If I is not correct
we may revert the change.
Thanks.
[1]
/!\ Note: Sometimes repositories will be empty -- the updates testing
repos for example will be empty if no
updates have been released yet or if no packages are currently
undergoing testing. In such cases
/!\ Note: Fedora pre-release repositories are available. They're just
not yet browsable with this tool.
--
Sérgio M. B.
RPM Fusion update report
------------------------
Section free:
-------------
Fedora 26
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
VirtualBox-5.2.10-1.fc26
VirtualBox-kmod-5.2.10-2.fc26
smplayer-18.4.0-1.fc26
vlc-3.0.2-1.fc26
Fedora 27
-------------
Pushed to testing:
shotcut-18.03.06-1.fc27
Pushed to stable:
VirtualBox-5.2.10-1.fc27
VirtualBox-kmod-5.2.10-2.fc27
vlc-3.0.2-1.fc27
Fedora 28
-------------
Pushed to testing:
audacity-freeworld-2.2.2-5.fc28
buildsys-build-rpmfusion-28-1
shotcut-18.03.06-1.fc28
Pushed to stable:
VirtualBox-5.2.10-2.fc28
VirtualBox-kmod-5.2.10-2.fc28
smplayer-18.4.0-1.fc28
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
VirtualBox-5.2.10-1.el7
VirtualBox-kmod-5.2.10-2.el7
smplayer-18.4.0-1.el7
Section nonfree:
-------------
Fedora 26
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
unrar-5.6.3-1.fc26
Fedora 27
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
unrar-5.6.3-1.fc27
Fedora 28
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
unrar-5.6.3-1.fc28
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Theses packages will be available in main mirror in few minutes. Wait for local mirrors to sync
Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org
RPM Fusion update report
------------------------
Section free:
-------------
Fedora 26
-------------
Pushed to testing:
VirtualBox-5.2.10-1.fc26
VirtualBox-kmod-5.2.10-2.fc26
smplayer-18.4.0-1.fc26
vlc-3.0.2-1.fc26
Pushed to stable:
Fedora 27
-------------
Pushed to testing:
VirtualBox-5.2.10-1.fc27
VirtualBox-kmod-5.2.10-2.fc27
vlc-3.0.2-1.fc27
Pushed to stable:
qtox-1.14.1-1.fc27
qtox-1.15.0-1.fc27
Fedora 28
-------------
Pushed to testing:
VirtualBox-5.2.10-2.fc28
VirtualBox-kmod-5.2.10-2.fc28
smplayer-18.4.0-1.fc28
Pushed to stable:
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
VirtualBox-5.2.10-1.el7
VirtualBox-kmod-5.2.10-2.el7
smplayer-18.4.0-1.el7
Pushed to stable:
Section nonfree:
-------------
Fedora 26
-------------
Pushed to testing:
unrar-5.6.3-1.fc26
Pushed to stable:
broadcom-wl-6.30.223.271-5.fc26
mednafen-1.21.2-2.fc26
unifi-5.7.23-1.fc26
Fedora 27
-------------
Pushed to testing:
unrar-5.6.3-1.fc27
Pushed to stable:
broadcom-wl-6.30.223.271-5.fc27
mednafen-1.21.2-2.fc27
unifi-5.7.23-1.fc27
Fedora 28
-------------
Pushed to testing:
unrar-5.6.3-1.fc28
Pushed to stable:
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
unifi-5.7.23-1.el7
Theses packages will be available in main mirror in few minutes. Wait for local mirrors to sync
Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org
2018-04-24 18:04 GMT+02:00 Antonio <sagitter(a)rpmfusion.org>:
> commit c1e20ce483dd65186e868eba8d83f2684f1401b7
> Author: sagitter <sagitter(a)fedoraproject.org>
> Date: Tue Apr 24 18:04:29 2018 +0200
>
> Use %%{?_isa} on 'Requires' package
> -Requires: ffmpeg
> +Requires: ffmpeg%{?_isa}
Why such change ?
ffmpeg is not supported to be multi-arched in a given repository, so
you can't have an alternative ffmpeg from another arch anyway.
What this is supposed to fix ? Is there a bug tracker ?
Also
$ rpm -qR moc
ffmpeg
libFLAC.so.8()(64bit)
libasound.so.2()(64bit)
libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9)(64bit)
libasound.so.2(ALSA_0.9.0rc4)(64bit)
libavcodec.so.57()(64bit)
libavcodec.so.57(LIBAVCODEC_57)(64bit)
libavformat.so.57()(64bit)
libavformat.so.57(LIBAVFORMAT_57)(64bit)
libavutil.so.55()(64bit)
libavutil.so.55(LIBAVUTIL_55)(64bit)
So it seems like moc is already linked to the appropriate libraries.
There is no need to use the ffmpeg requires in the first step (or does
moc also uses the ffmpeg binaries ?)
Thx for your answer.
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
RPM Fusion update report
------------------------
Section free:
-------------
Fedora 26
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Fedora 27
-------------
Pushed to testing:
qtox-1.14.1-1.fc27
qtox-1.15.0-1.fc27
Pushed to stable:
devedeng-4.9.0-1.fc27
Fedora 28
-------------
Pushed to testing:
VirtualBox-5.2.10-1.fc28
VirtualBox-kmod-5.2.10-1.fc28
ffmpeg-4.0-1.fc28
kffmpegthumbnailer-1.1.0-13.fc28
kodi-17.6-8.fc28
minidlna-1.2.1-6.fc28
mplayer-1.3.0-21.20180119svn.fc28
mplayer-1.3.0-22.20180424svn.fc28
mpv-0.28.2-4.fc28
pithos-1.4.1-3.fc28
qtox-1.14.1-1.fc28
qtox-1.15.0-1.fc28
rpmfusion-free-release-28-1
terminatorX-4.0.1-4.fc28
vdr-weatherforecast-0.2.0-4.fc28
vlc-3.0.2-1.fc28
Pushed to stable:
alsa-plugins-freeworld-1.1.6-4.fc28
alsa-plugins-freeworld-1.1.6-5.fc28
devedeng-4.9.0-1.fc28
k9copy-3.0.3-6.fc28
performous-1.1-2.fc28
rpmfusion-free-release-28-0.7
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Section nonfree:
-------------
Fedora 26
-------------
Pushed to testing:
broadcom-wl-6.30.223.271-5.fc26
mednafen-1.21.2-2.fc26
unifi-5.7.23-1.fc26
Pushed to stable:
mednafen-1.21.2-1.fc26
Fedora 27
-------------
Pushed to testing:
broadcom-wl-6.30.223.271-5.fc27
mednafen-1.21.2-2.fc27
unifi-5.7.23-1.fc27
Pushed to stable:
mednafen-1.21.2-1.fc27
Fedora 28
-------------
Pushed to testing:
broadcom-wl-6.30.223.271-5.fc28
mednafen-1.21.2-2.fc28
rpmfusion-nonfree-release-28-1
unifi-5.7.23-1.fc28
wl-kmod-6.30.223.271-18.fc28
Pushed to stable:
mednafen-1.21.2-1.fc28
rpmfusion-nonfree-release-28-0.7
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
unifi-5.7.23-1.el7
Pushed to stable:
Theses packages will be available in main mirror in few minutes. Wait for local mirrors to sync
Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org
It is fixed , need update ca-upload-cert with fedora-package-setup, and after renew your client cert with rpmfusion-cert -n
Best regards
Sent from my AndroidEm 23/04/2018 5:56 da tarde, Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> escreveu:
>
> I am trying to build a kodi update, but rfpkg build stated a certificate error.
>
> Could not execute build: Could not auth with koji. Login failed: [('SSL routines',
> 'ssl3_read_bytes', 'sslv3 alert certificate expired')]
>
> My certificate expires today but not for several more hours.
>
> I attempted to generate a new certificate and the RPMFusion FAS server reports:
>
> "Your certificate could not be generated."
>
> Is this a known issue?
>
> Thanks,
> Michael
> _______________________________________________
> rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers(a)lists.rpmfusion.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-leave(a)lists.rpmfusion.org
