[Bug 4749] New: Review request: deepin-movie - Deepin Movie based on
mpv
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4749
Bug ID: 4749
Summary: Review request: deepin-movie - Deepin Movie based on
mpv
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: sztsian(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
namespace: free
Spec URL: https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/deepin-movie/deepin-movie.spec
SRPM URL:
https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/deepin-movie/deepin-movie-2.2.14-2...
Description: Deepin Movie based on mpv
Fedora Account System Username: zsun
RPMFusion FAS Username: zsun
* Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora:
This depends on mpv, which is not accepted in Fedora.
* This is my first RPM Fusion package.
* I am a current Fedora Packager
* RPMlint
- For all spelling error, mpv is a program so not a typo.
- For debuginfo(build-id), all packages built in rawhide contains this, so I
assume this won't hurt.
$ ls
deepin-movie-3.2.0-1.fc27.src.rpm
deepin-movie-3.2.0-1.fc28.src.rpm
deepin-movie-3.2.0-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
deepin-movie-debuginfo-3.2.0-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
deepin-movie-debugsource-3.2.0-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
deepin-movie-devel-3.2.0-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
deepin-movie.spec
$ rpmlint *.rpm
deepin-movie.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mpv -> mp, mpg, mph
deepin-movie.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found zh_CN
deepin-movie.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mpv -> mp, mpg, mph
deepin-movie.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mpv -> mp, mpg, mph
deepin-movie.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary deepin-movie
deepin-movie-debuginfo.x86_64: E: useless-provides debuginfo(build-id)
deepin-movie-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation
deepin-movie-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
deepin-movie-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2
[Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5 years, 3 months
[Bug 4363] New: Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
Bug ID: 4363
Summary: Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld -
Chromium media libraries built with all possible
codecs
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: alexjnewt(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC URL:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42480493/chromium-libs-media-freeworl...
SRPM URL:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42480493/chromium-libs-media-freeworl...
Description:
Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs. Chromium is an
open-source web browser, powered by WebKit (Blink). This package replaces
the default chromium-libs-media package, which is limited in what it
can include.
RPMlint output:
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codecs ->
codes, coders, code's
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
codecs -> codes, coders, code's
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src:227: E: hardcoded-library-path in
/usr/lib/libc.so
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src:879: W: macro-in-comment %{target}
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src:90: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces:
line 90, tab: line 60)
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src: W: invalid-url Source2:
depot_tools.git-master.tar.gz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.
None of this really matters too much. As for the hardcoded-library-path error,
please read the note in the spec for more details. The
mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs is trivial and will be fixed in the next revision.
This package is mostly based off of the chromium package but has been trimmed
down to only really include the two codec libraries that Fedora will not
provide for legal reasons. I'm sure I'm probably building too much and things
can be trimmed down.
Note that this package takes forever to compile, but as I said, the spec likely
needs to be cleaned up, but feedback is welcome for sure. This will likely go
into rpmfusion free, but I'll be honest, I need to look into the source a bit
more as there maybe some nonfree bits.
I'll continue to work on it, I just wanted to upload something that built, so I
can get feedback.
One issue that should be addressed though; chromium depends on
chromium-libs-media, which this package provides as an alternative to the
trimmed down fedora version. I would think if chromium updates without this
packaging being updated, this package would be removed by the updater, while if
this package updates before chromium, it would cause broken dependencies.
EItherway, having rpmfusion's packages out of sync with Fedora's would no so
nice.
Perhaps a "chromium-freeworld" package would be better? The maintainer for
chromium has made it painfully easy to package a freeworld version, so this
wouldn't be too bad. I'll run a build of a chromium-freeworld package overnight
for testing, as I'm sort of leaning towards this being a better option.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5 years, 4 months
[Bug 4892] New: Review request: retroarch - Reference frontend for
the libretro API
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4892
Bug ID: 4892
Summary: Review request: retroarch - Reference frontend for the
libretro API
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: markand(a)malikania.fr
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
namespace: free
Hi,
This is my first RPM Fusion package.
RetroArch is not eligible for inclusion in Fedora because:
1. It depends on ffmpeg,
2. It has a lot of assets / libretro cores that are open source but in a
non-commercial clause,
3. Some libretro core also depend on ffmpeg.
What is RetroArch?
RetroArch is the reference frontend for the libretro API. Popular examples
of implementations for this API includes videogame system emulators and
game engines, but also more generalized 3D programs. These programs are
instantiated as dynamic libraries. We refer to these as "libretro cores".
$ rpmlint retroarch.spec
SPECS/retroarch.spec:74: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
SPECS/retroarch.spec:141: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_libdir}
SPECS/retroarch.spec:142: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_datadir}
SPECS/retroarch.spec:143: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_datadir}
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
The home made configure file do not require installation of any library, other
warnings are a bit useless to me.
$ rpmlint retroarch-1.7.2-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency alsa-lib
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency bzip2-libs
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libX11
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXau
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXext
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXxf86vm
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libglvnd-egl
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libglvnd-glx
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libpng
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libv4l
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxcb
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency pulseaudio-libs
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency systemd-libs
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency zlib
retroarch.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) frontend -> fronted, front
end, front-end
retroarch.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libretro -> libretto, lib
retro, lib-retro
retroarch.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US frontend -> fronted,
front end, front-end
retroarch.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libretro -> libretto,
lib retro, lib-retro
retroarch.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US videogame -> video
game, video-game, ideogram
retroarch.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
retroarch.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/retroarch.cfg
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 14 errors, 7 warnings.
I can't understand the problem with dependencies.
SPEC: http://markand.fr/static/rpms/retroarch.spec
SRPM: http://markand.fr/static/rpms/retroarch-1.7.2-1.fc28.src.rpm
I don't have a sponsor yet.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5 years, 5 months
[Bug 3954] New: Review request: nordlicht - Create colorful barcodes from video files
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3954
Bug #: 3954
Summary: Review request: nordlicht - Create colorful barcodes
from video files
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: ngompa13(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/nordlicht.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/nordlicht-0.4.4-1.fc23.src.rpm
Description:
nordlicht is for converting video files into colorful barcodes. It is inspired
by the Moviebarcode Tumblr, but aims at the next logical step: Integrating
these barcodes into video players to make navigation faster and more precise.
Why nordlicht isn't eligible to be included in Fedora:
nordlicht depends on FFmpeg, which is not included in Fedora, but is included
in RPM Fusion.
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint nordlicht.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint nordlicht-0.4.4-1.fc23.src.rpm
nordlicht.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) barcodes -> bar codes,
bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly]
nordlicht.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcodes -> bar codes,
bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly]
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint nordlicht-0.4.4-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
nordlicht.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) barcodes -> bar codes,
bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly]
nordlicht.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcodes -> bar
codes, bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly]
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint nordlicht-libs-0.4.4-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
nordlicht-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcodes -> bar
codes, bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly]
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint nordlicht-devel-0.4.4-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
nordlicht-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib [Ignored because
pkgconfig file and symlink .so belong in devel]
nordlicht-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation [Ignored because documentation is
included in the libs package, which is Required by the devel package]
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
This is my first RPM Fusion package, but I've been a packager in Fedora for
several years (FAS: ngompa).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5 years, 6 months
[Bug 4186] New: scid - A chess database application
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4186
Bug #: 4186
Summary: scid - A chess database application
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: sergio(a)serjux.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC: http://www.serjux.com/rpms/scid.spec
SRPM: http://www.serjux.com/rpms/scid-4.6.2-1.fc21.src.rpm
I will be able to add this package , the scid.spec is the same made by Mikhail
Kalenkov , I just update it to 4.6.2
Scid can perform many different searches, such as for particular
players, a certain opening position, material searches, and pattern
searches such as isolated pawns. It is very fast, because it uses its
own efficient format, but it can convert games to and from PGN, the
standard format for chess game files.
Scid can use a chess engine such as Crafty to analyze games and also
has a "tree" mode where it automatically shows all moves played from
the current position, their opening codes, success rates, etc.
Why not in Fedora:
Scid package has some small part of nonfree code. It is Nalimov
tablebase decoding code. Nalimov tablebases may be very important in the
endgame
analysis.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5 years, 6 months
[Bug 4669] New: Review request: comskip - A free commercial detector
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4669
Bug ID: 4669
Summary: Review request: comskip - A free commercial detector
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: mprahl(a)redhat.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
namespace: free
Hello,
This is my first RPMFusion package. I am a sponsored Fedora packager, but not
an RPMFusion packager.
Spec file: https://mprahl.fedorapeople.org/comskip.spec
SRPM: https://mprahl.fedorapeople.org/comskip-0.82.002-1.fc26.src.rpm
Description: Comskip is a free commercial detector
This package is not eligible to be in Fedora because it requires ffmpeg and
ffmpeg-devel, which are not available in the official Fedora repos.
rpmlint output:
comskip.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US erikkaashoek
comskip.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/comskip
comskip.x86_64: W: no-documentation
comskip.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary comskip
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2
[Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5 years, 6 months
[Bug 4444] New: firebird-emu - Third-party emulator for ARM-based TI
calculators
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4444
Bug ID: 4444
Summary: firebird-emu - Third-party emulator for ARM-based TI
calculators
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: rosser.bjr(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Source URL:
https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/rpmfusion/firebird/firebird-emu.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/rpmfusion/firebird/firebird-emu-1.2-1...
Description: This project is the community, third-party TI Nspire emulator,
Texas Instruments' ARM-based series of graphing calculators.
It supports the emulation of Touchpad, CX and CX CAS calcs on
Android, iOS, Linux, Mac and Windows.
FAS Username: tc01
Why not in Fedora: firebird-emu is pure FOSS, but not only does it require TI's
proprietary operating system for the Nspire line of calculators, but also the
proprietary boot/base code blobs from the calculator itself. Thus as per the
emulator policy, since this package isn't functional without any proprietary
blobs, I believe this package still needs to be in RPM Fusion.
rpmlint output:
firebird-emu.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US calcs -> calls,
calms, calks
firebird-emu.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iOS -> OS, SOS, DOS
firebird-emu.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US calcs -> calls,
calms, calks
firebird-emu.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iOS -> OS, SOS,
DOS
firebird-emu.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary firebird
firebird-emu.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary firebird-send
Note: upstream usually uses the name "firebird" for this package, but the name
"firebird" belongs to another package in Fedora, so I opted for "firebird-emu"
(as this name is also sometimes used by upstream).
There is a potential for name conflicts. Currently the firebird package
installs a %{_sbindir}/firebird [1]. This package installs a
%{_bindir}/firebird. This doesn't cause a conflict per _se_, but if both are on
$PATH there's a potential for confusion. Should I rename the binary from
firebird -> firebird-emu as well?
As far as I can tell, the packages do not currently conflict in any other way.
The current firebird-emu filelist is:
-rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/firebird
-rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/firebird-send
-rwxr-xr-x /usr/share/applications/firebird.desktop
drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/firebird-emu
-rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firebird-emu/README.md
-rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firebird-emu/TODO.md
-rw-r--r-- /usr/share/icons/firebird.png
drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/licenses/firebird-emu
-rw-r--r-- /usr/share/licenses/firebird-emu/LICENSE
[1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/firebird.git/tree/firebird.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5 years, 7 months