[Bug 4444] New: firebird-emu - Third-party emulator for ARM-based TI
calculators
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4444
Bug ID: 4444
Summary: firebird-emu - Third-party emulator for ARM-based TI
calculators
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: rosser.bjr(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Source URL:
https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/rpmfusion/firebird/firebird-emu.spec
SRPM URL:
https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/rpmfusion/firebird/firebird-emu-1.2-1...
Description: This project is the community, third-party TI Nspire emulator,
Texas Instruments' ARM-based series of graphing calculators.
It supports the emulation of Touchpad, CX and CX CAS calcs on
Android, iOS, Linux, Mac and Windows.
FAS Username: tc01
Why not in Fedora: firebird-emu is pure FOSS, but not only does it require TI's
proprietary operating system for the Nspire line of calculators, but also the
proprietary boot/base code blobs from the calculator itself. Thus as per the
emulator policy, since this package isn't functional without any proprietary
blobs, I believe this package still needs to be in RPM Fusion.
rpmlint output:
firebird-emu.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US calcs -> calls,
calms, calks
firebird-emu.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iOS -> OS, SOS, DOS
firebird-emu.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US calcs -> calls,
calms, calks
firebird-emu.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iOS -> OS, SOS,
DOS
firebird-emu.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary firebird
firebird-emu.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary firebird-send
Note: upstream usually uses the name "firebird" for this package, but the name
"firebird" belongs to another package in Fedora, so I opted for "firebird-emu"
(as this name is also sometimes used by upstream).
There is a potential for name conflicts. Currently the firebird package
installs a %{_sbindir}/firebird [1]. This package installs a
%{_bindir}/firebird. This doesn't cause a conflict per _se_, but if both are on
$PATH there's a potential for confusion. Should I rename the binary from
firebird -> firebird-emu as well?
As far as I can tell, the packages do not currently conflict in any other way.
The current firebird-emu filelist is:
-rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/firebird
-rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/firebird-send
-rwxr-xr-x /usr/share/applications/firebird.desktop
drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/doc/firebird-emu
-rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firebird-emu/README.md
-rw-r--r-- /usr/share/doc/firebird-emu/TODO.md
-rw-r--r-- /usr/share/icons/firebird.png
drwxr-xr-x /usr/share/licenses/firebird-emu
-rw-r--r-- /usr/share/licenses/firebird-emu/LICENSE
[1] http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/firebird.git/tree/firebird.spec
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6 years, 2 months
[Bug 3111] New: Review Request: ppsspp - playstation portable emulator
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3111
Bug #: 3111
Summary: Review Request: ppsspp - playstation portable emulator
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: fast.rizwaan(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Description:
PPSSPP is a playstation portable emulator
Why not in fedora: emulators are not allowed.
SPEC:https://www.dropbox.com/s/likw80h5k1yqigp/ppsspp.spec
SRPM:https://www.dropbox.com/s/mmaz75mm4hauacf/ppsspp-v0.9.6_366-1.gitga1...
also I've made a bash script which makes latest rpm from git snapshot
rpms:https://www.dropbox.com/s/5ziwo5e49emml6j/make-ppsspp-rpm-from-git.sh
rpmlint output:
bash-4.2$ rpmlint ppsspp.spec ppsspp-v0.9.6_366-1.gitga113abd.fc20.src.rpm
ppsspp.spec:10: W: non-standard-group Applications/Games
ppsspp.spec:14: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
ppsspp.spec:14: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
ppsspp.spec:15: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
ppsspp.spec:17: W: macro-in-comment %{chkoutversion}
ppsspp.spec:20: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
ppsspp.spec:20: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
ppsspp.spec:55: W: setup-not-quiet
ppsspp.spec: W: invalid-url Source0: ppsspp-v0.9.6_366.tar.xz
ppsspp.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Playstation -> PlayStation, Play
station, Play-station
ppsspp.src: W: non-standard-group Applications/Games
ppsspp.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
ppsspp.src: W: invalid-url URL ppsspp.org
ppsspp.src: W: strange-permission make-ppsspp-from-git.sh 0755L
ppsspp.src: W: strange-permission ppsspp.spec 0640L
ppsspp.src: W: strange-permission ppsspp.png 0755L
ppsspp.src:14: W: macro-in-comment %{name}
ppsspp.src:14: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
ppsspp.src:15: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
ppsspp.src:17: W: macro-in-comment %{chkoutversion}
ppsspp.src:20: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
ppsspp.src:20: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
ppsspp.src:55: W: setup-not-quiet
ppsspp.src: W: invalid-url Source0: ppsspp-v0.9.6_366.tar.xz
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 24 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
6 years, 3 months
Mass rebuild on 24th of July
by Nicolas Chauvet
Hi there,
There is a mass rebuild to be scheduled for f29 before branching
As per the fedora 29 schedule, the branching should occurs around 14th
of August in Fedora side.
It would be nice to branch at the same time (or close enough)
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/29/Schedule
I would expect to start next week (on 24th of July), so this leave some room to:
- Fix FTBFS fedora packages so it's not the previous and outdated
version that lands in buildroot.
- have a better fedora toolchain that would avoid us to head yet
another mass rebuild (remember f28 ?).
As a side note, in f29 the compiler is expected to be removed from the
default buildroot.
I see no point to remove it at this point in time for RPM Fusion (just
before the mass rebuild), but I will probably remove it in rawhide
after f29 is branched. So please add BR: gcc or gcc-c++ as needed.
Thx
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
6 years, 4 months
RPM Fusion update report 2018-07-29
by noreply@rpmfusion.org
RPM Fusion update report
------------------------
Section free:
-------------
Fedora 27
-------------
Pushed to testing:
vdr-xineliboutput-2.1.0-7.20180701git97b7e78.fc27
Pushed to stable:
VirtualBox-5.2.16-1.fc27
VirtualBox-kmod-5.2.16-1.fc27
crystalhd-kmod-20170515-2.fc27
lightspark-0.8.1-1.fc27
mythtv-29.1-20.30.20180709.g2a0dadb37c.fc27
rfpkg-1.25.5-1.fc27
Fedora 28
-------------
Pushed to testing:
kdenlive-18.04.3-1.fc28
mp4tools-3.6.1-1.fc28
mpv-0.29.0-1.fc28
vdr-xineliboutput-2.1.0-7.20180701git97b7e78.fc28
Pushed to stable:
VirtualBox-5.2.16-1.fc28
VirtualBox-kmod-5.2.16-1.fc28
crystalhd-kmod-20170515-2.fc28
lightspark-0.8.1-1.fc28
mythtv-29.1-20.30.20180709.g2a0dadb37c.fc28
rfpkg-1.25.5-1.fc28
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
VirtualBox-5.2.16-1.el7
mythtv-29.1-20.30.20180709.g2a0dadb37c.el7
rfpkg-1.25.5-1.el7
Section nonfree:
-------------
Fedora 27
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
lpf-flash-plugin-30.0.0.134-1.fc27
nautilus-dropbox-2015.10.28-7.fc27
steam-1.0.0.54-18.fc27
Fedora 28
-------------
Pushed to testing:
pcsx2-1.4-10.fc28
Pushed to stable:
lpf-flash-plugin-30.0.0.134-1.fc28
nautilus-dropbox-2015.10.28-7.fc28
steam-1.0.0.54-18.fc28
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
Theses packages will be available in main mirror in few minutes. Wait for local mirrors to sync
Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org
6 years, 4 months