[Bug 3576] New: Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software Studio
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3576
Bug #: 3576
Summary: Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software
Studio
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: fedorauser(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2, 30
https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
https://fedorauser.fedorapeople.org/obs-studio.spec
Open Broadcaster Software is free and open source software for video recording
and live streaming.
OBS is not in Fedora because it depends on ffmpeg and other non free software.
I need to be sponsored as this is my first package and I'm not sponsored in
Fedora.
OBS studio has some issues with placing files in correct location, there was a
discussion about this (https://github.com/jp9000/obs-studio/pull/391). I think
that all of these errors are related to this.
rpmlint outputs:
$ rpmlint SRPMS/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
obs-studio.src:33: E: hardcoded-library-path in
%{buildroot}/usr/lib/libobs*.so*
obs-studio.src:54: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/cmake/LibObs
obs-studio.src:62: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib/obs-plugins
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
obs-studio.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libobs.so.0
exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libobsglad.so
obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libobs.so
obs-studio.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/libobs-opengl.so
obs-studio.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/obs-studio/COPYING
obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-devel-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/obs-studio-debuginfo-0.9.0-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5 years, 1 month
RPM Fusion mediacenter Spin
by Nicolas Chauvet
I had this project to try to build a dedicated Spin targeting media center
Finally got something basically testable with an iso generated within
koji for x86_64/
The idea is to be able to deploy a Kodi setup using RPM Fusion packages.
(it could be based on another mediacenter solution if relevant).
The current produced media is considered alpha state. Still lot of
work to be done:
- Setup a dedicated "product" to enable firewall, tuning and services
options as appropriate
- Enable initial setup tool
- Have a mean to fetch dvb firmware files and others.
- cockpit is bundled for remote administration
- Better rely on comps group to install packages.
- Have a dedicated page on the wiki.
- Have an ostree version.
Github with the kickstart:
https://github.com/rpmfusion-infra/rpmfusion-kickstarts
PS: please don't share the link widely yet
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=210378
Anyone interested in helping this project ?
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
5 years, 3 months
[Bug 4760] New: Review request: deepin-voice-recorder - Deepin Voice
Recorder
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4760
Bug ID: 4760
Summary: Review request: deepin-voice-recorder - Deepin Voice
Recorder
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: sztsian(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
namespace: free
SPEC URL:
https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/rpmfusion/deepin-voice-recorder.spec
SRPM URL:
https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/rpmfusion/deepin-voice-recorder-1....
Description: Deepin Voice Recorder
RPMFusion FAS Username: zsun
* Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora:
This depends on some codec, which are not accepted in Fedora.
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
deepin-voice-recorder.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
deepin-voice-recorder.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/dman/deepin-voice-recorder/en_US/icon/Enter.svg
deepin-voice-recorder.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/dman/deepin-voice-recorder/en_US/icon/Enter.svg
deepin-voice-recorder.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/dman/deepin-voice-recorder/en_US/icon/close_icon.svg
deepin-voice-recorder.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/dman/deepin-voice-recorder/en_US/icon/close_icon.svg
deepin-voice-recorder.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/dman/deepin-voice-recorder/zh_CN/icon/Enter.svg
deepin-voice-recorder.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/dman/deepin-voice-recorder/zh_CN/icon/Enter.svg
deepin-voice-recorder.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/dman/deepin-voice-recorder/zh_CN/icon/close_icon.svg
deepin-voice-recorder.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/dman/deepin-voice-recorder/zh_CN/icon/close_icon.svg
deepin-voice-recorder.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang
/usr/share/dman/deepin-voice-recorder/zh_CN/icon/tips.svg
deepin-voice-recorder.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/dman/deepin-voice-recorder/zh_CN/icon/tips.svg
deepin-voice-recorder.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary
deepin-voice-recorder
deepin-voice-recorder-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation
I believe I don't need to fix problems in svg files. So almost all the above
message should be harmless.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5 years, 3 months
[Bug 4749] New: Review request: deepin-movie - Deepin Movie based on
mpv
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4749
Bug ID: 4749
Summary: Review request: deepin-movie - Deepin Movie based on
mpv
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: sztsian(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Blocks: 2
namespace: free
Spec URL: https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/deepin-movie/deepin-movie.spec
SRPM URL:
https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/deepin-movie/deepin-movie-2.2.14-2...
Description: Deepin Movie based on mpv
Fedora Account System Username: zsun
RPMFusion FAS Username: zsun
* Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora:
This depends on mpv, which is not accepted in Fedora.
* This is my first RPM Fusion package.
* I am a current Fedora Packager
* RPMlint
- For all spelling error, mpv is a program so not a typo.
- For debuginfo(build-id), all packages built in rawhide contains this, so I
assume this won't hurt.
$ ls
deepin-movie-3.2.0-1.fc27.src.rpm
deepin-movie-3.2.0-1.fc28.src.rpm
deepin-movie-3.2.0-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
deepin-movie-debuginfo-3.2.0-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
deepin-movie-debugsource-3.2.0-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
deepin-movie-devel-3.2.0-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
deepin-movie.spec
$ rpmlint *.rpm
deepin-movie.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mpv -> mp, mpg, mph
deepin-movie.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found zh_CN
deepin-movie.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mpv -> mp, mpg, mph
deepin-movie.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) mpv -> mp, mpg, mph
deepin-movie.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary deepin-movie
deepin-movie-debuginfo.x86_64: E: useless-provides debuginfo(build-id)
deepin-movie-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation
deepin-movie-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
deepin-movie-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 7 warnings.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2
[Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5 years, 3 months
[Bug 4363] New: Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld - Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4363
Bug ID: 4363
Summary: Review request: chromium-libs-media-freeworld -
Chromium media libraries built with all possible
codecs
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: alexjnewt(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC URL:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42480493/chromium-libs-media-freeworl...
SRPM URL:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/42480493/chromium-libs-media-freeworl...
Description:
Chromium media libraries built with all possible codecs. Chromium is an
open-source web browser, powered by WebKit (Blink). This package replaces
the default chromium-libs-media package, which is limited in what it
can include.
RPMlint output:
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) codecs ->
codes, coders, code's
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
codecs -> codes, coders, code's
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src:227: E: hardcoded-library-path in
/usr/lib/libc.so
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src:879: W: macro-in-comment %{target}
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src:90: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces:
line 90, tab: line 60)
chromium-libs-media-freeworld.src: W: invalid-url Source2:
depot_tools.git-master.tar.gz
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings.
None of this really matters too much. As for the hardcoded-library-path error,
please read the note in the spec for more details. The
mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs is trivial and will be fixed in the next revision.
This package is mostly based off of the chromium package but has been trimmed
down to only really include the two codec libraries that Fedora will not
provide for legal reasons. I'm sure I'm probably building too much and things
can be trimmed down.
Note that this package takes forever to compile, but as I said, the spec likely
needs to be cleaned up, but feedback is welcome for sure. This will likely go
into rpmfusion free, but I'll be honest, I need to look into the source a bit
more as there maybe some nonfree bits.
I'll continue to work on it, I just wanted to upload something that built, so I
can get feedback.
One issue that should be addressed though; chromium depends on
chromium-libs-media, which this package provides as an alternative to the
trimmed down fedora version. I would think if chromium updates without this
packaging being updated, this package would be removed by the updater, while if
this package updates before chromium, it would cause broken dependencies.
EItherway, having rpmfusion's packages out of sync with Fedora's would no so
nice.
Perhaps a "chromium-freeworld" package would be better? The maintainer for
chromium has made it painfully easy to package a freeworld version, so this
wouldn't be too bad. I'll run a build of a chromium-freeworld package overnight
for testing, as I'm sort of leaning towards this being a better option.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5 years, 4 months
Upgrading EL7 with a newer ffmpeg
by Nicolas Chauvet
Hi there,
With the update gstreamer packages to 1.10.4 (that was due in RHEL 7.4
already), the gstreamer1-libav package has bumped the requirement to
ffmpeg 3.X. So we are currently in a in-between state.
There is also a need to a newer ffmpeg with vlc 3.x that I consider
upgrading EL7 to (current vlc 2.2.x version is unmaintained, even
debian stable updated from 2.2.x to 3.x because of that).
We might give an opportunity to update x264/x265 too and eventually
refresh some dependencies here.
My plans would be to update to either ffmpeg 3.3x or 3.4.x (the latest
from the 3.x branch). there is already a compat-ffmpeg28 package ready
to ease the transition.
There isn't a terribly high number of el7 packages that depends on
ffmpeg fortunately (or not).
And it's a shame because EL7 has way more users than any Fedora
releases together (according to epel stats (2)).
So I really would like some volunteer to take a deeper look at what we
can support here.
Thx
(1)
$ repoquery --whatrequires libavcodec.so.56\* --source
audacity-freeworld-2.0.6-1.el7.src.rpm
ffmpeg-2.8.15-1.el7.src.rpm
ffmpegthumbnailer-2.2.0-3.el7.src.rpm
ffms2-2.23-2.el7.src.rpm
gpac-0.6.1-1.el7.src.rpm
ffmpeg-2.8.15-1.el7.src.rpm
libopenshot-0.2.0-1.el7.src.rpm
libquicktime-1.2.4-13.el7.src.rpm
mplayer-1.1-23.20140414svn.el7.src.rpm
mlt-freeworld-6.4.1-1.el7.src.rpm
motion-3.3.0-trunkREV557.9.el7.src.rpm
mpd-0.19.21-1.el7.src.rpm
mplayer-1.1-23.20140414svn.el7.src.rpm
mpv-0.23.0-3.el7.src.rpm
libopenshot-0.2.0-1.el7.src.rpm
qmmp-plugins-freeworld-0.8.8-1.el7.src.rpm
libopenshot-0.2.0-1.el7.src.rpm
simplescreenrecorder-0.3.11-1.el7.src.rpm
transcode-1.1.7-17.el7.src.rpm
tvheadend-4.0.9-3.el7.src.rpm
vlc-2.2.8-2.el7.src.rpm
x264-0.148-11.20160614gita5e06b9.el7.src.rpm
xine-lib-1.2.9-2.el7.src.rpm
zoneminder-1.30.4-3.el7.src.rpm
(2)
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mirrormanager/statistics/2018-09-04/repos...
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
5 years, 5 months
[Bug 4892] New: Review request: retroarch - Reference frontend for
the libretro API
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4892
Bug ID: 4892
Summary: Review request: retroarch - Reference frontend for the
libretro API
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: markand(a)malikania.fr
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
namespace: free
Hi,
This is my first RPM Fusion package.
RetroArch is not eligible for inclusion in Fedora because:
1. It depends on ffmpeg,
2. It has a lot of assets / libretro cores that are open source but in a
non-commercial clause,
3. Some libretro core also depend on ffmpeg.
What is RetroArch?
RetroArch is the reference frontend for the libretro API. Popular examples
of implementations for this API includes videogame system emulators and
game engines, but also more generalized 3D programs. These programs are
instantiated as dynamic libraries. We refer to these as "libretro cores".
$ rpmlint retroarch.spec
SPECS/retroarch.spec:74: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
SPECS/retroarch.spec:141: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_libdir}
SPECS/retroarch.spec:142: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_datadir}
SPECS/retroarch.spec:143: W: macro-in-%changelog %{_datadir}
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.
The home made configure file do not require installation of any library, other
warnings are a bit useless to me.
$ rpmlint retroarch-1.7.2-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency alsa-lib
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency bzip2-libs
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libX11
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXau
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXext
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXxf86vm
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libglvnd-egl
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libglvnd-glx
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libpng
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libv4l
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxcb
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency pulseaudio-libs
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency systemd-libs
retroarch.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency zlib
retroarch.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) frontend -> fronted, front
end, front-end
retroarch.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) libretro -> libretto, lib
retro, lib-retro
retroarch.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US frontend -> fronted,
front end, front-end
retroarch.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US libretro -> libretto,
lib retro, lib-retro
retroarch.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US videogame -> video
game, video-game, ideogram
retroarch.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog
retroarch.x86_64: W: non-conffile-in-etc /etc/retroarch.cfg
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 14 errors, 7 warnings.
I can't understand the problem with dependencies.
SPEC: http://markand.fr/static/rpms/retroarch.spec
SRPM: http://markand.fr/static/rpms/retroarch-1.7.2-1.fc28.src.rpm
I don't have a sponsor yet.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5 years, 5 months
[Bug 3954] New: Review request: nordlicht - Create colorful barcodes from video files
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3954
Bug #: 3954
Summary: Review request: nordlicht - Create colorful barcodes
from video files
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: ngompa13(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Spec URL: http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/nordlicht.spec
SRPM URL:
http://kinginuyasha.enanocms.org/downloads/nordlicht-0.4.4-1.fc23.src.rpm
Description:
nordlicht is for converting video files into colorful barcodes. It is inspired
by the Moviebarcode Tumblr, but aims at the next logical step: Integrating
these barcodes into video players to make navigation faster and more precise.
Why nordlicht isn't eligible to be included in Fedora:
nordlicht depends on FFmpeg, which is not included in Fedora, but is included
in RPM Fusion.
rpmlint output:
$ rpmlint nordlicht.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.
$ rpmlint nordlicht-0.4.4-1.fc23.src.rpm
nordlicht.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) barcodes -> bar codes,
bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly]
nordlicht.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcodes -> bar codes,
bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly]
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint nordlicht-0.4.4-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
nordlicht.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) barcodes -> bar codes,
bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly]
nordlicht.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcodes -> bar
codes, bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly]
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
$ rpmlint nordlicht-libs-0.4.4-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
nordlicht-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US barcodes -> bar
codes, bar-codes, barcaroles [Ignored because barcodes is spelled correctly]
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
$ rpmlint nordlicht-devel-0.4.4-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
nordlicht-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib [Ignored because
pkgconfig file and symlink .so belong in devel]
nordlicht-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation [Ignored because documentation is
included in the libs package, which is Required by the devel package]
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
This is my first RPM Fusion package, but I've been a packager in Fedora for
several years (FAS: ngompa).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5 years, 6 months
[Bug 4186] New: scid - A chess database application
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4186
Bug #: 4186
Summary: scid - A chess database application
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Platform: All
OS/Version: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: Review Request
AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
ReportedBy: sergio(a)serjux.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
SPEC: http://www.serjux.com/rpms/scid.spec
SRPM: http://www.serjux.com/rpms/scid-4.6.2-1.fc21.src.rpm
I will be able to add this package , the scid.spec is the same made by Mikhail
Kalenkov , I just update it to 4.6.2
Scid can perform many different searches, such as for particular
players, a certain opening position, material searches, and pattern
searches such as isolated pawns. It is very fast, because it uses its
own efficient format, but it can convert games to and from PGN, the
standard format for chess game files.
Scid can use a chess engine such as Crafty to analyze games and also
has a "tree" mode where it automatically shows all moves played from
the current position, their opening codes, success rates, etc.
Why not in Fedora:
Scid package has some small part of nonfree code. It is Nalimov
tablebase decoding code. Nalimov tablebases may be very important in the
endgame
analysis.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5 years, 6 months