September 2018 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 4669] New: Review request: comskip - A free commercial detector

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4669 Bug ID: 4669 Summary: Review request: comskip - A free commercial detector Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: mprahl(a)redhat.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 namespace: free Hello, This is my first RPMFusion package. I am a sponsored Fedora packager, but not an RPMFusion packager. Spec file: https://mprahl.fedorapeople.org/comskip.spec SRPM: https://mprahl.fedorapeople.org/comskip-0.82.002-1.fc26.src.rpm Description: Comskip is a free commercial detector This package is not eligible to be in Fedora because it requires ffmpeg and ffmpeg-devel, which are not available in the official Fedora repos. rpmlint output: comskip.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US erikkaashoek comskip.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/comskip comskip.x86_64: W: no-documentation comskip.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary comskip Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

5 years, 6 months

1
22
0 / 0

[Bug 4928] New: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx - NVIDIA's 390xx series proprietary display driver for NVIDIA graphic cards

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4928 Bug ID: 4928 Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx - NVIDIA's 390xx series proprietary display driver for NVIDIA graphic cards Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: nonfree SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx.spec SRPM: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx-390.67-1.fc28.src.rpm Summary: NVIDIA's 390xx series proprietary display driver for NVIDIA graphic cards This is for the nonfree section. The goal is to introduce this everywhere (el6->f29). Every users will be switched to 390xx. Then we can re-introduce the 396+ serie as the new main version. TODO: Restore either builtin tools (nvidia-xconfig/nvidia-settings/others?) At this step we can assume the same can be used from the 396+ serie. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

5 years, 6 months

1
28
0 / 0

[Bug 4640] New: Review request: slowmoVideo - Creates slow-motion videos from your footage

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4640 Bug ID: 4640 Summary: Review request: slowmoVideo - Creates slow-motion videos from your footage Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: metal3d(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2 namespace: free Spec file: https://examples.metal3d.org/slowmoVideo/slowmoVideo.spec SRPM file: https://examples.metal3d.org/slowmoVideo/slowmoVideo-git33f5c84-1.fc26.sr... It does not simply make your videos play at 0.01× speed. You can smoothly slow down and speed up your footage, optionally with motion blur. How does slow motion work? slowmoVideo tries to find out where pixels move in the video (this information is called Optical Flow), and then uses this information to calculate the additional frames between the ones recorded by your camera. This package could not be elligible on Fedora official repository due the ffmpeg dependencies. That is my first rpm on rpmfusion and I'm seeking a sponsor. Regards, Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

5 years, 6 months

1
25
0 / 0

[Bug 4929] New: Review nvidia-390xx-kmod - NVIDIA 390xx display driver kernel module

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4929 Bug ID: 4929 Summary: Review nvidia-390xx-kmod - NVIDIA 390xx display driver kernel module Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: nonfree SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/nvidia-390xx-kmod.spec SRPM: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/nvidia-390xx-kmod-390.67-1.fc28.src.rpm Summary: NVIDIA's 390xx series proprietary display driver for NVIDIA graphic cards This is for the nonfree section. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

5 years, 6 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 5030] New: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx - NVIDIA's 390xx series proprietary display driver for NVIDIA graphic cards

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5030 Bug ID: 5030 Summary: Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx - NVIDIA's 390xx series proprietary display driver for NVIDIA graphic cards Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: hobbes1069(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: nonfree SPEC: https://www.dropbox.com/s/fcdauqm4kdkelzh/xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx.spec SRPM: https://www.dropbox.com/s/tougxv66frfoixe/xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx-390.8... Summary: NVIDIA's 390xx series proprietary display driver for NVIDIA graphic cards This is for the nonfree section. The goal is to introduce this everywhere (el6->f29). Every users will be switched to 390xx. Then we can re-introduce the 396+ serie as the new main version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

5 years, 6 months

1
15
0 / 0

[Bug 5035] New: Review request: gr-dab - GNU Radio DAB digital audio broadcasting module

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5035 Bug ID: 5035 Summary: Review request: gr-dab - GNU Radio DAB digital audio broadcasting module Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: jskarvad(a)redhat.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free Spec: http://download.eng.brq.redhat.com/scratch/jskarvad/gr-dab/gr-dab.spec SRPM: http://download.eng.brq.redhat.com/scratch/jskarvad/gr-dab/gr-dab-0.2.1-1... Description: GNU Radio DAB digital audio broadcasting module. Package is not eligible for Fedora because it requires MPEG4 faad2 decoder. I am Fedora packager, this is not my first RPMFusion package. $ rpmlint gr-dab.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint gr-dab-0.2.1-1.20180925gita33609bd.fc29.src.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint *.rpm gr-dab-debuginfo.x86_64: E: useless-provides debuginfo(build-id) not packaging error gr-dab-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation false positive gr-dab-debugsource.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/src/debug/gr-dab-0.2.1-1.20180925gita33609bd.fc29.x86_64/lib/neaacdec.h notified upstream gr-dab-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib false positive gr-dab-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation false positive gr-dab.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libgnuradio-dab.so.3.7.13 exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5 upstream problem, it shouldn't be fixed downstream gr-dab.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/libgnuradio-dab.so.3.7.13 gr-dab.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/libgnuradio-dab.so.3.7.13 false positive, used new macro gr-dab.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary dab_rx_constellation.py gr-dab.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary grdab gr-dab.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rtl_sdr_dab_calibrate.py gr-dab.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rtl_sdr_dab_rx.py gr-dab.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary rtl_sdr_dab_rx_constellation.py gr-dab.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary usrp_dab_rx.py gr-dab.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary usrp_dab_rx_audio.py gr-dab.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary usrp_dab_tx.py no manual pages exists 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 4 errors, 12 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

5 years, 6 months

1
7
0 / 0

bug #1629418 cdrkit packages doesn't not provides anymore cdrecord and mkisofs

by Sérgio Basto

Hello , Still not sure what the best solution for [1] but in F29 we can't install the follwing packages: - nothing provides mkisofs needed by devedeng-4.12.0-3.fc29.noarch - nothing provides mkisofs needed by dvd-slideshow-0.8.6.1-2.fc29.noarch - nothing provides cdrecord >= 2.01 needed by mytharchive-29.1-22.36.20180907.gdde16d475a.fc29.x86_64 - nothing provides mkisofs >= 2.01 needed by mytharchive-29.1-22.36.20180907.gdde16d475a.fc29.x86_64 - nothing provides mkisofs needed by vdrsync-0.1.3-24.PRE1.050322.fc29.noarch [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629418 Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B.

5 years, 6 months

3
3
0 / 0

Koji build space

by Michael Cronenworth

Hi, It appears the x86/x86_64 builders have run out of hard disk space. Is that anyone can address? Thanks, Michael

5 years, 6 months

2
1
0 / 0

[Bug 4993] New: Review Request: chromium-vaapi A webkit(blink) powered web browser with VIDEO ACCELERATION

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4993 Bug ID: 4993 Summary: Review Request: chromium-vaapi A webkit(blink) powered web browser with VIDEO ACCELERATION Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: akarshan.biswas(a)hotmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free SRPM: https://github.com/biswasab/chromium-vaapi/releases/download/68.0.3440.10... SPEC FILE: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/biswasab/chromium-vaapi/master/chromium... Description: Chromium-vaapi is an open source web browser powered by webkit(blink) with video acceleration enabled. Video is accelerated using libva and vaapi which not only increase the overall battery lifetime but also enable smooth High Definition videos on extremely weak platforms(If supported). This build of chromium browser seems to work with Intel, AMD and some older Nvidia GPUs with nouveau driver and firmware from the binary driver. The video codecs that can be accelerated can be determined by vainfo from libva-utils. Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora? Proprietary codecs such as h264 and others. rpmlint: SRPM log: chromium-vaapi.src: W: strange-permission downloadsource.sh 775 ##This script is included for downloading latest tarball chromium-vaapi.src:133: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 76, tab: line 133) #This is intended 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. RPM log: chromium-vaapi.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libva ##Ofcource we need libva chromium-vaapi.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 68.0.3440.106-1 ['68.0.3440.106-34.1', '68.0.3440.106-34.1'] #Used obs to test, Let's ignore it chromium-vaapi.x86_64: W: invalid-url DistURL obs://build.opensuse.org/home:hellbangerkarna/Fedora_28/ac502e01cba651bfa... #Used obs to test, Let's ignore it chromium-vaapi.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/chromium-vaapi/chrome-sandbox chromium-vaapi.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/lib64/chromium-vaapi/chrome-sandbox chromium-vaapi.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/chromium-vaapi/chromedriver chromium-vaapi.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/lib64/chromium-vaapi/chromium-vaapi chromium-vaapi.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-chdir-with-chroot /usr/lib64/chromium-vaapi/chromium-vaapi chromium-vaapi.x86_64: E: setuid-binary /usr/lib64/chromium-vaapi/chrome-sandbox root 4755 chromium-vaapi.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/lib64/chromium-vaapi/chrome-sandbox 4755 chromium-vaapi.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/chromium-vaapi/xdg-mime 644 /bin/sh #It;s not a script chromium-vaapi.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib64/chromium-vaapi/xdg-settings 644 /bin/sh #It's not a script 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 7 errors, 5 warnings. Upon testing the binary, libatomic doesn't get automatically installed with my chromium-vaapi. So I have added it as requirement later. I'm thinking of adding conflicts with the chromium package as they both uses the same profile can might create issues. Now everything works as expected. This is my first rpmfusion package after I was contacted by Nicolas(kwizard). I wish to keep on improving the package. I also seek sponsor as I'm not a Fedora sponsored packager nor an RPM Fusion sponsored packager. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

5 years, 6 months

2
75
0 / 0

[Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Antonio Trande <anto.trande(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on|4993 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4993 [Bug 4993] Review Request: chromium-vaapi A webkit(blink) powered web browser with VIDEO ACCELERATION -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

5 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers September 2018