November 2019 - rpmfusion-developers

[Bug 3863] New: Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3863 Bug #: 3863 Summary: Review request: game-data-packager - Installer for game data files Classification: Unclassified Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Platform: All OS/Version: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: Review Request AssignedTo: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org ReportedBy: alexandre.detiste(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Various games are divided into two logical parts: engine and data. . game-data-packager is a tool which builds .rpm files for game data which cannot be distributed (such as commercial game data). Almost all ScummVM, Doom, Quake games are supported + others. http://pkg-games.alioth.debian.org/game-data/ ------------- http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-games/game-data-packager.git/tree/tool... The RPM support has been added _after_ the last release, so I temporary use dummy snapshot tarballs until next release. These are built this way: git archive --prefix=game-data-packager/ --format tar.gz master > ../rpmbuild/SOURCES/game-data-packager.tar.gz Which makes rmplint complain: "game-data-packager.src: W: invalid-url Source0: game-data-packager.tar.gz" ------------- This tool originated in Debian "contrib", because it's free software, but of no use without non-free assets; likewise it doesn't belong in Fedora. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279177 : "game-data-packager's sole purpose is to repackage non-free game resources into distro packages. As such it has no place in Fedora itself." --------------------------- remaining rpmlint: game-data-packager.noarch: E: zero-length /etc/game-data-packager/quake3-mirrors well, maybe GDP should use data from filewatcher to enhance it's mirror lists. either at build-time (bad, need internet acces), from time to time, or at run time. We have SHA1 hashes for files, so the source doesn't much matter. http://www.filewatcher.com/m/linuxq3apoint-1.32b-3.x86.run.30923961-0.html game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/game-data-packager that's not a script intended to be run, but a script fragement to be sourced game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/games/game-data-packager/game_data_packager/games/__init__.py game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/games/game-data-packager/game_data_packager/version.py game-data-packager.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/share/games/game-data-packager/game_data_packager/paths.py these are generated during the build, a shebang could be added too ----- This is my first RPM Fusion package. ------- upstream Makefile lacks a "make install" rule; having this would allow to trim the specfile. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

3 years, 3 months

1
29
0 / 0

Re: [x264/f30: 7/7] Merge branch 'f29' into f30

by Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski

On Friday, 04 October 2019 at 10:23, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Please consider to use cherry-pick next time. > I don't see the point to compute a merge resolution for the changelog > because of a single fix. > This is craziness. Cherry-picking only makes sense when the branches are too diverged. I did cherry-pick from f29 to el7 for that reason. The others are more or less the same. All the fixes that went into all branches should have been applied to the oldest applicable branch first and then merged upwards. This wasn't done, hence the current merge commits look uglier than they could be. They will be much cleaner in the future if this workflow is followed. Christopher over at fedora devel list has some valid points in favour of this way[1]: Git has excellent branch merging features. Merging branches, rather than cherry-picking across them, results in commits representing the same changeset being present in multiple branches, making it easier to search git history and identify which branches contain a specific change. Regards, Dominik [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.o... -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan

3 years, 5 months

5
11
0 / 0

[Bug 5450] New: Review request: scrcpy- Display and control your Android device

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5450 Bug ID: 5450 Summary: Review request: scrcpy- Display and control your Android device Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: faezebax(a)riseup.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Blocks: 2, 30 namespace: free spec file: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/faezebax/rpms/master/scrcpy.spec source rpm: https://github.com/faezebax/rpms/raw/master/scrcpy-1.10-1.fc31.src.rpm This application provides display and control of Android devices connected on USB (or over TCP/IP). It does not require any root access. This application uses ffmpeg which is not in official fedora repos since so it cannot be placed in fedora repos. Also it has a sever part that should be build by gradle which needs Android SDK. It is placed as a scrcpy-server.jar in the package. I talked with upstream and asked them to find a way to build it without needing to Android SDK. Output of "rpmlint scrcpy-1.10-1.fc31.src.rpm": 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Output of "rpmlint scrcpy-1.10-1.fc31.x86_64.rpm": 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Output of"rpmlint scrcpy.spec" 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. This is my first RPM Fusion package. I want to contribute more to fedora and I am seeking a sponsor. I appreciate any advice that make my package better and increase my knowledge. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2 [Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 [Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

3 years, 6 months

1
7
0 / 0

About multilibs support in RPM Fusion

by Nicolas Chauvet

Hi there, For the info, I've restored the capability to build for multilibs on fedora 31+ (as we don't build i686 by default). There is a rfpkg update that is been prepared by sergio to automate the appropriate packages to be forwarded to the related koji build target. The current packages that will build on multilibs are currently limited to steam, libva-intel-driver and nvidia driver. If other components are missing, please let me know. For the long run, it's more complicated as i386 repos doesn't seem to be published (el8) or are going to be less reliable (fedora 31+). So instead, I envision to build using the x86_64 repos (using a x86_64 compiler and tools and i686 libraries). For information, RHEL8 is obviously building i686 with -m32 -march=x86_64 by default, so I assume the i686 packages are already built using a x86_64 userspace there. I've reported this issue to mock to investigate how this can be achieved: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues/340 Thx -- - Nicolas (kwizart)

3 years, 8 months

4
6
0 / 0

[Bug 5367] New: Review request: fedy - Install codecs and additional software

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5367 Bug ID: 5367 Summary: Review request: fedy - Install codecs and additional software Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: kwizart(a)gmail.com CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Group: Package Reviews namespace: free SRPM: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/fedy-5.0.0-1.fc29.src.rpm SPEC: http://dl.kwizart.net/review/fedy.spec Summary: Install codecs and additional software Koji scratch build: http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=350702 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

3 years, 10 months

1
14
0 / 0

Re: [audacity-freeworld] Update to Audacity 2.3.3. Modify wxWidgets build require to wxGTK3 (gtk3 version). Modify libdir pat

by Nicolas Chauvet

Le ven. 29 nov. 2019 à 11:14, David Timms <dtimms(a)rpmfusion.org> a écrit : > > commit 8eb6c033f30f616867f13afc21d90076e9bc9374 > Author: David Timms <dtimms(a)iinet.net.au> > Date: Fri Nov 29 21:11:52 2019 +1100 > > Update to Audacity 2.3.3. > Modify wxWidgets build require to wxGTK3 (gtk3 version). > Modify libdir patch for 2.3.3. > Fix -manual file archive dropping the leading help/ in path. > Disable twolame for EPEL-8 as the -devel package isn't available. ... > diff --git a/audacity-2.3.3-libdir.patch b/audacity-2.3.3-libdir.patch > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..2659a0c > --- /dev/null > +++ b/audacity-2.3.3-libdir.patch > @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ > +--- ./src/effects/ladspa/LadspaEffect.cpp.orig 2019-10-22 07:29:41.000000000 +1100 > ++++ ./src/effects/ladspa/LadspaEffect.cpp 2019-11-10 09:44:41.865684664 +1100 > +@@ -378,11 +378,10 @@ > + #else > + > + pathList.push_back(wxGetHomeDir() + wxFILE_SEP_PATH + wxT(".ladspa")); > ++ pathList.push_back(wxT("/usr/%{_lib}/ladspa")); ^^ This looks wrong as %{_lib} is a RPM macro and there is no reason this will be expanded to either lib or lib64. (unless you are dynamically patching the patch which looks wrong.) > + #if defined(__LP64__) This is also wrong, as aarch64 (aka arm64) are LP64 but isn't using the lib64, same for ppc64le (IIRC). You really need to use the configured --libdir, there is no way around. > +- pathList.push_back(wxT("/usr/local/lib64/ladspa")); > + pathList.push_back(wxT("/usr/lib64/ladspa")); > + #endif > +- pathList.push_back(wxT("/usr/local/lib/ladspa")); > + pathList.push_back(wxT("/usr/lib/ladspa")); > + pathList.push_back(wxT(LIBDIR) wxT("/ladspa")); > + > diff --git a/audacity-freeworld.spec b/audacity-freeworld.spec > index 02b5bf0..b57840c 100644 > --- a/audacity-freeworld.spec > +++ b/audacity-freeworld.spec > @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ > > Name: audacity-freeworld > > -Version: 2.3.2 > -Release: 2%{?dist} > +Version: 2.3.3 > +Release: 1%{?dist} > Summary: Multitrack audio editor > License: GPLv2 ... > BuildRequires: taglib-devel > +%if 0%{?rhel} && 0%{?rhel} == 8 > +#note: epel-8 currently doesn't have twolame-devel. > +%else Please fix the above, we have twolame-libs in appstream repository, but we are using a -devel in our override repo, so it's there. http://koji.rpmfusion.org/buildsys-override/el8-free/x86_64/ > BuildRequires: twolame-devel > +%endif -- - Nicolas (kwizart)

3 years, 11 months

4
5
0 / 0

[Bug 5468] New: Review Request: gstreamer-ffmpeg - GStreamer FFmpeg-based plug-ins

by RPM Fusion Bugzilla

https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5468 Bug ID: 5468 Summary: Review Request: gstreamer-ffmpeg - GStreamer FFmpeg-based plug-ins Product: Package Reviews Version: Current Hardware: x86_64 OS: GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P1 Component: Review Request Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org Reporter: dominik(a)greysector.net CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org namespace: free Spec URL: https://www.greysector.net/~rathann/review/gstreamer-ffmpeg/gstreamer-ffm... SRPM URL: https://www.greysector.net/~rathann/review/gstreamer-ffmpeg/gstreamer-ffm... Description: GStreamer is a streaming media framework, based on graphs of filters which operate on media data. Applications using this library can do anything from real-time sound processing to playing videos, and just about anything else media-related. Its plugin-based architecture means that new data types or processing capabilities can be added simply by installing new plugins. This package provides FFmpeg-based GStreamer plug-ins. FAS: rathann This is an unretirement review request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.

3 years, 11 months

1
16
0 / 0

RPM Fusion update report 2019-11-29

by noreply＠rpmfusion.org

RPM Fusion update report ------------------------ Section free: ------------- Fedora 30 ------------- Pushed to testing: qmplay2-19.11.26-1.fc30 vlc-bittorrent-2.7-3.fc30 Pushed to stable: alsa-plugins-freeworld-1.2.1-1.fc30 xpra-codecs-freeworld-3.0.2-1.fc30 Fedora 31 ------------- Pushed to testing: HandBrake-1.3.0-2.fc31 qmplay2-19.11.26-1.fc31 vlc-bittorrent-2.7-3.fc31 Pushed to stable: xpra-codecs-freeworld-3.0.2-1.fc31 EL 6 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: rpmfusion-packager-0.6.6-1.el7 Pushed to stable: EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Section nonfree: ------------- Fedora 30 ------------- Pushed to testing: clipgrab-3.8.7-1.fc30 unrar-5.8.4-1.fc30 Pushed to stable: Fedora 31 ------------- Pushed to testing: clipgrab-3.8.7-1.fc31 unrar-5.8.4-1.fc31 Pushed to stable: EL 6 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 7 ------------- Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: EL 8 ------------- Pushed to testing: unrar-5.8.4-1.el8 Pushed to stable: Theses packages will be available in main mirror in a few hours. Wait for local mirrors to sync Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org

4 years

1
0
0 / 0

RPM Fusion logo

by Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski

Hi! Does anyone have a vector version of the RPM Fusion logo? If not, then at least a high resolution version of what's on the wiki. I'm making a presentation for a conference and I've just found out I don't have a nice-looking RPM Fusion logo. Thanks in advance! Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan

4 years

3
2
0 / 0

Sponsoring new packagers

by Nicolas Chauvet

Hi there, FYI, I've raised few rpmfusion members as packager sponsor. If you are doing review and helping others members, feel free to ask to be a sponsor in FAS. Thx -- - Nicolas (kwizart)

4 years

2
1
0 / 0

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

rpmfusion-developers November 2019