[Bug 4750] New: Review request: deepin-music - Deepin Music Player
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4750
Bug ID: 4750
Summary: Review request: deepin-music - Deepin Music Player
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: sztsian(a)gmail.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org,
sensor.wen(a)gmail.com
Blocks: 2
namespace: free
Spec URL: https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/rpmfusion/deepin-music.spec
SRPM URL:
https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/rpmfusion/deepin-music-3.1.7.2-2.f...
Description: Deepin Music Player
Fedora Account System Username: zsun
RPMFusion FAS Username: zsun
* Why this package is not eligible to be included in Fedora:
This depends on some codec that are not accepted in Fedora.
* This is my second RPM Fusion package. (The other is bug 4749 which is also
just filed)
* I am a current Fedora Packager
* RPMlint:
$ rpmlint *.rpm
deepin-music.src: I: enchant-dictionary-not-found zh_CN
deepin-music.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tweakful -> tweak
deepin-music.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gstreamer ->
streamer, g streamer, steamer
deepin-music.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US quanpin -> piquant
deepin-music.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US tweakful -> tweak
deepin-music.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gstreamer ->
streamer, g streamer, steamer
deepin-music.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US quanpin -> piquant
For these above, they are from upstream and I believe they are expected.
deepin-music.x86_64: E: zero-length
/usr/share/dbus-1/services/com.deepin.dde.music.service
Upstream provided an empty file.
https://github.com/linuxdeepin/deepin-music/blob/master/music-player/data...
deepin-music.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary deepin-music
deepin-music.x86_64: E: invalid-desktopfile
/usr/share/applications/deepin-music.desktop file contains group "Next Shortcut
Group", but groups extending the format should start with "X-"
deepin-music.x86_64: E: invalid-desktopfile
/usr/share/applications/deepin-music.desktop file contains group "PlayPause
Shortcut Group", but groups extending the format should start with "X-"
deepin-music.x86_64: E: invalid-desktopfile
/usr/share/applications/deepin-music.desktop file contains group "Previous
Shortcut Group", but groups extending the format should start with "X-"
For desktop file related. This music player is originally part of Deepin
Desktop Environment(Short as DDE), and above are written under DDE's way. So I
believe I shouldn't modify them.
deepin-music-debuginfo.x86_64: E: useless-provides debuginfo(build-id)
For debuginfo(build-id), all packages built in rawhide contains this, so I
assume this won't hurt.
deepin-music-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-documentation
deepin-music-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
deepin-music-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 5 errors, 10 warnings.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2
[Bug 2] Tracker: New packages awaiting review
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5 years, 8 months
RPM Fusion update report 2019-03-27
by Leigh Scott
> Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:34:31 +0000
> From: Sérgio Basto <sergio(a)serjux.com>
> Subject: Re: RPM Fusion update report 2019-03-27
> To: RPM Fusion developers discussion list
> <rpmfusion-developers(a)lists.rpmfusion.org>
> Message-ID:
> <3fc9a7a905ba188a5b417e7f3f8f11510b7a35b3.camel(a)serjux.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Hi,
> If is not much work , I request VirtualBox-kmod-6.0.4-4 be push to
> stable directly on F28, F29 and rawhide (F30)
I've already done the push and wont have the time to do another till the
weekend.
5 years, 8 months
rpmfusion-developers Digest, Vol 3331, Issue 1
by Leigh Scott
On 28/03/2019 02:16, rpmfusion-developers-request(a)lists.rpmfusion.org wrote:
> RPM Fusion update report 2019-03-27
I've already done the push and wont have the time to do another till the
weekend.
5 years, 8 months
RPM Fusion update report 2019-03-27
by noreply＠rpmfusion.org
RPM Fusion update report
------------------------
Section free:
-------------
Fedora 28
-------------
Pushed to testing:
obs-studio-23.0.2-3.fc28
telegram-desktop-1.6.3-1.fc28
Pushed to stable:
VirtualBox-6.0.4-2.fc28
VirtualBox-kmod-6.0.4-3.fc28
audacity-freeworld-2.3.1-1.fc28
libopenshot-0.2.3-1.fc28
libopenshot-audio-0.1.8-1.fc28
motion-4.2.2-2.fc28
openshot-2.4.4-1.fc28
telegram-desktop-1.6.2-1.fc28
Fedora 29
-------------
Pushed to testing:
obs-studio-23.0.2-3.fc29
rfpkg-1.25.6-3.fc29
telegram-desktop-1.6.3-1.fc29
Pushed to stable:
VirtualBox-6.0.4-2.fc29
VirtualBox-kmod-6.0.4-3.fc29
audacity-freeworld-2.3.1-1.fc29
chromium-vaapi-73.0.3683.86-1.fc29
k3b-extras-freeworld-18.12.2-1.fc29
libopenshot-0.2.3-1.fc29
libopenshot-audio-0.1.8-1.fc29
motion-4.2.2-2.fc29
openshot-2.4.4-1.fc29
telegram-desktop-1.6.2-1.fc29
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
obs-studio-23.0.2-3.el7
Pushed to stable:
VirtualBox-6.0.4-2.el7
VirtualBox-kmod-6.0.4-3.el7
motion-4.2.2-2.el7
Section nonfree:
-------------
Fedora 28
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
steam-1.0.0.59-9.fc28
Fedora 29
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
steam-1.0.0.59-9.fc29
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
steam-1.0.0.59-9.el7
Theses packages will be available in main mirror in few minutes. Wait for local mirrors to sync
Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org
5 years, 8 months
Re: rfpkgdb-cli and rfpkg
by Leigh Scott
Feel free to improve my rough python3 rfpkg port, what did you expect
from a fully qualified heating/plumbing engineer with virtually no
coding experience!
I hope you lot are proud of your inaction!!
5 years, 8 months
rfpkgdb-cli and rfpkg
by Antonio Trande
Hi all.
Is anyone already working on 'rfpkgdb-cli' packaging?
It looks like required by 'rfpkg' and, therefore, it needs work for
using 'rfpkgdb-cli'
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org'
GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7
GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
5 years, 8 months
[Bug 5191] New: Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster
Software Studio
by RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5191
Bug ID: 5191
Summary: Review request: obs-studio - Open Broadcaster Software
Studio
Product: Package Reviews
Version: Current
Hardware: x86_64
OS: GNU/Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P1
Component: Review Request
Assignee: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
Reporter: mike(a)michaelrochefort.com
CC: rpmfusion-package-review(a)rpmfusion.org
namespace: nonfree
OBS Studio is software designed for capturing, compositing,
encoding, recording, and streaming video content, efficiently.
The package is not available in Fedora (to the best of my knowledge) as it
links against packages that may have patent protections, such as x264/x265
and nonfree packages like fdk-aac. The latter is why I am proposing this go
into nonfree instead of free. It's an optional dependency,but I would like
opinions on it.
Spec/SrcRPM:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/edq1anc8415kc9f/AACfYPYzVBxTPl9doFVetlgXa?dl=0
Source tarball is generated by:
git clone -b %{version} https://github.com/obsproject/obs-studio.git
cd obs-studio
git submodule update --init --recursive
for i in $(find . -name ".git"); do rm -rf $i; done
rm -rf plugins/enc-amf/AMF/Thirdparty/ffmpeg
cd .. && mv obs-studio obs-studio-%{version}
tar czf obs-studio-%{version}.tar.gz obs-studio-%{version}
rpmlint results:
obs-studio-23.0.2-1.el7.src.rpm
-------------------------------
obs-studio.src:3: E: hardcoded-library-path in %{_prefix}/lib
- Haven't figured out how to get OBS to install to lib64 without breaking.
Just renaming the lib directory to lib64 does not solve this issue.
obs-studio.src: W: invalid-url Source0: obs-studio-23.0.2.tar.gz
- I really don't know.
obs-studio-23.0.2-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
----------------------------------
obs-studio.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency alsa-lib
obs-studio.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libX11
obs-studio.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXcomposite
obs-studio.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXi
obs-studio.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libXinerama
obs-studio.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libglvnd
obs-studio.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libglvnd-egl
obs-studio.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libglvnd-gles
obs-studio.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libglvnd-glx
obs-studio.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libglvnd-opengl
obs-studio.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libv4l
obs-studio.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency pulseaudio-libs
obs-studio.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency x264-libs
obs-studio.x86_64: E: explicit-lib-dependency x265-libs
- Is there a reason lib-dependencies are considered errors?
obs-studio.x86_64: E: arch-dependent-file-in-usr-share
/usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/obs-ffmpeg/ffmpeg-mux
- Unsure
obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-documentation
- In the doc package
obs-studio.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir
/usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/decklink-ouput-ui/.keepme
- Not sure if worth trying to figure out how to exclude this
obs-studio.x86_64: E: zero-length
/usr/share/obs/obs-plugins/decklink-ouput-ui/.keepme
obs-studio.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary obs
obs-studio-libs-23.0.2-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
---------------------------------------
obs-studio-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib/libobs.so.0
exit(a)GLIBC_2.2.5
- Unknown what this means.
obs-studio-libs.x86_64: E: invalid-soname /usr/lib/libobs-scripting.so
libobs-scripting.so
- This isn't a versioned file, but I believe is necessary for any app scripting
abilities.
obs-studio-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation
- In the doc package
obs-studio-libs.x86_64: W: one-line-command-in-%post /sbin/ldconfig
obs-studio-libs.x86_64: W: one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig
- Need to run ldconfig in order for libraries to be picked up
obs-studio-devel-23.0.2-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
---------------------------------------
obs-studio-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
- In the doc package
obs-studio-debuginfo-23.0.2-1.el7.x86_64.rpm
---------------------------------------
obs-studio-debuginfo.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
- Not sure?
This is my first time packaging an RPM for distribution/RPM Fusion so I'll need
a someone to
help refine and sponsor this package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are the assignee for the bug.
5 years, 8 months
RPM Fusion update report 2019-03-25
by noreply＠rpmfusion.org
RPM Fusion update report
------------------------
Section free:
-------------
Fedora 28
-------------
Pushed to testing:
VirtualBox-6.0.4-2.fc28
VirtualBox-kmod-6.0.4-3.fc28
chromium-freeworld-73.0.3683.75-2.fc28
libopenshot-0.2.3-1.fc28
libopenshot-audio-0.1.8-1.fc28
motion-4.2.2-2.fc28
openshot-2.4.4-1.fc28
telegram-desktop-1.6.2-1.fc28
Pushed to stable:
audacity-freeworld-2.3.1-1.fc28
shotcut-19.02.28-1.fc28
Fedora 29
-------------
Pushed to testing:
VirtualBox-6.0.4-2.fc29
VirtualBox-kmod-6.0.4-3.fc29
chromium-freeworld-73.0.3683.75-2.fc29
chromium-vaapi-73.0.3683.86-1.fc29
libopenshot-0.2.3-1.fc29
libopenshot-audio-0.1.8-1.fc29
motion-4.2.2-2.fc29
openshot-2.4.4-1.fc29
telegram-desktop-1.6.2-1.fc29
Pushed to stable:
audacity-freeworld-2.3.1-1.fc29
k3b-extras-freeworld-18.12.2-1.fc29
shotcut-19.02.28-1.fc29
telegram-desktop-1.6.1-1.fc29
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
VirtualBox-6.0.4-2.el7
VirtualBox-kmod-6.0.4-3.el7
chromium-freeworld-73.0.3683.75-2.el7
Pushed to stable:
Section nonfree:
-------------
Fedora 28
-------------
Pushed to testing:
steam-1.0.0.59-9.fc28
Pushed to stable:
Fedora 29
-------------
Pushed to testing:
steam-1.0.0.59-9.fc29
Pushed to stable:
EL 6
-------------
Pushed to testing:
Pushed to stable:
EL 7
-------------
Pushed to testing:
steam-1.0.0.59-9.el7
Pushed to stable:
nvidia-kmod-418.56-1.el7
nvidia-modprobe-418.56-1.el7
nvidia-persistenced-418.56-1.el7
nvidia-settings-418.56-1.el7
nvidia-xconfig-418.56-1.el7
xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-418.56-1.el7
Theses packages will be available in main mirror in few minutes. Wait for local mirrors to sync
Please report any issue to https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org
5 years, 8 months
Building new OpenShot (and libs) for branches only
by FeRD
OpenShot released a new version 2.4.4 earlier this week, so I'm readying
new builds of the libopenshot-audio, libopenshot, and openshot packages for
the f29 and f28 branches.
libopenshot-audio is still FTBFS in rawhide due to GCC 9, so the new
version *won't* be built there. I seem to recall that this exact situation
was presented as an example scenario that would exempt a package from the
"must be built in rawhide first" rule, though I can't find that particular
exception now. (Nor can I even remember whether it's an rpmfusion rule, or
part of the Fedora packaging guidelines themselves.)
Anyway, just a heads-up to explain the unusual situation.
(Regarding the libopenshot-audio FTBFS problem, it's been reported upstream
but the developers wanted to get the release out first before tackling it.
Hopefully now that's been done, we'll see some movement on GCC 9
compatibility.)
5 years, 8 months
